Showing posts with label religious. Show all posts
Showing posts with label religious. Show all posts

Sunday, November 10, 2013

Underlining a Lie

Underlining a Lie A/C.3/68/L.48 Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping,stigmatization, discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons, based on religion or belief continues by underlining a false fact full of false premises.
Underlining the fact that States, regional organizations, non-governmental
organizations, religious bodies and the media have an important role to play in
promoting tolerance and respect for religious and cultural diversity and in the
universal promotion and protection of human rights, including freedom of religion
or belief,

religious bodies

    Islam is a way of life, not a religion. Islam has religious, legal, economic and military components. Its religious component serves as a carrot and stick motivating Muslims to plunder. Its economic  component is plunder & extortion. Its military  component, its highest peak, is perpetual offensive warfare; genocidal, terrorist imperialism by which Moe derived income and power.  The "original religion" of Islam is Jihad: "War against non-Muslims". .

promoting tolerance

    Waging war until only Allah is worshiped and "people of the book" are subjugated and extorted is not tolerant and does not promote tolerance. Declaring that seeking another religion will not be accepted is not tolerant and does not promote tolerance. Bringing us to Islam with chains on our necks is not tolerance and does not promote tolerance.

cultural diversity

    Legal proscription of displaying crosses, ringing bells, public processions, praying aloud in public, building and maintaining churches does not promote cultural diversity.

human rights

    Declaring that our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims and that we only obtain rights by becoming Muslims neither promotes nor protects human rights.

freedom of religion

    Please post a comment explaining exactly how in Hell waging war until only Allah is worshiped promotes freedom of religion and how waging war on Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians until they are subjugated and submit to extortion protects and promotes freedom of religion. 

    Is there a right to wage war against your disbelieving neighbors? Is there a right to kill the men, enslaving the women and children?  Please refer to The Reliance Of The Traveller: O9.0, 9.1, 9.8, 9.9, 9.13 & 9.14 in your reply, considering them in the light of Hedaya 2.141.

    Is there a right to rape captive women?  Explain your answer in the light of Sahih Bukhari 5.59.469. Moe raped Safiya after taking her as spoil of wqr. Muslims are ordered to emulate him, hence to rape captive women.

Right to Practice

    The Qur'an must be believed and implemented completely, it is not cafeteria Catholicism:  2.85, 15.91. The practice of Islam therefore entails genocidal, terrorist imperialism, captivation, rape and enslavement.  Since there is no human right to perform those evil acts, a right to practice and propagate Islam is impossible.
   

Sunday, October 14, 2012

Muslims and Dhimmis Covering Camel Crap: Interfaith Alliance-Truth About American Muslims

What is the truth about American Muslims? Questions and Answers
 

http://interfaithalliance.org/americanmuslimfaq


   
The deception begins with an appeal to authority: listing 21 organizations endorsing their propaganda.  But content is key: either factual or false. This blog post will point out the most important malignancies contained in the screed.  I have excerpted the main points in the screed, using them as headings.  The screed begins with a diversionary question.

What is the truth about American Muslims?

        Muslims are Muslims, American, European, Arabian or Asian, they have submitted to Allah and recited the Islamic creed. American Muslims are not a special sub set of the Ummah just because they reside in America.  Islam has a standard doctrine set which is enshrined in the Qur'an and exemplified by Moe's sunah.  The truth with  which we must be concerned is the truth about Islam: the doctrines and practices which it imposes on Muslims and seeks to impose upon the whole world, by stealth or by force as required by the circumstances.  . 

religious liberty

    The rights, liberties and privileges of citizens, enshrined in the Declaration of Independence & Constitution are individual rights, liberties and privileges, applying to individual citizens jointly and severally, not to religions or other associations.

    The free exercise clause applies to religions, not to continuing criminal enterprises.  Religions, rightly understood, are eleemosynary and beneficent institutions whose mission is worship and right relations between men, society and God.  Islam does not fit that mold; it is a way of life: predation on the rest of the human race, not a religion.  Its mission is mercenary and its method is martial. 

    `The faith component of Islam serves two purposes: first and foremost, it motivates Muslims to participate in Jihad for the emolument of Moe and his caliphs. Second, it serves as a camouflage to prevent its victims from recognizing Muslims as predators.("Great religion of peace.")

    Moe, speaking for Allah, issued imperatives, a threat and a promise, the latter two serving to ensure compliance with the imperatives.  Surah An-Naba' contains the primary description of Islamic Paradise & Perdition.  Parts of the description are scattered through the Qur'an.  You need to be aware of them to form an accurate judgment; I ask that you follow these links and read the relevant ayat before proceeding. 

Which do you choose: Allah's celestial bordello or the fire?  Allah has a carrot and a stick to motivate his slaves.  The headings are linked to the relevant ayat.

Allah's Promise

    If you participate in Jihad, for pure and pious motives, I will forgive your sins and admit you to my celestial bordello. 

Allah's Threat

    If you do not join the Jihad when called, I will cast you into Hell. 

Jihad Imperatives

    Jihad is ordained for Muslims, though they may dislike it; Allah knows what is best for his slaves. The ordinance is in 2:216. In Surah Al-Anfal ("Spoils of War") 8:39 commands perpetual war against pagans until resistance ceases and only Allah is worshiped on a global scale.  8:57 commands Muslims to deliver harsh treatment to their defeated victims to terrorize prospective victims, thus reducing their ability and will to mount an effective defense.  8:60 commands Muslims to maximize their military force so as to terrorize their prospective victims. 

    9:29 commands Muslims to wage perpetual war against people with scriptural religions until they are subjugated and make annual extortion payments in lieu of destruction. .  9:123 commands Muslims to attack disbelievers nearest them first.

    Muslims and their Dhimmis will assert falsely that those ayat do not mean what they plainly say, that they are mis-translated, mis-interpreted or taken out of context.  The links above go to a translation authorized by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which lets you see the full context and translator's footnotes.  To gild the lilly, I now add links to 37 parallel translations, a word by word breakdown of the ayat, Tafsir Ibn Kathir, & al-Jalalayn, confirming ahadith and Shari'aj so that all doubt may be dispelled. 

Jihad is undertaken on Islamic initiative, it is primarily offensive, not defensive. This fact is found, somewhat encrypted, in Reliance O9.1, cited above and Hedaya 2:9:1:141 which states that Infidels may be attacked without provocation. The permanent nature of Jihad is codified in page 140, see the marginal note.   The matter of Jizya being in lieu of destruction is in Hedaya, page 218.

extremists claiming to act in the name of Islam

    That shibboleth is full of malignant, malicious malarkey.  Moe preached and exemplified Islam. What Moe preached and exemplified is normative Islam, not extremism.  Extremists are a figment of fertile imaginations; heads full of fecal matter.  Believers exist, extremists do not. Read 8:1 in context through 8:6.  What is the meaning of "spend" and "go out "? I will save you the research: believers are only those who join the jihad, fighting in Allah's cause, which is total global domination.  Believers sold their souls to Allah so they fight in his cause, killing and being killed for admission to his celestial bordello after they die. 

conflate all of Islam with extremist violence

    Same shibboleth, different expression. It remains malicious, malignant malarkey.  Islam is what Moe preached and practiced.  "Extremist violence" is often used as a code phrase for terrorism, which is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam.  Follow the links to the fatal facts.  3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220

    9:120 is of particular interest for this critical clause:  "nor they take any step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of righteousness." Terrorism is a :deed of righteousness: which earns extra credit towards moving up one level in Allah's celestial bordello.

small factions within Islam

    Jihad, war against Infidels, is ordained for Muslims; all Muslims, not just a few.  It is how Allah tests them to see which are the real believers. Offensive jihad is fard al-kifaya: binding on all until a sufficient number have reported to the front.  However, failure to go or at least desire to threatens with the fire.  See Sunan Ibn Maja 2763, Riyad Us-Saliheen 1341 and 1348. How did a "small faction" conquer half the known world in a few centuries?

extremist theology

    Only Allah has the right to be worshiped.  Only Allah has the right to rule. Only Islam is accepted.  Muslims are the best of people as they drag us in chains to Islam: 3:110, Sahih Bukhari 6.60.80

acts of violence

by radical individuals and groups

must not be used to condemn Islam itself

    What did Allah command Muslims to doWho must Muslims emulate? What did he exemplify for them to emulate?

    When an institution is founded by a man who said this, the institution is condemned by its founding:

«بُعِثْتُ بَيْنَ يَدَيِ السَّاعَةِ بِالسَّيْفِ حَتَّى يُعْبَدَاللهُ وَحْدَهُ لَا شَرِيكَ لَهُ، وَجُعِلَ رِزْقِي تَحْتَ ظِلِّ رُمْحِي، وَجُعِلَتِ الذِّلَّةُ وَالصَّغَارُ عَلَى مَنْ خَالَفَ أَمْرِي، وَمَنْ تَشَبَّهَ بِقَومٍ فَهُوَ مِنْهُم»

 

(I was sent with the sword just before the Last Hour, so that Allah is worshipped alone without partners. My sustenance was provided for me from under the shadow of my spear. Those who oppose my command were humiliated and made inferior, and whoever imitates a people, he is one of them.)

Manners in Speech

The Benefits of Iron

Sahih Bukhari Ch. 61[Bewley]

    An institution, whose founder, after its founding, dictated and dispatched extortion letters in the name of the institution and followed up with armed conquest is condemned by its founder and its mission, which is mercenary & martial. 

understanding and respect

     We come to understand Islam when we read its canon of scripture, exegesis, tradition, jurisprudence & biography. Islam is not respectable and people who are informed and moral will never respect it.

religious

    Religious law is no problem, when it confines itself to internal and spiritual matters, without negatively impacting non-members. The Shari'ah of Salat is no problem, it does no external harm if a Muslim must repeat his prayers if he farts.

    The law of Zakat is a problem, because it requires 1/8 of the amount collected to be paid to terrorists. See Reliance of the Traveller H8.17.

enforce or interpret religious law

    "Courts may not, and do not, apply religious law in deciding contracts disputes, divorce or child custody cases or even in refereeing disputes over control of houses of worship."  The Center for Security Policy, in their report on Shari'ah in state courts, reveals that 21 cases involved marriage issues, 17 cases involved child custody issues, 5 cases involved Shari'ah contract law, 3 cases involved Shari'ah doctrine, 2 involved Shari'ah property, 1 case involved due process issues  law and 1 case involved both marriage & custody issues.  The decisions were Shari'ah compliant in 15 cases. See Tables 3 & 4 on page 45 of the report.

charitable giving

    Zakat, the Muslim charity tax, pays a 1/8 share to terrorists. Giving Zakat to Infidels is strictly prohibited. H8.24

political movement

    Islam is a continuing criminal enterprise: a war crime against humanity, not a political movement.  It conflates the spiritual and temporal powers.  It seeks world domination through stealth and conquest, but its founding mission was its founder's personal emolument.

spoken out against extremist violence

    Camel Crap! That is the most egregious lie! What they label as extremist is normative Islam.  They can not and will never abjure Islamic violence because to do so is a death warrant.  Islamic law explicitly forbids denying anything belonging to the Qur'an, which includes the Jihad genocide and terror imperatives found in Surahs Al-Anfal & At-Taubah.  To abjure them entails apostasy, punishable by execution as per Reliance O81, 8.2 & 8.7.

  “Islam strictly condemns religious extremism and the use of violence against innocent lives.  There is no justification in Islam for extremism or terrorism.
The devil is in the details: Muslims lie by al-Taqiyya and kitman. In the present case, kitman is employed: they are obscuring their private definition of innocent. Only Muslims can be innocent, all others are infidels subject to arbitrary destruction

    Islam considers non-Muslims to be rebels against Allah and prescribes hudud for them: crucifixion, execution, amputation or expulsion. The details are in 5:33. The Qur'anic expression is "wage war against Allah and his Messenger". The Qur'an does not define it, but Tafsir Ibn kathir does.  "`Wage war' mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. "

freedom of expression and religious liberty

    Each year for the last decade, the OIC has pushed resolutions through the UN demanding criminalization of criticism of Islam. The resolutions condemn associating Islam with terrorism & human rights violations.  Islamic blasphemy law, found in Reliance O81, 8.2 & 8.7, is applied to conquered Jews & Christians in O11.10.

Jihad

    Offensive, genocidal, terrorist conquest is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam.  Defined in Shari'ah as war against non-muslims, two translators of the Qur'an list the benefits of engaging in Jihad and the costs of abandoning it. Scroll to the bottom of the page and read the footnote 2:190.

  forbids forced conversion

    8:39 declares a fight until loop against pagans. Its terminal condition is compound: cessation of resistance and a monopoly for Allah.  Islamic law implements it thusly: "The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim.  3:110 is said to mean bringing us to Islam with chains on our necks. 

ethical conditions under which it is permissible to fight

`The basic law of Jihad is laid down in this hadith:  Sahih Muslim 19.4294. It does not say what makes war holy, but it does list acts which profane it:

  1. embezzling spoils
  2. killing children
  3. mutilating bodies
  4. fleeing from the enemy

The first two items in that list are the same. If you do not understand this, read and re-read Reliance O9.13 until you obtain a clue.
Moe ordered his generals in the field to offer three choices:

  1. embrace Islam
    1. join the jihad
  2. pay extortion and accept subhuman status

if the second choice was refused, they stayed in place as Muslims and did not collect spoils. If the third choice was rejected, the general implored Allah's aid

misuse the term “jihad”

 to give a religious veneer to their

violent political movements and tactics.

    Moe did that. Modern terrorists are obeying Allah and emulating Moe. 

require women to be covered

    Umar recognized Sauda, one of Moe's wives answering a call of nature  and harassed her, resulting in the hijab rule.

four wives

    The Qur'an permits it. Moe had 9 wives at once.  Shari'ah permits it. In England, Muslims can have 4 wives living on welfare. 

honor killings

    Denial is not proof.  'The Qur'an is proof 18:74. Islamic law is proof: Reliance O1.2(4). A companion of Moses allegedly killed a boy on assumption that he would go astray and dishonor his parents; that Allah would replace him with one better.  There is no retaliation for killing one's own child or grandchild. 

Taqiyya

    Muslims are prohibited to form inferior and equal relationships with infidels.  Doing so is taken as a sign of hypocrisy except in the case of the Muslim who deceives infidels for his own protection or the promotion of Islam.  3:28. See also Tafsir Ibn kathir

Sharia

    If Moe said it in Allah's name or did it, its Shari'ah. Allah is to be obeyed and Moe emulated.  Many provisions of Shari'ah are 180° out of phase with our Constitution and laws. A Muslim can compel his pre-pubescent virgin daughter to marry the man of his choice. He can divorce his wife by thrice saying "i divorce you:. There is no alimony or child support. A divorced Muslima loses child custody if she remarries.  An Infidel divorced by a Muslim can not obtain child custody.  Infidels can not testify in court.  The indemnity paid for the death of a Muslim is 100 camels, for a Muslima, 50, for a Christian, 33, for a Zoroastrian, 15.

    In this blog post, I have given you links to two codifications of Shari'ah. Now I add a third: the Maliki's Risala, which is shorter and more legible than Reliance & Hedaya.  This link goes directly to the law of Jihad. 

Monday, January 4, 2010

"Defamation" Resolutions: Restricted Liberty Impaired Rights

Several excellent articles have been written about the (unintended?) consequences of the UN's resolutions Combating Defamation of Religions. Now two courageous writers have added a new dimension to the discussion by generalizing about the consequences on the ground and naming the prime offender.

Abuse of Religious Freedom Hurts Indonesia And Renders God Defenseless by Muh Taufiqurrohman and Rebecca Lunnon is clear, specific and well written. If their lives are shortened as a consequence of the publication of their article, I will not be surprised.

Besides identifying the problem and suggesting solutions, the authors have identified the principal antagonist.
In addition to harmonizing these outdated laws, the government needs to replace problematic statutes like the 1965 Law on Prevention of Abuse and Defamation of Religions, the 2006 Revised Joint Ministerial Decree on the Construction of Houses of Worship and the 1978 Guidelines for the Propagation of Religion with an all encompassing law guaranteeing religious freedom. Such a law could be written along the lines of the Australian Constitution, which prohibits the government from making any laws to establish a religion, impose religious observance or prohibit the free exercise of religion. The law should give all individuals the freedom to express a diversity of views, as long as they do not incite religious hatred or violate the rights of others. [...]

The government also must address the violation of religious freedom and human rights made possible by the existence of religious institutions such as the Coordinating Board for Monitoring Mystical Beliefs in Society (Bakor Pakem) and the Indonesian Council of Ulema (MUI). Tasked with monitoring and resolving instances of deviant interpretation of religious doctrine, Bakor Pakem’s authority has increased state intervention in religious issues in a way that clearly violates the constitutional guarantee of religious freedom.

The Related Articles sidebar links to two specific examples of violent abuse. Everyone who is concerned about the erosion of religious liberty should click the title link and read the entire article.