This is the ninth installment of a series on offensive Jihad in Fiqh.
Ibn Taymiyya, d. 1328, hanbali. Al-Siyasa al-Shariyya, cit. ur Rudolph Peters, Jihad in Classical and Modern Islam, s. 44-54.
Since lawful warfare is essentially jihad and since its aim is that the religion is God’s entirely and God’s word is uppermost, therefore, according to all Muslims, those who stand in the way of this aim must be fought. As for those who cannot offer resistance or cannot fight, such as women, children, monks, old people, the blind, handicapped, and their likes, they shall not be killed, unless they actually fight with words [i.e. by propaganda] and acts [e.g. by spying or otherwise assisting in the warfare]. […] we may only fight those who fight us when we want to make God’s religion victorious. […]
This jihad is obligatory if it is carried out on our intitiative and also if it is waged as defence. If we take the initiative, it is a collective duty, [which means that] if it is fulfilled by a sufficient number [of Muslims], the obligation lapses for all others and the merit goes to those who have fulfilled it […] But if the enemy wants to attack the Muslims, then repelling him becomes a duty for all those under attack and for the others in order to help them.
So the latter [form of jihad] consists in defense of the religion, of things that are inviolable, and of lives. Therefore it is fighting out of necessity. The former, however, is voluntary fighting in order to propagate the religion, to make it triumph and to intimidate the enemy, such as was the case with the expedition to Tabuk and the lik. |
- since its aim is that the religion is God’s entirely and God’s word is uppermost, therefore, according to all Muslims, those who stand in the way of this aim must be fought.
- Get a clue! It means that everyone who does not embrace Islam or submit to subjugation & extortion must be fought.
- they shall not be killed, unless they actually fight with words
- Do you understand this? We may be killed because we expose Islam with these blog posts; even though we may be too old or infirm to fight on the battlefield.
- This jihad is obligatory if it is carried out on our intitiative
- Defense it ain't! It is offensive, aggressive war of conquest. Get a clue!
- The former, however, is voluntary fighting in order to propagate the religion, to make it triumph and to intimidate the enemy, such as was the case with the expedition to Tabuk and the lik.
- to propagate Islam
- to make Islam triumph
- to intimidate the enemy
- Get a clue, for Chrissake! Islam is a war machine, neither a religion nor peaceful.
3 comments:
.
{{{{{{{{{{ yawn }}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}
.
.
"...Get a clue, for Chrissake! Islam is a war machine, ..."
There you go again. Your hate-filled vilification of people has absolutely _NOTHING_ to do with Christ or for Christ's sake.
Damnation, you have made it your goal in life to subvert and pervert every point of Jesus' teachings and messages. Jesus stands for everything you are not and that you detest. Remember Jesus was an anti-establishment pacifist, a socialist, a liberal, and open minded person.
___
The way you praise Islam and all its glory, one could come to believe you are a Muslim agent-provocateur.
.
.
"...Jesus stands for everything you are not and that you detest. Remember Jesus was an anti-establishment pacifist, a socialist, a liberal, and open minded person. ..."
While I'm at it, let me add more things that I see JC was and _you_ are not.
JC through his life, efforts and messages was brave and honest with a capacity to understand the human condition. You can learn much by following JC's examples; to begin with, try having faith.
.
Post a Comment