Showing posts with label Barak Obama. Show all posts

Friday, October 17, 2008

Drink the Kool-Aid

Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, ObamaObama,

Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, ObamaObama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama,

He's 'The One'..................

Thursday, October 9, 2008

Louis Farrakhan Calls Obama, "The Messiah"

In a You Tube video released yesterday, Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan calls Barak Obama "The Messiah!"

Farrakhan's message, recorded in February, brings the insanity that is Barak Obama to a whole new level of madness.

Listen for yourself...and if you believe him, then drink the Kool-Aid...

Monday, October 6, 2008

Clinton/Obama-Type Socialism Bred Financial Crisis

The truth finally becomes clear as to why the United States is in the financial mess that it is. Though the main stream (read:liberal) media, Obama himself and every Democrat who can find a microphone is blaming President GW Bush for the entire crisis (just like they blame him for everything, all the time), a revelation that is impossible to ignore points the finger directly where it all started.

The following New York Times article printed on September 30, 1999, leaves no misunderstandings as to how we got in this predicament. It was the Clinton administration and its normal socialist policies that can be proven to be responsible for opening the Pandora's Box of loans to people who logic said were not qualified.

The Clinton administration put tremendous pressure on financial markets to open themselves up to loans to people whom basically could not afford to carry such loans.

Such 'wisdom' is typical of the short-sighted, ignorant liberal party that does nothing except hurl us toward a socialist system. What else can you call it when the federal government is forced to bail out, and thus own, the commercial structure of this country?

And Obama blames Bush. Which is further evidence that no liberal is actually interested in anything close to the truth, rather simply blindly destroys this country in the name of an ignorant political agenda.

Here is that article from the NY Times from 1999:

Fannie Mae Eases Credit To Aid Mortgage Lending

By STEVEN A. HOLMES

Published: September 30, 1999

In a move that could help increase home ownership rates among minorities and low-income consumers, the Fannie Mae Corporation is easing the credit requirements on loans that it will purchase from banks and other lenders.

The action, which will begin as a pilot program involving 24 banks in 15 markets -- including the New York metropolitan region -- will encourage those banks to extend home mortgages to individuals whose credit is generally not good enough to qualify for conventional loans. Fannie Mae officials say they hope to make it a nationwide program by next spring.

Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits.

In addition, banks, thrift institutions and mortgage companies have been pressing Fannie Mae to help them make more loans to so-called subprime borrowers. These borrowers whose incomes, credit ratings and savings are not good enough to qualify for conventional loans, can only get loans from finance companies that charge much higher interest rates -- anywhere from three to four percentage points higher than conventional loans.

''Fannie Mae has expanded home ownership for millions of families in the 1990's by reducing down payment requirements,'' said Franklin D. Raines, Fannie Mae's chairman and chief executive officer. ''Yet there remain too many borrowers whose credit is just a notch below what our underwriting has required who have been relegated to paying significantly higher mortgage rates in the so-called subprime market.''

Demographic information on these borrowers is sketchy. But at least one study indicates that 18 percent of the loans in the subprime market went to black borrowers, compared to 5 per cent of loans in the conventional loan market.

In moving, even tentatively, into this new area of lending, Fannie Mae is taking on significantly more risk, which may not pose any difficulties during flush economic times. But the government-subsidized corporation may run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in the 1980's.

''From the perspective of many people, including me, this is another thrift industry growing up around us,'' said Peter Wallison a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. ''If they fail, the government will have to step up and bail them out the way it stepped up and bailed out the thrift industry.''

Under Fannie Mae's pilot program, consumers who qualify can secure a mortgage with an interest rate one percentage point above that of a conventional, 30-year fixed rate mortgage of less than $240,000 -- a rate that currently averages about 7.76 per cent. If the borrower makes his or her monthly payments on time for two years, the one percentage point premium is dropped.

Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, does not lend money directly to consumers. Instead, it purchases loans that banks make on what is called the secondary market. By expanding the type of loans that it will buy, Fannie Mae is hoping to spur banks to make more loans to people with less-than-stellar credit ratings.

Fannie Mae officials stress that the new mortgages will be extended to all potential borrowers who can qualify for a mortgage. But they add that the move is intended in part to increase the number of minority and low income home owners who tend to have worse credit ratings than non-Hispanic whites.

Home ownership has, in fact, exploded among minorities during the economic boom of the 1990's. The number of mortgages extended to Hispanic applicants jumped by 87.2 per cent from 1993 to 1998, according to Harvard University's Joint Center for Housing Studies. During that same period the number of African Americans who got mortgages to buy a home increased by 71.9 per cent and the number of Asian Americans by 46.3 per cent.

In contrast, the number of non-Hispanic whites who received loans for homes increased by 31.2 per cent.

Despite these gains, home ownership rates for minorities continue to lag behind non-Hispanic whites, in part because blacks and Hispanics in particular tend to have on average worse credit ratings.

In July, the Department of Housing and Urban Development proposed that by the year 2001, 50 percent of Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's portfolio be made up of loans to low and moderate-income borrowers. Last year, 44 percent of the loans Fannie Mae purchased were from these groups.

The change in policy also comes at the same time that HUD is investigating allegations of racial discrimination in the automated underwriting systems used by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to determine the credit-worthiness of credit applicants.

Ronald Reagan IS rolling over in his grave

Wednesday, October 1, 2008

Obama's Liberal Fascism Threatens Missouri

Taking a page right out of Benito Mussolini's 1940's Italy book, the Obama-Biden camp has recently threatened to prosecute media outlets in Missouri and other states who would broadcast certain McCain campaign ads that the Obama side feels are 'untruthful.'

With key state legislators and prosecuters in their hip pockets, the Biden-Obama folks actually intend to press charg

es should McCain ads that do not measure up to Obama's personal 'truth meter' be shown.

Obama's actions show exactly where he stands on the issue of Free Speech. Furthermore, he has already stated that he wants to take people's guns away. It is left only to the imagination how many other Constitutional rights Obama is willing to attempt to trample on to get himself elected.

For this scenario, that of using the state to limit free speech, is nothing but pure facscim, and Obama nothing but a pure liberal fascist.

So Obama thinks some things in McCain's ads might be 'untrue,' while at the same time Obama himself has put forth various versions of many things in his life, like where he was born, when he stopped being a Muslim, what his relationship to MANY nefarious people actually was or is, etc. So if Obama is so interested in the truth, why does he not apply this to his own campaign rather than to try to intimidate the free speech of others with the power of the state?

Is there no level that the morally- and Constitutionally-challenged Obama campaign will not sink to? Does he ex

pect every media manager to bow to Obama's version of the truth? Will the prosecutors be stepping forward in jack-boots and doing some kind of goose-step? What kind of nonsense is this?

If he can pull this kind of outrageous maniuplation against our Constitutional rights to get elected, Barak Obama is a dangerous, dangerous man. And if he acts more like Tony 'The Scar" Mascalletti in a campaign, imagine what he would do with the power of the Oval Office.

That cannot be allowed to happen. Americans need to see this man for who he is and respond accordingly.

Friday, August 29, 2008

McCain Drops the Nuclear Bomb: Sarah Palin

John McCain dropped the nuclear bomb on Barak Obama's campaign today; and her name is Sarah Palin.

Conservative, mother of five, including a newborn with Down's syndrome, wife of a fisherman/oil field worker, pro-life, pro-second amendment, member of National Rifle Association, point guard on her state championship basketball team, high school leader of the Fellowship of Christian Athletes, runner-up in the 1984 Miss Alaska beauty pageant, and also Miss Congeniality in the same pageant, authentic as your neighbor, mother of an infantryman in the United States Army, reformist, tax-cutter, 'Maverick,' "Sarah Barracuda," Washington outsider, individual with solid morals, values and character, and the current governor of Alaska, 44-year old Sarah Palin is the Bomb in every way.

And her husband is the second-luckiest man in the world. I'm the first.

Here she is, Sarah Palin Nuclear Bomb:

Wonkette.com declares, “This chick could be solely responsible for why polar bears have no icebergs to swim to.”

Monday, April 14, 2008

Hey Barak, NOW They're Bitter

Barak Obama, if you thought small-town people were bitter before, I dare you to go take their pulse now.

Not only have you mis-judged and stereo-typed an entire nation of honest, hard-working Americans, who are the backbone of this country, you have pretty much declared that you are completely unqualified to be their president.

Because, you see, while they were learning American values and the culture, you were bowing to Allah in some mosque in Indonesia or Malaysia or wherever Muslim country you went to school in. No wonder you don't know them.

And as far as the 'they take refuge in guns and religion' stereo-type, or whatever you said, well, I think you have got Americans confused with those people you are trying to appease and surrender to, you know: Muslims. Yes, THEY are the ones that are bitter and find security in religion and guns, yet I do not hear you condemning OUR ENEMY, I see you judging and condemning our AMERICAN CITIZENS. Exactly whose side are you on, Mr. Obama?

But I suppose anyone who has spent a few decades in that racist and hate-preaching church that you go to with that racist preacher is bound to cast stereo-typical judgments on small-town white people; they teach the 'hate-whitey' doctrine pretty good, there, don't they?

Mr. Obama, you have NO IDEA what the small town culture is all about. Your stereotypes are are sickening. Furthermore, they reveal that you are no more qualified to be an American president than you would be the president of Russia. You are not one of them, neither are you one of us. You have got caught with your arrogance showing again, and this time it will cost you the election.

But don't be bitter; that's only for small-town white people, right?

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Barak Obama Exposed

So just where does Barak Obama stand on the abortion issue? How about gun laws? How about most of the issues? It seems he is big enough on splash that nobody really has to know who he is or what he really stands for. Seems kind of teflon. Not Al-Gore-plasticman-teflon, but not exactly forthcoming.

One of Obama's recent speeches, this one quite lengthy, was finally meaty enough to begin to nail him down on just where he really is at on some controversial issues. The speech was then reviewed and evaluated by a highly-educated, conservative, patriotic and analytical Christian leader who looks at Obama here for who he is from an American Christian's perspective.

Though the onion has many more yet-to-be uncovered layers, the ones peeled back in this summary are already enough to make you cry. It is very revealing and could well define how the Christain Right identifies this pretender from Illinois (all emphasis and colored text is mine and not the author's):

"I listened to the whole thing. If I were teaching speech this school year and Obama were in my class, he would get an A for sure. He is personable, poised, articulate, likable, and eloquent.

But what did he really say of substance? He began by quoting Alan Keyes, his opponent in his Senate race. It was not till minute 36 (of 39) that he admitted to one of Keyes's apparent criticisms (he didn't really specify what Keyes's objections had been, just that Keyes was convinced that Jesus wouldn't have voted for Obama)--he finally admitted that he, Obama, is pro-abortion. He danced all around the question whether he supports homosexual "marriage." His remarks about Keyes, Pat Robertson, and the late Jerry Falwell were entirely ad hominem, completely devoid of meaningful content.

Not until minute 14 did he mention his having walked the aisle of a church to receive Jesus as Savior, but he immediately undercut that testimony by saying that Jews and Muslims are "on the same path." No serious and honest Jew or Muslim would agree with him, of course. A few minutes later, he claimed that "we need Christians, Jews, and Muslims on Capitol Hill."

Finally, after minute 18, we hear some of his views for the first time. He is anti-gun, so he apparently does not support--or does not understand--the Second Amendment. (Later on, he says some good things about the First Amendment, but without reference to anybody specific who he thinks opposes the principles of the First Amendment.) He wants more tax money to be spent on education. He claims that simply giving more information about contraception will ameliorate, if not solve, the problems of teenage pregnancy and abortion. He is against cuts in the Federal budget.

In minute 26, he finally tells this crowd (containing, apparently, mainly self-described Christians) that he believes America is "no longer a Christian nation," and he makes that statement with apparent approval. He asks a meaningless rhetorical question after minute 27, "Whose Christianity should we teach in the public schools?" (Who in American politics is recommending that we teach Christianity in the public schools? He doesn't say.) Right afterward, he gives some near-sarcastic commentary based on distorted views of the Torah like those popularized by Martin Sheen's character on a popular TV show.

After minute 29, he insists that Christians cannot oppose abortion meaningfully and effectively unless they can justify their opposition to unbelievers, and after minute 31 he says that people of faith must submit to pure reason (that is, reason as defined by those who are not people of faith). In other words, if we can't make our positions palatable and sensible to those who have a completely different (and even hostile) worldview, then we have no business setting our positions forward in the public square.

He concedes that the Pledge of Allegiance, even with "under God," is OK--especially since most kids don't even say it with conviction anyway--and that voluntary prayer groups in public schools would probably be all right.

In sum, this speech contained a lot of effective rhetoric, given in a winning way--a lot of charm--but very little in the way of "real ideas" beyond tactical advice to the left wing on how they can win over people of faith.

Bob Hellam"

Very well said, Bob! Thank you for those important insights.

K.O. (Knock Out)

Right Hooks