Of course the articles on that site are normally revolting and vile, but today's post seems to personify a special hatred because it is pointed at an Evangelical Christian, Pastor Rick Warren who Obama has selected to lead the inaugural invocation.
And how has Mr. Warren earned the loathe of the left? Why, he has stood up and vocalized the normal, traditional Christian value system that has been on the planet for several millenia and which happened to define the very freedoms upon which the Daily Kos stands upon in its berations. Has Mr. Warren personally attacked the author of today's post, some clown named, 'Ouroboros'? Of course not.
So why the hatred toward Rick Warren? Because the Daily Kos author believes that Warren is trying to tell the man what to do with the man's own penis. In fact Ourboros spends a lot of time on the subject, apparently greatly offended by the standard of righteousness that Warren teaches.
But is this Warren's standard, or is this the standard from another source? If Warren's teachings are from the Bible, then who, really does the Daily Kos' featured author disagree with? Warren is just the messenger, yet the Daily Kos shoots him because they hate the message.
And if the Bible is actually the Word of God, as Evangelical Christians believe it is, then the Daily Kos does not just hate the messenger, and the message, but they actually hate God, the authority behind the message. How dare God tell a Daily Kos author what to do or what not to do with the his penis! The nerve of this God.
How convenient it is that, rather than to be accountable to a holy God with what the Daily Kos author does with his penis, he rails against the message and the messenger so that whatever he is doing with his penis is not deemed to be evil, unhealthy or wrong.
Is there even a better way to deny evil? It is little wonder that the liberal becomes the dhimmi victim of his soon-to-be Muslim master. It is little wonder that liberal policies, wherever practiced, create desperation and chaos. They have abandoned the standard of right and wrong so that they may do with their penises whatever they want, and they have replaced it with their own standard of relevance.
In his article, Ouroboros suggests to Warren that Warren might try exercise, diet and maybe some yoga instead of the 'fairy tales' of Christianity. So is health Ouroboros' god, or is it just his penis? And just WHO is INTOLERANT???
Regardless, Ouroboros and many like him have created false gods that will allow them to perform any act under the sun which they so desire; they have no shame. It is like taking down the speed limit signs so that they can drive as fast as they want to. They have replaced any notions of a holy, Creator God of the universe with the god of license. Which makes what they want more important than what God might want.
They have made themselves gods, sole authorities of acceptable behavior in this universe which they did not create.
Read the God-hating, vile-spewing filth here: (Note some of the vile, offensive words have been edited by me)
Rick Warren: Penis Regulator (with Poll!)
by Ouroboros
Thu Dec 18, 2008 at 10:28:45 AM PST
This is a short diary which contains no research and little forethought. I see diaries hit the recommend list every now and then which only exist to beg people not to write diaries like this, for a variety of legitimate reasons, but alas I cannot help myself. I see Rick Warren's name and face everywhere and I get nauseous. Please do not recommend. See my reasoning for doing this below the jump.
I find it thoroughly repulsive that gluttonous pied pipers of spirituality fancy themselves as Universal Penis Regulators. Rick Warren thinks his values system ought to determine the nature and behavior of my penis, your penis, or perhaps your husband's penis, your son's, your father's, or brother's. He must be stopped.
I know, I know, Rick Warren doesn't just want to control the behavior of penises. He also seeks to control the actions of every uterus and vagina on planet Earth. He thinks his specific interpretation of The Lord of the Rin-- I mean the Bible, imbues him with magical wisdom which enables him to dictate the sex life of all the women of Earth as well as the men. That's totally gross, but I'm more determined with me right now. And the rights granted to my penis by the framers of our Constitution.
Rick Warren is a disgusting pig. Out of all the Wizards summoned to hokus pokus over the ceremony welcoming in our new President, why does it have to be a particularly fat and disgusting authoritarian wizard who thinks he knows better than me how to regulate my penis? I'm sick of these perverts being in public life in general.
I really hope Obama doesn't nominate him to his cabinet as the new Secretary of Co#*.
I wrote this diary because I wanted people across the world to see "Rick Warren: Penis Regulator" make its way down the right side of the page today. The harsh light of truth needs to be shined on these freaks. Rick Warren is not a respectable man. He seeks to control your penis.
Why can't a single journalist ask a conservative preacher the following: "Why are you trying to regulate other men's penises? Are you that bored with yours?"
If the crazy general from Dr. Strangelove thought that the Church sought to put chemicals in the water to control his precious bodily fluids, instead of the Commies, would he have been that far off the mark?
And Rick Warren, if you're somehow reading this, heed my advice: Clean up your lifestyle. Eat more healthfully and get yourself in the gym. Maybe accompany Barack to the gym one day so he can teach you his fitness regimen. We don't need you driving up our health costs when you go in for your diabetes and triple by-pass. Have you tried Yoga? We don't need you setting a fat example for our children. And Jesus, Rick! There are children starving across the world! Take that chicken wing out of your mouth and give it to somebody who actually needs it! And after you start taking better care of yourself, you still need to stop thinking about my di#*. You have no idea how creepy you come across to people who don't buy into your fairy tales.
19 comments:
.
FYI -
Pastor Rick Warren is not god.
________
You are no Liberal. So try not to tell people what Liberals believe.
.
Ema,
FYI, I did not say that Pastor Rick Warren was God, now did I?
-------------
I think the Daily Kos was quite clear on explaining what liberals believe...I am simply saying it looks like a spade, it acts like a spade, it speaks like a spade, it hates like a spade, so it must be a spade.
Have a nice weekend.:)
.
Cowards make statements and then deny making them.
Happy Winter Solstice.
.
Cowards? Deny? You sound drunk again. Your solstice party isn't until Sunday.
a few points...
i personally don't think homosexuality is evil.
i personally think its good that obama invited warren to lead the invocation, as it shows that he was being serious about a respectful tone in politics and respecting all sides of an issue.
i do believe in right and wrong.
i am a liberal.
eating shellfish is also an abomination in the bible. i don't think red lobster is evil.
i don't hate God.
and the thing about rick warren's diet and health was meant to be ironic. he used the arguments that rick warren uses against homosexuality and applied them to warren's eating habits. make of that what you will.
you have a warped view of what liberalism is and you need to stop generalizing us as God-hating evil-doers.
pw,
You said, "i personally don't think homosexuality is evil."
What part of 'abomination' don't you understand?
Just sayin.
other abominations in leviticus:
Whatever in the water does not have fins or scales; that shall be an abomination to you. (Leviticus 11:12)
i still eat at red lobster.
and our own national bird, the bald eagle, is considered an abomination: " they are an abomination: the eagle, the vulture, the buzzard." (Leviticus 11:13)
i still think bald eagles are among the coolest birds ever.
how do we decide which of these archaic rules to live by and which to ignore?
but we could argue about the morality or immorality of homosexuality all day. the main thing i wanted to correct though, is that we liberals don't accept homosexuality because we hate God or lack any sense of morality. we have a legitimate argument to make that homosexuality is NOT immoral. whether or not you accept our argument is up to you. but to dismiss the argument as evidence of a purported hatred of God by the left is neither accurate nor fair.
PW,
Neither you nor any of your liberal friends gets to call evil good or good evil. Jesus said that those who love Him are the ones that obey His commandments, not those who deny that sin is sin.
Even though Jesus said that righteousness is by faith and that none of us are righteous, there is never any comfort afforded for one who is in open, blatant and unrepentant sin; and it is a complete disservice to your homosexual friends to deceive them and to let them think that there is no need for repenting from sin. In fact their blood will be on your hands if you have so deceived them.
You can conveniently call it, 'archaic,' but that does not change what the Bible, both Old Testament and New, says about it...there is not even any gray area here, it is clearly sin, as is adultery, as is stealing, as is bearing false witness.
so, yes or no, do you consider eating lobster to be a sin?
PW, Did God rain fire from the sky on Sodom and Gomorrah and destroy both cities and all the people for eating lobster or for rampant homosexuality?
"Now this was the sin of Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy. They were haughty and did detestable things before me. Therefore I did away with them as you have seen."
Ezekiel 16:49-50
"detestable things" could very well mean eating shellfish. after all, it is an abomination:
"Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you."
Leviticus 11:12
so maybe the people of sodom faced fire and brimstone raining from the skies for eating delicious shrimp.
PW, ""Before they had gone to bed, all the men from every part of the city of Sodom -- both young and old -- surrounded the house. They called to Lot, 'Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them.'" (19:4-5, NIV)
ALL the men from EVERY PART OF THE CITY lusted for the 'angels' whom they thought were men. It was obviously generally accepted and legal. What's more, when Lot wouldn't let them in, they pulled the ol' 'you're judging us' rant that we hear from the homosexual community today: 9 "Get out of our way," they replied. And they said, "This fellow came here as an alien, and now he wants to play the judge! We'll treat you worse than them." They kept bringing pressure on Lot and moved forward to break down the door.
Sound familiar?
And what about this?...
"You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination. (Leviticus 18:22, NRSV)
"If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall be put to death; their blood is upon them." (Leviticus 20:13, NRSV)
Now about shellfish, riddle me this from Acts 10:
9About noon the following day as they were on their journey and approaching the city, Peter went up on the roof to pray. 10He became hungry and wanted something to eat, and while the meal was being prepared, he fell into a trance. 11He saw heaven opened and something like a large sheet being let down to earth by its four corners. 12It contained all kinds of four-footed animals, as well as reptiles of the earth and birds of the air. 13Then a voice told him, "Get up, Peter. Kill and eat."
14"Surely not, Lord!" Peter replied. "I have never eaten anything impure or unclean."
15The voice spoke to him a second time, "Do not call anything impure that God has made clean."
16This happened three times, and immediately the sheet was taken back to heaven. (Acts 10:9-16 NIV)
Nice try on the shellfish.
.
"... Neither you nor any of your liberal friends gets to call evil good or good evil. Jesus said that those who love Him are the ones that obey His commandments, not those who deny that sin is sin. ..."
Given that Jesus hung out with the down-trodden peoples of the establishment and actively advocated socialist life styles, you are no where right. Remember _all_ of JC's known disciples were men (wink, wink, nod, nod). Like so many of your sad ilk, you are twisting a great man's loving and caring messages (remember the Beatitudes) for your own deceitful statements of bigotry and hate.
You are trying to words into your man JC's mouth. Have I over looked where JC said anything against homosexuals? Please give chapter and verse.
.
Ema, This 'JC' as you put it, hung out with the downtrodden and misfits because He loved them and came to save them...because they needed Him, like we all do. Hanging out with someone and approving of the lifestyle of that person are two different things; love the sinner, hate the sin. Remember the woman caught in adultery (not a greater nor a lesser sin than homosexuality, but a sin nonetheless)? What did Jesus say to her? He forgave her of her sin and told her to go and sin no more (I think...might not be exact words). The point is, is that Jesus came not to condemn, but to save; while at the same time He DID say that if a person does not believe in Him that there WOULD BE CONDEMNATION.
So the bottom line is that the one who commits the sin of homosexual activity needs to repent and turn from that sin, just as the adulterer does and the thief; when that person 1.) agrees that his behavior is sinful to God and 2.) repents/believes, he will be forgiven. That is a great gift that we all need.
But to go around and try to change what the meaning of sin is, is to disable the whole process. How can a man know that he can be saved from his sin if he is not told what his sin is?
Your insinuation that Jesus' disciples were homosexuals is insidious. Peter was married and others likely were as well. Pretty desperate.
so do you think gays should "surely be put to death," as Leviticus suggests?
ha. you leave out the part from genesis 19 where lot gives up his daughter to be gang raped instead. also, lot doesn't object to sex with the male angels because they are male, but because they are "under the protection of his house."
"Look, I have two daughters who have never slept with a man. Let me bring them out to you, and you can do what you like with them. But don't do anything to these men, for they have come under the protection of my roof."
Genesis 19:8
pw,
you said,"so do you think gays should "surely be put to death," as Leviticus suggests?"
What does it matter what I think? What I think means nothing. The question you should be asking is,' What does GOD think?
And the answer to that is in the Bible.
If you were a Christian you would already know the answer to this one because your sin would also have been forgiven.
.
You may define your concept of sin any way you want.
Should a person not accept your need for sin, then why should that person worry? Why are you so worried about forcing others into the straitjacket of your narrow religion?
You claim you are a follower of the teachings of the great teacher, Jesus Christ. JC preached,
"Blessed are the poor in spirit,
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
"Blessed are they who mourn,
for they shall be comforted.
"Blessed are the meek,
for they shall inherit the earth.
"Blessed are they who hunger and thirst for righteousness,
for they shall be satisfied.
"Blessed are the merciful,
for they shall obtain mercy.
"Blessed are the pure of heart,
for they shall see God.
"Blessed are the peacemakers,
for they shall be called children of God.
"Blessed are they who are persecuted for the sake of righteousness,
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven."
Why are you so belligerent toward so many other people? Do you not trust your faith in Jesus?
Happy Winter Solstice.
.
Post a Comment