Where is Al Sharpton? Where is Jesse Jackson? Where is Louis Farakkan? Where is the 'Rev.' Jeremiah Wright? Where is the outrage against blatant racism??
At the Iowa State fair over the weekend, a mob of blacks went out on what they called, 'Beat Whitey Night,' assaulting a large number of innocent white people, putting several in the hospital and also assaulting police officers 'because they were white.'
Where is the outrage on NBC? CBS? ABC? CNN? Oh, they are strangely SILENT on the matter.
Mr. Obama, where is your 'silly' insight and comments?
Where is the outcry against PURE and UNDENIABLE racism???
I know, when Iowa's big 'ol, baseball-bat-wielding farm boys start getting a little revenge, THEN you will hear the likes of cowards like Jesse Jackson, Mr, Sharpton and Mr. Wright start whining about 'racism.'
Sorry, you hypocritical racists, this street does not only go one way - you know, where blacks such as Michelle Obama can slander countless white people as 'racists' because they did not vote for her Kenyan husband for President - you cannot make up instances of presumed racism when it suits your agenda and then IGNORE REAL, BLATANT RACISM when blacks are beating people BECAUSE THEY ARE WHITE.
Those racist fools who went out to beat up white people on 'Beat Whitey Night' had better hope that Iowa's white people do not organize and return the favor.
But who could blame them?
Certainly not Jackson, Sharpton and their ilk, for if they REALLY opposed racism, they ALREADY WOULD HAVE SPOKEN UP.
Sorry hypocrites, it's too late.
And I think Bubba and his friends are starting to open up a huge can...
Your drivel becomes more nonsensical by the day. There can be no question but that you are sitting, with your seat belt tightened, firmly on the Crazy Train. In a little over two months, you and the likes of you will be banished from the arena of official representation and we will never allow the Crazies to get such power again. Remember what they say about payback, because it's a comin...in SPADES.
Look for these signs: -Obamacare repealed -Obama's thugs prosecuted and jailed -Obama impeached for some of his long list of High Crimes and Misdemeanors -War on terror re-engaged with vigor -Iran bombed back to the 3rd century B.C. -Palestinain terrorists, Hamas terrorists and Hezbollah reduced to ashes and begging for peace -Illegal immigrants engaged by military on southern US border, decide to stay in Mexico - Arizona's law becomes the model for all states, millions of illegals sent home - Perverted homosexual 'marriages' outlawed forever - People's tolerance to the homosexual agenda will cease and they will not put up with the perverts' agenda any longer - Mosques in the USA will be limited to the number of churches allowed to be built in Saudi Arabia - Muslims will be confronted on the streets - Key subversive Muslim activists like the ones trying to build ground zero mosque will be assassinated for being 'enemies of the United States,' which they are -Mosques will be burned and destroyed; if they respond by attacking even one church, there will be a blood-bath nation-wide - Muslims will be driven out of the country -Islam will be made illegal because it refuses to recognize the Sovereignty of the United States and will be declared a enemy of the US Constitution and the US, which it clearly already is - A conservative Congress will stop all Obama's spending and get this country back on track economically - Gitmo will remain open for business - Radicals like Bill Ayers, Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Van Jones, and all Obama's czars and cronies will never again be given a credible platform from which to plot the overthrow of this country - This country will be declared to be the Christian country that it always has been and always will be...if you don't like it, GET OUT! - Common sense Americans will seize the power back from the radical enemies, such as yourself, and start getting this country back on track.
We have had enough of your hair-brained, fantastical pipe-dreams. Real life is nothing like the imaginary one that floats around in your generally empty and completely immoral brains. We have had enough. You and all those like you are wrong....dead wrong, and we will not tolerate it any more because you all had your chance to lead and all you have done is destroy. Time's up. You and your kind will be reduced to the lower rung of society which you really are...those who have nothing to contribute, but only want what someone else earns. Those who would be duped by our enemies and would give comfort, aid and assistance to them. We have had it. You shall no longer lead, for you are not leaders...you are WHACKS. QUACKS. And HACKS.
Far from enlightened, you are BLIND, yet you think your blindness is GENIUS.
We all know better. We see you for what you are and you have been exposed by truth and the light, something you hide from and try to spin and manipulate.
We see you ALL for who you are and your days are now numbered.
America is about to be taken back on a revolutionary scale and your 'progressive,' 'liberal' ideology will be regarded for what it is: selfish, ignorant, power-hungry, treasonous, dangerous idiocy!
Prepare to be conquered. Prepare to be vanquished. Prepare to be ruled by common sense Americans who are 'we the people,' not 'you the radicals and freaks.'
For the fat lady is stepping up to the microphone, her song sheet is in front of her, and she's clearing her throat....
The language barrier is obviously at play in this update. If I interpret it correctly, a stay had been issued in conjunction with an appeal to the High Court but the Judge pressed forward regardless.
It becomes clear that there is little or no justice for Christians in Pakistan. The section of Reliance of the Traveller which explains who is qualified to testify in court exposes the horrific truth. Note the words which I emphasized.
o24.2 Legal testimony is only acceptable from a witness who:
(a) is free;
(b) is fully legally responsible (mukallaf, def: c8.1)
(0: as testimony is not accepted from a child or insane
person, even when the child's testimony regards injuries
among children that occurred at play);
(e) is able to speak;
(d) is mentally awake;
(e) is religious (0: meaning upright (024.4)
(A: and Muslim), for Allah Most High says,
"Let those of rectitude among you testify" (Koran 65:2),
and unbelief is the vilest form of corruption, as goes without saying);
Mehwish Aleem August 23 at 3:46pm
Dear group members.
21st August 2010 was the hearing of Hector Aleem, so here is the update about the hearing. First of all our lawyer asked the judge for the stay, because the High Court has given the stay for the quashment of the case and advised the lower court not to proceed until the High Court allows the lower court but as the judge of the lower court is very discriminative, he was not ready to give the stay even after the order of the High Court but after our lawyer gave some legal points and told him to wait until the judgment of the High Court he agreed not to proceed but the Mullahs and the Lawyer of the plaintiff pressurized him to proceed other wise they will protest and will destroy the court, the judge than started the proceeding. All the witnesses were available and our lawyer had to question them but the Investigation officer of Hector’s case was not available, so the judge has ordered the IO (investigation officer) to come on the next hearing. During the argument of both lawyers (our and plaintiff’s) they both argued so harshly and were about to had a physical fight. But the judge ordered both of them to calm down. And gave the next date of hearing. This all situation tells us that our lawyer is quiet brave and is ready to face any situation.
Thank you for all your moral and financial support. Those who can donate please use the following methods.
I want you to see a video which discloses some of the suffering of Copts in Egypt. Copts are are indigenous Christians who suffer great injustice under Islamic domination.
The video, which runs 14 minutes and 34 seconds, is in Arabic with English sub titles. It gives us a window into the persecution of Christians conquered by Islam. who are persecuted for attempting to build churches and worship. You will see one story about 32 Christians arrested for meeting in a house to pray.
I can't find the information required to embed the video, which was posted on Facebook, just click this link to view it. The video advertises the Free Copts web site, where you can find many articles about current events, including the oppression of Egyptian Copts.
To fully comprehend what is happening in Egypt, you need to know that Muslims consider their system and themselves superior to all others. Non-Muslims are to be humiliated and punished for not being Muslim. This sample of Surah Al-Imran will help you to understand. [Emphasis added.]
3:110. You [true believers in Islâmic Monotheism, and real followers of Prophet Muhammad and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)] are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind; you enjoin Al-Ma'rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that Islâm has forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better for them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh - and rebellious against Allâh's Command).
3:111. They will do you no harm, barring a trifling annoyance; and if they fight against you, they will show you their backs, and they will not be helped.
3:112. Indignity is put over them wherever they may be, except when under a covenant (of protection) from Allâh, and from men; they have drawn on themselves the Wrath of Allâh, and destruction is put over them. This is because they disbelieved in the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allâh and killed the Prophets without right. This is because they disobeyed (Allâh) and used to transgress beyond bounds (in Allâh's disobedience, crimes and sins).
3:110 identifies the subject, 3:111 assures Muslims of an easy victory; 3:112 tells us that people of the scriptures are covered with indignity and destruction. One hadith clarifies this matter better than any other.
Moe's arrogance comes through loud and clear; Muslims share that arrogance as part of emulating their Profit. Islamic law sets the seal on the issue. The following quotes are from Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9. Turn to page 507 of the pdf file to verify these quotes. I post this because I want you to see just how tolerant Islam is; there is a need to know. If you don't know about this, you can not detect the lies spewed by Muslims and our elected traitors.
o11.0 NON·MUSLIM SUBJECTS OF THE
ISLAMIC STATE (AHL AL-DHIMMA)
o11.1 A formal agreement of protection is made
with citizens who are:
(1) Jews'
(2) Christians;
(3) Zoroastrians;
(4) Samaritans and Sabians, if their religions do not
respectively contradict the fundamental bases of Judaism and Christianity;
(5) and those who adhere to the religion of Abraham
or one of the other prophets (upon whom be blessings and peace).
011.2 Such an agreement may not be effected
with those who are idol worshippers (dis: o9.9(n:»,
or those who do not have a Sacred Book
or something that could have been a Book.
(A: Something that could have been a Book
refers to those like the Zoroastrians, who have
remnants resembling an ancient Book. As for the
psuedoscriptures of cults that have appeared since
Islam (n: such as the Sikhs, Baha'is, Mormons,
Qadianis, etc.), they neither are nor could be a
Book, since the Koran is the final revelation (dis: w4).)
011.3 Such an agreement is only valid when the
subject peoples:
(a) follow the rules of Islam (A: those mentioned
below (011.5) and those involving public behavior and dress,
though in acts of worship and their private lives, the subject
communities have their own laws, judges, and courts,
enforcing the rules of their own religion among themselves);
(b) and pay the non-Muslim poll tax Jizya).
Notice that there is a "treaty of protection", for which refer back to 3:112, quoted above. This treaty is only imposed upon people who have been conquered or intimidated so that they surrender to Muslims who attacked them. [9:29]
Notice that idol worshipers, Sikhs, Baha'is & Mormons who are specifically excluded, must be fought until they are dead or Muslim [o9.9].
THE NON-MUSLIM POLL TAX
011.4 The minimum non-Muslim poll tax is one
dinar (n: 4.235 grams of gold) per person (A: per
year). The maximum is whatever both sides agree
upon. It is collected with leniency and politeness, as
are all debts, and is not levied on women, children.
or the insane.
o11.5 Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply with Islamic rules
that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life, reputation, and property.
In addition, they:
(1) are penalized for committing adultery or theft, though not for drunkenness;
(2) are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);
(3) are not greeted with "as-Salamu 'alaykum" ;
(4) must keep to the side of the street;
(5) may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims' buildings, though if they
acquire a tall house, it is not razed;
(6) are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display
of their funerals and feast days;
(7) and are forbidden to build new churches.
o11.6 They are forbidden to reside in the Hijaz, meaning the area and
towns around Mecca, Medina, and Yamama, for more than three days
(when the caliph allows them to enter there for something they need).
`I added emphasis to a few important items in that list to make them stand out. Reexamine #4 in the light of this quote: "when you meet any one of them on the roads force him to go to the narrowest part of it." from Sahih Muslim 26.5389.
The sixth item in that list prohibits ringing church bells, displaying crosses, reading the scripture aloud and public funeral processions. The seventh item proscribes church construction. Did someone mention freedom of religion? Why can't Copts build churches?
O11.10 lists acts which violate the treaty of protection. Pay close attention to these.
011. IO The agreement is also violated (A: with
respect to the offender alone) if the state has stipu-
lated that any of the following things break it, and
one of the suhjects does so anyway. though if the
state has not stipulated that these break the agree-
ment, then they do not; namely, if one of the subject
people:
(1) commits adultery with a Muslim woman or marries her:
(2) conceals spies of hostile forces;
(3) leads a Muslim away from Islam;
(4) kills a Muslim;
(5) or mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet
(Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam.
011.11 When a subject's agreement with the state
has been violated, the caliph chooses between the
four alternatives mentioned above in connection
with prisoners of war (09.14).
If you, as a dhimmi, make the mistake of marrying a Muslim woman or criticizing Islam, what happens to you under Shari'ah?
09.14 When an adult male is taken captive, the
caliph (def: 025) considers the interests (0: of
Islam and the Muslims) and decides between
the prisoner's death, slavery, release without
paying anything, or ransoming himself in
exchange for money or for a Muslim captive
held by the enemy.
If the prisoner becomes a Muslim (0: before
the caliph chooses any of the four alternatives)
then he may not be killed, and one of the other
three alternatives is chosen.
As a violator of the treaty of protection, you can be killed or enslaved. Why the reference to disposition of prisoners of war? You become a dhimmi as a result of conquest or intimidation. You are a prisoner of war. Why the provision for adult males; what happens to women and children?
09.13 When a child or a woman is taken captive,
they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the
woman's previous marriage is immediately annulled.
Got a clue yet? Are you ready for building "bridges of understanding?" Do you want America to be "Shari'ah compliant"? How are you going to understand Islam without exploring its canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence? Can you trust what any Muslim tells you? Can you trust what any politician tells you? Can you trust what the talking heads tell you?
Islamic law covers every facet of human life, from conception to burial. Much of it, such as the rituals and requirements of wudu & salat are arcane & esoteric, downright silly if not obscene. The parts I showed you, about religious liberty and war, are more directly related to our lives. There are others, such as marriage, divorce and genital mutilation. But I wish to leave you with something more important; more directly linked to the privileges & immunities of American citizens. As a Christian, you can not testify in court; as a female, your testimony has half the weight of a male's.
o24.2 Legal testimony is only acceptable from a witness who:
(a) is free;
(b) is fully legally responsible (mukallaf, def: c8.1) (0: as
testimony is not accepted from a child or insane person,
even when the child's testimony regards injuries among
children that occurred at play);
(e) is able to speak;
(d) is mentally awake;
(e) is religious (0: meaning upright (024.4)
(A: and Muslim), for Allah Most High says,
"Let those of rectitude among you testify" (Koran 65:2),
and unbelief is the vilest form of corruption, as goes without saying);
o24.7 The testimony of the following is legally acceptable
when it concerns cases involving property,
or transactions dealing with property, such as sales:
(1) two men;
(2) two women and a man;
(3) or a male witness together with the oath of the plaintiff.
024.8 If testimony does not concern property, such as a
marriage or prescribed legal penalties,
then only two male witnesses may testify (A: though the
Hanafi school holds that two women and a man may testify for marriage). [Emphasis added.]
In this post I have linked to an authentic but incomplete scan of Reliance of the Traveller which begins with book f. If you need to see books a-e or the certificates of authenticity, you can go to Amazon and buy a copy, or you can view this low resolution scan.
The Examiner published an article by Armir Taraj entitled: Park51 Opponents Linked to Admirer of Terror Group Founder. The article presented ad hominem arguments against Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer and appealed to biased authority figures without presenting relevant, verifiable facts to refute the arguments presented by Geller and Spencer.
Presuming that their comment system would not allow links, I responded with references to Islam's canon.
Liberals resort to argumentum ad hominem because they have no relevant, verifiable facts with which to defend their emotion based positions .
The fact is that Islam is intrinsically evil, by design . Its mission is mercenary. Anyone can confirm that fact by reading the Qur'an & hadith: 8:1, 41, & 67; 33:26,27; 48:20, Sahih Muslim 19.4327, Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331, 4.52.220, 3.37.495 & 4.52.267 You can look up those references or you can search for and read "Islam's Mercenary Mission".
The fact is that Islam is martial, it ordains warfare for Muslims, the relationship between Allah and Muslims is master:slave; purchased to fight in his cause, kill and be killed. Allah commanded Muslims to wage war against pagans until only Allah is worshiped and to wage war against Jews & Christians until they are subjugated & make annual extortion payments. Moe confirmed those imperatives, declaring that he was "ordered to fight".
You can confirm those facts by reading the Qur'an & hadith: 8:69, 9:29, 9:123 & Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387.
Moe sent out extortion letters and followed up with his army. You can search for Muhammad's letters and treaties and you can read Sahih Bukhari's books of Jihad, Khumus & Expedition. Or you can search for, download and read Jihad.chm.
Moe was a terrorist and bragged about it. You can verify this fact by reading Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220 & 1.7.331 or you can search for, download and read Islamic Terror.chm.
You can find a substantial subset of the relevant quotes, linked to source, in my blog post: "What's Wrong With Islam/Muslims?" You could look up the writings of Ibn Khaldun, Ibn Taymiyya, Qutb & Maududi. You could look up Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9 to verify the fact that the jihad imperatives are codified in Shari'ah. You could look up the "science of Naskh" to discover that the relatively tolerant and peaceful early Meccan verses have been abrogated by Surah al-Anfal & at-Taubah.
You could do the research, but you won't, because you are a Liberal, and liberals know that they are superior, intellectually and morally. Liberals know that their instincts are obviously correct, they do not require relevant, verifiable factual evidence.
The Examiner's automated system responded with this message:
My comment did not contain any profanity, so I decided to go all the way with another attempt at commenting.
Fighting facts with personal denigration is unfair. Robert Spencer posts facts at Jihad Watch. I attempted to post references to the source documents, your automated system accused me of trying to post profanity and rejected my comment.
The second attempt produced exactly the same result. When I attempted to post a message announcing my intent to create this post, I got a message saying that I had failed to enter the correct characters, but no capcha form was visible. A latter attempt was successful, but there was no capcha.
It is evident that LibTards are repelled by relevant, verifiable facts. They do not want their emotion driven assumptions to be refuted with truth.
Here is the money quote (from FAIR):
"By selectively ignoring inconvenient Islamic texts and commentaries, Spencer concludes that Islam is innately extremist and violent."
Lets get specific, which the LibTards won't do. Here is a sample of the "peaceful, tolerant ayat" which supposedly contradict Spencer's evidence.
2:256. There is no compulsion in religion. Verily, the Right Path has become distinct from the wrong path. Whoever disbelieves in Tâghût and believes in Allâh, then he has grasped the most trustworthy handhold that will never break. And Allâh is All-Hearer, All-Knower.
5:32. Because of that We ordained for the Children of Israel that if anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread mischief in the land - it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind. And indeed, there came to them Our Messengers with clear proofs, evidences, and signs, even then after that many of them continued to exceed the limits (e.g. by doing oppression unjustly and exceeding beyond the limits set by Allâh by committing the major sins) in the land!.
10:99. And had your Lord willed, those on earth would have believed, all of them together. So, will you (O Muhammad ) then compel mankind, until they become believers.
10:100. It is not for any person to believe, except by the Leave of Allâh, and He will put the wrath on those who are heedless.
109:6. "To you be your religion, and to me my religion (Islâmic Monotheism)."
16:125. Invite (mankind, O Muhammad ) to the Way of your Lord (i.e. Islâm) with wisdom (i.e. with the Divine Inspiration and the Qur'ân) and fair preaching, and argue with them in a way that is better. Truly, your Lord knows best who has gone astray from His Path, and He is the Best Aware of those who are guided.
The self-anointed experts who would so blithely dismiss Spencer's arguments overlook the science of Naskh. When two ayat conflict, the ayeh revealed later abrogates the older ayeh. [2:106, 16:101] Examine the sequence of revelation.
18
Kafirun
6
Mecca
109
51
Yunus
109
Mecca
10
70
Nahl
128
Mecca
16
87
Baqarah
286
Medina
2
88
Anfal
75
Medina
8
112
Maidah
120
Medina
5
113
Taubah
129
Medina
9
8:39 & 9:29 cancel out the more tolerant, peaceful verses. Even though 5:32 is canceled out by Surah at-Taubah, lets consider the ayat which Muslims and their apologists never quote.
5:33. The recompense of those who wage war against Allâh and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter.
If you "wage war against Allah", you "shall be": killed, crucified, have hand & foot cut off or exiled. Why do Muslims practice kitman by concealing this verse? Because of the definition of "wage war against Allah". Ibn Kathir provides that definition in his tafsir. [Emphasis added.]
Disbelief in Allah constitutes waging war against him, subjecting one to the hudud listed in 5:33. And they accuse us of cherry picking!
Examine Surah at-Taubah 29 carefully, what does it command Muslims to do?
9:29 Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
What does Islamic law say about that? Lets consult Umdat al-Salik.
THE OBJECTIVES OF JIHAD
o9.R Thc caliph (025) makes war upon Jews,
Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has
first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice,
and if they will not, then invited them to
enter the social order of Islam by paying the nonMuslim
poll tax (jizya, def: 01 L4)-which is the
significance of their paying it, not the money
itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions)
(0: and the war continues) until they
become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll
tax (0: in accordance with the word of Allah Most
High,
"Fight those who do not believe in Allah and
the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and
His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice
the religion of truth, being of those who have
been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax
out of hand and are humbled" (Koran 9:29),
the time and place for which is before the final descent
of Jesus (upon whom be peace). After his
final coming, nothing but Islam will be accepted
from them. for taking the poll tax is only effective
until Jesus' descent (upon him and our Prophet be
peace), which is the divinely revealed law of
Muhammad, The coming of Jesus does not entail
a separate divinely revealed law, for he will rule
by the law of Muhammad, As for the Prophet's
saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),
"I am the last, there will be no prophet
after me,"
this does not contradict the final coming of Jesus
(upon whom be peace), since he will not rule
according to the Evangel, but as a follower of our
Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace)).
al-Shaybani, d. 803 / 5, Hanafi. Siyar, transl. Majid Khadduri, The Islamic Law of Nations: Shaybani's Siyar (Baltimore 1966), p. 76-7, 87, 95-6, 100-1.
Quote:
Fight in the name of God and in the ”path of God” [i.e. truth]. Combat [only] those who disbelieve in God. Whenever you meet your polytheistic enemies, invite them [first] to adopt Islam. If they do so, accept it, and let them alone. […] If they refuse [to accept Islam], then call upon them to pay the jizya; if they do, accept it and leave them alone. If you besiege the inhabitants of a fortress or a town and they try to get you to let them surrender on the basis of God’s judgment, do not do so, since you do not know what God’s judgment is, but make them surrender to your judgment and then decide their case according to your own views.
Ibn Abi Zayd al-Qayrawani, d. 996, maliki. Cit. ur Leon Bercher, La risala ou epitre sur les elements du dogme de la loi d’Islam (Algiers 1945).
Quote:
Jihad is a precept of Divine institution. We Malikis maintain that it is preferable not to begin hostilities with the enemy before having invited the latter to embrace the religion of Allah except where the enemy attacks first. They have the alternative of either converting to Islam or paying the poll tax, short of which war will be declared against them.
Sheikh Burhanuddin Ali of Marghinan, d. 1196, hanafi. The Hidayah, cit. ur T.P. Hughes, A Dictionary of Islam (London 1895/1994), s. 244-5.
Quote:
The destruction of the sword is incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the traditions which are generally received to this effect. […] When the Muslims enter the enemy’s country and besiege the cities or strongholds of the infidels, it is necessary to invite them to embrace the faith, because Ibn Abbas relates of the Prophet that he never destroyed any without previously inviting them to embrace the faith. If, therefore, they embrace the faith, it is unnecessary to war with them, because that which was the design of the war is then obtained without war. […] If the infidels, upon receiving the call, neither consent to it nor agree to pay capitation tax, it is then incumbent on the Muslims to call upon God for assistance, and to make war upon them […]
Molla Khosrew, d. 1480, hanafi. Kitab al-Gihad, övers. Nicola Melis, Trattato sulla guerra (Cagliari, Italien 2002), s. 95-6.
Quote:
[…] jihad is a fard al-kifaya, that is, that one must begin the fight against the enemy, even when he [the enemy] may not have taken the initiative to fight, because the Prophet […] early on […] allowed believers to defend themselves, later, however, he ordered them to take the initiative at certain times of the year, that is, at the end of the haram months, saying, ”Kill the idolaters wherever you find them” (Q9:5). He finally ordered fighting without limitations, at all times and in all places, saying, ”Fight those who do not believe in God, and in the Last Day” (Q9:29); there are also other [similar] verses on the subject. This shows that it is a fard al-kifaya.
"Islam is a great religion of peace", yeah, right. LibTards will never accept the evidence, no matter how much we present. Evidence does not count, only emotion based assumptions count to LibTards.
I just found this video posted on Facebook. I need to share it with you. It does not go into deep detail, but it goes into deep emotions, and and it exposes some of the top level details of rational objection to the propagation of Islam and their victory Mosque at Ground Zero.
The video montage is very well selected and the lyrics are extremely clear and expressive. Lets make this one go viral as rapidly as possible.
I just learned that YouTube pulled the video from the original link I published. If the embed fails, use the link below to view the video. Please share it; make it go viral. Thank you!!! 08/27/10
The Ottawa Citizen published an article by Andrew Potter: A monument to modernity. I find that article to be a monumental exemplar of ignorance, prejudice & arrogance. I will reproduce and analyze selected excerpts here. If you desire to read the entire article in context, use the link above.
Examine the article's sub headline.
A mosque near Ground Zero would be the perfect rebuke to Islamic fundamentalists, and demonstrate the power of western liberalism
"Fundamentalists" are not at issue, neither are "extremists" nor are "radicals". Only "believers" are significant to this debate. The ignorant fools who will not read the Qur'an do not know what believers do. Unfortunately, that information is crucial. I will quote Surah Al-Imran 110 in its entirety, including the translator's parenthetical & bracketed expressions, because it is crucial to comprehending the critical concept involved.
3:110. You [true believers in Islâmic Monotheism, and real followers of Prophet Muhammad and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)] are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind; you enjoin Al-Ma'rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that Islâm has forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better for them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh - and rebellious against Allâh's Command).
The first bracketed expression identifies the antecedent of the personal pronoun: believers. Believers are the best of people who enjoin the good and forbid the bad. To discover the full importance of this ayeh, we must turn to the hadith, one of which explains it explicitly. "...the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam". The believers bring us with chains on our necks until we convert. What part of this do you not understand?
Surah Al-Anfal begins with the disposition of spoils and then defines believers. Context is required for clarity.
8:2. The believers are only those who, when Allâh is mentioned, feel a fear in their hearts and when His Verses (this Qur'ân) are recited unto them, they (i.e. the Verses) increase their Faith; and they put their trust in their Lord (Alone);
8:3. Who perform As-Salât (IqâmatasSalât) and spend out of that We have provided them.
8:4. It is they who are the believers in truth. For them are grades of dignity with their Lord, and Forgiveness and a generous provision (Paradise).
Fearing Allah is a reference to obedience-- to the jihad imperatives. Spending is a reference to participation in Jihad "with your wealth and your lives".
Dignity, forgiveness & generous provision are references to the Mujahid's reward. Once again, full context is required.
3:169. Think not of those who are killed in the Way of Allâh as dead. Nay, they are alive, with their Lord, and they have provision.
3:170. They rejoice in what Allâh has bestowed upon them of His Bounty, rejoicing for the sake of those who have not yet joined them, but are left behind (not yet martyred) that on them no fear shall come, nor shall they grieve.
3:171. They rejoice in a Grace and a Bounty from Allâh, and that Allâh will not waste the reward of the believers.
Another ayeh states the definition with great clarity.
49:15. Only those are the believers who have believed in Allâh and His Messenger, and afterward doubt not but strive with their wealth and their lives for the Cause of Allâh. Those! They are the truthful.
There are no extremists, only believers. There are no moderates, only hypocrites, who shirk jihad. They are described in another hadith. "...During the last days there will appear some young foolish people who will say the best words but their faith will not go beyond their throats (i.e. they will have no faith) and will go out from (leave) their religion as an arrow goes out of the game. So, where-ever you find them, kill them, for who-ever kills them shall have reward on the Day of Resurrection."
Next, Potter accuses conservatives of having more in common with Muslims.
...revealed the basic mean-spiritedness of contemporary American conservatism. But more tellingly, the dispute has revealed the way in which conservatives have more in common with Islamic fundamentalists
Notice how we are labeled as mean-spirited. Is it possible that our LibTard is the mean spirited one?
fat, dumb fish like Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich swimming happily into the barrel to be shot
How did he describe Palin & Gingrich? "fat, dumb fish"; implying suckers. As a conservative, I demand moral clarity. I will not vote for either of them because they attach unnecessary adjectives to Islam but I do not call them suckers, I call them RINOS and I do not advocate shooting them. .
Potter invokes an authority figure to sum up the argument.
Atlantic magazine editor Michael Kinsley probably summed it up best in a widely-circulated blogpost this week, where he asked, "Is there any reason to oppose the mosque that isn't bigoted, or demagogic, or unconstitutional?"
The proposed Ground Zero (Park 51) Mosque is a symbol of Islamic triumph & supremacy; a place where Muslims will go to curse us and pray for our defeat five times each day. It will be a place to celebrate and inculcate the damnable doctrines which impelled the "magnificent 19" to attack us. It will serve to raise the morale of our enemies, aiding in their recruitment & fund raising efforts. There is nothing bigoted about opposing the Mosque on these grounds.
Is there any reason to support the Mosque that is not demagogic? LibTards claim constitutional grounds of religious liberty while in fact, they seek the votes of Muslims while they calumniate conservatives. If their conduct is not demagogic, what is?
How can it be unconstitutional to deny the enemy, which has declared and is prosecuting asymmetrical warfare against us, the "right" to plant their flag of triumph and erect a recruiting center at ground zero? The First Amendment's free exercise clause protects legitimate religions, not mercenary & martial war cults which seek to subvert our system and enslave us.
Potter exposes abysmal ignorance of Islam.
The defining characteristic of Islamic fundamentalism is not its hostility to Christianity. Muslims are pretty convinced God is on their side, and they would easily win an even fight between competing religions. But when it comes to the fight between Islam and modernity, it's another story. The rise of Islamic fundamentalism over the course of the 20th century was driven largely by a growing fear of the secularism, individualism, and consumerism of the modern West.
Islam is intolerant. It demands a global monopoly on faith & practice. Cursing us begins in the last two ayat of the first surah. Allah commands warfare against us in the ninth surah, and immediately thereafter curses us. Convinced they can win? Allah had to reduce a promised 10: kill ration to 2:1 because the Muslims could not cut the mustard. So "fundamentalism" is a response to our modernity? LibTards might suffer less embarrassment if they would research before they write.
LibTards can not comprehend the fact that Moe's preaching & practice set the standard of Islam, Muslims are commanded to obey what he preached and emulate what he did. Offensive conquest, genocide & terrorism are normative Islam, not extremism.
Potter is generous in exposing his irrationality.
But beyond that, what makes western civilization so powerful is precisely the fact that people here are free to think, say, and do just about anything.
This issue boils down to the right to hold and propagate a conviction that one has a divine commission to conquer and subjugate the entire world, to kill all who resist, rape their widows,enslave their orphans and seize their property. LibTards can not comprehend the fatal fact that extending rights to Islam abrogates all our rights. Waging war against disbelievers is part of Islamic worship. It is mandatory, not optional. LibTards can't comprehend that fact. Even if they would read the Qur'an, hadith & Islamic law they would never get a clue.
Potter is was not satisfied with that, he continued exposing his irrationality and ignorance.
It is hard not to conclude that the reason conservatives are so upset by the proposed mosque is that they don't have much faith in their own culture
A Muslim who can afford them is allowed to have four wives. That special privilege, in addition to their large population base, gives them a high reproduction rate. They can and will out breed us as they are doing to Europe.
Our culture is superior, but LibTards can't admit that fact. They are hung up on multiculturalism, blindly assuming that all cultures are equal. They resist any and all attempts to protect and preserve our culture. What happened to the Christian and Zoroastrian cultures in Persia, Ethiopia, and other cultures in the surrounding region? What happened to the Hindu & Buddhist cultures in India?
Was Churchill conservative? Did he have confidence in his culture?
No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome. -- Sir Winston Spencer Churchill (The River War, first edition, Vol. II, pages 248-50 (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1899).
Potter exhibits the hallmark of a damned fool.
Imagine a society that could not just permit, but actually encourage Muslims to build a mosque a few blocks from Ground Zero. How fearsome would that be?
Letting yellow jackets build a nest in your bedroom would not be a sign of strength, it would be a sign of idiocy. Put away all spill, choke and fire hazards before clicking the next link. I want you to see what Potter wants to invite to ground zero. Revolution Muslim
I received an email, reproduced below, from the Dove World Outreach Center, which originated the International Burn a Koran Day. Pastor Jones reports that their bank has called their mortgage and their insurance company has canceled their policy.
While Pastor Jones did not state a cause for those actions, I assume that the bank and insurer came under pressure from CAIR. I hope that Landmark Legal or some other firm will take the case on and litigate pro bono and seek immediate discovery. Nobody should be punished, by public or private agency, for telling the truth.
I would prefer to see the Koran read not burned. It is only by reading Islam's canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence that we discover how evil Islam is. Burning the Koran is a symbolic act which draws attention to its contents. I hope that the call to burn the Koran will encourage you to read it.
That does not bother you because you are an atheist? Does the subjugation of women as chattel property bother you? Does divine approval of wife beating bother you?
But you are a male, so that's no problem; how about the prohibition of drinking & gambling, does that bother you? My principal objection to Islam is its inculcation of hatred and incitement of violence. After the accursed abomination 9/11, that should be sufficient for any rational person.
I am not in a financial position to aid the mission of Pastor Jones and his congregation. If you are, I hope that you will consider that worthy cause. All I can do is contribute a little publicity, and I am doing that right now.
International Burn a Koran Day 9/11/2010
DOVE WORLD OUTREACH CENTER
needs your support!
City of Gainesville denies burn permit - BUT WE WILL STILL BURN KORANS
RBC Bank calls in mortgage - BUT WE WILL STILL BURN KORANS
Cottons All-Lines cancels insurance - BUT WE WILL STILL BURN KORANS
We will proceed with the Koran Burning Event, Saturday 9/11, 6-9pm, as planned.
RBC Bank called in our mortgage with a limited time to pay it off. Now Cottons All-lines Insurance has also cancelled our commercial insurance on our property putting our mortgage in immediate default. We need to raise the $140,000 to pay off the RBC loan immediately.
We need your help! Please send as generous a donation as possible.
Make checks payable to Dove World Outreach Center, 5805 NW 37th Street, Gainesville, FL 32653
or use our Paypal donation link on the main page of our http://www.doveworld.org/ website here..
Thank you for your prayers and support.
Call or send us an email at info@doveworld.org with your thoughts and questions. Stay in touch!
Keith Olbermann made a slick, slimy spew of self-righteous drivel which disgusts me to an extreme degree. I share it with you because I need to expose Olbermann's al-taqiyya & kitman. If you can view and hear this spew of sophistry & sewage without smashing or spitting on your monitor, you are one tough cookie.
I found the transcript here, fortunately' because Olbermann spews much faster than I can type and we need to freeze the stream in order to view the Turds floating by in the rapids.
The title contains the first lie: ...the inaccurately described "Ground Zero mosque." What is planned for the top floor? Why did they include an Islamic prayer room? Is it because a few nearby Mosques are over crowded, with worshipers spilling out into the street? So, regardless of the building's other functions, its primary function is that of a Mosque. If it was not a Mosque, it would not have a prayer room.
Next, Olbermann quotes Pastor Martin Niemoller as a slick equation of those who oppose the Ground Zero Mosque to Nazis. Nazis rounded up innocent people and slaughtered them. We rise up in opposition to the erection of a symbol of Islamic triumph & Supremacy. We have no storm troopers, no force beyond our voices and our votes.
There follows an overloaded description of Niemoller.
"He witnessed persecution, he acquiesced to it, he ultimately fell victim to it. He had been a German World War 1 hero, then a conservative who welcomed the fall of German democracy and the rise of Hitler and had few qualms the beginning of the holocaust until he himself was arrested for supporting it insufficiently."
Note how slickly Olbermann ties conservative to the fall of democracy, again calumniating conservatives by equating us with National Socialists. If God wanted to give the world an enema, he'd insert the tube in Olbermann 's mouth.
The calumny continues with a malapropism.
"...In quoting him, I make no direct comparison between the attempts to suppress the building of a Muslim religious center in downtown Manhattan, and the unimaginable nightmare of the Holocaust. Such a comparison is ludicrous. At least it is, now."
Olbermann has gone to some length to imply an equation between the Holocaust and opposition to the Ground Zero Mosque, now he denies it, with a reservation. Someone should set a beer trap for that slug.
Again, he invokes Niemoller as to support calumny.
"...He was warning of the willingness of a seemingly rational society to condone the gradual stoking of enmity towards an ethnic or religious group warning of the building-up of a collective pool of national fear and hate, warning of the moment in which the need to purge, outstrips even the perameters of the original scape-goating..."
Olbermann declares us irrational and accuses us of stoking enmity towards Muslims, as if we were wagging the dog, artificially creating a war. His sly suggestion lies 180° out of phase with reality. Nine years ago, 19 Muslims, motivated by Allah's command to attack disbelievers and his promise of eternity in the celestial bordello, hijacked four airliners and flew three of them into occupied office structures.
Between our war of revolution and 1815, the Barbary Pirates, who happened to be Muslims, sacked our shipping, enslaved the crews and demanded tribute, which became the chief cause of federal debt at that time. When asked by what right they attacked us, they had a ready response.
"The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War
According to Olbermann, we are artificially "stoking enmity" where none exists. In reality, Islamic scripture, tradition and law require attacks upon us, promise paradise to those who engage in jihad and threaten shirkers with eternal damnation.
Olbermann continues to invoke Niemoller to calumniate us.
"He was warning of the thousand steps before a holocaust became inevitable. If we are at just the first of those steps again — today, here — it is one step too close."
Olbermann accuses us to building up momentum for genocide. I can not write for anyone else, but for my part, I seek no genocide. I seek the outlawing of Islam, the closure of its institutions and the denaturalization and deportation of its votaries. There is no good reason to harbor, on our soil, an enemy fifth column whose scripture, tradition and cannon law require the prosecution of war upon us.
Olberman is in a state of denial.
"Yet, in a country dedicated to freedom, forces have gathered to blow out of all proportion the construction of a minor community center; to transform it into a training ground for terrorists and an insult to the victims of 9/11 and a tribute to medieval Muslim subjugation of the West."
Proportion? Usama hoped to destroy our economy and vitiate our will to resist. Nearly three thousand people died in that attack. "Community center"? A skunk by any other name will smell as pungent. Build a Mosque, add a library, meeting rooms and swimming pool and it is no longer a Mosque. No prayers for victory over the disbelieving people, no daily cursing of Jews & Christians, no preaching of Jihad, no collection of Zakat to finance war against us. Oh, perish the thought.
Minor community center? $5,000,000 acquisition costs plus $100,000,000 construction cost; minor indeed. What would be major? How about the annual operating costs of a 13 story building?? Who is paying for that minor community center, and why?
Insult to the victims? Build a Mosque, a Muslim house of prayer, where Muslims will gather five times each day to curse us and pray for our defeat, where they will gather every Friday afternoon to hear sermons inciting jihad. Build it where a landing gear landed after passing through one of the towers; where a cloud of dust and ash including human remains flowed through the street several stories deep. No insult at all to the victims and their survivors. When Muslims conquer an area, after finishing the slaughter of innocents, they next tear down the local temple and replace it with a Mosque as a symbol of triumph and supremacy. Name it Cordoba House in honor of the symbol of the conquest of Spain. No insult at all, perfectly inoffensive; yeah, right.
"There is, in fact, no "Ground Zero mosque." It isn't a mosque."
What in Hell do they call Muslim prayer rooms?? If it ain't a Mosque, why does it need an Imam? Is Ground Zero a point, a dimensionless figure? How can it be limited to the footprint of a few destroyed structures when other surrounding structures suffered damage and collected body parts on their roofs? If you ask me, Ground Zero extends as far as the dust clouds reached when the towers collapsed.
"A mosque is a Muslim holy place in which only worship can be conducted."
They never do anything but pray in Mosques? No weddings; no funerals? No Jurgas? How about bomb building? But bomb building is an act of worship.
Olbermann asserts that we are a threat to Muslims, inverting reality. At least one recent Mosque arson was perpetrated by a member of the congregation. How does the number of attacks on Mosques compare to the terrorist attacks recently failed or thwarted when the authorities got lucky?
"...terrorism by extremists who happen to be Muslim, and never face the shameful truth about our country: As the Jacksonville mosque bombing shows, since Sept. 11, Muslims have been at far greater risk of being victims of terrorism in the United States, than have non-Muslims."
"Extremists" is a shibboleth. Moe, who founded Islam, bragged about being made victorious with terror. That makes him a terrorist. Emulating Moe is normative Islam, not extremism. One Mosque, one pipe bomb. How many attacks on the WTC? How many attempted bombings? How many shootings? How many vehicular assaults? Muslims are more at risk than we are. Yeah, right.
Back to the name game.
"In Spain, in Cordoba, though the Muslims established multi-cultural, non-denominational institutions of learning, they were under constant attack from Christians, and from a series of internal all-Muslim Civil Wars."
So they established schools, big deal. What was the status of conquered Jews & Christians? Did Muslims treat them as equals? Why were there 45 Christian martyrs? Muslims were under attack from Christians, as if trying to reverse Muslim conquest is a great evil. Typical LibTard moral inversion.
Olberman continues by using argumentum Tu-Quoque to divert our attention from Islam.
"And is there not a logical extension to Mr. Gingrich's conclusions about Cordoba and "triumphalism?" Virtually every church, every synagogue, indeed every mosque built on this continent stands where a Native American lived, or died, or was buried, or saw his world — his religions included — wiped out. By us."
Watch the slick sleight of tongue.
"when the historical implications of Cordoba were made clear to the backers of this project, the property developer, Sharif Gamal, changed the name. They already compromised."
As if the developer was unaware of the historical context! A skunk by any other name will smell as pungent. Changing the name does not change the intent neither does it change the effect.
Following more flatulence about the location, Olberman spouts off about churches in the area, neatly overlooking the fact that that area had a largely Christian populace when those churches were constructed. Further, he avoids the story of the St. Nicholas Church which was destroyed by debris from the collapse. The bureaucrats have delayed rebuilding for nine years yet they hasten to expedite construction of a Mosque.
"People hear "Ground Zero Mosque" and they think Mecca in the backyard and a loud call to prayer and they take umbrage.":
Who wants to hear that amplified caterwauling five times a day beginning at 4:30 a.m.??
Observe how he waves away the concern of a survivor.
"We got no more than a few inches of skin and a couple of pieces of bone. Ground Zero is the burial place of my son," said Joyce Boland at the public hearing about the Center. "I don't want to go there and see an overwhelming mosque looking down at me."
I honor her pain, and her fear, but Mrs. Boland has nothing to worry about. Unless she walks directly to it, she'll never see it. This is what you see from where the Center will be. Another non-descript building across the street. This building and others like it will block views of the Trade Center, and views from the Trade Center."
How does Olbermann know what routes Mrs. Boland will take through the city? The Mosque will be reported in the news, common knowledge, and survivors will know about it. Muslims around the world will take pride and pleasure in it, viewing it as a symbol of triumph and supremacy. That will be an advantage to the terrorists for recruitment and financing.
In his self-righteous rant, Olbermann launches into kvetching about the invasion of Iraq, a topic entirely irrelevant to the Ground Zero Mosque. The invasion was poorly conceived and executed, Shrub attempted to do it on the cheap, compromising with domestic and international politics.
"We sacrificed 4,415 of our military personnel in Iraq to save Muslims, and there are thousands still there tonight to protect Muslims, but we don't want Muslims to open a combination culinary school and prayer space in Manhattan?"
We sacrificed 4,415 and billions of dollars to political correctness, sending men where we should have sent nukes. Everybody knows it but few have the courage to acknowledge objective factual reality. We are losing in Afghanistan and Iraq. We will continue to lose so long as their populations and governments remain Islamic. We wasted blood and treasure because Shrub refused to identify the enemy.
Observe the flow of sludge.
"From the beginning of this nation we have fought prejudice and religious intolerance and our greatest enemy: stupidity, exploited by rapacious politicians."
Islam epitomizes religious intolerance. Olberman probably has not read the Qur'an. Take 3:85, for example. 3:85. And whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers. Islam declares war on us, how tolerant is that?
Olberman continues to spew sludge.
"Despite the nobility of our founding and the indefatigable efforts of all our generations, there have always been those who would happily sacrifice our freedoms, our principles, to ward off the latest unprecedented threat, the latest unbeatable outsiders. Once again, at 45 Park Place, we are being told to sell our birth-right, to feed the maw of xenophobia and vengeance and mob rule."
We will not sacrifice our freedoms; we seek to preserve our lives and liberties. Claiming abridgment of religious liberty in this Mosque dispute is a red herring. Islam is a war cult, not a legitimate religion. It denies the sanctity of our lives and property; it declares and is prosecuting war against us. Islam's mission is mercenary: Moe's personal emolument. Anyone who will read and comprehend Surah al-Anfal will realize the truth of this matter.
Islam attacked us two hundred years ago, forcing us to go into debt to pay tribute, killing and enslaving sailors. It killed millions all over the world, yet it is dismissed as an imaginary threat even though it recently killed three thousand and tried to kill more. The LibTard accuses us of abandoning freedom of religion to spite Islam. LibTards lack sufficient intelligence and knowledge to comprehend the fact that Islam denies freedom of religion. It attacks people solely based on their rejection of Islam. Christians are murdered with impunity in Egypt, Indonesia, Kenya, Nigeria & Pakistan. Their churches and houses are burned. Islamic law imposes restrictions on Christians. Perhaps the LibTards should read it to see what they are supporting.
The spew continues.
"The terrorists who destroyed the buildings from which you could only see 45 Park Place as a dot on the ground, wanted to force us to change our country to become more like the ones they knew. What better way could we honor the dead of the World Trade Center, than to do the terrorists' heavy lifting for them? And do you think 45 Park Place is where it ends?"
They seek to impose Islam upon us, to kill us or force us to convert. Olbermann has the situation precisely inverted. Eliminating Islam from our soil would reduce the risk of further terror attacks and preserve, not threaten our liberty. Giving the enemy another base on our soil dishonors the victims in the worst way.
In his inverted way, Olberman gets one thing right.
"And in America, when somebody comes for your neighbor, or his bible, or his torah, or his Atheists' Manifesto, or his Koran, you and I do what our fathers did, and our grandmothers did, and our founders did you and speak up."
Islam seeks to impose its Shari'ah on us, to criminalize all criticism and questioning of Islam. They want to make the practice of Christianity illegal. I want no part of it. I want the enemy and his institutions out of my country! I do not want any enemy bases here! That does not make me a bigot, racist or Nazi.
I want you to sign these petitions, share them with your friends, family & associates and make them go viral. The text of those petitions contains the evidence which proves Olbermann wrong, exposing Islamic aggression, genocide & terrorism.
