Donald Trump: The New Sheriff in Town

Liberals are going through Kleenex boxes faster than Barack Obama is shredding paper. Canada's immigration website crashed under the volume of lawbreakers looking for another country's laws to break. Collaborating media types are whining and blaming everyone but their sorry traitorous selves, who all supported the unConstitutional power grab of King Barack the Last and tried to steal the election so that his successor, Hillary Clinton would continue the reign. George Soros is crapping in his depends. Cockroaches of all flavors are scrambling to flee or making attempts to cover their tracks. Why? Well, it is all because the new sheriff just showed up at the edge of town and he's about to walk in and take over. And the darkness hates it.

Imagine what it is going through the illegal immigrant Mexican's head...he now knows he will soon be HELD ACCOUNTABLE. He will actually get arrested and sent to jail for several years. What is he going to do? He will likely flee back to Mexico on his own in the next two months. And he will bring millions with him. Because the new sheriff doesn't play.

Imagine what the BLM murderers are thinking...they now know their days are also numbered and the cross-hairs will soon be pointed back at them. They will likely scatter and dissipate and try to live like they were never involved.

And what if you're ISIS? You are making plans to sink lower and dig deeper and bury yourself further underground.

Barack Obama's legacy just crashed and burned like we all prayed it would. The fact that he will be charged, tried, convicted and executed for treason is simply icing on the cake. But he has a dilemma, how does he get out of the USA when Donald Trump is sworn in? My dream is that two seconds after Donald Trump is sworn in as the 45th President of the United States, he pulls an arrest warrant out of his pocket and orders law enforcement to arrest Barry the Usurper.

Hillary Clinton could also be executed for treason (remember her and Barack switched sides on the War on Terror in 2011) but she will likely just go to prison for her Clinton Foundation criminality.

And everybody is singing a different tune. Donald Trump not only beat the Democrats, he also beat the Republican establishment; he beat BOTH parties.  But it wasn't Trump, it was us - We the People - who yearned for the movement which Trump tapped in to. And now Democrats and Republican establishment colluders are all trying to figure out how to spin their own actions, how to seemingly re-align themselves for their very political existence. They are all reeling. But we don't care. Let them die on the vine of an abandoned field because the new sheriff has new plans and we will be moving forward with new vision. Because one of the things about this election was that everyone's cards were out on the table.  The element of where you really stand was revealed.  There is no hiding now for the enemies of the Constitution. They are laid bare for all to see and they now have zero credibility in this new frontier.

Aside from the coming enforcement of laws, the prosecution of lawlessness including the former Ruling Class, it is an interesting exercise to wonder who President Trump will use to assist him in his task. Personally I think he will tap Sarah Palin to be Secretary of State. And that would be a good choice. I like Sheriff Joe for Attorney General if Trump puts Mark Levin in the Supreme Court. Otherwise, maybe Levin fits in as Attorney General. Then Sheriff Joe leads the FBI. Or maybe Mikwaukie's Sheriff David Clarke would lead the FBI. He will also likely use such allies as Ben Carson, Mike Huckabee, Rudy Guilianni and Trump's buddy Chris Christie at some levels. Regardless Trump is a solid decision maker and smart. He will use only talented and proven people. And he will put the right people in the right places.

This is a good day. It was the prayer of many that God would bring down the principalities raised up against Him. Those principalities are George Soros, globalists, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, progressives, Democrats, liberals and communists. They all are raised up against God and many prayed that God would bring them down. Well, last night's miraculous election was a severe strike in that direction.

And America's future is brighter today because of it. Perhaps God might see fit to make America great again.

The morning after...

So this morning there is wailing and gnashing of teeth in the lame-stream media.  It's fun watching them scramble after they had to toss out all of the stories I'm sure they had planned for today.  Just think of all of those lovely stories about how Hillary rose above all of the challenges to become the first woman elected president in spite of Trump being such a bully that are frantically being deleted 

On GMA, one of their big stories is about how to talk to your children after this election and what to say about how terrible it was. They have a psychiatrist on talking about how to help your precious little snowflake deal with the disappointment of the election.  My kids have been exposed to politics all their lives.  I remember coming home the night Paul Wellstone was elected to hear from my then 2 year old son "that's the naughty man who steals mommy and daddy's pennies."  Fast forward today to the 22 year old young man who proudly voted for Trump and was texting me half the night with updates.  My 17 year old daughter is dragging today at school as she was up until after one this morning waiting for results.  Yesterday the 18 year old seniors at her school were proudly walking around with Trump signs to let everyone know who they voted for-what a great thing to know that even though your state didn't go for Trump, the first time you voted you were on the winning side of a historical event.

Here are some of the lessons my daughter learned from this election:  Think for yourself-you can't trust everything you hear from the media-you have to look deeper  at the motives behind their message.  Just because someone is a woman (or whatever you identify with) doesn't mean you have to vote with her.  Standards and character are more important than race/gender/orientation.  Your lies will catch up with you.  Think before you tweet.  Emails never go away.  Every vote does count.  Be yourself-even if you are brash and may put your foot in your mouth, at least you are being honest and don't have to try to remember the story you told last time. Be gracious when you win.  Don't ever wear suits that would look better on a Kirby.

No Trump wasn't my first choice but as the campaign went along I realized he was the best choice.  Hillary would have steam-rollered my original pick-Trump was what we needed now!  We've been given a second chance-don't blow it!

In a side note: They just had a commercial for Starbucks with the message that the red cup is coming. I think the red cup has arrived...

My closing warning (hope?) for today: Get out of the way so you're not trampled by the exodus of disappointed celebrities. Good bye and  don't let the screen door hit you on your way out.

WE are the Deplorables and our voice has been heard!

Surprising October surprise

We got our October surprise this weekend, albeit not the one most of us were expecting.  I'm sure most of us thought the dems would come up with some more wild stories about Trump so that he would have to spend his remaining time before the election trying to refute them rather than focusing on the real issues that the people want to hear his solutions for. 

In an unexpected announcement, we learned that the FBI is again looking at Hillary’s emails after 650,000 emails were found on Weiner’s laptop that he had shared with Huma.

Hillary started out her response to this with more lies.  She whined that they only sent it to Republicans.  Of course it was addressed to Republicans-they are the chairmen of the congressional committees!  She conveniently missed the second page of the letter that shows Comey also sent the letter to ranking democrats on the same committees.  She went on to say that this release of information was unprecedented and never before had something like this happened so close to an election.

Hillary must still be suffering the same memory loss from her concussion that kept cropping up in her previous interviews with the FBI.  Wasn’t there another presidential candidate who benefitted from a very similar situation when charges were filed against his opponent a week before the election‽‽‽  24 years ago a special prosecutor brought new charges in the Iran Contra affair against a staff member of the incumbent president, George H. W. Bush.  His opponent, the original Clinton liar jumped on it with a claim that he was running against a “culture of corruption” and "it demonstrates that President Bush knew and approved of President Reagan's secret deal to swap arms for hostages." 

Does any of this sound familiar? Of course Hillary’s screaming about this happening.  We all know what that election turned out!  She can’t turn her back on Huma at this point-they’ve been together long enough that Huma knows where all the bodies are buried (probably literally)?  It will be interesting to see how this one unfolds.  The media can't ignore this even though they are doing everything they can to soften the importance of this.

It looks like the Clinton dynasty may crash the same way it soared.  Karma is a bitch!

Make sure it happens-get out there and vote for Trump!

Words speak louder than actions

Just so you know where I’m coming from-I’m a white middle-class, middle-aged, married, evangelical Christian mother.

I finally got a chance to read through a transcript of what was said on the infamous video of Trump and Bush.  My first reaction to it was “is this what all the uproar is about???”  Other than a couple of the specific words used, I’ve heard worse that this on prime time network TV and daytime talk shows (Jerry Springer was the Democratic mayor of Cincinnati). 

Just looking at what was said, how many of you reading this can honestly say you haven’t at some point had a similar conversation with your friends?  I’m not just talking about men either-most of the women I know have had a version of those conversations too (it wasn’t men buying those 125 million copies of Fifty Shades of Grey).  For everyone to be feigning outrage over this tape is hypocritical. 

The standards of what is acceptable have been getting lower and lower as more and more could be shown and said on network TV.  How many of you remember that the sound of Archie Bunker’s toilet flushing was the first time a toilet was heard on air?  Lucy and Ricky slept in separate beds and the Brady’s didn’t even have a toilet.  Now you get to see the conversation between the guys at the urinals (sometimes having the same discussion that’s causing such a stir now) or the couple who just hooked up very obviously having sex.  I won’t even get started on the rap music I hear on the radio stations my teenage daughter listens too.  This video came out of that Hollywood environment where anything goes, not out of the political environment he is in now where he has to come across as professional and dignified (unless you’re Hillary where anything still goes).

Another thing from the video that the media isn’t mentioning is that he totally turned off the frat boy talk when Ms. Zucker joined the conversation.  Bush was the obnoxious one from that point on. Trump was friendly but nothing out of line, even mentioning his wife when asked if he wanted a hug.  That demonstrates that Trump knows what not to say and when not to say it which is a vital quality in a president.  Hopefully, he’ll have the sense not to say things when there is a microphone around like Obama’s comment to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev: "This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility."  I find that much more frightening and offensive than Trump’s “locker room” talk.

The most disturbing thing is all of the republicans who have jumped on the bandwagon to distance themselves from Trump and call for him to step down.  Paul Ryan had an immediate response to the video: "I am sickened by what I heard today. Women are to be championed and revered, not objectified. I hope Mr. Trump treats this situation with the seriousness it deserves and works to demonstrate to the country that he has greater respect for women than this clip suggests."

Personally, I find Ryan’s comment more sexist that Trump’s.  To me it smacks of the “let’s put the little woman on a pedestal-she needs a big, brave man to defend her because she’s too weak to do it herself” mentality that I thought we as women have been fighting against for decades.   I don’t want to be “championed and revered” just because I’m a member of the “weaker sex” any more than I want to be objectified because I’m a woman.  Sexist remarks from Trump, especially ones from ten years ago, aren’t going to destroy this country if he’s elected president.  That was proved during Bill Clinton’s presidency where he didn’t just talk that way, he acted it!  

All of the things that have come out against Trump are nothing compared to the skeletons in Hillary’s closet but the media is doing its best to make sure that you don’t see it that way.  One of the newspapers I read Saturday demonstrated this perfectly.  The Trump video was the front page story while news of the release of more emails from Hillary was stuck on the back page.  The only reason I even noticed it was because the Trump story continued to the back page next to it.  

Don’t let the media steer us to who they think we should vote for.  What you can do to fight this is to get out there on November 8^th and vote for Trump.  Yes, he is a flawed candidate but those flaws are what make him a strong candidate who can beat Hillary.  I know that I’m not perfect but how many of us are?  He has the ideas that can pull this country back from the edge of the abyss we’ve been heading for.  Let’s give him a chance to prove it! There are so many things that Hillary is wrong on that we can't take a chance on giving her that much power.

If we roll over and let Hillary win because of this unimportant issue, we really have proven that words speak louder than actions.

#NeverHillary!

 

 

Evil George Soros' Agenda is Obama's Agenda

The day before Barack Hussein Obama was sworn into office as pResident of the United States this blog wrote an article exposing Obama's puppet master, evil George Soros, and warning about the perils that would come if this unholy marriage of demigod and despot were allowed to continue.

Not only was this blog right on in the assessment that America would become Soros' canvas for his planetary social experiments but those claims have been validated dozens of times in the years since and notably in recent weeks with all the revelations about Soros' involvement in every aspect of the current world-wide turmoil, mostly through his Open Society Foundation.

Before re-posting that article from 2009 because I want to say I told ya so,  I thought it would be helpful to demonstrate some of what Soros agenda was and how it is identical to what we've had shoved down our throats ever since from the bastard Barack Obama:

- Obamacare - Soros' agenda. Written by Soros' people. Implemented by Obama, Harry Reid and Nancy Peloshe's Ugly.
- 'Economic Recovery Plan' - Soros' agenda to burden American with overwhelming debt. Implemented by King Barry.
- Arab Spring -  Soros' baby. De-stabalize the middle east, create a 'refugee situation' which would be 'solved'  by mass immigration to the West. Implemented by Sultan B. Hussein Obama and his murdering crony Hillary Clinton.
- Open borders - All Soros. He funds this from top to bottom. Implemented by Senor Barack Obama and all the Democrats and globalist RINOs.

And the list goes on and on and on. EVERYTHING that George Soros wanted became Barack Obama's agenda. Their agendas are identical. What we have had forced on us is the Soros-Obama Agenda. And the propaganda media doesn't whisper a word about this sedition. The media are collaborators and equally guilty of Soros' subversion and Obama's treason.

Additionally Soros is behind the efforts to get Hillary elected. (Hillary's daughter's wedding was held on George Soros' property!) Hillary is also a shill for Soros. (Oh, did I mention how Soros is also funding BLM? Nothing but cherries on this cake!)

Don't believe me? Where have you been? Google 'Open Society Foundation'. Then weep. Then find a Democrat and 'thank' him. This is on them as well. Each and every one.

Now I would like to take you back to the RightHooks article from 2009 called 'Obama Called Soros Every Day'. Besides the general warnings there was an interesting fact presented in that article. And that fact was that on the run up to his election and after, Obama placed daily calls to his puppet master, George Soros. How do I know this? Well, it was one of those I know someone who knows someone things. I ask a lot of questions. I meet people. Some people have interesting backgrounds. Some people's backgrounds involve some sneaky things we did in the past. And then I actually spoke face to face with the person who witnessed Obama's calls to Soros first-hand. There were no emails. There were no phone conversations. There was just a conversation in a parking lot.

Here then, over seven years later, is a re-posting of the article that stated plainly where America was going if Obama was allowed to stay in office:

Obama Called Soros 'Every Day'

If you haven't yet read discoverthenetworks.org's bio on ba-zillionaire elitist-socialist George Soros yet, you should; all of it.

Because he is now your daddy.

For, the United States of America is about to be handed to him on the silver platter of his own fashioning, named Barack Obama, in tomorrow's Presidential Inaugaration.

If you doubt this, do fifteen minutes of research and you will see what you should have known before Soros manipulated you into voting for his puppet, Obama.

And if you think that this is just hearsay, just another radical conservative voice, consider this: RightHooks investigative team has learned that Senator Obama was calling George Soros every day for a significant period of time in 2008.

I hope you re-read that. In case you didn't, let me say it again, Senator Barack Obama made personal telephone calls to George Soros EVERY DAY over a significant period of time during his 2008 presidential campaign.*

If this doesn't shake you to your roots, you have no roots, and it also means that you didn't read all of discoverthenetworks' bio on George Soros. So now would be a good time to understand exactly who Mr. Soros is so that you can understand what a significant piece of information this is.

For what on earth would possess a man running for President of the United States of America to make daily, private, personal calls to openly subversive, anti-American, treasonous traitors like George Soros? Unless he was in Soros' pocket.

Furthermore, not only did Soros give Obama daily advice and direction, but Soros also told associates to pull money from their banks because something was going to happen to the banks*...this was in the summer of 2008.

How did Soros know this unless it was he and his fellow elite-stooges pulled the strings to facilitate such a collapse? Certainly there was evidence of such an economic attack which was briefly reported and appeared here in Righthooks, but Soros' other child, the mainstream media, never uttered a word about such a conspiracy.

And why would Soros manipulate the market to crash in his 'October Surprise' unless it was to create the impression that the Republicans caused the meltdown, thus strengthening Obama's hand?

Well, let's let George Soros answer that question for himself; as outlined in the above-named bio, Soros said in a 2003 interview that he "declared that derailing the President's reelection bid in 2004 "is the central focus of my life ... a matter of life and death." "America under Bush," he said, "is a danger to the world, and I'm willing to put my money where my mouth is." "

And when Soros lost the 2004 election, how do you suppose such a defeat made him feel? Do you think he might have had some money left over? Do you think he might have had strong motivations to get involved in the 2008 election? Well, if you do, where do you think he put his money and efforts?

All of this you can find out for yourself if you look. But if you want to remain blind, by all means, do so; just don't wonder where your country went when you wake up one day and see that it has CHANGED, for that's what you voted for. Because if you voted for Barack Obama, you voted for George Soros to be the most powerful man in the world.

*Such information comes directly from the mouth of one who was a witness to these things inside the very home of George Soros in Long Island,NY, and has been uncovered by Righthooks. The unnamed witness saw/heard Obama's daily phone calls to Soros as well as heard Soros tell his associates to take their money out of the banks. Righthooks occassionally uses sarcasm and satire to make a point in some posts, but this post is not an attempt at sarcasm or satire; RightHooks firmly and confidently stands behind the statements by the witness, as to what the witness saw and heard, as being absolutely and unequivocaly true.

And guess what? We're there..

Obamination: Peace: Hillary Clinton Spews Feces

The news stories about Clinton's insane remarks about the 'mid east conflict" center on Obamination's frustration. It becomes obvious that the primary focus of their frustration and rage is Israel's refusal to extend the construction moratorium.  That is all about kicking  & back stabbing Israel while pretending to stroke and support her.

Full text link to the remarks.  Video Link.

The secretary of State spoke at the  seventh annual forum of the Brookings Institution's Saban Center for Middle East Policy. One news article described the speech as "lengthy".  The video indicates a run time of 33:10.  I find the rant to be insane, dishonest & redundant, a target rich environment  I have selected some of the more pungent clumps of feces to kick, for the full context, use the link provided above.

..."we are here discussing tonight – strengthening U.S.-Israeli relations and securing a just and lasting peace in the Middle East."

relationship

    The relationship between America and Israel has been one of treachery & enmity ever since Shrub went back on his wiser word and devised the Road Map to Hell.  We need to tear down that relationship and start over. Two sovereign nations, supposedly allies, should not be attempting to dictate to or dominate each other. There should be mutual respect, not condescension.

just & lasting peace

    Peace imposed by aggressive conquest is not a just peace. Peace resulting from appeasing an aggressor is neither just nor lasting. A just peace can only result from a decision of victory for the victim, not for the aggressor. Lasting peace can only result from breaking the aggressor's will & capacity to launch repeated conquests.  In the case of Islam, lasting peace can only come from extinction.  Now is the time to dig in with our pitch fork, remove the feces, and expose the core of the conflict.

• Allah commanded the Muslims to wage war against Jews.
  
  • 9:29 Make war upon such of those to whom the Scriptures have been given as believe not in God, or in the last day, and who forbid not that which God and His Apostle have forbidden, and who profess not the profession of the truth, until they pay tribute out of hand, and they be humbled.
• Moe confirmed the order.
  
  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 196:
    Narrated Abu Huraira:
    Allah 's Apostle said, " I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,' and whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,' his life and property will be saved by me except for Islamic law, and his accounts will be with Allah, (either to punish him or to forgive him.)" 
• Moe expressed his preference for the conquest of the Levant.
  
  • Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2477
    Narrated Ibn Hawalah:

        The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: It will turn out that you will be armed troops, one is Syria, one in the Yemen and one in Iraq. Ibn Hawalah said: Choose for me, Apostle of Allah, if I reach that time. He replied: Go to Syria, for it is Allah's chosen land, to which his best servants will be gathered but if you are unwilling, go to your Yemen, and draw water from your tanks, for Allah has on my account taken special charge of Syria and its people.

• The gates of Paradise will not swing open for Muslims until they hunt down and kill the last Jew.
  
  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 177:
        Narrated Abu Huraira:

        Allah's Apostle said, "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him."

• Allah gave the command, Moe confirmed it, Umar carried it out.
  
  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 53, Number 386:
    Narrated Jubair bin Haiya:
    'Umar sent the Muslims to the great countries to fight the pagans. ...
• Allah will always send someone to harass the Jews.
  
  • 7:167. And (remember) when your Lord declared that He would certainly keep on sending against them (i.e. the Jews), till the Day of Resurrection, those who would afflict them with a humiliating torment. Verily, your Lord is Quick in Retribution (for the disobedient, wicked) and certainly He is Oft­Forgiving, Most Merciful (for the obedient and those who beg Allâh's Forgiveness).
• Jesus will return to help them finish the job.
  • Sunan Abu Dawud 37.4310: ...He will fight the people for the cause of Islam. He will break the cross, kill swine, and abolish jizyah. Allah will perish all religions except Islam....
  • Eternal Humiliation placed on the Jews [Tafsir Ibn Kathir] ...In the future, the Jews will support the Dajjal (False Messiah); and the Muslims, along with `Isa, son of Mary, will kill the Jews....
• Allah will give the land to Muslims, through conquests, his decision is irreversible.
  
  • 13:41. See they not that We gradually reduce the land (of disbelievers, by giving it to the believers, in war victories) from its outlying borders. And Allâh judges, there is none to put back His Judgement and He is Swift at reckoning.
• If a reversal occurs, the Muslims must reconquer the land. 
  • 2:191. And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah is worse than killing. And fight not with them at Al-Masjid-al-Harâm (the sanctuary at Makkah), unless they (first) fight you there. But if they attack you, then kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers.
• Allah promised a 2: 1 kill ratio.
  
  • 8:66. Now Allâh has lightened your (task), for He knows that there is weakness in you. So if there are of you a hundred steadfast persons, they shall overcome two hundred, and if there are a thousand of you, they shall overcome two thousand with the Leave of Allâh. And Allâh is with As-Sâbirin (the patient ones, etc.). 
• Allah gave the Muslims "good news" !
  
  • The Good News that Muslims will Dominate the People of the Book  [Tafsir Ibn Kathir]
    "While delivering the good news to His believing servants that victory and dominance will be theirs against the disbelieving, atheistic People of the Scriptures, Allah then said, (They will do you no harm, barring a trifling annoyance; and if they fight against you, they will show you their backs, and they will not be helped.) ﴿3:111

Islam is the "obstacle to peace"!

    The first fact which must be faced is Allah's command, with Moe's confirmation. Then there is his special interest in the Levant, his predictions, his promises and his good news. The restoration of the state of Israel contradicts and disproves Allah's promise & good news. It proves Allah to be an impotent idol, the ultimate blasphemy. Muslims can never tolerate that. 

    There was no peace, there is no peace and there will be no peace while there are Muslims alive on this planet. It ain't possible!  Anyone who tells you otherwise is a fool, a liar or both.  

    The damnable doctrines of Islam, not settlements, not Jerusalem, not "refugees", not "occupation";  Islam is the "obstacle to peace"!  In Islam, peace is what happens when Dar ul-Islam engulfs Dar ul-Harb through conquest. Peace comes with conquest.  Until the conquest is completed, there is "fitna". I do not expect that I will ever hear any politician acknowledge this fatal fact.

I want to focus tonight on the way forward, on America’s continuing engagement in helping the parties achieve a two-state solution that ends the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians once and for all, and on what it will take, finally, to realize that elusive, but essential goal.

two-state solution

    Eliminating Islam is the solution. There is no other just solution.  Creating another terrorist state entity will make the problem worse, not solve it. Muslims do not want a state, they want a single nation of Islam, on a global scale: the caliphate.

ends the conflict permanently

    The conflict is existential: While the nation of Israel exists; while one Jew lives, Believers must wage war, that is their role in life. When Israel and Jews are eliminated, they will concentrate on conquering  us.  Politicians can not acknowledge the fact that Islam is the source of conflict.

The United States will always be there when Israel is threatened.

when Israel is threatened

    Israel is always threatened, that is the constant. It is not possible for Muslims to cease threatening and attacking Israel.

We have also stepped up efforts to block the transfer of dangerous weapons and financing to terrorist groups like Hezbollah and Hamas. But Iran and its proxies are not the only threat to regional stability or to Israel’s long-term security. The conflict between Israel and the Palestinians and between Israel and Arab neighbors is a source of tension and an obstacle to prosperity and opportunity for all the people of the region. It denies the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people and it poses a threat to Israel’s future security. It is at odds also with the interests of the United States.

terrorist groups

    Islam is the terrorist group "terrorist groups" are composed of believers. Only those who wage war are believers, its what Islam is; what Muslims do.

Iran and its proxies

    "Its Islam, stgupid." Iran, Hamas & Hezbollah are Muslims. Terrorism: what Islam is; what Muslims do. Moe is their role model, he was a terrorist.

legitimate aspirations

    Since when are regional & global conquest "legitimate aspirations"?  There is nothing legitimate about genocide & politicide. They do not give a damn about statehood; they need to eliminate Israel as a stepping stone to continued and expanding conquest.

conflict between Israel

and the Palestinians

    That is a code phrase for Israel's resistance to reconquest. If Israel would just surrender, the whole problem would be solved.

I know that improvements in security and growing prosperity have convinced some that this conflict can be waited out or largely ignored. This view is wrong and it is dangerous. The long-term population trends that result from the occupation are endangering the Zionist vision of a Jewish and democratic state in the historic homeland of the Jewish people. Israelis should not have to choose between preserving both elements of their dream. But that day is approaching.

the occupation

    In the seventh century, Umar conquered the Roman Province of Syria. Muslims invaded and occupied Israel. Barack Hussein Obama & Hillary Clinton can't get a clue. The 'occupation' & 'settlements' they bitterly kvetch about are smokescreens that prevent us from perceiving the real  illegal occupation & settlements.

Jewish homeland

    Is there any good reason why Jews should not return to their ancient patrimony?  England conquered it from the Ottoman Empire which was one of the aggressors in the first world war.  She promised to return it to its rightful heirs and reneged, giving 75% of it to the Hashemites  driven from the Hijaz by Saud, as a consolation prize.  In the 1948 war, Egypt & Jordan illegally seized Gaza, Judea & Samaria.  When they renewed their genocidal assault in 1967, Israel won them back.  There is no good reason why Israel should not annex and settle that land There is no good reason  why Israel should surrender it or why it should be judenrein!   

At the same time, the ever-evolving technology of war, especially the expanding reach of the rockets amassed on Israel’s borders means that it will be increasingly difficult to guarantee the security of Israeli families throughout the country without implementing peace agreements that answer these threats.

peace agreements

    Conceited, arrogant fools imagine that peace is made by agreements. Peace is made by victory, not by agreements!  In an existential conflict, there can be no peace while the aggressor exists. Muslims are bound by a religious  obligation to exterminate Israel. They can not get into Paradise until they finish that task. Get a clue!

    Muslims do not make peace agreements, they make hudna, which last no more than ten years, and can be abrogated as soon as the Muslims recover sufficient strength to resume aggression.  They are commanded not to be weak and "ask not for peace" while they have the upper hand.

"Radicalization of the region’s young people and growing support for violent ideologies undermine the stability and prosperity of the Middle East."

Radicalization

    Radicals & extremists are imaginary creatures, they do not exist. Islam consists of believers.  To discover what believers are and what they do, read 9:111 & 49:15.

..."ending this conflict once and for all and achieving a comprehensive regional peace is imperative for safeguarding Israelis’ future."

ending this conflict once and for all

    A single kernel of truth in a massive pile of feces.

"We also look at our friends the Palestinians, and we remember the painful history of a people who have never had a state of their own, and we are renewed in our determination to help them finally realize their legitimate aspirations. The lack of peace and the occupation that began in 1967 continue to deprive the Palestinian people of dignity and self-determination. This is unacceptable, and, ultimately, it too is unsustainable."

our friends

    Israel is our friend, we should be theirs.  Falestinians are our enemies, not our friends.

state of their own

    Some of them had Egypt, others had Jordan,  Iraq or Yemen.    They occupied Israel; they have no right to it..   

..."bring a just, lasting, and comprehensive peace to the Middle East based on two states for two peoples."

two states for two peoples.

    Israel and the Hashemite Kingdom of Trans-Jordan; what did that solve? What will the creation of another Falestinian state solve? What is the difference between the Falestinians and the majority  in Jordan?

...:their respective aspirations; for the Israelis, security and recognition; for the Palestinians, an independent, viable sovereign state of their own."

aspirations

1. Reconquest of Israel.
2. Global conquest. 

"There is no alternative other than reaching mutual agreement."

no alternative

    There is no alternative to victory!

..."they have not yet made the difficult decisions that peace requires."

difficult decisions

1. Abandon  Islam.
2. Abandon Jihad.
3. Recognize Israel's right to exist.

..."moving forward with refocused goals and expectations."

refocused goals and expectations

    Forcing Israel to commit suicide.

"It is time to grapple with the core issues of the conflict on borders and security; settlements, water and refugees; and on Jerusalem itself"

core issues

    Islam, jihad, genocide, terrorism.  There are no other issues.

borders

    Israel's borders with Jordan & Egypt, Lebanon & Syria.

security

    Eliminate Islam from a circle whose center is Jerusalem and whose radius is the longest rocket range.

settlements

    Remove the Muslim settlements from Israel.

refugees

    Resettle them in the Arab countries their ancestors left when they occupied Israel.

..."continue to urge the states of the region to develop the content of the Arab Peace Initiative and to work toward implementing its vision."

Arab Peace Initiative

    Reconquest of Israel followed by the rest of the world. 

"Significantly, both sides decided together to pursue a framework agreement that would establish the fundamental compromises on all permanent status issues and pave the way for a final peace treaty."

decided together

    Abbas never took the first step toward that objective, he dragged his feet all the way.

..."the parties can begin to rebuild confidence, demonstrate their seriousness, and hopefully find enough common ground on which to eventually re-launch direct negotiations and achieve that framework."

rebuild confidence

    That sentence is full of  code phrases  for "surrender first, then we can talk about the terms".

"The Palestinian leaders must be able to show their people that the occupation will be over."

occupation will be over

    The occupation will be over when the Arabs go home. When will they leave Israel?

"Israeli leaders must be able to offer their people internationally recognized borders that protect Israel’s security."

borders

    Borders  do not stop rockets, mortars, artillery shells or homicide bombers, regardless of international recognition.  When Israel built a wall to protect her citizens, the whole world condemned it.

"Second, on refugees. This is a difficult and emotional issue, but there must be a just and permanent solution that meets the needs of both sides."

refugees

    Arab leaders told them to evacuate, clearing the way for their armies to exterminate the Jews. They failed. That's tough. You lost, get over it and go home to Egypt and Jordan, where you belong.

"The position of the United States on settlements has not changed and will not change. Like every American administration for decades, we do not accept the legitimacy of continued settlement activity. We believe their continued expansion is corrosive not only to peace efforts and two-state solution, but to Israel’s future itself."

settlements

    For what good reason should Jews not live where their ancestors lived before Rome expelled them from their homeland?  For what good reason should Jews not live in Hebron, where their ancestors are buried?   Why should any part of the world be judenrein?  

"And finally, on Jerusalem which is profoundly important for Jews, Muslims, and Christians everywhere. There will surely be no peace without an agreement on this, the most sensitive of all the issues. The religious interests of people of all faiths around the world must be respected and protected. We believe that through good faith negotiations, the parties should mutually agree on an outcome that realizes the aspirations for both parties, for Jerusalem, and safeguard its status for people around the world."

Jerusalem

    Why should Jews not live in the city King David built up, where King Solomon built the  Temple?  In 1948, when King Hussein illegally seized half the city, he promised to allow access. He violated that vow, excluding Jews, desecrating synagogues & cemeteries. Why should that  injustice be repeated??

religious interests

    What religious interest?  Moe had a nightmare in which he rode a flying mule with the face of a woman from Medina to Jerusalem and from there to Paradise where he met the Prophets.  The Jews had Jerusalem as their capital city and built their Temple there. Jesus was crucified there. How does Moe's dream match those interests and connections??

..."maintaining pressure on Hamas to end the weapons smuggling and accept the fundamental principles of peacemaking – recognizing Israel, renouncing violence, and abiding by past agreements. This is the only path to achieve Palestinians’ dreams of independence."

pressure on Hamas

    What pressure?  Who ever stopped or even  slowed their rearmament?  Yeah, right, and Res 1701 would prevent Hexbollah from rearming.

recognizing Israel

    What makes any fool think that will ever happen? Hamas is Islam. Islam is Hamas. Islam is a religious obligation to exterminate Jews and conquer the world.  Has Hillary ever considered reading the Charter of Hamas?

renouncing violence

    You might as well demand that they renounce Islam!

past agreements

    Arafat made an agreement, and never implemented any of its provisions.  Hamas never made any agreement with Israel, what fool expects them to abide by the Oslo Accords?

"As the Palestinian security forces continue to become more professional and capable, we look to Israel to facilitate their efforts." ... "And we hope to see a significant curtailment of incursions by Israeli troops into Palestinian areas."

Palestinian security forces

    The grand scheme was that they would stop terror attacks. Instead of stopping  attacks, they participate in them.  Israel has to send troops in to arrest terrorists because the "security forces"  won't do it. They are not professional nor capable, neither are they willing. 

"The legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people will never be satisfied, and Israel will never enjoy secure and recognized borders until there is a two-state solution that ensures dignity, justice, and security for all."

legitimate aspirations

    Hillary has studied from Paul Joseph Goebbels, who said that a lie would be believed if repeated  with sufficient frequency. The sentence is redundant, and full of excrement.

"The United States and the international community cannot impose a solution. Sometimes I think both parties seem to think we can. We cannot. And even if we could, we would not, because it is only a negotiated agreement between the parties that will be sustainable. The parties themselves have to want it."

parties must want peace

    "From the river to the sea."  "A million martyrs marching to Jerusalem!"  Yeah, right, they want peace; give it to them!  How many MOABs would it take?

"Palestinians must appreciate Israel’s legitimate security concerns  And Israelis must accept the legitimate territorial aspirations of the Palestinian people."

legitimate territorial aspirations

    What is legitimate about "from the river to the sea"?  

"They should help build confidence, work to minimize distractions, and focus on the core questions, even in a period when they are not talking directly."

build confidence

    I already dissected that  crap; the sentence is redundant, an attempt to  summarize a manure pile.

"Across the Middle East, moderates and advocates of peace and coexistence will be strengthened, while old arguments will be drained of their venom and the rejectionists and extremists will be exposed and marginalized."

rejectionists and extremists

    What was it the Arab League said? No recognition, no peace, no negotiation?   Islam's deity commanded perpetual warfare; its Profit exemplified it, along with terrorism and genocide. Moe was the founder of Islam, not an extremist.  Genocidal jihad  is the core of Islam, it is not extremism!

    Those arrogant Harvard lawyers are so narcissistic  that they  believe they can simultaneously promise polar opposites to Arabs & Jews without anyone wising up.  Let this be a lesson to you in the 2012 election cycle. Be careful when voting and make no mistakes.

H.R. Clinton: Free Speech

Remarks on the Human Rights Agenda for the 21st Century


Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State
Georgetown University's Gaston Hall
Washington, DC
December 14, 2009

In our first session, we cosponsored the successful resolution on Freedom of Expression, a forceful declaration of principle at a time when that freedom is jeopardized by new efforts to constrain religious practice, including recently in Switzerland, and by efforts to criminalize the defamation of religion – a false solution which exchanges one wrong for another. And in the United Nations Security Council, I was privileged to chair the September session where we passed a resolution mandating protections against sexual violence in armed conflict.

The Secretary of State packed three lies into the single sentence quoted above.

1. The cited resolution is not a forceful declaration of principle. While it is acclaimed as a rejection of the concept of 'defamation of religion', it embraces 'negative stereotyping' as a grounds for outlawing expression, a distinction without a difference. The clear intention is to make criticism of Islam a criminal offense.
2. The Swiss ban on minaret construction does not impair practice, it outlaws erection of a symbol of supremacism. I find no mention of minarets in the Hilali & Khan Noble Qur'an translation. I find no reference to the construction of minarets in the four top hadith collections & Ibn Kathir's Tafsir except to the rebuilding of one destroyed by fire.
3. There is no wrong to exchange; declaration of the fact that Muhammad, founder of Islam, was a terrorist is not wrong, neither is it an act which should be criminalized. While the Motoons exaggerate, they expose reality. Exposing the violent verses of the Qur'an is not wrong, it is an an exposure of intrinsic evil, as in the case of Geert Wilders' documentary, Fitna. There is no justification for outlawing Fitna and the Motoons. Unlike Islamic scripture, they neither inculcate hatred nor incite violence. The riots which followed publication of the Motoons were incited by incendiary sermons at Juma Salat, not by the Motoons.

Religious Freedom Report: Suicidal Orwellianism

Remarks on the Release of the 2009 Annual Report on International Religious Freedom
2009 Report on International Religious Freedom.

Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State
Washington, DC
October 26, 2009

The right to profess, practice, and promote one’s religious beliefs is a founding principle of our nation.

It is the first liberty mentioned in our Bill of Rights, and it is a freedom guaranteed to all people in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

Our founders made an understandable oversight, relying on the traditional acceptance of institutions popularly considered to be religions, perhaps because they did not anticipate the development of modern transportation with its resultant increase in immigration which brought Islam to the West.

Unfortunately, Islam does not fit the pattern for two reasons. First, it is a war cult, not a legitimate religion, being founded for a mercenary mission. Second, it is intolerant and violent, denying others the tolerance and respect it demands from them.

The practice of Islam involves Jihad, and Jihad involves terrorism & genocide. How can that be tolerated?

We commend Jordan’s role in initiating the common word dialogue...

The Common Word Between Us and You, a missive from the Ulema to Pope Benedict XVI, is a pious fraud. Christianity and Islam have nothing in common except what Islam plagiarized from Judaism & Christianity,

These important efforts build on the shared values and common concerns of faith communities to sow the seeds of lasting peace.

Christianity values life and peace. Islam values war and death. We have no shared values.

Now, some claim that the best way to protect the freedom of religion is to implement so-called anti-defamation policies that would restrict freedom of expression and the freedom of religion. I strongly disagree. The United States will always seek to counter negative stereotypes of individuals based on their religion and will stand against discrimination and persecution.

Anti-defamation policies have nothing to do with protecting freedom of religion. Their purpose is to protect Islam from truthful criticism. The OIC and their allies are complaining of and campaigning for the criminalization of "negative stereotyping of religions", particularly association of terrorism with Islam.

But an individual’s ability to practice his or her religion has no bearing on others’ freedom of speech. The protection of speech about religion is particularly important since persons of different faiths will inevitably hold divergent views on religious questions. These differences should be met with tolerance, not with the suppression of discourse.

The proper practice of Islam involves warfare for the purpose of making it dominant. Islam perceives our freedom of expression as an impairment of their demonic duty to enforce Islamic law, which prescribes the death penalty for any negative expression about Allah, Muhammad and their doctrines & practices.

Based on our own experience, we are convinced that the best antidote to intolerance is not the defamation of religion’s approach of banning and punishing offensive speech, but rather, a combination of robust legal protections against discrimination and hate crimes, proactive government outreach to minority religious groups, and the vigorous defense of both freedom of religion and expression.

In its practical implementation, "proactive government outreach to minority religious groups" means appeasement of Islam.

So it is our hope that the International Religious Freedom Report will encourage existing religious freedom movements around the world and promote dialogue among governments and within societies on how best to accommodate religious communities and protect each individual’s right to believe or not believe, as that individual sees fit.

If the Secretary would read Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387, she might learn that only Muslims have rights. How can we have rights when our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims?


The secretary called on Assistant Secretary Michael Posner to elaborate further on the report

Briefing on the Release of the 2009 Annual Report on International Religious Freedom


Michael H. Posner
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor

QUESTION: Can I ask – the Secretary was quite strong in her comments about the defamation laws that – U.S. opposition to – well, perhaps not defamation laws, but I think this refers to something at the Human Rights Council. Is that – that’s correct? Can you elaborate a little bit more on that? And I thought it was sufficiently watered down or defeated that – and that that met your concerns.

ASSISTANT SECRETARY POSNER: There are really two separate issues that have been raised and sometimes conflated at the United Nations. I was part of the delegation last month at the Human Rights Council, where we actually joined with Egypt in promoting a resolution on freedom of expression that did, in fact, meet our concerns. There was a debate in the context of that about how to deal with issues of defamation, and we agreed after much negotiation, much discussion, that there is a legitimate subject as to whether or not an individual, an individual of any particular faith, can be defamed and whether that kind of harassment or discrimination is to be condemned. It clearly is.

Assistant Secretary Posner wants us to believe that the concept of defamation was excluded from the recently passed Freedom of Opinion and Expression Resolution. Like most politicians, his words are deceptive. The concept is present, slightly disguised. [Emphasis added.]

6. Recognizes the positive contribution that the exercise of the right to freedom of expression, particularly by the media, including through information and communication technologies such as the Internet, and full respect for the freedom to seek, receive and impart information, can make to the fight against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance and to preventing human rights abuses, but expresses regret about the promotion by certain media of false images and negative stereotypes of vulnerable individuals or groups of individuals, and about the use of information and communication technologies such as the Internet for purposes contrary to respect for human rights, in particular the perpetration of violence against and exploitation and abuse of women and children and disseminating racist and xenophobic discourse or content;

"Related intolerance" is a code phrase for "Islamophobia", which is a code word for any negative expression about Islam, which is considered defamation. "false images and negative stereotypes" and "racist" are codes for criticism of Islam. If you have been reading my posts, you know that those codes refer to the Danish Cartoons and Fitna, the short video documentary by Geert Wilders. See You've Been Mooned for the proof.

There’s a second resolution that was promoted – that’s been promoted by the Islamic Conference at the UN, which is a broader defamation of religion resolution. It’s being debated, in fact, in one form right now. And it goes, we think, too far in restricting free speech – the notion that a religion can be defamed and that any comments that are negative about that religion can constitute a violation of human rights, to us, violates the core principle of free speech which is so central to us in our own system.

There is one little detail he does not tell us: that other forum is working on a protocol to ICERD, which will be enforcible international law, not a non-binding resolution. .

When asked about misogyny, whether it was of religious origin:

ASSISTANT SECRETARY POSNER: No, I reject that. I think the major religions of the world are all predicated based on assumptions of humanity and ethical behavior. The fact that people take a kind of extreme view and interpret religions in a way that promotes violence and discrimination, I think, is an aberration. That’s part of the purpose of this report. I think we are all mindful of the fact that people of deep faith throughout the world are driven by and motivated by their religious beliefs. We want to encourage that. And we want to discourage people who misuse that faith in a way that’s going to undermine basic human rights.

He thinks that all major religions are predicated on humanity and ethical behavior. He thinks that extremists interpret Islam in a way that promotes violence and discrimination, which are abberations. Does he actually know anything about Islam? I doubt it. In Islam, women are chatle property, literally fields to be plowed. Muslims have Allah's permission to beat their wives. Women are inferior in intelligence and religion.

Violence and discrimination are also intrinsic and foundational. Mr. Posner would know that if he had read Book O of Reliance of the Traveller.

Introduction

First, religious freedom is the birthright of all people, regardless of their faith or lack thereof. Enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international instruments, the freedom to profess, practice, and propagate one's faith must be respected by all societies and governments. The United States takes this obligation seriously. "America will always stand," the President said in his Ramadan message to Muslims, "for the universal rights of all people to speak their mind, practice their religion, contribute fully to society, and have confidence in the rule of law."

There is an absolute right to profess, practice and propagate, regardless of the substance of the faith; its doctrines and practices. If the doctrines include supremacism & triumphalism and the practices include conquest, genocide & terrorism, that's ok with our Department of State. It ain't ok with me; is it with you? What they did in Beslan and are doing in Darfur is foundational to Islam. It is intrinsic and inseverable; impossible to reform. Who gives a damn? Certainly not our government.

Al-Anfal 39 commands warfare against pagans until resistance ceases and only Allah is worshiped on a global scale. Al Anfal 12 declares that Allah will cast terror and orders Muslims to decapitate their victims and cut off their fingers and toes. Al-Anfal 60 orders Muslims to build armies and stock up on weapons with which to terrify their enemies. Al-Anfal 67 informs us that while Moe wanted ransom money, Allah prefers great slaughter. At-Taubah 29 commands Muslims to make war on Christians & Jews until they are subjugated and extorted. Moe confirmed the order by declaring that he was ordered to fight with men until they became Muslims and that their blood and property were not sacred to Muslims until they did so. Those doctrines are foundational to Islam [3:7], can't be abandoned and can't be changed.

By expressing agreement with the false concept of an absolute right to Jihad, our Federal Government is engaging in civilizational suicide.
Executive Summary

`Multilateral, Global, and Regional Challenges to Religious Freedom

In addition to these country-by-country concerns, the wide spectrum of efforts to undermine the right to religious freedom extends to multilateral, regional, and global fora. For instance, over the past decade, the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), an inter-governmental organization comprising 57 states with majority or significant Muslim populations, has worked through the United Nations (UN) to advance the concept of "defamation of religions" by introducing annual resolutions on this subject at the UN Human Rights Council and UN General Assembly. While the United States deplores actions that exhibit disrespect for particular religious traditions, including Islam, we do not agree with the "defamation of religions" concept because it is inconsistent with the freedoms of religion and expression.

"While the United States deplores actions that exhibit disrespect for particular religious traditions, including Islam"; then the United States deplores this blog post. because it tells the truth about Islam. Since when is truth defamatory? What is wrong; deplorable about naming and shaming the enemy?

The United States understands the primary concern of the resolution to be the negative stereotyping of members of religious groups, particularly minority groups, and the contribution of such stereotypes to disrespect and discrimination. The United States shares concerns about the impact of negative stereotypes and believes that such stereotyping, particularly when promoted by community, religious, or government leaders, contributes to disrespect, discrimination, and in some cases, to violence. The United States, however, believes the best way for governments to address these issues is to develop robust legal regimes to address acts of discrimination and bias-inspired crime; to condemn hateful ideology and proactively reach out to all religious communities, especially minority groups; and to defend vigorously the rights of individuals to practice their religion freely and to exercise their freedom of expression.

"The United States shares concerns about the impact of negative stereotypes and believes that such stereotyping, particularly when promoted by community, religious, or government leaders, contributes to disrespect, discrimination, and in some cases, to violence." Jihad, genocide & terrorism are intrinsic sacraments of Islam. That is a fact, not stereotyping. The terror attacks at Beslan, London, Madrid & Washington D.C. were perpetrated by young Muslim Males who shouted "Allahhu Akbar" as they murdered innocent victims. Only a damn fool can tolerate the continued propagation of the damnable doctrines which motivated those men to murder for the promise of eternity in a celestial bordello.

"To condemn hateful ideology"? Why don't they condemn Islam? Don't they know that it curses us and declares perpetual war against us? Don't they know that it declares genocide as a prerequisite to Judgment Day, when they hope to gain admission to the celestial bordello?

"Proactively reach out to all religious communities, especially minority groups"; those are code words for appeasement. A lot of good that foolishness has done Israel in the last 60 years. Are these fools incapable of learning?

With their lips, our Department of State pays lip service to freedom of speech. With their pen, they co-authored a UNHRC resolution which erodes that freedom, while ignoring the composition of a protocol to ICERD which will criminalize all criticism of Islam, effectively nullifying our First Amendment.