Innocence of Muslims Update: Hisham Kandil: Go to Hell!

Innocence of Muslims Update: Hisham Kandil: Go to Hell! http://counterjihadreport.com/2012/09/12/an-apology-from-egypts-muslim-brotherhood-government-no-a-veiled-threat/
http://www.trust.org/alertnet/news/egypt-says-us-govt-not-to-blame-for-prophet-mohammad-film

Egypt's Prime Minister Hisham Kandil

 "We ask the American government to take a firm position¹ toward this film's producers² within the framework of international charters³ that criminalise acts that stir strife⁴ on the basis of race, colour or religion⁵."

This is what the Minister is bitching about: 

I believe that the primary source is Martin Ling's Sira, which is considerably shorter than Guillaume's. Much of the story can be verified in Ibn Sa'd's Sira - including the  hallucinations, suicidal tendency  and offensive violence.  The murders commissioned by Moe are documented here:  List of Killings Ordered or Supported by Muhammad.  Moe really did marry the six year old daughter of his bosom buddy; for the details, go to:  Aisha's Age of Consummation.

    Attention Lazy doubters & deniers: the most significant quotes from Hishham's Rescension of Ibn Ishaq's Sira & Tabari's Tahrik are to be found in the topical quotes appendix of The Prophet of Doom. You can save a great deal of time by perusing these listings in the right sidebar.: 

---

1. This is a demand for censorship: prohibition and punishment of publishing facts unflattering to Islam. 
2. The writer, director, producer and distributors are acting within their rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights cited below. 
3. ICCPR   [Emphasis added.]
   
   • Article 19

   • 1. Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.

     2. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression¹; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.

     3. The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article carries with it special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are provided by law and are necessary:

     (a) For respect of the rights² or reputations³ of others;

     (b) For the protection of national security or of public order (ordre public), or of public health or morals.

   • Article 20 

     1. Any propaganda for war⁴ shall be prohibited by law.

     2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence⁵ shall be prohibited by law.

   • Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion⁵, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press⁶; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
4. Publishing a video clip of a documentary film is not an act stirring strife.  Nowhere in the video is the audience exhorted to perform any violent act.  Muslims rioted in Egypt and Libya because they are Muslims: rabble roused by the media, Imams and militia leaders, not because of the video clip. 

        Islamic law declares that "Infidels may be attacked without provocation". Five of the 9/11 conspirators signed a statement which included this sentence:  "Nevertheless, it would have been the greatest religious duty to fight you over your infidelity."

5. Siraj Wahhaj is Black, Ibrahim Hooper is White; both are Muslims: what race is Islam?  Islam is not a race!  What legitimate religion is mercenary: created for the personal emolument of its founder through the accrual of spoils of war?  What legitimate religion is violent: commanding and mandating perpetual war?  What legitimate religion mandates the execution of anyone who apostatizes?  Islam is not a legitimate religion!

 

---

1. The video imparts information: by means of the video, people unable or unwilling to read can discover that Moe was an impious fraud who falsely attributed his own words to his god.   They can discover his pederasty & lechery and his barbarism.  The audience has a right to know, even though Muslims desperately need to conceal those facts, which, if widely known, will be fatal to Islam. 
2. There is no right to be shielded from all criticism. Islam is not a living person and has no human rights in any case. 
3. Moe died in 632, he can not be injured by revelation of his evil character.  Islam is not a living person and has no  right  to be shielded from criticism.
4. When any Imam shouts "Jihad", he violates this provision.  The Qur'an violates this provision in the following ayat [and others]:  2:216, 8:39, 9:29, 9:123. The authentic hadith collection of Imam Bukhari violates this provision in these ahadith [and others]: 1.8.387, 4.52.177. Shari'ah violates this provision in the Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9.  It is therefore necessary that Islam's canon of scripture, tradition, jurisprudence & exegesis be proscribed by law and Islam be outlawed because it inculcates hatred and incites violence. 
5. Congress is prohibited from enforcing Shari'ah!
6. Congress is prohibited from censoring truthful and passive expression; the movie can not be censored because it is truthful and does not exhort viewers to violent acts.