Netanyahu @UN: PC Poison

http://gadebate.un.org/67/israel

http://www.policymic.com/articles/15409/netanyahu-speech-at-un-general-assembly-full-transcript-and-video

We won’t solve our conflict with libelous speeches at the UN. That’s not the way to solve it. We won’t solve our conflict with unilateral declarations of statehood.

We have to sit together, negotiate together, and reach a mutual compromise, in which a demilitarized Palestinian state recognizes the one and only Jewish State.

Israel wants to see a Middle East of progress and peace. We want to see the three great religions that sprang forth from our region – Judaism, Christianity and Islam – coexist in peace and in mutual respect.

Yet the medieval forces of radical Islam, whom you just saw storming the American embassies throughout the Middle East, they oppose this.

They seek supremacy over all Muslims. They are bent on world conquest. They want to destroy Israel, Europe, America. They want to extinguish freedom. They want to end the modern world.

Militant Islam has many branches – from the rulers of Iran with their Revolutionary Guards to Al Qaeda terrorists to the radical cells lurking in every part of the globe.

But despite their differences, they are all rooted in the same bitter soil of intolerance. That intolerance is directed first at their fellow Muslims, and then to Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus, secular people, anyone who doesn’t submit to their unforgiving creed.

They want to drag humanity back to an age of unquestioning dogma and unrelenting conflict.

our conflict

    It is not your conflict, it is Islam's. Moe hated Jews because, after he fabricated his new cult to appeal to them, they recognized his fraud and rejected it.  Moe went to them and asserted ownership of the world and that he would expel them from the Hijaz if they did not convert to Islam.  Moe expressed a preference for conquering the Levant before Yemen, saying that Allah had, on his account, taken special charge of the people of Syria.  Umar's conquest of the Levant was completed in 638.

won't be solved

    The conflict is existential: it can only be ended by extinction.  Sahih Bukhari 4.52.177 & Sahih Muslim 41.6985 inform us that Islam intends to solve it by genocide.  Ibn Kathir's exegesis of 7:167 informs us that Jesus Christ will lead the Muslims in the final genocide of Jews.  Who might Allah send to continually humiliate and torment the Jews until the last day? 

    Muslims can never tolerate the existence of Israel because it is the ultimate blasphemy: it proves Allah to be an impotent idol whose promise is void.  Allah promised Muslims, in 13:41, that Allah would irreversibly give the land to them; that none could recover it.  Allah promised the Muslims first a ten to one, then a two to one kill ratio, yet they lost four wars in which they intended to exterminate you. 

Peace

    Peace is the absence of Muslims:  cause them to cease believing in Allah, his imperative,  threat & promise, or usher them into Hell.  There are no other options.

Palestine

    Israel is Palestine, Jews are Palestinians. Palestine is Israel, Palestinians are Jews. Gaza, Judea & Samaria are occupied by Muslim interlopers who must be expelled. Jerusalem has not been the capital of any nation other than the Jews.  No nation of Palestine ever existed.  There are enough Muslim nations, we don't need any more anywhere.

    July 11, '02, Joseph Farah published  in World Net Daily,  a revelation of truth difficult for many to accept. He lifted the wool, exposing the fraud perpetrated by the propagandists.   One quote in that article stands out above the rest for  the clarity of its revelation.

The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct "Palestinian people" to oppose Zionism. ...[Zahir Muhsein, P.L.O. Executive Cmte.]

'Three great religions'

    Two, AssWhole.  No decent person calls Islam a religion, much less great! Such terms are the exclusive domain of damned fools and liars. What religion executes apostates? What religion ordains offensive conquest?  If Islam were a religion, how would conquering half of the known world make confer greatness on a religion?

coexist

    How in the G'd'd Hell does any fool hope to coexist with an ideology dedicated to his extermination?

respect

    Who respects those who "earned Allah's wrath", sons of monkeys & swines; the worst of living creatures? Who can respect those who describe Jews that way?

radical Islam

    Malignant malarkey!!!! "Its Islam, stupid!"  Pull your head out of your anus long enough to read the Qur'an , Hadith: Sahih Bukhari: Jihad, Kumus & Expedition and  Shari'ah: Reliance of the Traveller O9 & Hedaya Vol. II, Book IX, Chapter 1. Normative Islam is what Moe preached and practiced, nothing else. <META NAME="DESCRIPTION" CONTENT="Your keyword rich marketing sales-pitch meta description goes here">
<META NAME="KEYWORDS" CONTENT="your keywords,go here,separated by a comma,but not a space"> <META NAME="DESCRIPTION" CONTENT="Your keyword rich marketing sales-pitch meta description goes here">
<META NAME="KEYWORDS" CONTENT="your keywords,go here,separated by a comma,but not a space">

American Congress for Truth Webcast

The next American Congress for Truth webcast “Radical Islam: A Threat America Must Take Seriously.” will take place April 24, 2010 from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. EDT. The webcast is intended for federal, state and local legislators, their staffers and other elected officials. Everyone who wants to learn more about the threat of Islamic global Jihad is welcome to attend.

If your internet connection will support You Tube videos, you will be able to view the webcast.

Featured speakers include:

Brigitte Gabriel Robert Spencer, Director of Jihad Watch and author of Stealth Jihad Walid Phares, author of Future Jihad John Guandolo, former FBI agent and expert on the Muslim Brotherhood

The previous webcast from Nov. 7, 2009 is still available, click this link to view it. If you have contact with influential public servants, now is the time to alert them to these learning opportunities.

Limbaugh Off Target: Strategic Plan

When I tuned into the Rush Limbaugh show today, Rush launched into a rant about Obama's changes to the National Security Strategy.
I selected three quotes from Rush's rant because they convey and overlook important concepts.

The change would be a significant shift in the National Security Strategy, a document that previously outlined the Bush Doctrine of preventive war. It currently states, 'The struggle against militant Islamic radicalism is the great ideological conflict of the early years of the 21st century.'" Obama doesn't like that. He's pulling it out.

Shrub and Obamination are both wrong; Shrub is only slightly closer to objective factual reality. "Militant Islamic radicalism" is a fallacy; no such entity exists. The enemy is Islam; standard, off the shelf, orthodox Islam as Moe preached and practiced it, not some imaginary 'radicals' or 'extremists.

Islam is not defined by the relatively 'secular' or 'moderate' Muslims or 'Muslims in name' only. Islam is defined by what Moe said while speaking for Allah, recorded in the Qur'an. Islam is exemplified by Moe's sunna, as recorded in the collected oral traditions of his companions. Moe had a name for those "secular" Muslims: hypocrites. He said of them that "They recite Qur'an but it does not go beyond their throats (i.e. they do not act on it) and they will desert Islam as an arrow goes through a victim's body, so that the hunter, on looking at the arrow's blade, would see nothing on it;" [Sahih Bukhari 4.56.807]

Allah commanded Muslims to wage war against Polytheists and atheists until resistance ceases and only Allah is worshiped on a global scale. The commandment is recorded in 8:39. confirmed by Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387 and codified into Shari'ah in Reliance of the Traveller O9.9. The clear and obvious meaning of the command is confirmed by Ibn Kathir's Tafsir: The Order to fight to eradicate Shirk and Kufr.

Allah commanded Muslims to wage war against Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians until they are subjugated and make annual extortion payments. The commandment is recorded in 9:29, confirmed by Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387 and codified into Shari'ah in Reliance of the Traveller O9.8. the clear and obvious meaning of the command is confirmed by Ibn Kathir's Tafsir: The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They give the Jizyah.

Those commands are not anachronisms; Allah's word has no expiration date. Jihad is defined in Reliance of the Traveller O9.0 as "To war against non-Muslims". Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2526 informs us of the duration of Jihad: "jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist)."

Between 1783 and 1815, American merchant vessels engaged in trade were attacked by the Barbary Pirates. At that time, Israel was occupied by the Ottoman Empire. There were no American troops stationed in Arabia. So, why did Islam attack our shipping? Because not being Muslim is a status offense.
Jefferson and Adams asked the crucial question and got this answer from Tripoli's envoy to London

"It was written in their Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every Muslim who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise."[ Wikipedia]

Faithful Muslims have a right and duty to plunder and enslave us. I gave you links to the source of the doctrine. I gave you a quote which illustrates the application of that doctrine. "Its Islam, stupid". No 'radicalism', no 'extremism'; Islam! Its time to drop the p.c. adjectives & pretense; to name and shame the enemy. It is long overdue, so why not do it?

What are we doing having relationships with the Muslim world anyway? Do we have a relationship with the Catholic world? Do we have a relationship with the Buddhist world? Do we have a relationship with the Jewish world? Well, if we did, Obama's taken care of that.

As a Muslim, President Obama has a relationship to Islam and Muslims; he is one of them. He has a right and duty to plunder and enslave us. Yes, Rush, we have an Ambassador to the Vatican. But Islam's relationship to us is inimical. We need to reciprocate.

Now we can't call 'em Islamic radicals. Now we have to have a relationship with the Islamic radical world -- sorry -- Muslim world.

We can call them what they are: Muslims. Their relationship to us is the same as that of Germany & Japan in WW2.

Shrub could not bring himself to name and shame the enemy. Nor would he specify the ideological differences we have with Islam. President Obama won't name and shame the enemy. Nor will he list our most important differences with Islam any more than Shrub would. But, not being President, I will.

Freedom	Islam
right to life	Muslims can kill kuffar
liberty	Muslims can enslave kuffar
equality	Muslims are superior
gender equality	men are superior, own women as chattel
representative government by consent of the governed	theocracy imposed by force
freedom of religion	only Allah has right to be worshiped
peace unless attacked	war as a way of life