Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Its Shari'ah, Stupid #23

In this twenty-third installment of Offensive Jihad in Fiqh, we turn to another modern authority.

Abdullah Yusuf Azzam issued his fatwah Defense of the Muslim Lands, the First Obligation after Faith (1979) after the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Fatwahn supported by Saudi Arabia's Grand Mufti, Abd al-Aziz Bin Bazz. Azzam legitimize both defensive and offensive jihad.


Quote:
”Jihad Against the Kuffar is of two Types: Offensive Jihad (where the enemy is attacked in his own territory) ... [and] Defensive Jihad. […] Where the Kuffar [infidels] are not gathering to fight the Muslims, the fighting becomes Fard Kifaya [religious obligation on Muslim society] with the minimum requirement of appointing believers to guard borders, and the sending of an army at least once a year to terrorise the enemies of Allah. It is a duty of the Imam to assemble and send out an army unit into the land of war once or twice every year. Moreover, it is the responsibility of the Muslim population to assist him, and if he does not send an army he is in sin. - And the Ulama have mentioned that this type of jihad is for maintaining the payment of Jizya. The scholars of the principles of religion have also said: ’Jihad is Daw’ah with a force, and is obligatory to perform with all available capabilities, until there remains only Muslims or people who submit to Islam.”

http://www.religioscope.com/info/doc ... _chap1.htm


Notice the minimum requirement:the sending of an army at least once a year to terrorise the enemies of Allah. This is is agreement with Al-Shafi'i and other authorities. Notice also that offensive Jihad is fard Kifaya.

2 comments:

Ema Nymton said...

.

Ali Ben Ali Mohammad -

"GOD DAMN ISLAM!!!"? Shouldn't you have shrilly screamed, “Damn Boeing.” The aircraft, after all, that crashed were built by Boeing.

"“pissed off, if you think I ain't full of hatred, if you think I ain't Goddamn outraged”" and you are totally deranged. Your call to kill unarmed and defenseless people to assuage your misdirected anger is tragic.

You “arrogantly asserts a demonic mandate to kill” unarmed and defenseless people in response to an act in which the people of Islam had no involvement. (No more involvement than Christians had in the bombing in April 1995 of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building by Timothy McVeigh in Oklahoma.)

"I lift the lid and let the world see the shit which floats on the surface of Islam. I document every lump of turd, seething with worms."

You spend a lot of time in the sewer. Is there any wonder why you find only shit? Stay in the gutter where you belong, scum.

"They dance, prance, slither & emote, but they can not find any relevant, verifiable facts to prove me wrong. "

Which does not have any bearing on anything. You can hate all you want. You are wrong to call for the killings of unarmed and defenseless people.

Given how literally you take the written word of Allah in the Qur'an, it is clear you are a true follower of Islam.

Which other religious teachings do you follow? Are you as literal with the written words of the Torah? (You know. Like the ones that command followers to kill people who live in the land of milk and honey.)

Should people read and take literally the words in the books of the 'Old Testament'? (You know. Like the order to stone those who try to not follow the laws of Moses.)

Lets cut the crap and drill down to the nitty gritty.

Every deed you claim followers of Islam have committed, has been documented to have been committed by Jews and Christians first.


+@;-/
.

PackSmack said...

Ema,

What's up with the +@;-/ ?

Are you the Pope or something?

Perhaps your avatar should look more like this: ( | ) to more accurately represent where your brain is. Whaddya say?