Monday, January 19, 2009

Obama Called Soros 'Every Day'

If you haven't yet read's bio on ba-zillionaire elitist-socialist George Soros yet, you should; all of it.

Because he is now your daddy.

For, the United States of America is about to be handed to him on the silver platter of his own fashioning, named Barack Obama, in tomorrow's Presidential Inaugaration.

If you doubt this, do fifteen minutes of research and you will see what you should have known before Soros manipulated you into voting for his puppet, Obama.

And if you think that this is just hearsay, just another radical conservative voice, consider this: RightHooks investigative team has learned that Senator Obama was calling George Soros every day for a significant period of time in 2008.

I hope you re-read that. In case you didn't, let me say it again, Senator Barack Obama made personal telephone calls to George Soros EVERY DAY over a significant period of time during his 2008 presidential campaign.*

If this doesn't shake you to your roots, you have no roots, and it also means that you didn't read all of discoverthenetworks' bio on George Soros. So now would be a good time to understand exactly who Mr. Soros is so that you can understand what a significant piece of information this is.

For what on earth would possess a man running for President of the United States of America to make daily, private, personal calls to openly subversive, anti-American, treasonous traitors like George Soros? Unless he was in Soros' pocket.

Furthermore, not only did Soros give Obama daily advice and direction, but Soros also told associates to pull money from their banks because something was going to happen to the banks*...this was in the summer of 2008.

How did Soros know this unless it was he and his fellow elite-stooges pulled the strings to facilitate such a collapse? Certainly there was evidence of such an economic attack which was briefly reported and appeared here in Righthooks, but Soros' other child, the mainstream media, never uttered a word about such a conspiracy.

And why would Soros manipulate the market to crash in his 'October Surprise' unless it was to create the impression that the Republicans caused the meltdown, thus strengthening Obama's hand?

Well, let's let George Soros answer that question for himself; as outlined in the above-named bio, Soros said in a 2003 interview that he "declared that derailing the President's reelection bid in 2004 "is the central focus of my life ... a matter of life and death." "America under Bush," he said, "is a danger to the world, and I'm willing to put my money where my mouth is." "

And when Soros lost the 2004 election, how do you suppose such a defeat made him feel? Do you think he might have had some money left over? Do you think he might have had strong motivations to get involved in the 2008 election? Well, if you do, where do you think he put his money and efforts?

All of this you can find out for yourself if you look. But if you want to remain blind, by all means, do so; just don't wonder where your country went when you wake up one day and see that it has CHANGED, for that's what you voted for. Because if you voted for Barack Obama, you voted for George Soros to be the most powerful man in the world.

*Such information comes directly from the mouth of one who was a witness to these things inside the very home of George Soros in Long Island,NY, and has been uncovered by Righthooks. The unnamed witness saw/heard Obama's daily phone calls to Soros as well as heard Soros tell his associates to take their money out of the banks. Righthooks occassionally uses sarcasm and satire to make a point in some posts, but this post is not an attempt at sarcasm or satire; RightHooks firmly and confidently stands behind the statements by the witness, as to what the witness saw and heard, as being absolutely and unequivocaly true.


Sissy Willis said...

Tell us more about your source inside the Soros household . . . I must admit that while your thesis is believable -- based upon all I have read about Soros's insidious manipulations -- I am skeptical.

Ema Nymton said...



Good to see you still post at your own blog. Began to wonder about what had happened to you.

The quality of your post is not much better than Ben's relentless blather. But it is different.

Mr Soros is openly participating in democracy. He is exercising his right. This makes the country stronger.

I love your use of unnamed sources. This allows you to make stuff up.

Unlike some, Mr Soros does not advocate the killing of unarmed and defenseless people. So let us celebrate the intelligent application of the will of the people.

Please keep posting. It is good humor.


PackSmack said...


Thank you for your interest in the post. Unfortunately since the list of those who have had access to the Soros home is a short one, I cannot name names without affecting someone's future...

But please review the history of this blog; though I have written sarcastically and satirically in the past, I have always written with a sincere belief that liberal policies are dangerous to this country and Islam is dangerous to this country as well. It is with this same sincerity that the post about Obama's daily calls to Soros was posted; I have no doubt whatsoever as to the truthfulness or validity of what the witness heard and saw. I could not be more sure of it.

So your skepticism is healthy and I have no way to convince anyone of this aside from letting the cat out of the bag, which I am unwilling to do. So in light of my inability to convince you or anyone, perhaps the most useful thing would be for you to simply store this up as a 'possibility' in your mind and look back on it from time to time as you yourself evaluate the things that are about to unfold in this once great country.

PackSmack said...


I'm glad that you are appreciative of my posting again; unfortunately it seems that you have not learned anything from my previous posts, so perhaps it would help you to go back and re-read them all again...LOL.

Is Soros even a CITIZEN of this country?

He is a meddler and a self-admitted seditionist...look at his work of undermining other countries. What makes you think that your 'intelligent will of the people' was not in any way created, shaped, formed, or influenced by such a man with such a track record and stated motivation? You are naieve if you fail to consider this.

As for the 'unnamed sources,' yeah, it does seem a little convenient, doesn't it? Unfortunately, though I have written my share of fiction here and other places, this post is not one of is not a work of fiction, exaggeration or hyperbole... it is saying exactly what an actual witness said. What can I say? You don't know who I know and I don't know who you know.

Do I think that this 'heresay' would stand up in court? Well, no, not unless I brought in said witness...and then it would.

But should I NOT write a post about it, because I know I cannot reveal the source and prove it, yet I know it actually happened? No, it is more important to me to let people know than to hold on to it myself. I'm not trying to convince you or anyone; I'll let the chips fall where they may.

But of all readers of this blog YOU should know that when I say I'm sincere, I'm sincere. And I'm saying that this post is a sincere post.

You said, Soros doesn't advocate the killing of unarmed and defenseless people...hmmm, you must not have checked into his stance on abortion?

Anonymous said...

So let me get this straight...

A wealthy liberal/evil philantropist single-handedly manipulates the economy against the will of a much larger and more powerful group of wealthy CONSERVATIVES in defiance of basic principles of economics (the 97th wealthiest individual in the world worth $9 billion can manipulate the $14 trillion U.S. economy substantially? Take an Economics class, buddy) to get Barack Obama elected. Meanwhile, Barack Obama gives instructions to Soros (or vice versa) every day to win an already easily winnable campaign to accomplish some of The Open Society Institute's sinister, secret goals. And you know all of this because you, an anonymous blogger held to no journalistic standards, have a super secret source that decided to talk to you rather than an established media organization. And we're supposed to believe it. I hate to be rude, but this is almost as fucking retarded as 9/11 conspiracy theories.

PackSmack said...

PW, Did I SAY he did it by himself? Or did I SAY I thought he did it with his cronies? Before you decided to act like a completely 'intolerant,' rude and obstinate typical liberal fruit, did you even RESEARCH what I said before you decided to pontificate on how wrong it was? Or were you in such a rush to prove that you an intemperate clot that you decided that slurs and ad-hominem attacks against me personally somehow make your ignorance legitimate and the words of the witness I posted about illegitimate?

And we're supposed to believe that because you can insult someone and act like a two-year old that what I said is therefore false?

Who are YOU to say that I did not hear what I heard? Because you can't or don't believe it, this is supposed to make it inherently false?

You have NO IDEA whom or what I might know...and because you don't know about it, this suddenly makes my post a lie. You're a real piece of work. Not all of live in a cave, PW.

I do not aspire nor pretend to be some kind of "real" journalist, whatever that might mean; perhaps you are impressed by the main-stream journalists, most whacked libs are.

But you know what? This is MY blog and I write on it whatever I want. I have absolutely NO DESIRE to try to convince or impress you about anything. And I could not care less if you believe me or not.

Feel free to read what's here for what it is, or feel free to pass this blog by. Nothing you say changes in the least what was posted, regardless of your own incredulity.

Ema Nymton said...



"...this is almost as fucking retarded as 9/11 conspiracy theories." You have, with this one expression, captured the very essence of PackSmack's blog.

Over the months I have read and commented on this blog, the retarded nature of PackSmack and his psychopathic buddy Ben has been clearly on display. Heck PackSmack and non compos mentis Ben pride themselves on being barely lucid in their expressions of pure hate and ignorance.

Don't worry, PackSmack will soon say he never said anything about what he said. (Please note how PackSmack makes really irrational statements and then backs away from them when you call him on the statements.)


PackSmack said...

Ema, eh, too, Brute?