Aggression, Ema. A concept you lack the intellect to comprehend: initiation of the use of force. Force is only justified against other people in self defense. Islam is the aggressor; it declared and is prosecuting perpetual warfare against all mankind. Warfare is its charter, fixed and immutable; it can not be improved nor reformed. You need to read and understand:
There is a book which is probably above your reading level, but which will be helpful to others: Jihad: The Islamic Doctrine of Permanent War. That book uses some archaic words and is written with a British accent (Indian Colonial) but it clarifies the concepts involved with examples from Indian history. Read it and curse Islam.
"... anyone with a functioning sense of morality ..." this leave you out! For any person to write (as you do), "... comprehending the fatal fact that there are no innocent Muslims. ..." clearly has no understanding. Calling for the killing of people who follow the teachings of Islam include people who live in USA.
Ema, you need to gaze at a mirror when writing such drek. You should see a fork tongued snake with venomous fangs staring back at you. Muslims, wheresoever dispersed over the face of the earth, are commanded to obey Allah and emulate Moe. What did Allah command? What did Moe do? The first question is answered in the ayat whose links are listed in the previous paragraph. What Moe did is answered by Books 52, 53 & 59 of Sahih Bukhari which you can find at USC-MSA, also linked above.Those books document what Islam is; what Muslims do. It ain't possible to execute a contract to murder and be innocent. Read 9:111 & 61:9-13.
So when do you start calling for _others_ to have every man, woman and child follower of Islam to be rounded up, shipped off to concentration camps, and exterminated in gas chambers?
Take a few moments to come up with your answers to the questions.
Ema, if you'd read Islam's canon of scripture, tradition & jurisprudence, you'd realize what a damned fool you are, and you'd wither in embarrassment, even with your black scaly soul.
- 47:4. So, when you meet (in fight Jihad in Allah's Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives). Thereafter (is the time) either for generosity (i.e. free them without ransom), or ransom (according to what benefits Islam), until the war lays down its burden. Thus [you are ordered by Allah to continue in carrying out Jihad against the disbelievers till they embrace Islam (i.e. are saved from the punishment in the Hell-fire) or at least come under your protection], but if it had been Allah's Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost,
- Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
The Verse:--"You (true Muslims) are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind." means, the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam.
Theres a war on Ema, declared by Allah in his damn book and prosecuted by his Messenger and his Caliphs. The war continues today on many fronts. We need to end it, permanently. There is only one way to accomplish that objective. Islam must cease to exist. There are two ways to accomplish that objective. One of them is preferable from a humanitarian standpoint. Some combination of the two will be required. The real world is not a nice place. By eliminating Islam, we'll make it safer for humanity.
.
Do you want cheese with your whine?
Make a statement and then deny making it. Good one.
"... I have no lust for blood, my lust is for peace, security and liberty, none of which can be secured in the presence of Islam. ..."
So will you answer the questions,
"... Is there any action, deed, or behavior that you claim your enemy has done that you yourself do not want _others_ to do? Where is the difference between 'your' side and 'them? ..."?