Obama About to Sleep on the Couch

When Michelle Obama sees this picture of her husband, Barack, oogling a stimulus package along with the French President, he will certainly be sleeping on Bill Clinton's White House couch!

Ha Ha Ha!

Sucker!

The Second American Revolution Begins...

We The People Stimulus Package

Obama Logically Ineligible to be President

Since Barack Hussein Obama traveled to Pakistan in 1981, it is impossible that he was a United States citizen, and, therefore, that he is qualified to be President of the United States.

See here, from a much-circulated email that makes very good points which lead to the only possible logical conclusion:

What passport did Obama use back in 1981 when he was shuttling between New York, Jakarta, and Karachi?

(So how did a young man who arrived in New York in early June 1981, without the price of a hotel room in his pocket, suddenly come up with the price of a round-the-world trip just a month later?)

And once he was on a plane, shuttling between New York, Jakarta, and Karachi, what passport was he offering when he passed through Customs and Immigration?

The American people not only deserve to have answers to these questions, they must have answers.

It makes the debate over Obama's citizenship a rather short and simple one.


Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20?
A : Yes, by his own admission.


Q: What passport did he travel under?
A: There are only three possibilities.
1) He traveled with a U.S. Passport,
2) He traveled with a British passport, or
3) He traveled with an Indonesia passport.


Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S. Passport in 1981?
A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department's "no travel" list in 1981.



Conclusion: When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with a British passport or an Indonesian passport.

-> If he were traveling with a British passport that would provide proof that he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims.

-> And if he were traveling with an Indonesian passport that would tend to prove that he relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or American, prior to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967.

Whatever the truth of the matter, the American people need to know how he managed to become a "natural born" American citizen between 1981 and 2008.

And EITHER scenario makes this pretender INELIGIBLE to be President of the United States, it is logically IMPOSSIBLE.

UPDATE: OBAMA CONTRADICTS HIMSELF ON WHICH HOSPITAL HE WAS BORN IN. LAST NOVEMBER HE STATED HE WAS BORN IN ONE HOSPITAL. RECENTLY HE WRITES A LETTER STATING THAT HE WAS BORN IN A SECOND HOSPITAL.

SEE THE STORY ON OBAMA THE FRAUD HERE: http://storyreportscomments.blogspot.com/2009/07/obama-birth-mystery-more-than-1.html

Right Hooks Blog Welcomes Additional Author

Until today, this blog has had three registered authors, "Ben," "RightHooks," and "RRRRROK," who has remained inactive.

We are pleased to announce today that an additional author will be joining the ranks. This author's name is, "Son of Shaphat."

Son of Shaphat brings an additional dynamic to this site in that he spends a lot of time with his ear to the ground as it applies to world events and Biblical prophecy. A LOT of time...

He is well-connected to some of the biggest names in this field.

His outlook, and, therefore insight, is consistent with the common evangelical protestant Christian interpretation of the Bible and eschatology. There is nothing mystical or spooky about his views, they are solid and well-grounded.

So Son of Shaphat, an experienced, educated and culturally-astute man, will be our eyes and ears into how the dramatic events unfolding in the world today are lining up with Scripture. This is something we should all be paying attention to, and Son of Shaphat will be keeping us alerted to what is, and what might be.

Therefore, we eagerly await his posts.

Welcome, Son of Shaphat, to RightHooks.

Readers, keep your eyes open for his upcoming posts and be willing to learn from this man...his words are wise and we all should take heed.

Obama Calls His Own Grandmother A Liar

Was Barack Obama born in Hawaii as he alleges, or was he born in Mombasa, Kenya, as his grandmother testifies to?

Since his qualification or disqualification to even BE President of the United States HINGES on the answer to this riddle, it is a vital and legitimate concern. And by continuing to claim that he was born in the United States, Obama is essentially calling his own grandmother a liar.

Sarah Hussein Obama, actually Obama's step-grandmother, has stated more than two times that she was present at Obama's birth in Kenya. Dr. Jerome Corsi over at WorldNetDaily has all the details. She said these things in front of witneses who have also sworn to the authenticity of her remarks. WND is in possession of those testimonies as well.

Both Barack Obama and his grandmother cannot be correct.

And, frankly, based on how he has already lied like a rug since he took a seat in the Oval Office, I believe his grandmother.

But there is another development in this saga.

According to Corsi's article, the Governor of Hawaii stands by disallowing anyone not a 'person of interest' from viewing whatever birth records Kapi'olani Medical Center has concerning Obama. Interestingly, among those actually allowed to view it is, 'a person having a common ancestor with the registrant'...

How that loophole could possibly get exploited is where our fun could begin...!

Who's up for the challenge?

Why Liberals Hate Sarah Palin

Since the day she was first hurled into the national spotlight, the Democrats/Liberals/Radicals have hatefully attacked Governor Sarah Palin with extremely harsh and unfair scrutiny.

From nasty comments about her looks to rumors about affairs and impropriety and finally to insults about her handicapped infant son, the left has shown itself to be the master hypocrites of all time. For the same ones who hold the microscope to every aspect of Palin's life, refuse to bring so much as a suggestion of impropriety toward their messiah, Barack Hussein Obama, who doesn't even have a birth certificate to qualify him to be President.

Every comment by a liberal about Palin this weekend was nothing but rabid, intolerant hate-speech.

The depth of vile and demonstrated hate by the left toward her reflects the very worst of the human condition and begs the question: why do they HATE her so much?

Absent of any logic, for if they were logically consistent they would hold Obama to the same standard they crucify Palin with, to explain the phenemonon, we must take on a liberal attribute...omniscience. (You know, the liberal omniscience that allowed Michelle Obama to state that anyone who did not vote for her husband did so because they were a 'racist'... the liberal omniscience that said that we went to war in Iraq for oil... the liberal omniscience that can state that global warming is a reality, which defies science... )

Yes, liberals are already omnisceintly pontificating about why she announced that she would resign as governor of Alaska last Friday, so we thought we might do the same.

So why is it that the liberals hate Sarah Palin so much?

Is it because she's attractive?

The omniscient answer is yes, that is part of it.

Liberals hate Sarah Palin because they are JEALOUS of her because she is beautiful.

But there is another part to the omniscient answer as to why liberals hate her so much.

Liberals also hate Sarah Palin because they are ugly. Yes, omniscience says that all liberals are ugly.

But don't take our word for it, judge for yourself:

Sarah Palin, conservative

Liberal

Time Magazine Spits on McNamara's Grave

Robert McNamara, Secretary of Defense during the war in Vietnam, died at home in his sleep this morning at the age of 93.

Time magazine, not content with undermining America's war efforts back then, and also helping to further the goals of the North Vietnamese communists, now finds it necessary to stab McNamara once again in a pitiful article written by leftist Mark Thompson, thus spitting on his grave.

Time calls McNamara a failure. Time calls Washington's efforts a failure. Time spits into the faces of U. S. soldiers yet again and calls the war a failure.

Yet it is Time magazine and its liberal peers who were the useful idiots to North Vietnam's agenda, which was political, not military, and who were played like fiddles to distort the truth and thus weaken the wills of American public opinion about the war. It is Time magazine and the likes of them who were a failure and worse: they seditiously invalidated the military victories in Vietnam and the blood of millions is on their hands. They were and are whiners, cowards, chumps and pawns.

For we never lost a battle in Vietnam; not one. What we lost was the support of the American people, again, thanks to Time magazine, Jane Fonda and the entire leftist, Communist-sympathizing media.

So it is the epitome of hypocrisy for Time magazine to slander once again a great man like Robert McNamara, a man who had to make much harder decisions than which latte to get today at Starbucks, as Time's cowardly authors are tasked with every day.

McNamara was a brave and loyal man. He served America; unlike Time magazine who continues to work for her demise with their perpetual leftist agenda.

May Robert McNamara and all Vietnam veterans forever be honored.

May Time magazine and Mark Thompson forever be scorned.

Rest in peace, Mr. McNamara. God bless you. And thank you.

Obama-Kennedy Health Plan: HELL NO!

Norman Hooben calls it "Mass Casualty".. Phyllis Schlafly, whose article he cross posted, calls it " A Model Not To Copy". It is the Massachusetts Plan, the model for Obama-Negligence. A few key points about the Massachusetts Plan:

• increased costs
• wasted tax revenues
• limited patients' choice
• caused shortages & waiting lists
• increased insurance premiums at nearly double the national rate.

Now is the time to click the link above and read that most informative article. Afterwards, you should visit http://www.congress.org to send emails to your Representative & Senators. Tell them to vote HELL NO!!! on Obama-Negligence.

Wise men learn from the mistakes of others. If you are wise you will disrespectfully demand rejection of socialized health care schemes and reject Mitt Romney as a candidate for the Presidency in '12.

Interreligious Dialogue: Snake Feces

The Pakistan Observer published an article by Muhammad Munir & Aftab Hussain about interreligious dialogue. One paragraph stands out from the rest as an exemplar of al-taqeyya. I present it here in block quote format with my comments running full column width.

The peaceful resolution of inter-confessional issues is possible only during an open and friendly dialogue.

Is Jesus Christ the son of God or not? Was he crucified; did he die on the cross? Was he resurrected? Answers from Christianity and Islam are polar opposites, no reconciliation is possible.

Reconquest of Israel, Spain, Greece & South Eastern Europe is another issue that can not be reconciled. Islam is intrinsically violent, mandated by Allah to conquer and subjugate the entire world.

Islam considers any assertion of Christ's deity to be blasphemy. Wherever Allah's writ runs, Christians are forbidden to build churches or repair existing churches.

In fact the religious, spiritual problems frequently are the catalyst of many negative political processes in the modern world. And here one can refer to both pure religious problems (as, for example, in the situation with caricatures of the Prophet Mohammed (PBUH) in the western press), and misinterpretation of religious norms by various confessions (for example, religious extremist misinterpret Islam in justification of terrorism).

Islamic law forbids any criticism of Allah and his Messenger. Refer to Reliance of the Traveller, O8.7 and O11.10. The cartoons depicted Moe as a terrorist, which he was by his own admission. [Bukhari 1.7.331, 4.52.220]

"Terrorism" is used by the writers as a shibboleth to distract us from the issue of Jihad. Jihad is ordained for Muslims, who are commanded to fight pagans until all resistance ceases and only Allah is worshiped. They are commanded to fight people with scriptural religions until they are subjugated & extorted. Jihad is the purpose of their relationship with Allah and a "commerce that will save them from a painful torment". Terrorism is a battle tactic sanctified by Allah in 3:151 & 8:12 and exemplified in 33:26 & 59:2. Moe bragged about being made victorious by casting terror.

Who misinterpreted the Qur'an? Moe said that he was "ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.'".

There are many hopes and aspirations attached to the third session of the congress. The international scenario is changing; people around the world have rejected fundamentalists and extremists. The elections held in different countries around the world have proven that fundamentalists and extremists have been defeated, may these be religious extremists or political fundamentalists. In such an environment it becomes very necessary for the religious leaders to play a role to fill the gap that was created by these extremists. The attempts by the president of Kazakhstan are highly appreciating and such steps should be taken around the world.

Are Hamas & Hezbollah "extremists" or "fundamentalists"? Which elected Islamic government rejects them and their program of reconquest? Which elected Islamic government denounces rocket & bomb attacks upon Israel and attempts to prevent their subjects from supporting those attacks financially?

Exposing Islam through Refutation of Lies

Go Burn With Muhammad does not draw many comments, so when a moderation notice is received, I take due notice. This blog post is my response to a comment by Carlisticeday. The post he commented on has been viewed 320 times since October 20, '07.

The post begins with a quotation from Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9. The post continues with a brief explanation of the quotes and an outline of the nature of Islam, with links to its foundation in scripture and tradition.

Carlisticeday's comment is reproduced here in block quote style & Ariel font; my responses to his points are interspersed in normal column width and Times Roman font. Unlike Akhter, Carlisticeday has written his own comment, I do not find any evidence of plagiarism in it.

What You Need to Know About Islam

Carlisticeday

Submitted on 2009/07/03 at 5:50pm

First of all, “Islam” doesn’t say or do anything – Muslims do. Ditto for Christianity.

Organized religions are fictional legal persons, governed by fallible men, who speak and act for them. Islam and Christianity have fundamental doctrines which define them and are codified in their respective canons of scripture. The doctrines of Islam, expressed in the Qur'an and exemplified in hadith are the subject of What You Need to Know About Islam.

Who in history made it a policy, indeed, a religious requirement to force people to believe as they believed or die horrible deaths by burning at the stake, torture, drowning, disembowelment and so on? Not Muslims, Christians.

Religions should be judged by their orthodox doctrines & practices, not by deviations therefrom. The Inquisition was a deviation from fundamental Christianity, not the standard.

In fact, the Qur’an explicitly forbids forced conversion, and it has been understood as such for centuries. Where is that in the Bible?

Moe revealed the Qur'an piece by piece between 610 and 622. It contains obvious situational scripture and conflicting ayat which are resolved by the science of naskh. Later revelations abrogate[2:102,16:101] earlier revelations with which they conflict. Al-Baqarah was #87 in sequence of revelation.

2:256. There is no compulsion in religion. Verily, the Right Path has become distinct from the wrong path. Whoever disbelieves in Tâghût and believes in Allâh, then he has grasped the most trustworthy handhold that will never break. And Allâh is All-Hearer, All-Knower.

Surah Yunus was #51 in sequence of revelation.

10:99. And had your Lord willed, those on earth would have believed, all of them together. So, will you (O Muhammad ) then compel mankind, until they become believers.

Surah Al-Anfal was #88 in sequence of revelation, therefore it is nasikh and 2:256 & 10:99 are mansukh: the more tolerant ayat have been abrogated.

8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

Fight them until...and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone.... Allah told Moe to fight pagans until all resistance ceased and only Allah was worshiped. How did Moe interpret that?

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah." Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, "O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?" He replied, "Whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah', faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have."

Ordered to fight until...then he is a Muslim... Got a clue yet? For the interminably recalcitrant, I offer confirmation from Shari'ah: Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9, Paragraph 9.

O9.9

The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to settle with paying the poll tax (jizya) ) (n: though according to the Hanafi school, peoples of all other religions, even idol worshippers, are permitted to live under the protection of the Islamic state if they either become Muslim or agree to pay the poll tax, the sole exceptions to which are apostates from Islam and idol worshippers who are Arabs, neither of whom has any choice but becoming Muslim (al-Hidaya sharh Bidaya al-mubtadi' (y21), 6.48-49) ).

Islamic scripture, tradition & jurisprudence form a congruent pattern; they confirm and reinforce each other. Unfortunately, the terminally recalcitrant are blind to that pattern. Can you perceive it? Unlike Moe, Jesus did neither preached nor practiced warfare. Instead, he taught his disciples to use persuasion.

9:1 Then he called his twelve disciples together, and gave them power and authority over all devils, and to cure diseases.

9:2 And he sent them to preach the kingdom of God, and to heal the sick.

9:3 And he said unto them, Take nothing for your journey, neither staves, nor scrip, neither bread, neither money; neither have two coats apiece.

9:4 And whatsoever house ye enter into, there abide, and thence depart.

9:5 And whosoever will not receive you, when ye go out of that city, shake off the very dust from your feet for a testimony against them.

(King James Bible, Luke)

Contrast that with the orders Moe gave to his generals in the field: Sahih Muslim Book 019, Number 4294.

Prior to 1900, did Muslims living under Christian rule enjoy anything like the freedoms and protections of life and property that Christians did under Islamic rule in the Middle Ages? No, not by a long shot.

Let us examine Shari'ah to discover the freedoms and protections enjoyed by Christians under Islamic rule.

O11.5

Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life, reputation, and property. In addition, they:

-1- are penalized for committing adultery or theft, thought not for drunkenness;

-2- are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);

-3- are not greeted with "as-Salamu 'alaykum";

-4- must keep to the side of the street;

-5- may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims' buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not razed;

-6- are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;

-7- and are forbidden to build new churches.

Do the Christian (or Jewish) scriptures provide in any way for these protections? No, on the contrary. Does the Qur’an? Yes, in fact it does.

At-Taubah 29 commands Muslims to make war upon Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians until they are subjugated and submit to annual extortion.

9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

At-Taubah 123 commands Muslims to fight the nearby Christians and treat them harshly.

9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious - see V.2:2).

Furthermore, if “Islam” is such a violent religion, tell me, who has been responsible for the most death, mayhem, oppression, suffering and injustice in history, Muslims or Christians? There is simply no comparison: all the deaths in wars by Islamic states don’t come close to the deaths in WWII alone – a war essentially precipitated by and led on both sides by Christians…and we haven’t even begun to talk about the colonial period.

The wars of the 20^th century were political and economic, not religious. Islam has a 1400 year track record, with 270 million victims.

Who depopulated North America so that they could own it all themselves? Not Muslims, Christians. Who enslaved millions in Central and South America for profit, and forced them to convert, to boot? Same answer.

Were the Conquistadors acting in accord with the teaching and example of Jesus Christ? Show me the Book, Chapter & Verse citations for Christ's commands to engage in conquest.

Who went around the world gobbling up everyone else’s resources and labor in the name of God and country? Who now refuses to take responsibility for any of the chaos, injustice and political unrest that has resulted from that?

Islam! These maps illustrate Islam's spread by the sword.

• first 25 years
• 750
• various Caliphates
  

Who supports the colonizer Zionist state at all costs and at the expense of the people who were displaced by it, and who refuses even to acknowledge the daily humiliation that state pours on those displaced people? Not Muslims, Christians.

That assertion inverts history, justice & morality in excellent form. Jews & Christians were living in the Roman Province of Syria in the 7^th century. Surah At-Taubah deals with the ghazwat against Tabuk, complaining of those Muslims who refused to join it. When asked which campaign a Muslim should join, Moe had a very significant answer.

Abu Dawud 14.2477
Narrated Ibn Hawalah:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: It will turn out that you will be armed troops, one is Syria, one in the Yemen and one in Iraq. Ibn Hawalah said: Choose for me, Apostle of Allah, if I reach that time. He replied: Go to Syria, for it is Allah's chosen land, to which his best servants will be gathered but if you are unwilling, go to your Yemen, and draw water from your tanks, for Allah has on my account taken special charge of Syria and its people.

Moe sent an extortion letter to Heracleus, it is informative. It is in Sahih Muslim Book 019, Number 4380 and LETTER TO HERACLES CAESAR.

Islam's attitude is that all land they conquer is Islamic forever. Allah will not allow Kuffar to reconquer it and rule over Muslims. He promised victory to the Muslims, but they fought on the losing side of WW1 and lost the Levant, which Caliph Umar had conquered in 638. Israel regained a tiny fragment of her ancient patrimony, and Muslims immediately attacked with genocidal intent. They attacked again in 1967 and lost the Gaza Strip & West Bank which they seized in 1948. Every condition the Falestinians complain about is a consequence of their attempted genocide & policide.

I could go on, but please note that

a) none of this is meant to justify violence in the name of religion – merely to provide perspective, and

b) nowhere have I said “Christianity” here. The Bible is full of blood, injustice and crimes of all sorts, all justified by religion. Even Christ said, “I come with the sword…”, and as a result his heirs gave us the “Christian soldiers” of European fame.

The point: it’s very easy to pick out sections from text, present them out of context and then make sweeping claims about “Islam” while ignoring what Muslims actually do. Likewise it’s easy to grab legal text books and assume that they necessarily reflect actual practice, rather than an abstract ideal.

Everything must be seen in context, and you have to see these texts as Muslims have understood them at different times and in different circumstances. That’s called being fair and reasonable.

But of course, you’re not interested in THAT, are you?

Allah's word mandates and sanctifies Jihad. 2:216 tells Muslims that Jihad is ordained for them. 8:39 commands Muslims to make perpetual war upon pagans. 9:29 commands Muslims to make perpetual war upon "people of the book". 61:10-13 describe participation in Jihad as a "commerce" that saves Muslims from "painful torment". Those mandates find confirmation in hadith & Shari'ah.

How Muslims have understood those texts is illustrated by Fiqh: rulings by scholars of Islamic law. I direct doubters & dissenters to download FOMIJihad.chm and read the Jihad in Fiqh chapter. How Moe understood those texts is illustrated by the oral traditions of his excellent companions. You can read them at USC-MSI.

• Fighting for the Cause of Allah (Jihaad)
• One-fifth of Booty to the Cause of Allah (Khumus)
• Military Expeditions led by the Prophet (pbuh) (Al-Maghaazi)
• The Book of Jihad and Expedition (Kitab Al-Jihad wa'l-Siyar)
• Jihad (Kitab Al-Jihad)
• Jihad

Sotomayor's Empathy on Display

Image by Jay Tamboli via Flickr

Sotomayor Achilles' heel? Wrongly imprisoned man

Jeff Deskovic served 16 years of a 15-life sentence for rape and murder. One of his appeals, six years before his innocence was proved, was rejected by Sonia Sotomayor on a technicality.

In nominating her to succeed Justice Souter, President Obama cited her empathy. This quote from the World Net Daily article [linked above] says it all.

According to reports, his lawyer asked a court clerk about the deadline and was told it had to be mailed by that date. Wrong. The court rules required delivery by that date.

When the paperwork arrived late it was dismissed. Eventually Sotomayor and other appellate judge found that such a mistake didn't "rise to the level of an extraordinary circumstance" and dismissed it.

"The district court correctly dismissed Deskovic's petition as untimely," the appeals court decision from Sotomayor concluded. A subsequent appeal was dismissed with the terse: "It is ordered that said petition for rehearing is denied."

In light of the fact that a subsequent search discovered a dna match to the murderer, who confessed to the crime, we can only conclude that Judge Sotomayor's empathy only extends to members of her own ethnicity. Her lack of empathy for a wrongly convicted man cost him six years in prison.

What if Deskovic had been sentenced to death for a crime he did not commit? She'd have sent an innocent man to the gallows. Lets point this fact out to our Senators prior to her confirmation hearing.

The Prayer That Democrats Hate

Though Democrats hate all prayers, this one is particularly loathsome for them.

It was presented by the Rev. Joe Wright (not Obama's racist mentor) who was the senior pastor at Witchita's Central Christian Church. In 1996 he was invited to offer the opening prayer at the Kansas House of Representatives.

It made all the Democrats very angry.

I guess it must have hit too close to home.

And it applies more today that it did then.

Here it is:

Heavenly Father, we come before you to ask your forgiveness. We seek your direction and your guidance. We know your word says, "Woe to those who call evil good." But that's what we've done.

We've lost our spiritual equilibrium. We have inverted our values. We have ridiculed the absolute truth of your word in the name of moral pluralism. We have worshiped other gods and called it multiculturalism.

We have endorsed perversion and called it an alternative lifestyle.

We've exploited the poor and called it a lottery. We've neglected the needy and called it self-preservation. We have rewarded laziness and called it welfare. In the name of choice, we have killed our unborn. In the name of right to life, we have killed abortionists.

We have neglected to discipline our children and called it building self-esteem. We have abused power and called it political savvy. We have coveted our neighbor's possessions and called it taxes. We have polluted the air with profanity and pornography and called it freedom of expression. We have ridiculed the time-honored values of our forefathers and called it enlightenment.

Search us, oh, God, and know our hearts today. Try us. Show us any wickedness within us. Cleanse us from every sin and set us free. Guide and bless these men and women who have been sent here by the people of the State of Kansas, and that they have been ordained by you to govern this great state.

Grant them your wisdom to rule. May their decisions direct us to the center of your will. And, as we continue our prayer and as we come in out of the fog, give us clear minds to accomplish our goals as we begin this Legislature.

For we pray in Jesus' name,

Amen.

Libs Wrong, Surge Works, America Wins the War!

Here's a new one: the liberals were wrong about The Surge of soldiers in Iraq. Oh, wait, that's right, the liberals are always wrong.

With the withdrawal of troops from all major cities is Iraq today, proud Americans and mighty American warriors can deem this war won.

But do you remember the likes of John Kerry ponificating about how the war in Iraq was lost? Can you recall the many ways the liberals and their mouthpiece, the main stream media, were finding to lose the war, to blame America and to allow wicked Islamic terrorists to maintain a strangle-hold on Iraqi citizens?

The liberals wanted to give up; they were making up ways to lose.

The liberals, which includes all Democrats, should hang their heads in shame; but they will not, for they have no shame. Especially the weak-kneed leaders, Barack Obama included.

And they better not feel one ounce of pride in the heroic accomplishment of our troops, for they were the ones who turned their backs on America's soldiers.

Shame on you, liberal freaks. Shame on you. You are all traitors. You are not Americans; you are licentious, pansy degenerates. You have no honor, no authenticity, no integrity and no love for this country or We the People. You stand for nothing and fall for anything.

Today the rest of us can feel proud of the task accomplished by our brave troops in Iraq.

But don't you dare even turn up the corner of your mouth, you back-stabbing liberal! For you betrayed the very ones who fight for your freedom to do so. As usual.

Congratulations, United States Armed Forces. We are extremely proud of you all.

Supreme Court Overturns Racist Judge's Verdict

Obama Supreme Court justice nominee Sonya Sotowhatever's credibility was permanently washed down the drain today as the Supreme Court overturned her racist ruling she made at the district level.

So, though Obama, Pelosi and liberal propaganda press continue to have wool pulled over their eyes, it is now not only conservatives who can see Sotowhatever for the racist she is, but so can the Supreme Court.

Their decision states clearly that there was no merit to Sotowhatever's judgement which came against some New England firefighters, besides the racial prejudice exercised by her.

And it wasn't just 'white males' on the Supreme Court who handed her her career earlier today, so their judgement was certain not to be tainted...since 'white males' apparently have a deficiency in decision-making according to the racist herself.

Yet Obama still wants you to believe that she is qualified for the position of Supreme Court justice. And he's got some swamp land in Florida he wants to sell you, too...

Which begs the question, why would anyone support a racist judge unless he was a racist himself?

Hmmmm...

Open Execration to the G.O.P.

Gutless Old Party: go to Hell! It was bad enough that you abandoned principles and spent the federal treasury like a drunken sailor. It was bad enough that you nominated a pusillanimous RINO in '08, ceding the White House to the Communists. But allowing eight anal orifices to join the 'crats in passing Waxman-Markey is absolutely unacceptable.

I don't care about their liberal constituencies, or their liberal seats. I can't afford a doubled gas bill! My natural gas bill was twice my income last year! Go to Hell! I can't afford the current prices of electricity and food; the carbon tax will increase them drastically. Go to Hell!! Waxman-Markey will prolong the recession and convert it into a depression. Go to Hell!!!

Henceforth, I will not vote for any Republican nominee for any local, state or federal office. I will support the Loyalist Party. I urge Conservatives, particularly those who are aware of the threat posed by Islamic aggression, military, legal & demographic, to turn away from the Gutless Old Party which has abandoned us and join the Loyalist Party.

Ban Islam

One of my Google Alerts returned a link to a discussion thread at alt.religion.islam. The post was by kangarooistan, who titled it "There's a group called " BAN ISLAM " help us to delete it". Kangarooistan's post is intended to initiate a movement to pressure Face Book to delete a discussion board titled "Ban Islam."

I will not reproduce the complete drivel here, instead I will refute a few key deceptions which need to be addressed directly.

This group is created because there has been a breach of contract by the creator of the Group "Ban Islam" and Face book needs to address this issue as a group demoralizing any religion is disrespectful and encourages religious hatred among people...

The group began with an obscenity in its name, Face Book objected and the organizers changed the name.

• demoralizing any religion is disrespectful and encourages religious hatred among people

While some posters swing the heavy hammers of condemnation & execration, others post relevant factual evidence to support their conclusions. We tell the truth about Islam and they interpret it as demonization. Yes, kangarooistan chose the wrong word. Islam is immoral and demonic, by design.

• .encourages religious hatred among people

That is what the Qur'an does, but it goes further, inciting genocidal violence. The Skeptic's Annotated Qur'an lists 527 ayat which incite religious hatred.

Of course there is a freedom of speech.. BUT, There is no freedom of abusing, spamming, swearing or disrespecting!

Kangarooistan is a clever liar, the sentence quoted above is an exemplar of kitman: lying by commission or concealment. We can discover the truth of this matter by examining Islam's all purpose handbook of Shari'ah: Reliance of the Traveller.

• O11.10-5 or mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam

Any negative remark about Islam breaks the covenant of dhimmitude and forfeits the dhimmi's life.

• O8.7: Acts that Entail Leaving Islam

• -4- to revile Allah or His messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace);

• -5- to deny the existence of Allah, His beginingless eternality, His endless eternality, or to deny any of His attributes which the consensus of Muslims ascribes to Him (dis: v1);

• -6- to be sarcastic about Allah's name, His command, His interdiction, His promise, or His threat;

• -7- to deny any verse of the Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does belong to it;

• -15- to hold that any of Allah's messengers or prophets are liars, or to deny their being sent;

• -16- to revile the religion of Islam;

Remember the penalty for apostasy!

• O8.1

  When a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed.

• O8.2

  In such a case, it is obligatory for the caliph (A: or his representive) to ask him to repent and return to Islam. If he does, it is accepted from him, but if he refuses, he is immediately killed.

Every one has a right to oppose & criticize others' belief but in a positive and gentle way..

If you oppose or criticize Islam in any place where Allah's writ runs, they'll kill you for it!

Earth is sweltering with the heat of tyrant and brutality.. Let's transform it into an oasis of peace and love!.. Let's say no to hate!
Let's stand against the racism.. We all are created equal... Let's respect the differences!.. Neither any religion nor any philosophy preach hate... So let's join hand and walk together to make the earth a wonderful planet...

• Let's transform it into an oasis of peace and love!

Translation: convert the entire world to Islam, by force or deception, then it'll all be peachy keen.

• Neither any religion nor any philosophy preach hate

Islam is neither a religion nor a philosophy; it is a way of life: predation! It preaches hate and genocidal violence. 8:37 mandates perpetual war against pagans until only Allah is worshiped. 9:29 mandates perpetual war against Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians until they are subjugated and submit to annual extortion. 8:67 sets "great slaughter" as Moe's price of admission to Paradise. 47:4 commands killing and wounding "many of them". One Jewish settlement surrendered after a long siege. Moe decapitated the men, then he examined the boys, and decapitated any who had reached adolescence. Genocide, anyone? The historical record is here: Sunan Abu Dawud 38.4390. See also Sahih Bukhari 4.52.280.

Islam is aggressive, offensive, predatory, genocidal and mercenary. I have presented much of the evidence in this post. Click the links and see for yourself. If any doubt remains, read What's Wrong with Islam/Muslims and follow the links therein contained.

If you are ready to take action, here are some things you can do to advance the cause of human life and liberty against Islam's genocidal aggression. Please sign and promote the following on line petitions. Send their urls to your Congressman & Senators. Copy these petitions and paste them into emails, urging the recipients to forward them. Learn as much as you can about Islam and share your knowledge with others; each one teach two!

• Congress Debate Qur'an Petition
• Outlaw Islam!
• Ban Islam
• Citizens' Declaration of Threat & Plea for Relief

Idiotic Petition Comments

I recently visited the Ban Islam Petition and discovered two interesting new comments. The petition asks the World Court to outlaw Islam because of its intrinsically evil doctrines & practices.

787. Morgan Brykein Care to read the First Amendment?

The petition's author is a citizen of Canada, not shaded by the First Amendment's umbrella of protection. The Canadian Human Rights Council has the power to persecute him. The amendment's establishment & free exercise clauses apply to the federal government of the U.S.A., they have no application to the World Court.

786. Frikka Wow Wow Freedom of religion, crackers, ever hear of it?

Casting aside the racial slur as irrelevant, I'll tackle the freedom of religion argument. Those persons fortunate enough to be under the First Amendment's umbrella of protection are shielded from establishment of a national church and protected from national interference with their faith & practice. Freedom of religion implies that we can't be compelled to believe or worship nor be obstructed from belief & practice.

Islam has no such provision. 3:85 declares that no religion will be accepted but Islam and those who seek other religions will be condemned to Hellfire. 8:39 & 9:29 declare unremitting warfare against pagans and Jews & Christians respectively until all resistance ceases, only Allah is worshiped and "people of the book" are humbled, subjugated & extorted. In Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387, Moe informs us that our lives & property are not sacred to Muslims until we become Muslims.

If Muslims are free to practice Islam, then the rest of us are deprived of the right to live in addition to our freedom of religion. Open your Qur'an to 2:216, which ordains Jihad for Muslims. Jihad is what a Muslim must do to avoid Hellfire and be assured of admission to Paradise. Open your Qur'an to 61:10 and read through the 13^th ayeh. Muslims are obligated to fight in Allah's cause. Allah's cause is making his word and system dominate the entire world. Doubters & dissenters should turn to 9:33 followed by Sahih Bukhari 4.52.65. Offensive Jihad is fard Kifaya, binding on every able bodied male Muslim of military age until a sufficient number have answered the call. Defensive Jihad is fard Ayn, binding on every Muslim who can get to the front.

Obama's Treaty Gives NAMES of US Gun Owners to Foreign Governments

What the # !*# is this?

Over MY DEAD BODY!

NO-bomb-a is North Korea, Iran's 'Biatch'

In response to North Korea's beligerent threats to America, Barack Obama expressed in words that the United States military was fully prepared and capable to respond to any eventuality that might come about as a result of the rogue state's activities.

Unfortunately, though the US armed forces are prepared and capable, their Commander-in-Chief is not.

And North Korea knows it, for they have been watching Obama's 2009 Global Surrender and Appeasement Tour. They have seen him bully his own people, beat-up America's friends and brown-nose America's enemies.

For, you see, unlike the morally-bankrupt evil of liberal Obamabots, who are oblivious to how this all plays out, the blood-thirsty element of evil in the world CAN actually read between the lines. They understand weakness. They sense fear. And they smell blood.

North Korea, Iran and Al-Qaeda all fully understand that Obama does not dare show a spine to any enemy larger than a fly. They have watched and heard him be far harsher toward Israel, our friend and ally, than toward Iran whose military is killing its own citizens, and North Korea who threatens us with nuclear war.

Predators understand this as 'weakness.' Conquerers understand this as 'opportunity.' It emboldens dictators, encourages terrorists, and allows evil to thrive, unchecked. While at the same, it undermines our strength, discourages our allies and demeans our reputation and credibility around the world.

This all mixed together makes the world a much more dangerous place.

As the Obamabots bury their heads deeper into the sand (which explains what they talk out of, and why...)

So as the North Korean's cargo ship, suspected of carrying nuclear-prolifitiation materials, sails toward Burma, with the US Navy in its shadow, an emboldened North Korea has no fear whatsoever that there will be any problems - they are confident that they will be able to do what ever they desire - they are certain that they will not be confronted by the United States - because they know that Barack Hussein Obama does not have the sand to do a single thing about it.

And Iran is not even marginally deterred from its nuclear ambitions regardless of the inner turmoil going on there now, because they know that Obama will continue to appease, concede, surrender, give in and capitulate; they know that he is unwilling to pull the trigger, that he won't use the big stick. They know very well that Barack NO-Bomb-a is nothing but their 'biatch.'

Stop Socialized Medicine!

Conservatives for Patients' Rights is collecting signatures on a petition to stop the Socialized Medicine juggernaut. If you want to experience:

• massive tax increases
• massive premium increases
• your insurance company going out of business
• your employer going out of business or dropping health insurance benefits
• nameless, faceless bureaucrats making your health care decisions
• expanding waiting lists
• health care rationing

then sit there and do nothing. If you want to prevent those evils, then sign this petition and urge your family, friends, & associates to sign it.

After signing the petition, visit http://www.congress.org to send emails to your Representative, Senators & President Obama. Make sure that they fully comprehend your outrage and contempt for their demagogic scheme which will certainly ruin the best health care system ever developed. Don't just say no, say HELL NO!!! Let them know that your next vote will depend on their votes on this crucial issue.