Now comes word [a
special report] from
Eye on the UN that the Durban II Draft has been revised.
Eye on the UN has a
special page set aside for Durban II where you can find links to vital documents related to this issue. The revision is in the form of a 38 page, 192KB pdf document. The release notes follow.
Criteria used for technical review:
- The structure of the current document follows PC.2/8;
- All themes and messages of the compilation have been preserved;
- Duplicate provisions were deleted;
- Similar paragraphs were merged;
- Provisions identical to the DDPA were removed;
- Provisions similar to the DDPA and thus weakening it were removed;
- Region-specific language was made general or deleted;
- Paragraphs from the compilation marked with an * for which no language has been submitted were condensed or deleted;
- Paragraphs were located in accordance with the objectives of the respective sections;
- The annex to section 4 containing examples of best practices is suggested to be removed;
- Grammatical corrections were made as well as soft editing;
- Subheadings in italics were temporarily introduced to facilitate future work.
But did they make the draft report acceptable to lovers of truth, justice, life & liberty? Hell no! If you expected substantive improvement, you are severely deluded and probably require institutionalization.
Eye On the UN lists four areas of concern.
1. Demonizing Israel
2. Thwarting the war to end terrorism
3. Limiting freedom of expression
4. Creating the Islamic victim
I do not recall seeing mention of one particular issue which angers me: corrupting our language by conflating objections to Jihad with racism.
4. Emphasizes the urgent need to address the scourges of anti-Semitism, Christianophobia, and Islamophobia as contemporary forms of racism as well as racial and violent movements based on racism and discriminatory ideas directed at African, Arab, Christian, Jewish, Muslim and other communities;
That festering lump of feces comes from:
Preliminary document of the African Regional Conference Preparatory to the Durban Review Conference.
Opposition to Islam is not phobic! There is absolutely nothing irrational about it. Islam's demonic mandate to conquer and subjugate the entire world, expressed in two ayat containing explicit imperatives to make war [
8:39,
9:29] confirmed by hadith [
Bukhari 1.8.387] and reflected in Islam's Sharia law [
Reliance of the Traveller Book O9.8, 9.9] renders Islam absolutely intolerable. Nor is Islam a race; it victimizes people of several races, so that Allah's slaves include people of Black, Caucasian and Asian heritage.
Hence forth you know that whenever you read 'racism' or 'related intolerance' in a UN resolution, you can substitute rejection of Islam. Durban II word count:
- racism: 108
- related intolerance: 67
- terrorism: 9
- Islamophobia: 2
- profiling: 7
- defamation: 7
- defamation of religion: 5
- defamation of religions: 3
On page 5 of the pdf, we find this maggot encrusted lump:
Notes with concern instances of defamation of religions, which manifests itself in generalized and stereotypical association of religions, in particular Islam, with violence and terrorism, thus impacting negatively on the rights of individuals belonging to these religions, including Muslim minorities, and exposing them to hatred and discrimination. Such situations are further aggravated by the imposition of restrictions on the profession of religions, including restrictions on the construction of places of worship and their surveillance; (merger paras 2, 42, 43, 45, 46 section 1)
- stereotypical association of religions, in particular Islam, with violence and terrorism
I already showed you why Islam is associated with violence; why is Islam associated with terrorism?
- 3:151. We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve...
- 8:12....I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes."
- 8:57. So if you gain the mastery over them in war, punish them severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they may learn a lesson.
- 8:60.[Abdullah Yusuf Ali] Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know.
- 33:26.And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allah brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.
- 59:2.... But Allah's (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they expected it not, and He cast terror into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you with eyes (to see).
- 59:13. Verily, you (believers in the Oneness of Allah - Islamic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear in their (Jews of Bani An-Nadir) breasts than Allah. That is because they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and Power of Allah).
- Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331: ...Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month's journey....
- Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220: ...I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), ...
Got a clue yet? If not, you must be a
Lib
Tard, and never will have a clue until the Mujahideen are sawing your head off with a dull knife. Moe was ordered to fight, made victorious by frightening & terrifying his victims and made wealthy by
conquests, yet we are sternly advised that Islam is stereotypically associated with violence and terrorism. Yeah, right. That feces spewed from the mouth of
Hemayet Uddin, inter alia.
- Such situations are further aggravated by the imposition of restrictions on the profession of religions, including restrictions on the construction of places of worship and their surveillance;
How many churches are there in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia? There are many Christians imported as service workers, but no churches, why? What happens when Copts wish to build a new church or repair an old one? Why?
- O11.5-7 and are forbidden to build new churches
A hint for the clueless: Is there some reason why the profession & practice of Islam should not be restricted? Should Mosques not be surveilled after weapons and CBW related materials and equipment were found in a British Mosque?
The terminally ignorant do not comprehend the fact that
Jihad: aggressive warfare to propagate Islam and seize real & personal property,
genocide: making a great slaughter and
terrorism:
casting terror are intrinsic sacraments of Islam. You can not properly practice Islam without practicing them.
Jihad is not an anachronism; it must be continued until all resistance ceases and only Allah is worshiped. It must be continued until all "people of the book" are subjugated & extorted. Jihad will be practiced continuously from the
beginning of Moe's prophetic career in 610 to the last day.
Abandoning Jihad for more productive pursuits will cause Muslims to be cursed until they return to their "original religion".
Acknowledges that a most disturbing phenomenon is the intellectual and ideological validation of Islamophobia. When it is expressed against migrants it takes the form of religious-ethnic or religious-racial tones, when it is expressed in the form of defamation of religions, it takes cover behind the freedom of expression and when it is expressed in the form of profiling, it hides behind the war against terrorism. Believes that association of terrorism and violence with Islam or any other religion, including through publication of offensive caricatures and making of hate documentaries, would purposely complicate our common endeavours to address several contemporary issues, including the fight against terrorism and the occupation of foreign territories and peoples; (para 45 section 1)
They are bitching about the
Danish cartoons,
FITNA and blog posts such as this. They want to criminalize exposing Moe as the terrorist he was.
Urges States to take effective measures to address contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, and to take firm action against negative stereotyping of religions and defamation of religious personalities, holy books, scriptures and symbols; (para 100 section 5)
Calls on States to develop, and where appropriate to incorporate, permissible limitations on the exercise of the right to freedom of expression into national legislation; (para 96 c) section 5)
Would it have been proper, in 1935, to criminalize criticism of Hitler and his Nazi Party? How can we debate strategy & tactics in the current war without identifying and accurately describing the enemy and its doctrines? The UN has been co-oped by the enemy and is attempting to disarm us so that we will be led, dumb like sheep, to the slaughter.
Calls upon States to develop, in cooperation with multilateral organizations, Internet service providers, private sector stakeholders and civil society, and taking into account the principles of multilateralism, democracy and transparency, a coordinated global strategy to formulate a voluntary code of ethical conduct with a view to prohibiting the proliferation of ideas of superiority and the justification of racial or religious hatred and discrimination in any form, and promoting mutual respect and tolerance among all peoples; (merger paras 107, 110 section 5)
- prohibiting the proliferation of ideas of superiority and the justification of racial or religious hatred and discrimination in any form
How are you going to outlaw the Qur'an? It has been published in many languages, copies exist in Mosques, Madrassahs, private homes, libraries and book stores all over the world. Anyone who does not perceive the perverse absurdity of that call should remove himself from the gene pool for the benefit of society.
The bottom line: The Durban II Draft is an intolerable affront to logic, morality, truth, justice and liberty. It must be rejected. The American people must rise up as one disrespectfully demanding abstention from the Durban II meetings and withdrawal from the UN. We must rise up as one to condemn & curse those who condescendingly demand that we submit and surrender to Islam. Their arrogance can not be accepted. We must extend to them the impudent digit and the
thumb of death.
In this blog post, I have presented evidence from Islam's own canon of scripture, tradition & jurisprudence. The source documents are easily accessible on the web. The links to hadith will lead you to the USC MSA's Compendium of Islamic Texts where you can access the Qur'an in three parallel translations and the four major hadith collections. At scribid.com you can read a scanned image of Reliance of the Traveller, using a search engine to find specific text or the Book & Chapter designators.
Those ignorant, deluded fools who believe that I quote the Qur'an out of context, perverting, distorting or mis-translating it should turn to Ibn Kathir's Tafsir which will expose their idiotic assumptions. www.qtafsir.com has a search engine with which you can look up any verse included in the tafsir. Try these topics, which confirm the validity of what I have posted here.
I dissected the previous draft, exposing the lies, deceit & hypocrisy therein contained in the posts listed below.
.
"Ema Shakes Her Tail" and you soil yourself.
Ben,
Consequences. You call for actions that have consequences.
The extreme nature of of your unnatural fear of Islam has caused you completely to come off the rails of rationality. There can be no middle ground. You clearly state your goal is to 'eliminate' Islam and to force followers to convert or die.
Please talk us through your final solution for the Islamic question. Currently over a billion people call themselves followers of Islam.
So how do you propose carrying out the extermination of Islam? Who will do the work for you? How will you be able to tell if a Muslim is a true convert?
The world has been here before.
"In Germany they first came for the Communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Catholics,
and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant.
Then they came for me —
and by that time no one was left to speak up." - Pastor Martin Niemöller
_______-
Aggression is the difference between Ben's side and them??! Ha ha ha.
Ben really is 'out there.' Let us all hope he stays there.
.