Is It Too Early for Obama to Surrender to North Korea?

Time after time we have stated here on RightHooks that the world is an extremely more dangerous place with the weak and appeasing Barack Obama in the White House.

And now North Korea is proving our point.

Fresh off a second nuclear weapons test, which Obama, Pelosi and friends did nothing about, the insane leader of North Korea has declared an end to the truce that was signed in 1953 which stopped the shooting in the Korean War, and has also threatened carnage for anyone who dares intercept and search ships bound for North Korea.

So for 66 years the North Koreans dared not re-engage hostilities with South Korea or the United States, but 127 days into the Obama administration, North Korea now finds it appropriate to defy it's enemies and threaten both South Korea and the United States.

Apparently North Korea also has bought in to 'Change We Can Believe In.'

It is quite obvious, however, that North Korea does not fear Obama and, thus, the United States.

Having watched him surrender to Iran, bow to the king of Saudi Arabia, and work on behalf of terrorists everywhere, even the pea-brain dictator of North Korea could realize that Obama was a threat only to Americans, and not to any one else.

Hence, North Korea has played its hand, daring anyone to try to do anything about their defiance.

Everybody knows that Obama won't, because Obama is a sheep.

So RightHooks, therefore, wonders, is it too early for Obama to surrender to North Korea? Or should he wait a week?