Islamic Supremacism #1

Jeffrey Imm is a prolific writer on the subject of Islamic supremacism; here is a small sample.

• Transnational Jihad, Supremacism, and Cold War Tactics
• British Government Efforts against "Extremists" Ignores Jihad and Islamic Supremacism
• Jihad and Outreach to Islamic Supremacist Groups
• Crossroads in History

Mr. Imm keeps his writing about Islamic supremacism at a high level of abstraction. I wanted to see the details of its source, so I visited www.ask.com and put the question: What causes Islamic supremacism? Jeffrey Imm's articles were at the top of the list.

I also ran a search for Robert Spencer's articles on the subject; this one looked promising:
The American Muslim, terrorism, and Islamic supremacism. He brings out the source of Islamic aggression, but neglects the source of supremacism.

It is not easy to separate supremacism from aggression & triumphalism; they are severely entangled.
Lets visit Ask's Dictionary.com to be sure we are discussing the same thing.

supremacism

noun

the belief that some particular group or race is superior to all others; "white supremacism"

Stipulating for purpose of debate that Islam is a religion, which it really ain't, where would Muslims get the idea that Islam is superior to all other religions? To answer this question, we must turn to the foundation of Islam, Allah's book.

At the time of this writing, quranbrowser.com timed out, so I visited Islamicity and searched Abdullah Yusuf Ali's translation for supreme, finding 27 matches.

1. 2:255 Allah. There is no god but He,-the Living, the Self-subsisting, Eternal. No slumber can seize Him nor sleep. His are all things in the heavens and on earth. Who is there can intercede in His presence except as He permitteth? He knoweth what (appeareth to His creatures as) before or after or behind them. Nor shall they compass aught of His knowledge except as He willeth. His Throne doth extend over the heavens and the earth, and He feeleth no fatigue in guarding and preserving them for He is the Most High, the supreme (in glory).
2. 4:13 Those are limits set by Allah. those who obey Allah and His Messenger will be admitted to Gardens with rivers flowing beneath, to abide therein (for ever) and that will be the supreme achievement.
3. 9:63 Know they not that for those who oppose Allah and His Messenger, is the Fire of Hell?- wherein they shall dwell. That is the supreme disgrace.
4. 9:72 Allah hath promised to Believers, men and women, gardens under which rivers flow, to dwell therein, and beautiful mansions in gardens of everlasting bliss. But the greatest bliss is the good pleasure of Allah. that is the supreme felicity.
5. 9:89 Allah hath prepared for them gardens under which rivers flow, to dwell therein: that is the supreme felicity.
6. 9:100 The vanguard (of Islam)- the first of those who forsook (their homes) and of those who gave them aid, and (also) those who follow them in (all) good deeds,- well- pleased is Allah with them, as are they with Him: for them hath He prepared gardens under which rivers flow, to dwell therein for ever: that is the supreme felicity.
7. 9:111 Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Qur'an: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah. then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme.
8. 9:129 But if they turn away, Say: "(Allah) sufficeth me: there is no god but He: On Him is my trust,- He the Lord of the Throne (of Glory) supreme!"
9. 10:64 For them are glad tidings, in the life of the present and in the Hereafter; no change can there be in the words of Allah. This is indeed the supreme felicity.
10. 12:39 "O my two companions of the prison! (I ask you): are many lords differing among themselves better, or the One Allah, supreme and Irresistible?
11. 13:13 Nay, thunder repeateth His praises, and so do the angels, with awe: He flingeth the loud-voiced thunder-bolts, and therewith He striketh whomsoever He will..yet these (are the men) who (dare to) dispute about Allah, with the strength of His power (supreme)!
12. 13:16 Say: "Who is the Lord and Sustainer of the heavens and the earth?" Say: "(It is) Allah." Say: "Do ye then take (for worship) protectors other than Him, such as have no power either for good or for harm to themselves?" Say: "Are the blind equal with those who see? Or the depths of darkness equal with light?" Or do they assign to Allah partners who have created (anything) as He has created, so that the creation seemed to them similar? Say: "(Allah) is the Creator of all things: He is the One, the supreme and Irresistible."
13. 23:86 Say: "Who is the Lord of the seven heavens, and the Lord of the Throne (of Glory) supreme?"
14. 27:26 "(Allah)!- there is no god but He!- Lord of the Throne supreme!"
15. 27:40 Said one who had knowledge of the Book: "I will bring it to thee within the twinkling of an eye!" Then when (Solomon) saw it placed firmly before him, he said: "This is by the Grace of my Lord!- to test me whether I am grateful or ungrateful! and if any is grateful, truly his gratitude is (a gain) for his own soul; but if any is ungrateful, truly my Lord is Free of all Needs, supreme in Honour !"
16. 32:21 And indeed We will make them taste of the Penalty of this (life) prior to the supreme Penalty, in order that they may (repent and) return.
17. 36:81 "Is not He Who created the heavens and the earth able to create the like thereof?" - Yea, indeed! for He is the Creator supreme, of skill and knowledge (infinite)!
18. 37:60 Verily this is the supreme achievement! [Being removed from Hellfire.]
19. 38:65 Say: "Truly am I a Warner: no god is there but the one Allah, supreme and Irresistible,-
20. 38:67 Say: "That is a Message supreme (above all),-
21. 44:57 As a Bounty from thy Lord! that will be the supreme achievement!
22. 56:46 And persisted obstinately in wickedness supreme!
23. 56:74 Then celebrate with praises the name of thy Lord, the supreme!
24. 56:96 So celebrate with praises the name of thy Lord, the supreme.
25. 59:23 Allah is He, than Whom there is no other god;- the Sovereign, the Holy One, the Source of Peace (and Perfection), the Guardian of Faith, the Preserver of Safety, the Exalted in Might, the Irresistible, the supreme: Glory to Allah. (High is He) above the partners they attribute to Him.
26. 61:12 He will forgive you your sins, and admit you to Gardens beneath which Rivers flow, and to beautiful mansions in Gardens of Eternity: that is indeed the supreme Achievement.
27. 64:9 The Day that He assembles you (all) for a Day of Assembly,- that will be a Day of mutual loss and gain (among you), and those who believe in Allah and work righteousness,- He will remove from them their ills, and He will admit them to Gardens beneath which Rivers flow, to dwell therein for ever: that will be the supreme Achievement.

Does it declare Islam supreme? No. It declares Allah supreme in several verses.

• 2:255 supreme in glory
• 9:129 lord of the supreme throne of glory
• 12:39 supreme and irresistable
• 13:13 supreme power
• 13:16 supreme and irresistable
• 23:86 lord of the supreme throne of glory
• 27:26 lord of the supreme throne
• 27:40 supreme in honor
• 36:81 supreme creator
• 38:65 supreme and irresistable
• 56:74 your lord the supreme
• 56:96 your lord the supreme
• 59:23 Sovereign, the Holy One, the Source of Peace

ALLAH" is the Arabic name for THE ONE SUPREME UNIVERSAL GOD. ... THE ONE SUPREME UNIVERSAL GOD. In ... ONLY to Allah "ALLAH-HU-AKBAR" means "Allah is Greater" ... www.hajis.co.uk/hajj-and-islamic-terminology.pdf

If Allah is supreme--the greater, then is not his religion, righly understood & practiced superior?

3:19. Truly, the religion with Allah is Islam. Those who were given the Scripture (Jews and Christians) did not differ except, out of mutual jealousy, after knowledge had come to them. And whoever disbelieves in the Ayat (proofs, evidences, verses, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allah, then surely, Allah is Swift in calling to account.


3:83. Do they seek other than the religion of Allah (the true Islamic Monotheism worshipping none but Allah Alone), while to Him submitted all creatures in the heavens and the earth, willingly or unwillingly. And to Him shall they all be returned.

Herein lies the problem; the doctrine of domination. Islam must be maid to dominate the world because Allah said so.

3:55. And (remember) when Allah said: "O 'Iesa (Jesus)! I will take you and raise you to Myself and clear you [of the forged statement that 'Iesa (Jesus) is Allah's son] of those who disbelieve, and I will make those who follow you (Monotheists, who worship none but Allah) superior to those who disbelieve [in the Oneness of Allah, or disbelieve in some of His Messengers, e.g. Muhammad , 'Iesa (Jesus), Musa (Moses), etc., or in His Holy Books, e.g. the Taurat (Torah), the Injeel (Gospel), the Qur'an] till the Day of Resurrection. Then you will return to Me and I will judge between you in the matters in which you used to dispute."


9:33. It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam), to make it superior over all religions even though the Mushrikun (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah) hate (it).

22:78. And strive hard in Allah's Cause as you ought to strive (with sincerity and with all your efforts that His Name should be superior). He has chosen you (to convey His Message of Islamic Monotheism to mankind by inviting them to His religion, Islam), and has not laid upon you in religion any hardship, it is the religion of your father Ibrahim (Abraham) (Islamic Monotheism). It is He (Allah) Who has named you Muslims both before and in this (the Qur'an), that the Messenger (Muhammad ) may be a witness over you and you be witnesses over mankind! So perform As­Salat (Iqamat-as-Salat), give Zakat and hold fast to Allah [i.e. have confidence in Allah, and depend upon Him in all your affairs] He is your Maula (Patron, Lord, etc.), what an Excellent Maula (Patron, Lord, etc.) and what an Excellent Helper!


48:28. He it is Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam), that He may make it (Islam) superior over all religions. And All-Sufficient is Allah as a Witness.



61:9. He it is Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islamic Monotheism) to make it victorious over all (other) religions even though the Mushrikun (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, and disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah and in His Messenger Muhammed ) hate (it).

Notice that in 3:55, Allah tells Jesus that his followers will be superior to the disbelievers. Let us turn to Ibn Kathir's Tafsir for elaboration which will clarify this matter.

Throughout this time, the Christians had the upper hand and dominated the Jews. Allah aided them against the Jews because they used to be closer to the truth than the Jews, even though both groups were and still are disbelievers, may Allah's curse descend on them.

When Allah sent Muhammad , those who believed in him also believed in Allah, His Angels, Books and Messengers in the correct manner. So they were the true followers of every Prophet who came to earth. They believed in the unlettered Prophet , the Final Messenger and the master of all mankind, who called them to believe in the truth in its entirety. This is why they had more right to every Prophet than his own nation, especially those who claim to follow their Prophet's way and religion, yet change and alter his religion. Furthermore, Allah abrogated all the laws that were sent down to the Prophets with the Law He sent Muhammad with, which consists of the true religion that shall never change or be altered until the commencement of the Last Hour. Muhammad's religion shall always be dominant and victorious over all other religions. This is why Allah allowed Muslims to conquer the eastern and western parts of the world and the kingdoms of the earth. Furthermore, all countries submitted to them; they demolished Kisra (king of Persia) and destroyed the Czar, ridding them of their treasures and spending these treasures for Allah's sake. All this occurred just as their Prophet told them it would, when he conveyed Allah's statement,

(Allah has promised those among you who believe and do righteous good deeds, that He will certainly grant them succession in the land, as He granted it to those before them, and that He will grant them the authority to practice their religion which He has chosen for them. And He will surely give them in exchange a safe security after their fear (provided) they worship Me and do not associate anything with Me.) ﴿24:55﴾.

Therefore, Muslims are the true believers in `Isa. The Muslims then acquired Ash-Sham from the Christians, causing them to evacuate to Asia Minor, to their fortified city in Constantinople. The Muslims will be above them until the Day of Resurrection. Indeed, he, Muhammad , who is truthful and who received the true news, has conveyed to Muslims that they will conquer Constantinople in the future, and seize its treasures.[Altering the Religion of `Isa]

From 9:33, 22:78, 48:28 and 61:9 we learn that Allah sent Moe to make his word superior. If you read the context in Surah As Saff, you will discover that the meaning is military: Islam is to dominate by force of arms. What did we learn from the tafsir?

• Christians had the upper hand and dominated the Jews.
• Allah aided them against the Jews
• Muslims are the true followers of every Prophet who came to earth.
• Muhammad's religion shall always be dominant and victorious.
• allowed Muslims to conquer
• Muslims are the true believers in `Isa.
• The Muslims will be above them until the Day of Resurrection.
• That they will conquer Constantinople.

We discover what makes Islam dangerous to mankind: the convergence of supremacism, triumphalism & militarism.

Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 65:

Narrated Abu Musa:

A man came to the Prophet and asked, "A man fights for war booty; another fights for fame and a third fights for showing off; which of them fights in Allah's Cause?" The Prophet said, "He who fights that Allah's Word (i.e. Islam) should be superior, fights in Allah's Cause."

Allah's cause is to make Islam dominate the world by military force. Allah is supreme because he is the only deity; creator of everything in existence. Islam is superior because it is 'Allah's religion'. Islam is uncorrupted, other texts have been altered, denigrating their authenticity & authority.

9:111 informs us that the Muslim's contract with Allah is the supreme achievement. 61:11 reveals the meaning of that contract.

61:11 . That you believe in Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!

War in Camp

Thank you, Pack, for the kind and generous invitation to contribute to your wonderful web log. My tactical objective is to maximize the dissemination of accurate and useful information about the enemy which is assailing and infiltrating us.

It is with good reason that Moe said "Do not take the Qur'an on a journey with you, for I am afraid lost it should fall into the hands of the enemy.". [Sahih Muslim 20.4609] We have seized it and will use it against its adherents.

The Qur'an is given and accepted as Allah's ordinance written before the creation and kept sealed and protected. It was transmitted to Moe by Gabriel. How, you ask?

Sahih BukhariVolume 4, Book 54, Number 438:

Narrated Aisha:

Al Harith bin Hisham asked the Prophet, "How does the divine inspiration come to you?" He replied, "In all these ways: The Angel sometimes comes to me with a voice which resembles the sound of a ringing bell, and when this state abandons me, I remember what the Angel has said, and this type of Divine Inspiration is the hardest on me; and sometimes the Angel comes to me in the shape of a man and talks to me, and I understand and remember what he says."

Only the Qur'an is widely accepted by Muslims as Allah's authentic word. There is a small subset of hadith which are considered holy by some.

There are many translations of the Qur'an. Some are polemic, others strive for accuracy. Hilali & Khan were commissioned by the King of Saudi Arabia. They used Abdullah Yusuf Ali's translation as a base and included parenthetical exegeses from three tafsirs. I generally use their translation for reference. I generally link to ten parallel translations at www.quranbrowser.com. To my knowledge, only the King Fahd Complex publishes the translator's notes on the web. I sometimes have trouble with their site; when it is working, it is very useful. Try this link and scroll down to the footnotes for 2:190, where you will find an interesting definition of Jihad.

Hadith are sayings, oral tradition passed down from mouth to ear. They were codified more than 100 years after Moe died. Those considered most authentic are collected by Bukhari & Muslim. While there is considerably redundancy, the on line collections are not complete and there are efforts under way to censor them.

Hadith fill in many of the gaps left by the Qur'an. Since Muslims are commanded to obey Moe, they need the hadith to discover what he did; how and why he did it. His sunnah is to be emulated. Qur'an & hadith are the chief sources of Islamic law. Most of the hadith collections available on line are derived from the database at USC-MSA, which you can access through the links in the quotations above. The Hadith search at USC is not easy to use. I prefer the search engine at Islaam Net.

Reliance of the Traveller is the most accessible canon of Sharia. The Hedaya is another, but the chapter which contains the laws of Jihad was not included in the translation offered by Google Books. It is a 92MB pdf file, with no way to search its contents. Reliance is available as a large text file. You can search its 22 books by pressing the Ctrl f key combination. Scribid has a scanned image of the book. By some magic beyond my knowledge, they created a search engine that works with it. Allah.com displays a text file, so you can copy & paste. That will facilitate using quotes in blog posts. Unfortunately, they renamed and rearranged the books, and added a half dozen. Two columns are displayed, on the left, a list of the books and a code for deciphering the original names. Book O is transmuted to Book 9. Links to the entry points are in the right hand column.

Tafsir are explanations of the Qur'an. Exegetes compare verses to other verses and hadith to form their opinions. Ibn Kathir's Tafsir is the most known and accepted. I link to www.tafsir.com, which lacks a functioning search engine. www.qtafsir.com has a search engine so you can look up any verse that has been explained in the text.

The Gays/Libs Will Hate the Pope Next...

"Pope Benedict XVI has said that saving humanity from homosexual or transsexual behavior is just as important as saving the rain forest from destruction."

It looks the Pope will be the next target of the insatiable gay agenda and their vicious hate. He spoke out against the homosexual life style and behavior which will surely incur their pitiful scorn.

Calling homosexuality 'self-destruct[ive]' behavior, the Pope's comments will certainly get these little rosebuds up in arms.

God forbid if anyone might actually think that homosexuality is sin. No, we should all agree that evil is good and good evil to satisfy these whiners.

Ain't gonna happen.

Read the full story here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7796663.stm

More Liberals Hate God

Here is more evidence that gays and liberals hate God, and that it is God whom they are really fighting against:

(From the Orange County Register)

http://www.ocregister.com/articles/salvation-brea-thomas-2258287-army-bell

Liberals Hate God

The contrast between liberals and everybody else is on shining display today over at the Daily Kos, http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/12/18/125347/96/705/674577, that way-out-in-left-field whinosphere.

Of course the articles on that site are normally revolting and vile, but today's post seems to personify a special hatred because it is pointed at an Evangelical Christian, Pastor Rick Warren who Obama has selected to lead the inaugural invocation.

And how has Mr. Warren earned the loathe of the left? Why, he has stood up and vocalized the normal, traditional Christian value system that has been on the planet for several millenia and which happened to define the very freedoms upon which the Daily Kos stands upon in its berations. Has Mr. Warren personally attacked the author of today's post, some clown named, 'Ouroboros'? Of course not.

So why the hatred toward Rick Warren? Because the Daily Kos author believes that Warren is trying to tell the man what to do with the man's own penis. In fact Ourboros spends a lot of time on the subject, apparently greatly offended by the standard of righteousness that Warren teaches.

But is this Warren's standard, or is this the standard from another source? If Warren's teachings are from the Bible, then who, really does the Daily Kos' featured author disagree with? Warren is just the messenger, yet the Daily Kos shoots him because they hate the message.

And if the Bible is actually the Word of God, as Evangelical Christians believe it is, then the Daily Kos does not just hate the messenger, and the message, but they actually hate God, the authority behind the message. How dare God tell a Daily Kos author what to do or what not to do with the his penis! The nerve of this God.

How convenient it is that, rather than to be accountable to a holy God with what the Daily Kos author does with his penis, he rails against the message and the messenger so that whatever he is doing with his penis is not deemed to be evil, unhealthy or wrong.

Is there even a better way to deny evil? It is little wonder that the liberal becomes the dhimmi victim of his soon-to-be Muslim master. It is little wonder that liberal policies, wherever practiced, create desperation and chaos. They have abandoned the standard of right and wrong so that they may do with their penises whatever they want, and they have replaced it with their own standard of relevance.

In his article, Ouroboros suggests to Warren that Warren might try exercise, diet and maybe some yoga instead of the 'fairy tales' of Christianity. So is health Ouroboros' god, or is it just his penis? And just WHO is INTOLERANT???

Regardless, Ouroboros and many like him have created false gods that will allow them to perform any act under the sun which they so desire; they have no shame. It is like taking down the speed limit signs so that they can drive as fast as they want to. They have replaced any notions of a holy, Creator God of the universe with the god of license. Which makes what they want more important than what God might want.

They have made themselves gods, sole authorities of acceptable behavior in this universe which they did not create.

Read the God-hating, vile-spewing filth here: (Note some of the vile, offensive words have been edited by me)

Rick Warren: Penis Regulator (with Poll!)

by Ouroboros

Thu Dec 18, 2008 at 10:28:45 AM PST

This is a short diary which contains no research and little forethought. I see diaries hit the recommend list every now and then which only exist to beg people not to write diaries like this, for a variety of legitimate reasons, but alas I cannot help myself. I see Rick Warren's name and face everywhere and I get nauseous. Please do not recommend. See my reasoning for doing this below the jump.

I find it thoroughly repulsive that gluttonous pied pipers of spirituality fancy themselves as Universal Penis Regulators. Rick Warren thinks his values system ought to determine the nature and behavior of my penis, your penis, or perhaps your husband's penis, your son's, your father's, or brother's. He must be stopped.

I know, I know, Rick Warren doesn't just want to control the behavior of penises. He also seeks to control the actions of every uterus and vagina on planet Earth. He thinks his specific interpretation of The Lord of the Rin-- I mean the Bible, imbues him with magical wisdom which enables him to dictate the sex life of all the women of Earth as well as the men. That's totally gross, but I'm more determined with me right now. And the rights granted to my penis by the framers of our Constitution.

Rick Warren is a disgusting pig. Out of all the Wizards summoned to hokus pokus over the ceremony welcoming in our new President, why does it have to be a particularly fat and disgusting authoritarian wizard who thinks he knows better than me how to regulate my penis? I'm sick of these perverts being in public life in general.

I really hope Obama doesn't nominate him to his cabinet as the new Secretary of Co#*.

I wrote this diary because I wanted people across the world to see "Rick Warren: Penis Regulator" make its way down the right side of the page today. The harsh light of truth needs to be shined on these freaks. Rick Warren is not a respectable man. He seeks to control your penis.

Why can't a single journalist ask a conservative preacher the following: "Why are you trying to regulate other men's penises? Are you that bored with yours?"

If the crazy general from Dr. Strangelove thought that the Church sought to put chemicals in the water to control his precious bodily fluids, instead of the Commies, would he have been that far off the mark?

And Rick Warren, if you're somehow reading this, heed my advice: Clean up your lifestyle. Eat more healthfully and get yourself in the gym. Maybe accompany Barack to the gym one day so he can teach you his fitness regimen. We don't need you driving up our health costs when you go in for your diabetes and triple by-pass. Have you tried Yoga? We don't need you setting a fat example for our children. And Jesus, Rick! There are children starving across the world! Take that chicken wing out of your mouth and give it to somebody who actually needs it! And after you start taking better care of yourself, you still need to stop thinking about my di#*. You have no idea how creepy you come across to people who don't buy into your fairy tales.

Chicagobama Spins Semantic Voodoo

Like Bill Clinton's own semantic-spin statement, "That depends on what the word, 'is,' is," President elect Barack Obama embarked on his own slippery slope of semantic voodoo yesterday when he said, of ever having talked with the corrupt Illinois Governor, "I had no contact with the governor or his office and so I was not aware of what was happening."

I suppose the truthfulness of this all depends on what the word,'I' is, huh?

Does he mean, 'I,' as in 'I myself, personally never spoke with the governor,' or does he mean, 'I, myself, my assistants or my office never spoke with the governor'?

Good heavens, here we go again, and the man hasn't even been sworn in yet...!

Should we really be subjected to having to dissect the words that slide out of our leaders' mouths?

The indicted Governor himself has been caught on tape referring to discussions and things that his office and Obama's people were, 'working on,' together. Yet Obama insists nothing of the sort has ever happened.

That sickening feeling inside your stomach is called dread: you see a duck; you hear it quack; because other ducks have quacked before, you know what it is; but you know that duck is going to lie to you every time it opens up its mouth for the next four years and there's nothing you can do to shut it up.

On the other hand, this is exactly who America voted for, so it is not even a tiny bit surprising that the wheels of the bus are starting to fall off already.

But there will be no pity coming from here.

And because there is so much more of this mire ahead to swim in, I hope the people who voted for Obama like Semantic Voodoo Duck Soup.

US Cities Are Going to Burn

The 1992 L.A. Riots (pictured above) will look like a Boy Scout campfire-and-sing-along compared to what might be just around the corner for major U.S. cities.

Consider what enraged L.A.'s inner-city community which sparked the billion-dollar rampage of destruction; it was that police officers, who happened to be white, were found not guilty for trying to subdue a resisting Rodney King, who happened to be black.

Yes, that 'not guilty' plea was justification enough for some to loot, shoot, beat, burn and kill, destroying entire city blocks.

Now imagine what is going to happen if President-Elect Barack Obama is found by the US Supreme Court to be ineligible to hold the office of the President of the United States because of the fact that he was not born in the USA and is not a US citizen....!

Do you think that those who looted and burned over a relatively minor local judicial decision will somehow show integrity and restraint over a judicial decision that prevents the 'messiah' from getting in to the White House? Would you bet $1,000 on it? Me neither.

And do you think that the only people who would loot and burn all live in L.A.? Or might there be some who would do likewise in different cities if enough 'justification' were presumed by their community?

Now if Barack Obama was indeed not born in the USA, he is guilty of lawlessness and so is the DNC for presenting his name on the list of Democratic Presidential candidates. For each have willfully tried to subvert, undermine and bypass a very clear posit of the United States Constitution. In my book, this clearly makes both Obama and the DNC 'domestic enemies of the Constitution,' and they should be prosecuted for treason.

But what about the 64 million people who voted for the ineligible candidate? How are they going to respond to enforcement of the rule of law? How much preference for the rule of law was found in L.A. in 1992? Are there other communities who might respond similarly?

Unfortunately I have seen too many instances of community members ignoring the rule of law and pressing for what they want, regardless of its legality. And if the person whom they voted for President began his election by choosing what he wants over the rule of law, how can we expect anything less from those who view him as the Great Hope?

No, if Obama is ruled ineligible, every major US city is going to have elements within it that will riot, burn, loot, pillage and kill. And it could very likely be a bloody affair as armed law-abiding citizens legally protect their property, business and lives with the use of armed force.

If this is what has to come, so be it. If lawlessness seeks to take over, I can think of nothing more suiting than a confrontation and the elimination of those who refuse not submit to the laws of the United States of America.

So get some water, food and ammo before tomorrow, when the US Supreme Court decides if it will take the case.

Because we could see unprecedented riots all over this country and such lawlessness needs to be confronted or it will rule.

Don't Tread on My Constitution.

The Rise of the Age of License

America just voted itself the license to do whatever it wants to.

Slithering out of sixteen bitter years of Democratic agitation and foment, the spineless creature has evolved from blurring ethics under the Clintons, to brazen revolution under Obama.

No longer is it necessary to defer to any standard of morality, behavior or sense of right and wrong. None of that matters to the modern liberal agenda, the self-described 'progressive' creature. In fact to suggest that something is idealistically wrong, like, say homosexual 'marriage,' or abortion, is to "judge" people, according to any liberal you run in to. The measures of decency that were the plumb-line for American culture since its inception have no use in this new age.

For they have been replaced by something else. That is, objective right and wrong are no longer essential elements or currency in the directions that this country is now going. Ask most any college professor about anything and what you are likely to get is a philosophy class of radical liberal indoctrination for an answer. A generation of such 'value-neutral' geniuses in our higher educational campuses has eradicated the need for our young people to be concerned about whatever might be right, or whatever might be wrong; such terms have been neutered and are now useless.

Or drop in on any of your traditional national news networks. There you will be greeted by the confident and convinced news anchors and reporters, banging the drums and cheering up the crowd in the progressive parade, offering incantations of optimism while at the same time undermining everything that this country was founded upon which also gives them the very platform for their stage.

How about spending some time with the National Geographic Channel, or anything similar, and hearing with certainty, day after day, how man has evolved; how such and such happened a million, thirteen million, no, one point two billion years ago. The Big Bang happened. An asteroid killed the dinosaurs. Neathandral man was not only real, but he fought against us; and now they are even pronouncing his name in a new way. And what ever happened to the term, B.C.? Have you noticed that the 'authoratative academics' have attempted to shelve that term (so as to fit in with their godless peers?) and use one not so offensive to them? Yes, B.C. and A.D. have been usurped by the less foolish, er, religious-sounding terms, B.C.E. and C.E (Before Common Era, and Common Era.) What was wrong with B.C.? It must not be enlightened enough.

And then there is the 'Separation of Church and State' myth and its teeming, religiously-faithful hordes. 'Don't preach to me,' they say, 'the Constitution says that the church and the state should have a wall of separation between them. ' Don't you wish sometimes that that wasn't in the Constitution? Oh, that's right, it isn't. It is a referential fabrication and twist of something Thomas Jefferson said to concerned leaders of the Danbury Baptist Church who were concerned that the state would encroach on the church. Now it is invoked by those afraid that the church will encroach on the state. But it is not in the Constitution. And I wish that such heed was taken by the 'progressive' crowd to the other things that Thomas Jefferson and many other Founding Fathers said, not just convenient twists; but of course that would mean abandoning hypicrisy, so I suppose that will not be happening any time soon.

I'm not even going to go into the thug-culture.

So with all the best ideologies that the 60's counter-culture has implanted into our higher learning institutions, with the adoption as gospel any theory that an academic has conjured, with the complicity and involvement of media bubble heads, with the ethical natural selection crowd whittling out values, with the rise of the belligerent homosexual agenda and horrific murders of innocent infants in their mother's own wombs, and with the minimalism of Christ, God and anything church, our country has spawned a valueless culture of wrong. It is
The Age of License.

What is important now is not related to any objective standard of right and wrong; such archaic restrictions have been replaced by something else. And if you look closely, you can see what that is.

What is the common theme in the whole of this liberal revolution? Besides hate. What element is present in every platform this excular ('extremely-secular'...Hey, I just made a word up!) movement has manufactured as a legitimate issue? Think about it...

What has happened is that right and wrong is no longer defined by what we have always known right and wrong to be; it has been replaced in meaning. Now right and wrong is defined by this: 'what I want.'

Is abortion wrong? No...because I want one, it cannot be wrong. Is homosexual 'marriage' wrong? No...because I want it to be right, it is right. Is lying wrong? No, it will get me elected, so it is not wrong.

When objective standards are removed from society as the cultural norms, what happens is fracture, and the culture reduces to independant tribal behavior. The Gays. The Abortionists. The Greens. Blacks. Whites. Hispanics. Muslims. Everyone has separate standards, definitions of right and wrong, and unique agendas. No longer are any of us Americans, we are tribalists, loyal to our own and weary of all others.

And then when confrontation happens, power is the only rule. For right and wrong are relative to the tribe, and what the tribe 'wants.'

What would happen an hour after a decision from the U.S. Supreme Court that President-elect Obama was ineligible to be President because he was not born on US soil? You and I both know what would happen, because tribes are not concerned about right and wrong, they are concerned about what they want. American cities would burn. People would be denied what they wanted, and burn cities because they would not get it. There would be no regard or respect for what the United States Constitution says; what would matter is defined by what I want.

So lawlessness, faction, friction and separatism are what is in store for this country in this Age of License, this age of do-whatever-I want.

And B. Hussein O. will have been the first President of the Dis-United States of America.

I hope all the liberals are happy. They are going to get exactly the creature that they, themselves, have wanted.

Godspeed.

Rebuilding the Conservative Movement

Well, we have been down before and have arose.

In our united effort to consolidate, organize and rebuild, one of our starting points needs to include looking at one of the Conservative movement's original and stellar, yet little-known personalities. If you have not heard of Phyllis Schlafly yet, well, consider yourself enlightened today.

Here is a link to her blog: http://www.eagleforum.org/blog/.

We need to follow along with her insights and perspective now, read up on her, and listen to what she has to say as she describes what she thinks is the path on which to proceed from this point on.

She also has the Phyllis Schlafly Report here: http://www.eagleforum.org/psr/

Her main website, which links to her blog and report is this: http://www.phyllisschlafly.com/

Lets follow her ideological lead as we begin to rebuild.

Let's also plan on sticking together and keep ourselves organized and moving forward.

The Treatment of Bush Has Been a Disgrace - Wall Street Journal

Finally some much deserved respect for a President who has fought three wars: Iraq, Afghanistan and the hateful Demokrats and their liberal media propaganda machine.

Hats off to the WSJ for giving this great man, President Bush, some proper praise and recognition of the great things he has done.

Also, the writer accurately exposes the left's unpatriotic, selfish and short-sighted rants as weakness that our enemies will use against us.

But GWB is not weak or a coward.

This one is to you for you, Mr. Bush. God bless you.

(from the Wall Street journal:)

• NOVEMBER 5, 2008

The Treatment of Bush Has Been a Disgrace

What must our enemies be thinking?

By JEFFREY SCOTT SHAPIRO

Earlier this year, 12,000 people in San Francisco signed a petition in support of a proposition on a local ballot to rename an Oceanside sewage plant after George W. Bush. The proposition is only one example of the classless disrespect many Americans have shown the president.

AP

According to recent Gallup polls, the president's average approval rating is below 30% -- down from his 90% approval in the wake of 9/11. Mr. Bush has endured relentless attacks from the left while facing abandonment from the right.

This is the price Mr. Bush is paying for trying to work with both Democrats and Republicans. During his 2004 victory speech, the president reached out to voters who supported his opponent, John Kerry, and said, "Today, I want to speak to every person who voted for my opponent. To make this nation stronger and better, I will need your support, and I will work to earn it. I will do all I can do to deserve your trust."

Those bipartisan efforts have been met with crushing resistance from both political parties.

The president's original Supreme Court choice of Harriet Miers alarmed Republicans, while his final nomination of Samuel Alito angered Democrats. His solutions to reform the immigration system alienated traditional conservatives, while his refusal to retreat in Iraq has enraged liberals who have unrealistic expectations about the challenges we face there.

It seems that no matter what Mr. Bush does, he is blamed for everything. He remains despised by the left while continuously disappointing the right.

Yet it should seem obvious that many of our country's current problems either existed long before Mr. Bush ever came to office, or are beyond his control. Perhaps if Americans stopped being so divisive, and congressional leaders came together to work with the president on some of these problems, he would actually have had a fighting chance of solving them.

Like the president said in his 2004 victory speech, "We have one country, one Constitution and one future that binds us. And when we come together and work together, there is no limit to the greatness of America."

To be sure, Mr. Bush is not completely alone. His low approval ratings put him in the good company of former Democratic President Harry S. Truman, whose own approval rating sank to 22% shortly before he left office. Despite Mr. Truman's low numbers, a 2005 Wall Street Journal poll found that he was ranked the seventh most popular president in history.

Just as Americans have gained perspective on how challenging Truman's presidency was in the wake of World War II, our country will recognize the hardship President Bush faced these past eight years -- and how extraordinary it was that he accomplished what he did in the wake of the September 11 attacks.

The treatment President Bush has received from this country is nothing less than a disgrace. The attacks launched against him have been cruel and slanderous, proving to the world what little character and resolve we have. The president is not to blame for all these problems. He never lost faith in America or her people, and has tried his hardest to continue leading our nation during a very difficult time.

Our failure to stand by the one person who continued to stand by us has not gone unnoticed by our enemies. It has shown to the world how disloyal we can be when our president needed loyalty -- a shameful display of arrogance and weakness that will haunt this nation long after Mr. Bush has left the White House.

Mr. Shapiro is an investigative reporter and lawyer who previously interned with John F. Kerry's legal team during the presidential election in 2004.

The Resistance Starts NOW

Barack Obama has spoken, and Amerikans have listened and voted for him.

But for the rest of us, the Americans, the Resistance starts NOW.

We will not surrender our freedoms, we will not give up our liberties, we will not cave into European-style socialism, we will resist a national and internation welfare state, we will fight the removal of our free speech, we will fight the fascist state-bullyism that is sure to come next, we will never give in to Islamic subversion of our laws instead of their assimilation into our culture, we will not base our decisions and votes on what color a man is, we will not wear the slanderous term 'racist' because we chose to not vote for a radical socialist who started his career in the Socialist Party, we will not bear mandated abortion or homosexual 'marriages, the limitations of our firearms, and will resist every single inch of such encroachments on our freedoms by the Demokrats, and we will give our lives for the true freedom of this country, not the socialistic charade that has usurped power by manipulation, media propaganda and lies.

Stay tuned for orders.

History of American Conservatism and Liberalism

History 101
>
> For those that don't know about
> history ... Here is a condensed version:
>
> Humans originally existed as members of
> small bands of nomadic hunters/gatherers. They lived on deer
> in the mountains during the summer and would go to the coast
> and live on fish and lobster in the winter.
>
> The two most important events in all of
> history were the invention of beer and the invention of the
> wheel. The wheel was invented to get man to the beer. These
> were the foundation of modern civilization and together were
> the catalyst for the splitting of humanity into two distinct
> subgroups:
>
> 1. Liberals, and
> 2. Conservatives.
>
> Once beer was discovered, it required
> grain and that was the beginning of agriculture. Neither the
> glass bottle nor aluminum can were invented yet, so while
> our early humans were sitting around waiting for them to be
> invented, they just stayed close to the brewery. That's
> how villages were formed.
>
> Some men spent their days tracking and
> killing animals to B-B-Q at night while they were drinking
> beer. This was the beginning of what is known as the
> Conservative movement.
>
> Other men who were weaker and less
> skilled at hunting learned to live off the conservatives by
> showing up for the nightly B-B-Q's and doing the sewing,
> fetching, and hair dressing. This was the beginning of the
> Liberal movement.
>
> Some of these liberal men eventually
> evolved into women. The rest became known as girlie-men.
> Some noteworthy liberal achievements include the
> domestication of cats, the invention of group therapy, group
> hugs, and the concept of Democratic voting to decide how to
> divide the meat and beer that conservatives provided.
>
> Over the years conservatives came to be
> symbolized by the largest, most powerful land animal on
> earth, the elephant. Liberals are symbolized by the jackass.
>
> Modern liberals like imported beer (with
> lime added), but most prefer white wine or imported bottled
> water. They eat raw fish but like their beef well done.
> Sushi, tofu, and French food are standard liberal fare.
> Another interesting evolutionary side note: most of their
> women have higher testosterone levels than their men. Most
> social workers, personal injury attorneys, journalists,
> dreamers in Hollywood and group therapists are liberals.
> Liberals invented the designated hitter rule because it
> wasn't fair to make the pitcher also bat.
>
> Conservatives drink domestic beer, mostly
> Bud. They eat red meat and still provide for their women.
> Conservatives are big-game hunters, rodeo cowboys,
> lumberjacks, construction workers, firemen, medical doctors,
> police officers, corporate executives, athletes, members of
> the military, airline pilots and generally anyone who works
> productively. Conservatives who own companies hire other
> conservatives who want to work for a living.
>
> Liberals produce little or nothing. They
> like to govern the producers and decide what to do with the
> production. Liberals believe Europeans are more enlightened
> than Americans. That is why most of the liberals remained in
> Europe when conservatives were coming to America .. They
> crept in after the Wild West was tamed and created a
> business of trying to get more for nothing.
>
> Here ends today's lesson in world
> history:
>
>

The Bottom Line on the Socialist Barack Hussein Obama

Want to see the bottom line on the socialist Barack Hussein Obama in this election?

Here it is from http://usawakeup.org/USSA.htm








Socialism IS coming to the USA unless you vote it out NOW!

"All White People Are Racists, And Shouldn't Be Allowed to Vote" -Philadelphia Inquirer

So here's proof of what I've been saying...if you are white, you are a racist, according to politically-correct, liberal, Obama dogma.

But doesn't it seem, rather, that any person who would vote on a candidate BECAUSE of his race and not his policies IS INDEED THE RACIST? So are whites the racists, or are those who vote for a person BASED ON HIS RACE, the REAL RACISTS?

This blatant twisting of reality is so obvious, yet swallowed hook, line and sinker by kool-aid drinking libiots.

Pitiful.

Here's the article that says all whites are racists:



From: The Philadelphia Inquirer
Posted on Sun, Oct. 26, 2008

White people shouldn't be allowed to vote

It's for the good of the country and for those who're bitter for a reason and armed because they're scared.

Jonathan Valania

is editor in chief of the blog Phawker.com

As a lifelong Caucasian, I am beginning to think the time has finally come to take the right to vote away from white people, at least until we come to our senses. Seriously, I just don't think we can be trusted to exercise it responsibly anymore.

I give you Exhibit A: The last eight years.

In 2000, Bush-Cheney stole the election, got us attacked, and then got us into two no-exit wars. Four years later, white people reelected them. Is not the repetition of the same behavior over and over again with the expectation of a different outcome the very definition of insanity? (It is, I looked it up.)

Exhibit B is any given Sarah Palin rally.

Exhibit C would be Ed Rendell and John Murtha, who in separate moments of on-the-record candor they would come to regret, pointing out that there are plenty of people in Pennsylvania who just cannot bring themselves to pull the lever for a black man - no matter what they tell pollsters.

These people are ruining things for the rest of us white people who are ready to move on. Sure, they have their reasons, chimerical though they may be: He's a Muslim. He's a terrorist. He's a Muslim terrorist. He's going to fire all the white people and give their jobs to blacks.

But those are just the little white lies these people allow themselves to be told, a self-induced cognitive dissonance that lets them avoid saying the unsayable: I cannot pull the lever for a black man.

Hey, some people just aren't ready yet, even the governor said so. Just like some people aren't ready yet for computers or setting the clock on the VCR.

Or, to hear Murtha tell it, some people - specifically some people in Western Pennsylvania - will never be ready. But the fact is, if you did a statewide head count of racists, you'd find just as many in eastern Pennsylvania as you would in the western part of the state.

That's why this ban on white people voting I'm proposing has got to be statewide. And I'm sorry to say, it's going to have to include all white people, even those who would vote for Obama, because you can't just let some white people vote. That would be unfair.

By this point, you either think I am joking or are calling me an elitist. I assure you I am neither. OK, maybe a little of both. But it wasn't always like this. I come from the Coal Belt, from that Alabamian hinterland between Pittsburgh and Philadelphia, as per James Carville's famous formulation.

I am, in fact, just two generations out of the coal mines that blackened the lungs of my grandfather, leaving him disabled, despondent and, finally, dead at the ripe old age of 54.

So, understand that I am saying all this for the good of the country and, in fact, for the good of those hard-working white people that Hillary used to pander to.

I know those people, I come from them. They are not some shameful abstract demographic to be brushed under the rug of euphemism by Wolf Blitzer and his ilk.

I have broken kielbasa with those people. I went to school with their children. I have gone to Sunday Mass with a deer-hunter hangover with those people. They are bitter with good reason, and they are armed because they are scared. They mean well, but they are easily spooked.

I fear for what is to become of them after the campaigns leave town for the last time, and Scranton and Allentown and Carlisle go back to being the long dark chicken dance of the national soul they were before the media showed up.

Michelle Obama...Do As I Say, Not As I Do

Obama Smirks, Biden Smirks, Campaign Spokesman Smirks...Just Like O.J.

Republican Letter to Barack Obama Exposes His Lies

Barack Hussein Obama

---

The New York Times carried a story on Saturday, October 4, 2008 that proved you had a significantly closer relationship with Bill Ayers than what you previously admitted. While the issue of your relationship is of concern, the greater concern is that you lied to America about it. The Chicago Sun reported on May 8, 2008 that FBI records showed that you had a significantly closer relationship with Tony Rezko than what you previously admitted. In the interview, you said that you only saw Mr. Rezko a couple of times a year. The FBI files showed that you saw him weekly. While the issue of your relationship is of concern, the greater concern is that you lied to America about it. Your speech in Philadelphia on March 18, 2008 about 'race' contradicted your statement to Anderson Cooper on March 14 when you said that you never heard Reverend Wright make his negative statements about white America . While your attendance at Trinity Church for 20 years is of concern, the greater concern is that you lied to America on March 14. In your 1st debate with John McCain, you said that you never said that you would meet with the leaders of Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, and North Korea without 'preparations' at lower levels ... Joe Biden repeated your words in his debate with Sarah Palin ... while the video tape from your debate last February clearly shows that you answered 'I would' to the question of meeting with those leaders within 12 months without 'any' preconditions. While your judgment about meeting with enemies of the USA without pre-conditions is of concern, the greater concern is that you lied to America in the debate with McCain. On July 14, 2008, you said that you always knew that the surge would work while the video tapes of you from more than a year ago show that you stated that the surge would not work. While your judgment about military strategy as a potential commander in chief is of concern, the greater concern is that you lied to America on July 14. You now claim that your reason for voting against funding for the troops was because the bill did not include a time line for withdrawal while the video tapes of you from more than a year ago show that you voted against additional funding because you wanted our troops to be removed immediately ... not in 16 months after the 2008 election as you now claim. While your judgment about removing our troops unilaterally in 2007 is of concern, the greater concern is that you lied to America about your previous position. You claim to have a record of working with Republicans while the record shows that the only bill that you sponsored with a Republican was with Chuck Lugar ... and it failed. The record shows that you vote 97% in concert with the Democrat party and that you have the most liberal voting record in the Senate. You joined Republicans only 13% of the time in your votes and those 13% were only after agreement from the Democrat party. While it is of concern that you fail to include conservatives in your actions and that you are such a liberal, the greater concern is that you distorted the truth. In the primary debates of last February, 2008, you claimed to have talked with a 'Captain' of a platoon in Afghanistan 'the other day' when in fact you had a discussion in 2003 with a Lieutenant who had just been deployed to Afghanistan . You lied in that debate. In your debates last spring, you claimed to have been a 'professor of Constitutional law' when in fact you have never been a professor of Constitutional law. In this last debate, you were careful to say that you 'taught a law class' and never mentioned being a 'professor of Constitutional law.' You lied last spring. You and Joe Biden both claimed that John McCain voted against additional funding for our troops when the actual records show the opposite. You distorted the truth. You and Joe Biden claim that John McCain voted against funding for alternate energy sources 20 times when the record shows that John McCain specifically voted against funding for bio fuels, especially corn ... and he was right ... corn is too expensive at producing ethanol, and using corn to make ethanol increased the price of corn from $2 a bushel to $6 a bushel for food. You distorted the truth. You and Joe Biden claim that John McCain voted like both of you for a tax increase on those making as little as $42,000 per year while the voting record clearly shows that John McCain did not vote as you and Joe Biden. You lied to America . You and Joe Biden claim that John McCain voted with George W. Bush 90% of the time when you know that Democrats also vote 90% of the time with the President (including Joe Biden) because the vast majority of the votes are procedural. You are one of the few who has not voted 90% of the time with the president because you have been missing from the Senate since the day you got elected. While your absence from your job in the Senate is of concern, the greater concern is that you spin the facts. You did not take an active roll in the rescue plan. You claimed that the Senate did not need you while the real reason that you abstained was because of your close relationships with the executives of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Countrywide, and Acorn ... who all helped cause the financial problems of today ... and they all made major contributions to your campaign. While your relationship with these executives and your protection of them for your brief 3 years in the Senate (along with Barney Frank, Chuck Schumer, Maxine Waters, and Chris Dodd) is of concern, the greater concern is that you are being deceitful. You forgot to mention that you personally represented Tony Rezko and Acorn. Tony Rezko, an Arab and close friend to you, was convicted of fraud in Chicago real estate transactions that bilked millions of tax dollars from the Illinois government for renovation projects that you sponsored as a state senator ... and Acorn has been convicted of voter fraud, real estate sub prime loan intimidation, and illegal campaign contributions. Tony Rezko has contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to your political campaigns. You personally used your political positions to steer money to both Tony Rezko and Acorn and you used Acorn to register thousands of phony voters for Democrats and you. While your relationships with Rezko and Acorn are of concern, the greater concern is that you omitted important facts about your relationships with them to America . During your campaign, you said: 'typical white person.' 'they cling to their guns and religion.' 'they will say that I am black.' You played the race card. You tried to label any criticism about you as racist. You divide America . You claim that you will reduce taxes for 95% of America , but you forgot to tell America that those reductions are after you remove the Bush tax reductions. You have requested close to $1 Billion in earmarks and several million for Acorn. Your social programs will cost America $1 Trillion per year and you claim that a reduction in military spending ($100 billion for Iraq ) can pay for it. While your economic plan of adding 30% to the size of our federal government is of concern, the greater concern is that you are deceiving America . The drain to America 's economy by foreign supplied oil is $700 Billion per year (5% of GDP) while the war in Iraq is $100 Billion (less than 1% of GDP). You voted against any increases to oil exploration for the last 3 years and any expansion of nuclear facilities. Yet today, you say that you have always been for more oil and more nuclear. You are lying to America . Mr. Obama, you claimed that you 'changed' your mind about public financing for your campaign because of the money spent by Republican PACs in 2004. The truth is that the Democrat PACs in 2004, 2006, and 2008 spent twice as much as the Republican PACs (especially George Soros and MoveOn.org). You are lying to America . Mr. Obama, you have done nothing to stop the actions of the teachers union and college professors in the USA . They eliminated religion from our history. They teach pro gay agendas and discuss sex with students as young as first grade. They bring their personal politics into the classrooms. They disparage conservatives. They brainwash our children. They are in it for themselves ... not America . Are you reluctant to condemn their actions because teachers/professors and the NEA contribute 25% of all money donated to Democrats and none to Republicans? You are deceiving America . Oh Mr. Obama, Teddy Roosevelt said about a hundred years ago that we Americans should first look at the character of our leaders before anything else. Your character looks horrible. While you make good speeches, motivating speeches, your character does not match your rhetoric. You talk the talk but do not walk the walk. 1. You lied to America . You lied many times. You distorted facts. You parsed your answers like a lawyer. 2. You distorted the record of John McCain in your words and in your advertisements. 3. You had associations with some very bad people for your personal political gains and then lied about those associations. 4. You divide America about race and about class. Now let me compare your record of lies, distortions, race bating, and associations to John McCain: War hero. Annapolis graduate with 'Country first.' Operational leadership experience like all 43 previously elected presidents of the USA as a Navy Officer for 22 years. 26 years in the Senate. Straight talk. Maverick. 54% of the time participated on bills with Democrats. Never asked for an earmark. The only blemish on his record is his part in the Keating 5 debacle about 25 years ago. Mr. Obama, at Harvard Law School , you learned that the end does not justify the means. You learned that perjury, false witness, dishonesty, distortion of truth are never tolerated. Yet, your dishonesty is overwhelming. Your dishonesty is tremendously greater than the dishonesty that caused the impeachment and disbarment of Bill Clinton. Your dishonesty is tremendously greater than the dishonesty of Scooter Libby. You should be ashamed. Mr. Obama, it is time for us Americans to put aside our differences on political issues and vote against you because of your dishonest character. It is time for all of us Americans to put aside our political issues and vote for America first. It is time for America to vote for honesty. Any people who vote for you after understanding that you are dishonest should be ashamed of themselves for making their personal political issues more important than character. Would these same people vote for the anti-Christ if the anti-Christ promised them riches? Would they make a golden calf while Moses was up the mountain? Would they hire someone for a job if that someone lied in an interview? ... of course not. So why do some of these people justify their votes for you even though they know you are dishonest? Why do they excuse your dishonesty? Because some of these people are frightened about the future, the economy, and their financial security ... and you are preying on their fears with empty promises ... and because some (especially our young people) are consumed by your wonderful style and promises for 'change' like the Germans who voted for Adolf Hitler in 1932. The greed/envy by Germans in 1932 kept them from recognizing Hitler for who he was. They loved his style. Greed and envy are keeping many Americans from recognizing you ... your style has camouflaged your dishonesty ... but many of us see you for who you really are ... and we will not stop exposing who you are every day, forever if it is necessary. Mr. Obama, you are dishonest. Anyone who votes for you is enabling dishonesty. Mr. Obama, America cannot trust that you will put America first in your decisions about the future. Mr. Obama, you are not the 'change' that America deserves. We cannot trust you. Mr. Obama, You are not ready and not fit to be commander in chief. Mr. Obama, John McCain does not have as much money as your campaign to refute all of your false statements. And for whatever reasons, the mainstream media will not give adequate coverage or research about your lies, distortions, word parsing, bad associations, race baiting, lack of operational leadership experience, and general dishonest character. The media is diverting our attention to your relationships and ignoring the fact that you lied about those relationships. The fact that you lied is much more important than the relationships themselves ... just like with Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon ... Monica Lewinski and Watergate were not nearly as bad as the fact that those gentlemen lied about the events ... false witness ... perjury ... your relationships and bad judgments are bad on their own ... but your lies are even worse. Therefore, by copy of this memo, all who read this memo are asked to send it to everyone else in America before it is too late. We need to do the job that the media will not do. We need to expose your dishonesty so that every person in America understands who you really are before election day. Mr. Obama, in a democracy, we get what we deserve. And God help America if we deserve you. Michael Master McLean , Virginia Brought to you by the Party that stands for Liberty Democracy Community

Halloween, Obama - Style...

The Audacity of Dope

This used to be about a Presidential race. But with Michelle Obama's recent attacks on the African Press International (API) where she accused them of publishing a story because they were 'racists,' it appears that it is no longer about a Presidential race, it is just about race, period.

Toss in Democrat John Murtha's comments that suggest anyone who does not vote for Obama is a 'racist' or a 'redneck,' and you have accurate representation of what rung in the gutter the Democrats and all those out in left field have sunk to in this election. Everywhere there is the association that if you fail to vote for Obama, you are a racist.

But the shoe is entirely on the wrong foot here...for is a 'racist' not the person who would vote for a candidate because of the candidate's race? Such a person, a 'racist,' makes his decisions based on race, not because he agrees with the candidate's policies. Racism determines his decisions, not reason.

Michelle Obama supposed that the individuals of API were, individually, each a racist and were motivated to print a truthful story because Barack Obama is black. Of course this boggles the mind (see previous post) and demands the question, how can Michelle Obama, John Murtha, the whacked lefty-college professor, Madonna, or any body KNOW WHAT MOTIVATES ANOTHER PERSON'S VOTE???

Where do these people get off on ASSUMING that they can judge a person's heart, motivation and intent? Who gives them the right to so harshly judge and condemn other human beings like this? Is it not blatantly obvious and evident to all that when one claims to have such deep insight into another person's soul, which we all know is impossible, it is the same as announcing to the world, "I am a moron; I am a dope. And if you believe me, you are also a clueless dope."

Yet liberals have swallowed the dope - hook, line and sinker. They now assume that indeed it is true, if you do not vote for Obama, you are a racist.

Now I am not a Howard Stern fan. I strongly disagree with his selfish treatment of women. But even he could see through this foolishness, this Audacity of Dope, on behalf of the Obama campaign, as they are deliberately making this election about race.

Recently Stern sent a team out into New York city to interview people about the election. What his team did, however, was, when they found an Obama supporter, they asked about policies, and if the person agreed with the policy. Only the interviewers secretly exchanged McCain policies for Obama's policies so the person was being presented a McCain policy as if it was Obama's. And every time, the person being interviewed agreed with the policy if he thought it was an Obama policy.

Run that through your head a few times.

This election is all about race to many voters because Barack and Michelle Obama, and the Democratic machine, have deliberately made this about race to be able to win an election. They have inserted a harmful, divisive element into this society. The very ones who claim to be fighting racism, are indeed CAUSING RACISM.

This is shameful!

What hypocrisy.

This indeed, is the Audacity of Dope.

Michelle Obama, Democrats Are Omniscient

Michelle Obama is omniscient (which, for our pagan, Dumbocrat friends, means all-knowing.) Yes she is all-knowing. And so are all Democrats.

How do we know this? Well, it is because Michelle Obama can read the motives of your heart when you go cast your vote. She can tell that if you do not vote for her socialist husband in the upcoming election, you did not vote for him because you are a racist.

Yes, if you do not vote for Obama, it is because you are a slave-owning, cross-burning KKK piece of trash who is nothing but a hateful bigot. You are a racist puke if you do not vote for Obama.

Racist, racist, racist. You; you're a racist.

Of course this is what Michelle accused the African press corp of in her recent phone call to them because they had done their jobs, which was to report the news. Because the news was related to the fact that Barack Obama is a crony of a Kenyan thug, and now prime minister who has promised to establish Islamic Shariah Law in Kenya, Michelle Obama claims that the African Press International (API) reported on this because they were "racists."

Think about that one for a moment...

But that is not all. Recently an American youth wore a McCain-Palin t-shirt to school and was also labelled 'a racist' by someone who obviously shares Michelle Obama's intelligence level and omniscient insight. In fact, it is now politically correct, thanks to the left field's propaganda arm, the mainstream media, to associate voting for McCain with being a racist. If you vote for McCain, you are a racist. Period.

Isn't it liberating to know that there is an element of society that can read the minds, hearts, and intentions of everyone else in the country, and even in Africa? It is simply thrilling to know that Michelle Obama and the Democrats can look into all the hearts of their fellow Americans, and those in the AIP, of course, and judge what motivates their actions. It is amazing! I didn't think that was possible. I thought only God (this for the liberals, "God" is the name we use for the Supreme Being of the universe) was able to judge the hearts and minds of people, not Democrats!

But then again, there WAS another Biblical character that, if I remember correctly, Michelle Obama's behavior has parallels to...it was that character who presumed to know the hearts of others, and spent a lot of time challenging their motives and questioning their intentions ...oh, yes, he was called 'The Accuser.' His other name was Satan.

He presupposed that it was his duty to evaluate the hearts, minds and intentions of God's creatures by taking what was, wrapping it up in a package of accusation and condemnation, and presenting it as truth to God. Or visa-versa.

Yes, the Accuser could easily dish out things about a person, passing it off as revelation or truth. Of course it didn't actually have to be truth, it just had to be a suggestion presented as the truth. Like Michelle Obama's accusation, judgement and condemnation of the API who reported the news about Barack Obama because they are 'racists.'

Since Mrs. Obama and the Democrats are the only ones in the campaign with this ability, the rest of us are left to wonder when such abilities to judge a man will come to non-Democrats and people who are not militant black radicals...or are they the only ones that can see completely inside a man's soul?

Which begs the question, of course, why don't they have any mirrors?