Saturday, January 3, 2009

Ema Exposes Her Scaley Soul

Now comes Ema with another outrageous calumny, which, through the art of projection, exposes her own plan of action.
Ema Nymton has left a new comment on the post "Fire!!!":

.

So why are you not in Gaza? So much bravado and blood-lust, one can show all how to do it. (Are you not 'man' enough to do it yourself?)

Don't let any thing stop you. Go.

_____

I am convinced. You are so much like those you hate.

Is there any action, deed, or behavior that you claim your enemy has done that you yourself do not want _others_ to do? Where is the difference between 'your' side and 'them?'

So when do you start calling for _others_ to march innocent women and children off to concentration camps and gas chambers?


.
  • So why are you not in Gaza? So much bravado and blood-lust, one can show all how to do it. (Are you not 'man' enough to do it yourself?) Don't let any thing stop you. Go.
    • This is a token of the 'chicken hawk' argument, which ignores the fact that wars involve a minority, not universal participation. Those most able and willing serve in our volunteer military, while Israel has compulsory service.
    • the bravado & blood-lust are properties of Islam. I have no lust for blood, my lust is for peace, security and liberty, none of which can be secured in the presence of Islam.
    • Questioning an adversary's manhood is a school yard taunting tactic. The insult is intended to inflame anger. It exposes Ema's complete lack of relevant, verifiable facts and valid logic to support her vain imaginings.
  • I am convinced. You are so much like those you hate.
    • This is a token of the "lower yourself to their level" argument. According to which the defender is as evil as the aggressor. It is obvious to anyone with a functioning sense of morality that the argument is invalid on its face.
  • Is there any action, deed, or behavior that you claim your enemy has done that you yourself do not want _others_ to do? Where is the difference between 'your' side and 'them?'
    • Having run out of ammunition, Ema resorts to firing the same shell, without powder or lead. The conflict is predator vs prey. Israel is not preying upon the human race. Islam is the intra species predator. Ema lacks the cognitive ability to discern the difference.
  • So when do you start calling for _others_ to march innocent women and children off to concentration camps and gas chambers?
    • In this argument, Ema resorts to the tried and false tactic of projecting Adolf Hitler onto her adversary. Her argument is pure ad hominem, devoid of merit. Ema is not capable of comprehending the fatal fact that there are no innocent Muslims. Innocent Muslim is an oxymoron because Islam is a predator. As I pointed out in an earlier post, Allah uttered and published a curse upon the Muslims conditional upon their abandonment of Jihad. If they ever give up predation and turn to productive pursuits, Allah will make disgrace prevail over the Muslims and not withdraw it until they resume the predatory practice of Jihad. This execration is contained in Abu Dawud 23.3455.
    • Muslims are required to fight in Allah's cause, with their wealth and their lives:
      • on the battlefield, with the sword
      • on the home front by equipping and supporting Mujahideen
      • on the home front by supporting the dependent families of Mujahideen
      • by engaging in propaganda & agitation
      • by praying for victory.
    • Every Muslim is a potential terrorist, compelled to fight when called upon: "if you are called (by the Muslim ruler) for fighting, go forth immediately"
    • Muslims who refuse to participate in Jihad are deemed hypocrites, who are to be fought, defeated and gathered into Hell along with the Kuffar: "Strive hard against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be harsh against them, their abode is Hell, - and worst indeed is that destination."
    • I explicitly called for Islam's total defeat and extinction. Hamas must be defeated on the battle field. Likewise Hezbollah, Al-Qaeda and the myriad other militant organizations. Every possible effort should be made to liberate the hypocrites and secular, in name only & 'moderate' Muslims from Allah's yoke of slavery by promoting mass apostasy. I outlined the most important part of my strategy for that emancipation in a previous post in which I called for exposing Islam's damnable doctrines & practices in a full length feature documentary film.

7 comments:

Ema Nymton said...

.

Do you want cheese with your whine?

Make a statement and then deny making it. Good one.

"... I have no lust for blood, my lust is for peace, security and liberty, none of which can be secured in the presence of Islam. ..."

So will you answer the questions,

"... Is there any action, deed, or behavior that you claim your enemy has done that you yourself do not want _others_ to do? Where is the difference between 'your' side and 'them? ..."?

"... anyone with a functioning sense of morality ..." this leave you out! For any person to write (as you do), "... comprehending the fatal fact that there are no innocent Muslims. ..." clearly has no understanding. Calling for the killing of people who follow the teachings of Islam include people who live in USA.

So when do you start calling for _others_ to have every man, woman and child follower of Islam to be rounded up, shipped off to concentration camps, and exterminated in gas chambers?

Take a few moments to come up with your answers to the questions.

.

Ema Nymton said...

.

PackSmack,

Is it not time for you to take back your blog? Ben may have the right to put up anything Ben wants to on Ben's blog (wherever this piece of work may be). You should take responsibility for what is posted on your blog in your name.

Perhaps you can educate me. "Is there any action, deed, or behavior that Ben and you claim your enemy (followers of Islam) has done that you and Ben yourselves do not want _others_ to do? Where is the difference between 'your' side and 'them?"

In case you missed this point, calling for the killing of people who follow the teachings of Islam include law biding citizens who live in USA.

So when do you start calling for _others_ to have every man, woman and child follower of Islam to be rounded up, shipped off to concentration camps, and exterminated in gas chambers?

.

RightHooks said...

Ema,

And Ben has every right to post what he needs to say on my blog as well; it's not like the country of your ancestors, where there is no freedom of speech, because there Satanic Islam rules, and there are no freedoms.

Say whatever you want, but Islam is evil and Ben is doing a fantastic job of exposing it for what it is, don't you think? Or is it something other than what he has said...and if so, where is he wrong (chapter and verse, please)?

Ema Nymton said...

.

PackSmack,

Consequences. You and your blog call for actions that have consequences.

The extreme nature of of Ben's unnatural fear of Islam has caused him completely to come off the rails of rationality. There can be no middle ground. Ben clearly states his goal is to 'eliminate' Islam and to force followers to convert or die.

You are following his insane lead. So be it.

Please talk us through your final solution for the Islamic question.

So how do you propose carrying out the extermination of Islam? How will you be able to tell if a Muslim is a true convert?

________

"In Germany they first came for the Communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Catholics,
and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant.

Then they came for me —
and by that time no one was left to speak up." - Pastor Martin Niemöller

.

RightHooks said...

Ema,

Ben full of fear? There you go again imagining that anyone who exposes Islam for the evil that it is is somehow "afraid" of Islam. Perhaps that makes you feel like a man (I still don't buy that you're a lesbian), I don't know, but you keep on throwing the fear term out there as if it were a true statement. Sorry, I doubt that Ben is afraid of Islam, and I know for certain that I am not.

As for me following Ben's lead, well, Ben knows the Qu'ran and other Islamic sacred texts much better than I do, and he also sees Islam for exactly what it is; but I have been screaming out against Islam since the mid-1980's...and have had the opportunity to teach/speak in front of other people about it on many occasions. Ben can say in a sentence what it takes me a whole story to say because he is very good at identifying what is bs and what is truth, and also because of his specific awareness of the sacred texts, as just mentioned.

So you don't agree with what he says or what I say, but then again, you say Islam is not evil...so you are never going to agree with us because that is what one of the main focusses of this blog is...exposing Islam.

Nobody is calling for the gas chambers, but I do believe that the people who did use the gas chambers shared Islam's hatred for the Jews...

Ema Nymton said...

.

PackSmack,

"... Nobody is calling for the gas chambers, ..."
You get no pass on this. As ye sow, so shall ye reap."

You call for the extermination of Islam. One cannot kill a belief, one must kill people who hold the belief.

As over a billion people follow the teachings of Islam, you face quite a task. How do you intend to kill Islam without killing people? (Historical note - the last 'civilized' western nation that tried to cleanse the world of a religion faced a task of killing _only_ 11 million Jews.)

So please educate the world on how you will exterminate Islam.

.

RightHooks said...

Ema,

You said," "... Nobody is calling for the gas chambers, ..."
You get no pass on this. As ye sow, so shall ye reap." "

No, it is Islam that gets no pass; and as Muslims sow, they will reap.