Saturday, July 11, 2009

Islam in Action


The video embedded here was recorded at a recent Islamic Festival held in Dearborn, Michigan. In it you will see and hear Muslims assaulting and attempting to intimidate a Christian. Observe their expressions and gestures; hear their words and experience Islamic supremacism, triumphalism and arrogance. As their numbers increase, their attitude will intensify. The video was posted to You Tube by Act! For America.


The video has a ten minute run time and is 23MB. If, like me, you are limited to a dial- up cconnection, you will need to download it. For that you will need Firefox or Flock, with DWHelper; you will also need Irfanview to play the flv file.

The video centers around the Islamic response to Christians who wanted to discuss a pamphlet distributed by Muslims at a booth in the festival. The pamphlet's title was "Uprooting the Forces of Evil:: Islam's War on Terrorism". The pamphlet is available on the web as a pdf file at http://www.islaam.ca/downloads/islamswaronterror.pdf.

A critical examination of the pamphlet will explain their reluctance to have a Dialogue about it. The pamphlet is in question/answer format.
  • Are these indiscriminate bombings, such as what occurred in the US, London and Madrid, Islamically justifiable?
    • Islam unequivocally prohibits the likes of these horrendous acts and does not condone this awful behavior. Look at what Allah says, in the Quran, about those who kill innocent people.
      • "It would be as if he killed the whole of mankind; and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the whole of mankind."(Al-Ma'idah: 32)
    • Prophet Muhammad- may the peace and blessings of Allah be upon him-s stressed the prohibition of killing women and children on many occasions, even at times of war:
      • Abu Bakr; the Prophet's closest disciple said :Do not kill women or children or a senile person, do not cut down fruit-bearing trees and do not destroy an inhabited place."
    • Therefore, this behavior can never be justified in any way, shape or form.
The polemicist quotes 5:32, but completely ignores the verse which follows it, which has a bearing upon the definition of innocent.
5:33. The recompense of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter.
I have added emphasis to the most critical parts of that ayeh. We must focus our attention upon one key phrase: wage war against Allah; what does it mean?
The answer is contained in Ibn Kathir's Tafsir:
[...]`Wage war' mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. [...]
Waging war against Allah and his Messnger consists of opposing and contradicting Islam and it includes three parallel sub elements:
  1. disbelief
  2. blocking roads
  3. spreading fear.
If you do not believe in Allah, and fully submit to him, then you are not innocent; you may be killed with impunity because you are at war against Allah and his Messenger.

Whenever a Muslim speaks or writes about the prohibition of killing innocent people, he practices kitman: lying by omission. In so doing, he relies upon your assumption that he shares your definition of innocent. He does not; In the Muslim world view, only Muslims are innocent.

By the same token, we are expected to assume that the prohibition on killing women and children is based upon moral principles. It is not! The prohibition is economic, not moral. Kuffar women and children are economic assets for their captors. Examine Allah's word..
33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.
Note the italicized phrase: whom did they make captives? Once again, the answer is provided by Ibn Kathir.
[...]Those who were killed were their warriors, and the prisoners were their children and women.[...]
What is the disposition of captive women and children? We learn from Shari'ah that they become slaves by reason of capture. Examine this quote from Reliance of the Traveller.

O9.13 When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman's previous marriage is immediately annulled.

This hadith will clarify the matter for you; it should also fill you with disgust.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 459:

Narrated Ibn Muhairiz:

I entered the Mosque and saw Abu Said Al-Khudri and sat beside him and asked him about Al-Azl (i.e. coitus interruptus). Abu Said said, "We went out with Allah's Apostle for the Ghazwa of Banu Al-Mustaliq and we received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus. So when we intended to do coitus interrupt us, we said, 'How can we do coitus interruptus before asking Allah's Apostle who is present among us?" We asked (him) about it and he said, 'It is better for you not to do so, for if any soul (till the Day of Resurrection) is predestined to exist, it will exist."

They received captives. Captive women were distributed as part of the spoils. Moe gave his companions permission to rape those women.

8 comments:

RightHooks said...

Ben, that was an awesome video. It shows Muslims for the liars and bullies that they are. I hope this goes to court and each of the guilty are charged with assault. Kudos to the brave people who filmed it. Myself, I am sure that I would have ended up in jail because I would not take that kind of abuse from a Muslim in the United States of America. What a bunch of PUKES.

Anonymous said...

"Kudos to the brave people who filmed it."

Anyone who runs to the police saying they were assaulted because someone put their hand in front of the camera is not very brave.

This kind of "vigilante journalism" where some self-righteous dickhead with a camcorder decides to go piss people off on camera is pure trash.

RightHooks said...

PW, you obviously missed the point about how these Muslim pukes were bullying the one who was simply trying to ask a question. If that 'piss[es] people off ' then who's got the problem? And does the Muslim pukes being 'piss[ed] off' give them a right to assault an American? If you 'piss[ed]' me off with, say, a slanderous, demeaning, inaccurate article about me on your blog, does that give me the right, then to assault you? You must agree that it is OK for me to assault you, then, for you to be consistent.

Don't make excuses for Islam; we don't need any more Americans to excuse them, look the other way, appease them or be their apologists. Grow a backbone, man. Stand up for what is RIGHT.

Ema Nymton said...

.

Domestic "christian' Terrorist,

Muslims are Americans.

~@:o?
.

RightHooks said...

Ema,

Muslims cannot submit to the United States Constitution and the Qu'ran at the same time. Therefore they are domestic enemies of the Constitution and should be dealt with accordingly unless they renounce the Quran, it's teachings and its authority.

Ema Nymton said...

.

Domestic "christian' Terrorist,

Muslims are Americans.

Catholics cannot submit to the United States Constitution and the Pope in Rome at the same time. Therefore they are domestic enemies of the Constitution and should be dealt with accordingly unless they renounce the Pope, the Catholic Church's teachings and its authority.

Get over yourself.

~@:o?
.

RightHooks said...

Ema,

Wrong.

RightHooks said...

Ema,

James 1:21

“Therefore, get rid of all moral filth and the evil that is so prevalent and humbly accept the word planted in you, which can save you.”