What more evidence is necessary?
We have seen Barack Obama:
1. stop fighting the war on terror
2. give aid and comfort to terrorists
3. propose to get rid of our nuclear arsenal
4. cut spending in important defense projects
5. bankrupt the country
6. nationalize the banks
7. nationalize portions of the automobile industry
8. increase the national debt by trillions of dollars
9. begin to nationalize health care which would destroy it in America
10. bow to foreign kings,
11. schmooze with enemy dictators
12. surrender to Iran and North Korea by failing to take a strong stance against their aggression
13. betray Israel
14. attempt to give the land which God gave to Israel to the terrorist Palestinians
15. intimidate and threaten dissenters
16. cheat to get elected
17. stop indictments against ACORN
18. call Christians, conservatives, soldiers and anti-abortion people terrorists
19. totally misrepresent what is in the American people's interest
20. make the world a more dangerous place by not being strong against evil
21. snuggling up to our Muslim enemies with his policies
22. attemtping to silence the voice of dissent via radio talk show censureship
23. disrespect leaders of our long-time allies, Great Britiain and Israel
24. allowing North Korea to repeatedly expand it's war-time capabilities
25. attempting to take control of the internet and put conservatives on a watch list
What we have here is extreme, gross abuse of power.
What we have here is a man working to usurp and overthrow the United States Constitution, surrender our sovereignty, and re-make this nation into a mediocre European-style misery-pit. Which will then be an easy target fot the Islamic conquest which dances with him now because they understand that every action is weakening us, it's sworn enemy.
Barack Obama is commiting egregious acts of treason; he is a blatant enemy of the United States Constitution which, ironically, he has sworn to protect and defend. He is a domestic enemy of the Constitution and our military is sworn to confront such threats.
May some military commander, unit or soldier have the fortitude to do so before Obama ruins this country with his "Change (read: Dictatorial Revolution and Overthrow of the American people.)
It is time for the military to step in and confront this domestic enemy of the Constitution, as they too are sworn to do, to protect the American people from this rogue usurper.
Look around you...there is evidence everywhere of this Revolution against America. Wake up, you can see it.
It is time to stop the madness and save our country from the blatant overthrow which is occurring in huge steps this very moment.
May our military, those sworn to do such and with the autohrity to do so, seize and hold accountable the one who is forsaking our principles, interests, economy, values and way of life and our security for his own selfish, twisted ambitions. And may they thwart and overthrow the one who's Change Revolution is overthrowing this country.
Saturday, May 30, 2009
Obama Throws Israel Under the Bus
During his election campaign, Senator Barack Obama said that he was a friend of Israel and a supporter. Many were skeptical of those words based on Obama's allegiance to Muslims.
Recently Obama revealed his true colors when he told Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas that the United States foresees a creation of a Palestinian State with Jerusalem as its capital because this was in the American national and secutiry interest.
He also informed Abbas he would not let Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu "get in the way" of normalizing U.S. relations with the Arab and greater Muslim world.
"We were told from this new administration they will not allow a Netanyahu government to hurt their efforts of rehabilitating U.S. relations with the Arab and Islamic world, which is a high priority of Obama," an official said, speaking during a visit to Cairo.
Even more disturningly, a Palestinan official that the Obama administration told the PA that Jerusalem will never be united under Israeli sovereignty.
"Americans said an open Jerusalem – yes. But a united Jerusalem under Israeli sovereignty – no," Hatem Abdel Khader, the PA's minister for Jerusalem affairs, said.
Khader claimed the U.S. is cooperating with the PA to "thwart Israel's plans in Jerusalem."
(See the rest at WorldNet Daily)
Recently Obama revealed his true colors when he told Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas that the United States foresees a creation of a Palestinian State with Jerusalem as its capital because this was in the American national and secutiry interest.
He also informed Abbas he would not let Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu "get in the way" of normalizing U.S. relations with the Arab and greater Muslim world.
"We were told from this new administration they will not allow a Netanyahu government to hurt their efforts of rehabilitating U.S. relations with the Arab and Islamic world, which is a high priority of Obama," an official said, speaking during a visit to Cairo.
Even more disturningly, a Palestinan official that the Obama administration told the PA that Jerusalem will never be united under Israeli sovereignty.
"Americans said an open Jerusalem – yes. But a united Jerusalem under Israeli sovereignty – no," Hatem Abdel Khader, the PA's minister for Jerusalem affairs, said.
Khader claimed the U.S. is cooperating with the PA to "thwart Israel's plans in Jerusalem."
(See the rest at WorldNet Daily)
Friday, May 29, 2009
The Latest Czar to Regulate Far More than Cars
TSUNAMI MEDIA ALERTMay 29, 2009 The Latest Czar to Regulate Far More than Cars www.WAMAction.orgA long-forecast and dreaded announcement came this morning from the head of the "Change" Administration himself.The astonishing sequence of end-runs, by the "Change" Adminisitration - around traditional and critical structures whichpreserve the U.S. Constitution- and its balance of powers - seems about to take its greatest toll to date. The protections providedby the 3 American branches of government have continued to erode via Obama's unprecedented installation of "Czars" - i,e, politically hand-picked individuals who are given enormous powers over free enterprise - and whom report directly to the Chief Excutive himself. This newly invented system for expanding Executive branch authority, among its other dangers, eliminates the need for Congressional approval or involvement with these power-packed new authority figures. It also short circuits CapitolHill oversight of the activities which they undertake.Obama has made public today his plan to take control of the Internet - directly from the White House - on behalf of preserving"cyber-security." This strategy to expand his authority to encroach further on Americans right to privacy - with warrantless supervision of online activity - has been in the works since the Inauguration. The timing of its current announcement holds notable coincidence to the Chief Executive's recent decline in public opinion polls (along with the downhill slide of popularity among his key Congressional leadership (Pelosi, Reid and Dodd.)Former Democratic activists who worked against Obama's nomination are among those most aware of the alarm bells this currentmove to suppress opposition sets off. His online primary campaign, which generated maximum impact via use of high tech applications-is recalled by many for its brutality and vicious conduct against web opponents in 2008. Several reported personal threats while many more indicated repeated disruption of their blogs and large-scale attacks on their forums. Throughout the campaign season, an online army of campaign-paid web thugs were hired for these intrusions, as reported and verified by FOX News. Intimidation, verbal threats, gutter language and even obscene images were the order of the day.Those in the know, then are acutely aware, then, that the "threats to security" listed by this Head of State in his televised speech today ironically coincide with tactics similar to some his own campaign used to get elected. An Obama small-dollar-on-line donor even reported receiving a phone call on his unlisted cell phone to remind him of a "Meet Up" in his own neighborhood - this despite the fact that the donor had not supplied the campaign with either his cell number nor his physical address! At least one Nigerian husband and wife both confessed last year to using their executive positions with international tech corporations to obtain personal records of U.S. citizens for use in harassment by the "Change" campaign.In the meantime, while specifics of the new leader's rationale remain to be seen, it's already foreshadowed they will be as far-reaching as possible. Obama's sweeping statements about the urgent need to protect everything from banking records, to online purchases to information exchange. Rumors have indicated that the NSA is also disturbed that this new report-to-President only position would also circumvent this agency's normal role in cyber-watching. Further evidence of the long-term planning of this eradication of online privacy plan lies in the fact that Senators Rockfeller and Snowe introduced a bill in Congress on April 1st to give the White House these cyber-space powers.One could ask: How does the rest of Congress feel about turning over their responsibility and authority to the Executive Branch?Also, if the right to online privacy is allowed follow the path of warrantless phone wire-tapping what does Big Brother have in mindnext? And lest we wonder who might be put on the Cyber Czar's Watch List, just remember the recent Homeland Security Warningthat "right wing extremists" (ie any citizens identified as"Change administration opponents) are now a grave threat. Even a child could connect quickly connect the dots between that recent DHS Alert and the press conference on cyber-security threats today! it's not hard to guage whose "security" seems to feel most threatened. The only question that remains is how much more terror - against free enterprise and freedom of speech - will We the People permit the "Change" Administration to undertake?!For quick valuable information on other current events, come to Wake Up America Movement at: http://WAMAction.org/NewsRoom.html
Double Double Standard Standard
Is it any wonder that, 'sheep' rhymes with, 'asleep' and, 'not a peep?'
Because when any conservative was ever nominated to the Supreme Court by a Republican president in the last twenty years, there was plenty of 'baa-aaing' by the main stream media. But now that a radical liberal whack, Judge Soto-whatever, has been nominated by radical liberal whack, Barack Obama, there is nary a sound coming from the left-stream media.
The same crowd which nit-picked and assassinated some fine, quality people, ones with actual integrity, now looks the other way as a bigoted, Constitution-mocking, unjust, and liberal political activist is put under the same spot light.
Only when it was a conservative nominee, the media's spotlight became a microscope. Where is the microscope now?
Where are the actual tough questions?
Where are the REAL questions?
Why will a left-stream media reporter or member of Congress NOT HOLD Ms. Soto-whatever TO THE SAME STANDARD that conservative Supreme Court Justice nominees were held to???
Is there any more proof necessary to make it obvious that the liberals and their propaganda wing, the main stream media, have a hypocritical double double standard standard?
Justice Clarence Thomas was crucified by the liberals in Congress and the liberal press. Remember Anita, 'The Thrill,' Hill? Why do you remember everything about that? Because the liberals made such a big deal out of whatever did or did not happen. They scrutinized and sifted everything with fine-tooth combs.
Yet they are completely silent, not a peep, about Judge Soto-whatever's RACIST comments which reveal her disdain for white people!
For the liberal with the double double standard standard, I'll repeat that: Yet they are completely silent, not a peep, about Judge Soto-whatever's RACIST comments which reveal her disdain for white people!
Where is the microscope this time, liberals?
Where is the fairness?
Where is the justice?
Where is the equality?
Where is the racial outrage?
What if a white man had said the exact same thing same about a Hispanic woman that Sonia Sotomayor said about white men? Would you be screaming then?
Of COURSE you would because you have a DOUBLE DOUBLE STANDARD STANDARD!
So we hear not a peep because you are asleep like good little Obama-sheep.
Wednesday, May 27, 2009
Is It Too Early for Obama to Surrender to North Korea?
Time after time we have stated here on RightHooks that the world is an extremely more dangerous place with the weak and appeasing Barack Obama in the White House.
And now North Korea is proving our point.
Fresh off a second nuclear weapons test, which Obama, Pelosi and friends did nothing about, the insane leader of North Korea has declared an end to the truce that was signed in 1953 which stopped the shooting in the Korean War, and has also threatened carnage for anyone who dares intercept and search ships bound for North Korea.
So for 66 years the North Koreans dared not re-engage hostilities with South Korea or the United States, but 127 days into the Obama administration, North Korea now finds it appropriate to defy it's enemies and threaten both South Korea and the United States.
Apparently North Korea also has bought in to 'Change We Can Believe In.'
It is quite obvious, however, that North Korea does not fear Obama and, thus, the United States.
Having watched him surrender to Iran, bow to the king of Saudi Arabia, and work on behalf of terrorists everywhere, even the pea-brain dictator of North Korea could realize that Obama was a threat only to Americans, and not to any one else.
Hence, North Korea has played its hand, daring anyone to try to do anything about their defiance.
Everybody knows that Obama won't, because Obama is a sheep.
So RightHooks, therefore, wonders, is it too early for Obama to surrender to North Korea? Or should he wait a week?
And now North Korea is proving our point.
Fresh off a second nuclear weapons test, which Obama, Pelosi and friends did nothing about, the insane leader of North Korea has declared an end to the truce that was signed in 1953 which stopped the shooting in the Korean War, and has also threatened carnage for anyone who dares intercept and search ships bound for North Korea.
So for 66 years the North Koreans dared not re-engage hostilities with South Korea or the United States, but 127 days into the Obama administration, North Korea now finds it appropriate to defy it's enemies and threaten both South Korea and the United States.
Apparently North Korea also has bought in to 'Change We Can Believe In.'
It is quite obvious, however, that North Korea does not fear Obama and, thus, the United States.
Having watched him surrender to Iran, bow to the king of Saudi Arabia, and work on behalf of terrorists everywhere, even the pea-brain dictator of North Korea could realize that Obama was a threat only to Americans, and not to any one else.
Hence, North Korea has played its hand, daring anyone to try to do anything about their defiance.
Everybody knows that Obama won't, because Obama is a sheep.
So RightHooks, therefore, wonders, is it too early for Obama to surrender to North Korea? Or should he wait a week?
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
Sotomayor Nomination
Judge Sonia Sotomayor has been nominated to succeed Justice Souter on the Supreme Court bench. Already the quotes are flying. Newsmax has embeded video of the arrogant statement about appeals courts making policy. Viewers can hear and see her telling "potential law clerks":
Policy is made by the President, law is made by the Congress and interpreted by the courts. The quoted statement displays both arrogance and an attitude of judicial activism, both of which should militate against this nomination to the Supreme Court.
Issues of racism & sexism may be less directly related to the appointment, but they do reflect upon judicial temperament. The New York Times has an interesting quote and links to an article with more details. At U.C. Berkeley, in '01, Judge Sotomayor said this.
The link above is to the fourth of five pages containing the transcript of the lecture. There is plenty of significant detail bearing on this issue; I encourage you to read it.
In the context of a law scholar's quote, attributed to Justice O'Conor (doubted by Sotomayor), she expresses disagreement with a statement that a wise old man and a wise old woman would come to the same conclusion. This quote comes from the fifth page of the transcript.
The ABA Journal has information about two of Sotomayor's important cases. If you have the motivation and patience to delve into her decisions, visit SCOTUS Blog.
"court of appeals is where policy is made." "And I know — I know this is on tape, and I should never say that because we don’t make law. I know. O.K. I know. I’m not promoting it. I’m not advocating it ...".
Policy is made by the President, law is made by the Congress and interpreted by the courts. The quoted statement displays both arrogance and an attitude of judicial activism, both of which should militate against this nomination to the Supreme Court.
Issues of racism & sexism may be less directly related to the appointment, but they do reflect upon judicial temperament. The New York Times has an interesting quote and links to an article with more details. At U.C. Berkeley, in '01, Judge Sotomayor said this.
"While recognizing the potential effect of individual experiences on perception, Judge Cedarbaum nevertheless believes that judges must transcend their personal sympathies and prejudices and aspire to achieve a greater degree of fairness and integrity based on the reason of law. Although I agree with and attempt to work toward Judge Cedarbaum's aspiration, I wonder whether achieving that goal is possible in all or even in most cases. And I wonder whether by ignoring our differences as women or men of color we do a disservice both to the law and society."The issues of race & gender identity politics is clearly raised. So much for judicial objectivity.
"I further accept that our experiences as women and people of color affect our decisions. The aspiration to impartiality is just that--it's an aspiration because it denies the fact that we are by our experiences making different choices than others. Not all women or people of color, in all or some circumstances or indeed in any particular case or circumstance but enough people of color in enough cases, will make a difference in the process of judging."
The link above is to the fourth of five pages containing the transcript of the lecture. There is plenty of significant detail bearing on this issue; I encourage you to read it.
In the context of a law scholar's quote, attributed to Justice O'Conor (doubted by Sotomayor), she expresses disagreement with a statement that a wise old man and a wise old woman would come to the same conclusion. This quote comes from the fifth page of the transcript.
"Second, I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."With that, Judge Sotomayor threw objectivity out the window and took a firm stand on the race & gender platforms. The last two paragraphs give us a great deal to contemplate, including this.
"I can and do aspire to be greater than the sum total of my experiences but I accept my limitations. I willingly accept that we who judge must not deny the differences resulting from experience and heritage but attempt, as the Supreme Court suggests, continuously to judge when those opinions, sympathies and prejudices are appropriate."At the bottom of each page of the transcript, there is a menu linking to the other pages so that the two links I have furnished above give you access to the entire transcript. I encourage you to read it before advising your Senators how to vote on this nomination.
The ABA Journal has information about two of Sotomayor's important cases. If you have the motivation and patience to delve into her decisions, visit SCOTUS Blog.
Interrogation and Torture: False Equivalence
Jim has commented on Obamination: National Insecurity.
The "waterboarding" performed by convicted Japanese took two forms. One form was similar to that used by the CIA, but had two significant differences. The Japanese continued the treatment until their victim had a belly full of water, then they beat him or stomped his belly. Did the CIA fill Khalid Sheikh Mohammad with water? Did they beat him? Did they stomp him?
The second form involved tieing the victim to a ladder, with his throat up against a rung and his head hanging below the ladder. In that position he was dunked in a tub of water, submerged until he passed out. The victim was then revived and immersed again.
My source for that information is a post at Investor's Hub. In this Times Online article, linked in that forum post, a British officer who survived the water torture describes his experience. If you would like to know more about the torture performed by the Japanese who were convicted and hung, summon up all your intestinal fortitude and click this link.
Critical elements of the Japanese torture are missing from the CIA waterboarding, which was carried out with medical supervision and monitoring and did not involve saturation, beating or other physical injuries.
Jim is comparing interrogation to torture, ignoring the details which differentiate the two practices. It is obvious that he is ignorantly or maliciously repeating enemy propaganda. The moralistic tone of his comment leads me to conclude that he acts out of malice, not ignorance.
If waterboarding is not torture than why did we treat those who did it to our troops as war criminals in WWII? All your reasoning is in fact anti-law and anti-American. I suggest you re-consider your stand on this.
The "waterboarding" performed by convicted Japanese took two forms. One form was similar to that used by the CIA, but had two significant differences. The Japanese continued the treatment until their victim had a belly full of water, then they beat him or stomped his belly. Did the CIA fill Khalid Sheikh Mohammad with water? Did they beat him? Did they stomp him?
The second form involved tieing the victim to a ladder, with his throat up against a rung and his head hanging below the ladder. In that position he was dunked in a tub of water, submerged until he passed out. The victim was then revived and immersed again.
My source for that information is a post at Investor's Hub. In this Times Online article, linked in that forum post, a British officer who survived the water torture describes his experience. If you would like to know more about the torture performed by the Japanese who were convicted and hung, summon up all your intestinal fortitude and click this link.
Critical elements of the Japanese torture are missing from the CIA waterboarding, which was carried out with medical supervision and monitoring and did not involve saturation, beating or other physical injuries.
Jim is comparing interrogation to torture, ignoring the details which differentiate the two practices. It is obvious that he is ignorantly or maliciously repeating enemy propaganda. The moralistic tone of his comment leads me to conclude that he acts out of malice, not ignorance.
Sunday, May 24, 2009
Obamanation: National Insecurity
REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
AT THE UNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY COMMENCEMENT
Two excerpts from that commencement address stand out below the rest; I quote them here.
To witness the difference between a demagogue and a statesman, read the transcript of former Vice President Richard B. Cheney's remarks to the American Enterprise Institute.
AT THE UNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY COMMENCEMENT
Two excerpts from that commencement address stand out below the rest; I quote them here.
Sometimes a con man, in his conceit, will effectively confess his crimes to his victims, firm in the belief that they are too dull to fully comprehend what he is saying. I view that first quote as a prime example of that hubris. President Obama expected that the graduates were too excited and we were too lazy to plumb the depth of his words. The following outline may help you to observe how those words apply to the man who spoke them.
In a culture where so many chase the outward markers of success that can so often lead us astray -- the titles and status, the materialism and money, the fame and popularity -- these Americans have embraced the virtues that we need most right now: self-discipline over self-interest; work over comfort; and character over celebrity.
- outward markers of success
- titles and status
- Senator
- President
- materialism and money
- Presidential salary
- book royalties
- expensive Chicago real estate
- fame and popularity
- character over celebrity
Yesterday I visited the National Archives and the halls that holds our Constitution, our Declaration of Independence, and our Bill of Rights. I went there because, as our national debate on how to deal with the security challenge that we face proceeds, we must remember this enduring truth: The values and ideals in those documents are not simply words written into aging parchment, they are the bedrock of our liberty and our security. We uphold our fundamental principles and values not just because we choose to, but because we swear to; not because they feel good, but because they help keep us safe and keep us true to who we are.
What principle is more fundamental to this nation than individual liberty? What safeguards it more than strict limits on the power of governments? Have we so soon forgotten his egregious remarks about the Constitution's charter of "negative rights" which supposedly prevent the federal government from doing what it should for us?
Because when America strays from our values, it not only undermines the rule of law, it alienates us from our allies, it energizes our adversaries, and it endangers our national security and the lives of our troops. So as Americans, we reject the false choice between our security and our ideals. We can and we must and we will protect both.That last quote packs broad meaning into a few words. Lets take a closer look.
- when America strays from our values
- Waterboarding is torture.
- Enemy combatants are innocent.
- it alienates us from our allies
- it energizes our adversaries
- it endangers our national security and the lives of our troops
- false choice between our security and our ideals
To witness the difference between a demagogue and a statesman, read the transcript of former Vice President Richard B. Cheney's remarks to the American Enterprise Institute.
Thursday, May 21, 2009
Two Flight 93 Memorial Commissioners Quit in Protest
http://errortheory.blogspot.com/2009/05/two-memorial-project-commission-members.html
Two Pennsylvanian’s quit the Flight 93 Memorial Commission last week, protesting Park Service plans to condemn five crash-site properties that it never negotiated for in good faith. Consider the case of the Lambert family, who have been on their land for three generations:
Two Pennsylvanian’s quit the Flight 93 Memorial Commission last week, protesting Park Service plans to condemn five crash-site properties that it never negotiated for in good faith. Consider the case of the Lambert family, who have been on their land for three generations: "It's absolutely a surprise. I'm shocked by it. I'm disappointed by it," said Tim Lambert, who owns nearly 164 acres that his grandfather bought in the 1930s. The park service plans to condemn two parcels totaling about five acres — land, he said, he had always intended to donate for the memorial. "To the best of my knowledge and my lawyer, absolutely no negotiations have taken place with the park service where we've sat down and discussed this," Lambert said. Lambert said he had mainly dealt with the Families of Flight 93 and said he's provided the group all the information it's asked for, including an appraisal.They are condemning land that he was trying to GIVE to them, just because he had the gall to expect the Park Service to actually do its part. Project members have embraced the “absolute moral authority” conceit How dare anyone not rush to give these grieving 9/11 family members whatever they want? Didn’t they hear Maureen Dowd’s proclamation that “the moral authority of parents who bury children killed in Iraq [or on 9/11] is absolute”? When crash-site owner Mike Svonavec put up a donation box to try to cover some of the cost of hiring security guards for the hugely popular Temporary Memorial, Patrick White, cousin of Flight 93 hero Louis Nacke, told the press:
That land has been paid for with 40 lives ... the donation box is an insult to that cost.When Svonavec insisted that the Park Service follow its own legally required procedures for assessing property values (procedures that, as it happens, take into account current property values, not just pre-crash property values), White accused Svonavec of trying to profit from the blood of his cousin:
"I think Svonavec believes his land, because it has the blood of my cousin and 39 other people, it's worth more," he said.Using the flag of victim-hood to defend Paul Murdoch’s terrorist memorial mosque Project members use the same trick to deflect criticism of the giant Islamic-shaped crescent that is now being built on the crash-site. When people point out the hidden terrorist memorializing features—things that no one knew about when the Crescent of Embrace design was chosen—like the Mecca-orientation of the giant crescent, or the 44 glass blocks emplaced along the flight path, Project members not only deny these easy to verify facts, but they pretend that they are being accused of intending to honor the terrorists:
“That’s an absolute, unequivocal fabrication that is being portrayed as fact,” said Edward Felt’s brother, Gordon Felt [about the 44 blocks claim]. He says he is insulted people would believe he would participate in anything that honored his brother's killers.In The Church of Liberalism, Ann Coulter slammed the media for granting the Jersey Girls an “absolute moral authority” card, not questioning the Girls’ practice of blaming the Bush administration instead of al Qaeda for their husband's deaths on 9/11. The Jersey Girls were bad enough, but nowhere is the flag of victim-hood being used to cover up more bad behavior than at the Memorial Project. Active cover-up of an ongoing Islamic supremacist plot Like the Jersey Girls, the Memorial Project gives Islam a pass for 9/11. Project members might not have known about the Mecca-orientation of the Crescent of Embrace, but they DID know that it was a giant Islamic-shaped crescent. Now they are doing far worse. Now they DO know that the giant crescent points almost exactly at Mecca, and are consistently misleading the press about it. Their own Muslim consultant told them not to worry about the Mecca-oriented crescent, claiming that it can’t be seen as a mihrab (the Mecca-direction indicator around which every mosque is built) unless it points EXACTLY at Mecca (a claim that was contradicted earlier this month by Saudi religious authorities). So what does Project Supervisor Joanne Hanley say when asked about the Mecca-orientation claim?
The only thing that orients the memorial is the crash site.They are actively and knowingly covering up clear evidence of an ongoing al Qaeda sympathizing plot. Bad behavior indeed. To join our blogbursts, just send your blog's url.
Get a Brain, Ema!
Ema Nymton said... .You might perform at a higher level, Ema, if you used a brain for thinking instead of your anal sphincter. It probably wouldn't cure your projection habit, but it might make your writing more believable. It is Islam that declares unremitting warfare against the entire non-Muslim world. Surah Al-Anfal & At-Taubah contain the essential commands. The seeds of Jihad, genocide & terrorism are in those Surahs. Let any person who doubts this follow these links and read.
Ali Ben Ali Mohammad Abdul,
Learn to think!
Oh Grate Won your moronic calls for the killing of unarmed and defenseless men, women, and children are an argument of the absurd. Perhaps _YOU_ follow all the commandments in your Qur'an. Your sophistry about recalcitrant zealots by your insane definition is any believer of any religion.
Qur'an
The fact that Moe practiced what he preached is manifest in the text of Islam's codification of oral tradition. Follow these links and learn the harsh reality of Islamic practice.Hadith
- Bukhari
- One-fifth of Booty to the Cause of Allah (Khumus)
- Military Expeditions led by the Prophet (pbuh) (Al-Maghaazi)
- Muslim
- Abu Dawud
- Malik's Muwatta
Shari'ah
The Qur'an & hadith form a congruent pattern of theology & practice. That damnable pattern is confirmed by Islamic jurisprudence. Islamic law is codified in Umdat as-Salik : Reliance of the Traveller and guide of the Faithful. The same information is available in the Hidaya, but the translator skipped the chapter relevant to Jihad, declaring it irrelevant to the India of his age. I have quoted the most relevant passages in recent posts. Search for O9.8, 9.9 & 9.1 to find them. Or turn to http://www.nku.edu/%7Ekenneyr/Islam/Reliance.html hit Ctrl F and enter O9.0 and start reading.Fiqh
Further confirmation is to be found in Fiqh: Islamic legal rulings by Imams of note. A significant sampling of relevant Fiqh is contained within the Jihad in Fiqh chapter of FOMIJihad.chm.Believers
Allah revealed how he tests believers. I posted it before, and I repeat it now. Let all men take due notice thereof and govern themselves accordingly.49:15. Only those are the believers who have believed in Allâh and His Messenger, and afterward doubt not but strive with their wealth and their lives for the Cause of Allâh. Those! They are the truthful.
49:16. Say: "Will you inform Allâh about your religion? While Allâh knows all that is in the heavens and all that is in the earth, and Allâh is All-Aware of everything.
Islam's "good news" is that it will conquer and dominate the entire world. I do not speak for God, I write the truth. I reveal truth and you just perceive it as Hell. Islam is fully revealed by the accursed combination of ayat & ahadith as outlined above. They form a congruent pattern of Barbarism which is confirmed by Shari'ah & Fiqh. Ema, you have malignant maundery, I have facts. I provide easy means of verification & exploration.
"Islam is pure, unmitigated God damn evil," (So now you speak for god?) And does not your embrace of your twisted readings of islam make you pure, unmitigated God damn evil? You are the won who is spreading the gospel of islam.
The Good News
- The Good News that Muslims will conquer the Known World, and ultimately the Entire World
- The Good News that Muslims will Dominate the People of the Book
- The Good News that Islam shall prevail
The Bible does not contain any commandment for unending war. Jehovah commanded the Hebrews to conquer Canaan. Once that conquest was completed, the Hebrews fought defensively, not aggressively. Jesus Christ neither preached nor practiced warfare. Goddamn fools and liars make egregious claims which they can not support with facts.
"The Qur'an can not be interpreted, only explained"
by people. The bible'sand the torah's commandment for unending war are conveniently forgotten so people can learn to live in piece.
Jihad
In my series of posts on Jihad, Jihad.chm, I presented the damnable details, with links to source so that anyone can verify the facts. One fatal fact is unknown to most people: Islam co-opts Jesus Christ as a genocidal warmonger. This fact is fully documented in The Defamation of Jesus Christ . Here is the documentation of the fatal fact; read it, follow the links and curse Islam!I have saved the worst for last. What will Jesus do when he returns? Bukhari’s collection of authentic hadith is informative.
|
What is the meaning of break the cross and kill the pig? Can it mean anything less than the destruction of Judiasm & Christianity? If you harbor such hope, you are sadly deluded, as you will see from this next tafsir.
| …He will break the cross, kill the pig, and banish the Jizyah and will call the people to Islam. During his time, Allah will destroy all religions except Islam and Allah will destroy Al-Masih Ad-Dajjal (the False Messiah)…. |
Can it possibly get any worse? They claim that Jesus was totally human, not divine, not God’s son and that he will destroy Christianity. What is worse than that. Genocide! Islam teaches that Jesus will commit genocide! I discovered this information by following a link in an article by Ibn Misr at Sons Of Apes And Pigs. I will quote an ayat, followed by Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir of that ayat, which makes my case beyond any doubt. .
| And (remember) when your Lord declared that He would certainly keep on sending against them (i.e. the Jews), till the Day of Resurrection, those who would afflict them with a humiliating torment. Verily, your Lord is Quick in Retribution (for the disobedient, wicked) and certainly He is OftForgiving, Most Merciful (for the obedient and those who beg Allah’s Forgiveness). |
Allah will torment the Jews, so? Until the Day of Resurrection; then what happens? The tafsir has a shocking revelation.
| …Isa, son of Mary, will kill the Jews. This will occur just before the end of this world…. |
Do you fully comprehend what you have just read? Another hadith will provide some clarity.
| Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. “O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.” |
Muslims must hunt down and kill the last Jew as a prerequisite to entering Paradise to enjoy their Houris & rivers of wine. And Jesus Christ will lead them in that bloody battle.
So oh grate won why do you continue lying to yourself? You advocate genocide. Reason and logic aside, your 'facts' are lies.
People live together in peace by not being as stupid as you.
Genocide
People live together in peace by not being Goddamn Muslims!!! Genocide, Ema? Sweet, loving Jesus Christ!!! You'd piss off the pope with your insane ravings!!8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.
- What did Moe want?
- the money of ransom for freeing the captives
- What did Allah want?
- Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter.
- What must Moe do to obtain it?
- great slaughter
47:4. So, when you meet (in fight Jihâd in Allâh's Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives). Thereafter (is the time) either for generosity (i.e. free them without ransom), or ransom (according to what benefits Islâm), until the war lays down its burden. Thus [you are ordered by Allâh to continue in carrying out Jihâd against the disbelievers till they embrace Islâm (i.e. are saved from the punishment in the Hell-fire) or at least come under your protection], but if it had been Allâh's Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allâh, He will never let their deeds be lost,
- smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them,
- ordered by Allâh to continue in carrying out Jihâd against the disbelievers till they embrace Islâm
Abu Dawud Book 38, Number 4390:
Narrated Atiyyah al-Qurazi:
I was among the captives of Banu Qurayzah. They (the Companions) examined us, and those who had begun to grow hair (pubes) were killed, and those who had not were not killed. I was among those who had not grown hair.
- those who had begun to grow hair (pubes) were killed
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
Learn to Write, Ema
Ema Nymton said... .
Ali Ben Ali Mohammad Abdul,
Oh Grate Won, do you even pay attention to what you write?
"I have never called for killing women and children. "????
"and kill the recalcitrant zealots."???
Recalcitrant zealots
To write well, Ema, one must have some mastery of vocabulary, syntax and rhetoric. But without relevant facts, those factors are useless in a political debate. I used the word zealots, Ema, to which I added a qualifier: recalcitrant. Zealots, Ema, are fanatics who believe and attempt to carry out Allaha's demonic imperatives. Recalcitrant zealots refers to those Muslims who can not be separated from Allah's yoke of slavery, who will persist in genocidal aggression no matter what. Example: the Hamaas goons who fill the streets brandishing rifles, grenades, knives and other weapons along with the demon's banner. We see thousands of them every time another Falestinian terrorist is sent to burn with Allah. Recalcitrant zealots does not mean women and children, Ema.There are, as I stated before, two ways a Muslim can be rendered anodyne: apostasy and death. Age & gender are irrelevant to the matter. Muslims kill, by Allah's orders. If they are believers, Ema. I quoted 49:15, which defines the test of believers: only those who fight with their wealth and their lives in Allahs cause, Ema. I also cited Bukhari 4.52.65 which defines Allah's cause.
Women & children
Lets turn back to the issue of women and children. In Sahih Muslim 19.4294, Moe is quoted as saying:Make a holy war, do not embezzle the spoils; do not break your pledge; and do not mutilate (the dead) bodies; do not kill the children.How would the holiness of a war be impaired by embezzling the spoils? How would the holiness of a war be impaired by killing children? How are the two related? By identity!!! Children are spoils, Ema. Understanding the evil of Islam involves some familiarity with Shari'ah. Once again, I cite Umdat as-Salik. [Emphasis added.]
The true purpose of Jihad is accrual of spoils. Captive women and children are income property for Muslims.O9.13
When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman's previous marriage is immediately annulled.
"As always, your straw man argument is cemented with excrement, revealing the contents of your otherwise empty skull. Too bad you lack facts & logic; you could not refute the obvious truth even if you had a fact."Get a clue, Ema! I don't read the Torah and the Bible I read is irrelevant. Drop the distraction & diversion tactics and face the reality: Islam is pure, unmitigated God damn evil, by design. Now the uninitiated reader must assume that I am a profane bigot. Profane I am, bigot I ain't. If and when you become intimately familiar with Islam's canon of scripture, tradition, jurisprudence and exegeses, you will begin to comprehend the awful reality.
Which version of the bible do you read?
Which version of the torah do you read?
Which version of the koran do you read?
What's wrong with Islam?
To help you become familiar and aware, I uttered and published What’s Wrong With Islam/Muslims? and What You Need To Know About Islam.Those files provide links to the most vital information. They are suitable for use as email inclusions or attachments.
Qur'an
I use the Hilali & Khan translation for reference. That is the one I keep in a file just below my desktop. It is a chm file with table of contents, index, search and favorites tabs. Others can download it from the New Expanded Library at Crusader's Armory. I also have the pdf version with the translator's notes. In case you want a copy for your desk top, there is a download link in the Resources post at Go Burn With Muhammad. For those who prefer the on line version, start with 2:190, read the footnote carefully.I usually link to http://www.quranbrowser.com. In my previous post exposing Ema's stupidity and ignorance, I linked to three parallel translations by Pickthal, Shakir & Yusuf Ali at the Muslim Student Association at USC because it is easy to follow context there. While the word selections vary, the meanings do not. Hilali, Rodwell & Sale are less prone than others to Bowdlerize the text. Links at the bottom of the page at quranbrowser give access to proceeding and succeeding verses. Http://www.qtafsir.com has a search engine so you can look up verses in Ibn Kathir's Tafsir.
Oh Grate Won, you wrote, ""With the exception of Tirhmidi, most of the minor hadith collections are not available on the web. Bukhari, Muslim, Abu Dawud and Malik's Muwatta are available, with named anchors for linking. The first two listed here are considered the most authentic.I took that excrement apart in ample form in the previous post. Here it is again, just for the record.
If you consult tafsir & fiqh, you will discover that exegetes & jurists are dependent on hadith in forming and rationalizing their explanations and decisions." Ben wrote on 17 May 2009
http://righthooks.blogspot.com/2009/05/ban-ki-moon-traitor-or-buffoon.html
Oh Grate Won, you asked for facts and then avoid them.
Fact: You admit there are more than one interpretation and translation of the writings of islam, christianity, and judiaism.
As always, your straw man argument is cemented with excrement, revealing the contents of your otherwise empty skull. Too bad you lack facts & logic; you could not refute the obvious truth even if you had a fact.Moe's extra-quranic words and works are the only authentic interpretation of the Qur'an. They are found in his sira & sunna. Moe, being Allah's mouthpiece, was the only one authorized to interpret what he recited. Speaking for Allah, he said:
The Qur'an can not be interpreted, only explained by comparison of ayat & hadith. It contains two kinds of ayat: clear and ambiguous. The clear verses are to be believed in and implemented; the unclear verses are to be believed but neither interpreted nor implemented. Intelligent readers may easily verify this fact by consulting Ibn Kathir's tafsir of 3:7.
| Pickthall | And fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is all for Allah. But if they cease, then lo! Allah is Seer of what they do. |
| Yusuf Ali | And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in God altogether and everywhere; but if they cease, verily God doth see all that they do. |
| Hilali-Khan | And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allah) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allah Alone [in the whole of the world]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allah), then certainly, Allah is All-Seer of what they do. |
| Shakir | And fight with them until there is no more persecution and religion should be only for Allah; but if they desist, then surely Allah sees what they do. |
| Sher Ali | And fight them until there is no persecution and religion is wholly to ALLAH. But if they desist, then surely ALLAH is Watchful of what they do. |
| Khalifa | You shall fight them to ward off oppression, and to practice your religion devoted to GOD alone. If they refrain from aggression, then GOD is fully Seer of everything they do. |
| Arberry | Fight them, till there is no persecution and the religion is God's entirely; then if they give over, surely God sees the things they do; |
| Palmer | Fight them then that there should be no sedition, and that the religion may be wholly God's; but if they desist, then God on what they do doth look. |
| Rodwell | Fight then against them till strife be at an end, and the religion be all of it God's. If they desist, verily God beholdeth what they do: |
| Sale | Therefore fight against them until there be no opposition [in favour of idolatry], and the religion be wholly God's. If they desist, verily God seeth that which they do: |
Speaking for Allah, he said:
| Pickthall | Fight against such of those who have been given the Scripture as believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, and forbid not that which Allah hath forbidden by His messenger, and follow not the Religion of Truth, until they pay the tribute readily, being brought low. |
| Yusuf Ali | Fight those who believe not in God nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by God and His Apostle, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. |
| Hilali-Khan | Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allah, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islam) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. |
| Shakir | Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Apostle have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection. |
| Sher Ali | Fight those from among the people of the Book, who believe not in ALLAH, nor in the Last Day, nor hold as unlawful what ALLAH and HIS Messenger have declared to be unlawful, nor follow the true religion, until they pay the tax considering it a favour and acknowledge their subjection. |
| Khalifa | You shall fight back against those who do not believe in GOD, nor in the Last Day, nor do they prohibit what GOD and His messenger have prohibited, nor do they abide by the religion of truth - among those who received the scripture - until they pay the due tax, willingly or unwillingly. |
| Arberry | Fight those who believe not in God and the Last Day and do not forbid what God and His Messenger have forbidden -- such men as practise not the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book -- until they pay the tribute out of hand and have been humbled. |
| Palmer | Fight those who believe not in God and in the last day, and who forbid not what God and His Apostle have forbidden, and who do not practice the religion of truth from amongst those to whom the Book has been brought, until they pay the tribute by their hands and be as little ones. |
| Rodwell | Make war upon such of those to whom the Scriptures have been given as believe not in God, or in the last day, and who forbid not that which God and His Apostle have forbidden, and who profess not the profession of the truth, until they pay tribute out of hand, and they be humbled. |
| Sale | Fight against them who believe not in God, nor in the last day, and forbid not that which God and his apostle have forbidden, and profess not the true religion, of those unto whom the scriptures have been delivered, until they pay tribute by right of subjection, and they be reduced low. |
Speaking on his own account, he confirmed the imperative.
Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah." Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, "O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?" He replied, "Whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah', faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have."
Abu Dawud 14.2635The words vary, the meaning does not. Two ayat, ten translations, one hadith from two narrators & translators. Commands to fight and a confirmation that he was commanded to fight.
Narrated Anas ibn Malik:
The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: I am commanded to fight with men till they testify that there is no god but Allah, and that Muhammad is His servant and His Apostle, face our qiblah (direction of prayer), eat what we slaughter, and pray like us. When they do that, their life and property are unlawful for us except what is due to them. They will have the same rights as the Muslims have, and have the same responsibilities as the Muslims have.
The only question is: how can an idiot so analencephalic as you are breathe without mechanical assistance, much less compose rudimentary blog comments on a computer? You, Ema, are a most remarkable idiot savant!
Is there not more than one version of each of the world's holy scripts?
Fact: For every example of a call for holy war that can be pointed to in any of the 'holy' books of the major religions - it is up to people to learn to live together in peace.
Fact: You call for unending war, you say _all_ muslim call for unending war.
What is the difference between you and your make-believe enemy?
Answer the questions, Oh Grate Won.
It is more than a call to war, Ema! It is a collection of Goddamn imperatives, confirmed by hadith and codified in Shari'ah. Let him who has a brain get a clue.
- 2:216. Jihâd (holy fighting in Allâh's Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you. Allâh knows but you do not know.
Jihad or Hell
- 9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.
9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do all things. - Abu Dawud Book 14, Number 2497:
Narrated AbuUmamah:
The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: He who does not join the warlike expedition (jihad), or equip, or looks well after a warrior's family when he is away, will be smitten by Allah with a sudden calamity. Yazid ibn Abdu Rabbihi said in his tradition: 'before the Day of Resurrection". - 61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment.
61:11. That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!
61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of 'Adn Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.
61:13. And also (He will give you) another (blessing) which you love, help from Allâh (against your enemies) and a near victory. And give glad tidings (O Muhammad ) to the believers.
- fight: 369
- strive: 186
- Jihad: 22
- kill them: 6
Sahih Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 285:
Narrated Abu Ishaq:
Once, while I was sitting beside Zaid bin Al-Arqam, he was asked, "How many Ghazwat did the Prophet undertake?" Zaid replied, "Nineteen." They said, "In how many Ghazwat did you join him?" He replied, "Seventeen." I asked, "Which of these was the first?" He replied, "Al-'Ashira or Al-'Ashiru."
Hadith
- Bukhari
- One-fifth of Booty to the Cause of Allah (Khumus)
- Military Expeditions led by the Prophet (pbuh) (Al-Maghaazi)
- Muslim
- Abu Dawud
- Malik's Muwatta
Extortion Letters
Most people do not know that Moe dictated extortion letters to scribes and dispatched them by personal currier. To those who did not pay up, he sent his army.LETTER TO THE JEWS OF KHYBER In the name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful From Muhammad, the Prophet of Allah who is like Moosa (Moses A.S.) a prophet and messenger and he testifies to what Moosa (A.S.) had brought. 0 people of Torah, has Allah not stated in the Torah that "Muhammad (Sal Allaho Alehe Wasallam) is a Prophet of Allah. The people who will be with him, shall be harsh towards the enemies of Allah. And amongst themselves, they shall be kind and loving. They shall bow and prostrate before Allah. And they shall seek His bounty and goodwill". I ask you to swear by Allah, who sent Torah for you and who made your forefathers eat 'mann, and 'Salva' and dried sea for them and rid them of the tyranny of pharaoh. It is not written in Torah that you should believe in me? After the explanation about me in the Torah, do guidance and transgression become apparent? Therefore I invite you towards Allah and His Prophet.' Seal: Allah's Prophet Muhammad
Sahih Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 512:
Narrated Anas:
The Prophet offered the Fajr Prayer near Khaibar when it was still dark and then said, "Allahu-Akbar! Khaibar is destroyed, for whenever we approach a (hostile) nation (to fight), then evil will be the morning for those who have been warned." Then the inhabitants of Khaibar came out running on the roads. The Prophet had their warriors killed, their offspring and woman taken as captives. Safiya was amongst the captives, She first came in the share of Dahya Alkali but later on she belonged to the Prophet . The Prophet made her manumission as her 'Mahr'.
No expiration date
Jihad is not an anachronism; it has no expiration date.Abu Dawud Book 14, Number 2526
Narrated Anas ibn Malik:
The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Three things are the roots of faith: to refrain from (killing) a person who utters, "There is no god but Allah" and not to declare him unbeliever whatever sin he commits, and not to excommunicate him from Islam for his any action; and jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist). The tyranny of any tyrant and the justice of any just (ruler) will not invalidate it. One must have faith in Divine decree.
Sahih Muslim Book 020, Number 4716:
It has been narrated on the authority of Mughira who said: I heard the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) say: A group of people from my Umma will continue to be triumphant over the people until the Command of Allah overtakes them while they are still triumphant. The same tradition has been narrated through another chain of transmitters on the same authority.
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
Learn to Read, Ema
Ema Nymton said... .In my open letter to the President & Secretary of State I specified two options:
Ali Ben Ali Mohammad Abdul,
Oh Grate Won, you say, "Only one process will bring peace and security to Israel: the process of making Islam extinct."
How do you propose to do this? Do you still call for the killing of over a billion unarmed and defenseless men, women, and children (including citizens of USA)?
"You can nuke them or you can attack their ideology with the fatal facts I have presented and more which are readily available in Islam's canon of scripture, tradition & jurisprudence so that shame will drive Muslims from the war cult in mass apostasy."Any intelligent and literate person should be able to comprehend that statement and remember the two possible solutions to the problem of Islamic aggression. I disrespectfully demanded the extinction of Moe's War Cult. There are two possible ways to accomplish that necessary objective; I left the choice up to the intended targets of the message.
I have never called for killing women and children. I have disrespectfully demanded the extinction of Moe's War Cult. It would be obvious to any sentient person that neither of the two proposed alternative methods can be entirely successful. Common sense, which Ema entirely lacks, dictates that some combination will be required. We must emancipate as many as possible through induced apostasy and kill the recalcitrant zealots. If we wish to preserve our lives & liberties, we have no other option. .
So oh grate won. Tell us. Beyond your mindless kill kill kill kill blather what do you have to offer?Your straw man argument is full of excrement. It stinks. It reveals the contents of your skull.
As always, your straw man argument is cemented with excrement, revealing the contents of your otherwise empty skull. Too bad you lack facts & logic; you could not refute the obvious truth even if you had a fact.
Fact: You admit there are more than one interpretation and translation of the writings of islam, christianity, and judiaism.
The Qur'an can not be interpreted, only explained by comparison of ayat & hadith. It contains two kinds of ayat: clear and ambiguous. The clear verses are to be believed in and implemented; the unclear verses are to be believed but neither interpreted nor implemented. Intelligent readers may easily verify this fact by consulting Ibn Kathir's tafsir of 3:7.
Allah and his Messenger must be obeyed. Islam is submission to Allah. Muslims are those who submit to Allah. Turn to 8:2 and continue reading through verse 39 to verify this fact and see what Muslims are commanded to do. Turn next to 9:45 to see who it is that seeks to be released from the obligation of Jihad.
Fact: For every example of a call for holy war that can be pointed to in any of the 'holy' books of the major religions - it is up to people to learn to live together in peace.
[Emphasis added for clarity.]
49:15. Only those are the believers who have believed in Allâh and His Messenger, and afterward doubt not but strive with their wealth and their lives for the Cause of Allâh. Those! They are the truthful.May Jehovah add his blessing to the reading of the demon's turd! Let all men comprehend what Ema is too stupid to understand: the demon defines believers as those who engage in Jihad. Jihad is "holy fighting in Allah's cause". Allah's cause is to make Islam dominant.
49:16. Say: "Will you inform Allâh about your religion? While Allâh knows all that is in the heavens and all that is in the earth, and Allâh is All-Aware of everything.
Islamic law requires a minimum of one military attack against Kuffar in every year. Observe this Fiqh from al-Shafi'i.
"The least that the imam must do is that he allow no year to pass without having organised a military expedition by himself, or by his raiding parties, according to the Muslims' interest, so that the jihad will only be stopped in a year for a (reasonable) excuse."Note the dictate of Umdat as-Salik. [Links added.]
O9.1: The Obligatory Character of Jihad
Jihad is a communal obligation (def: c3.2). When enough people perform it to successfully accomplish it, it is no longer obligatory upon others (O: the evidence for which is the Prophet's saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),
"He who provides the equipment for a soldier in jihad has himself performed jihad,"
and Allah Most High having said:
"Those of the believers who are unhurt but sit behind are not equal to those who fight in Allah's path with their property and lives. Allah has preferred those who fight with their property and lives a whole degree above those who sit behind. And to each, Allah has promised great good" (Koran 4:95).
If none of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there was a possibility of having performed it. In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims.
The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, "Jihad is a communal obligation," meaning upon the Muslims each year.
The second state is when non-Muslims invade a Muslim country or near to one, in which case jihad is personally obligatory (def: c3.2) upon the inhabitants of that country, who must repel the non-Muslims with whatever they can).
Islam is perpetual war. This fatal fact is clear on the face of its canon of scripture, tradition & jurisprudence which I have exposed to you through quotes and links. Observe the damnable dictate of Shari'ah!
Fact: You call for unending war, you say _all_ muslim call for unending war.
What is the difference between you and your make-believe enemy?
O9.8: The Objectives of Jihad
The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,
"Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled" (Koran 9.29),
the time and place for which is before the final descent of Jesus (upon whom be peace). After his final coming, nothing but Islam will be accepted from them, for taking the poll tax is only effective until Jesus' descent (upon him and our Prophet be peace), which is the divinely revealed law of Muhammad. The coming of Jesus does not entail a separate divinely revealed law, for he will rule by the law of Muhammad. As for the Prophet's saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),
"I am the last, there will be no prophet after me,"
this does not contradict the final coming of Jesus (upon whom be peace), since he will not rule according to the Evangel, but as a follower of our Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) ).
O9.9
The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to settle with paying the poll tax (jizya) ) (n: though according to the Hanafi school, peoples of all other religions, even idol worshippers, are permitted to live under the protection of the Islamic state if they either become Muslim or agree to pay the poll tax, the sole exceptions to which are apostates from Islam and idol worshippers who are Arabs, neither of whom has any choice but becoming Muslim (al-Hidaya sharh Bidaya al-mubtadi' (y21), 6.48-49) ).
Those fatal facts have ample confirmation in Ibn Kathir's Tafsir.
~@:o?
- The Order for Jihad against the Disbelievers, the Closest, then the Farthest Areas
- The Order to fight to eradicate Shirk and Kufr
- The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They give the Jizyah
- The Order for Jihad against the Disbelievers and Hypocrites
- The Good News that Muslims will conquer the Known World, and ultimately the Entire World
- The Good News that Muslims will Dominate the People of the Book
- The Good News that Islam shall prevail
I have facts; Ema has excrement. Facts trump excrement! I have given you the truth and the means of verifying it. What will you do with it? Will you hide it under a bushel and ignore it or will you share it? The fate of humanity is in your hands. If you will not crusade for the extinction of Moe's damnable War Cult, then you are part of the problem, not part of the solution. Ignoring Islam enables and empowers it to triumph and destroy life, liberty & prosperity.
This blog post is placed in the public domain for non-commercial use. Readers are encouraged to cross post it and share it by email.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)