Obama Admits He's a Muslim

Ayman Zawahri Celebrates the Deaths of Muslims

To celebrate the deaths of tens of thousands of his fellow Muslims since 911, Al Qaeda's number 2 punk Ayman Zawahri (where is the coward, Bin Laden, anyways?) has accused Iran of cooperating with 'the Crusader's war against Islam,' in a newly-released video tape.

Perhaps Ayman Zawahri has forgotten that it is he and his fellow Islamic demons who flew jets into American buildings seven years ago.

Oh yes, and one went into the ground in Pennsylvania or wherever.

That is the plane where Jeremy Glick, a former judo national champion, and Mark Burnett and others, stormed the skinny little Arab pukes who had already killed an innocent passenger in cold blood. I can imagine that before he got into the cockpit, which forced the insane pilot to drive the jet into the ground, well, I can imagine that Glick got to bust a few Muslim heads and let them learn a little about what America is all about before the little slime balls went straight to hell. Having some familiarity with judo and the national championships myself, I can only imagine that those little Arab chumps experienced some real pain, and probably some broken bones, if not broken necks, before the Americans got into the cockpit.

So if Zawahri thinks that the Americans started this war, then who were the weasels that Jeremy Glick got to rip apart before he got into that cockpit?

Sorry, Ayman, you've got it wrong. It is YOU and your fool Bin Laden who sentenced many of your fellow Muslims to death by starting an Islamic war against us. Yes, you are right that Hizbullah are a bunch of idiots, and so is Iran, but on this date, around 9-11-2008, it is you that we are hoping finds a special place in hell to join your dead Muslim brothers.

Because, you slug, we will never, ever forget 911. And it is soooo not over. Except, of course, for all those dead Muslims whose blood is on your hands.

McCain Drops the Nuclear Bomb: Sarah Palin

John McCain dropped the nuclear bomb on Barak Obama's campaign today; and her name is Sarah Palin.

Conservative, mother of five, including a newborn with Down's syndrome, wife of a fisherman/oil field worker, pro-life, pro-second amendment, member of National Rifle Association, point guard on her state championship basketball team, high school leader of the Fellowship of Christian Athletes, runner-up in the 1984 Miss Alaska beauty pageant, and also Miss Congeniality in the same pageant, authentic as your neighbor, mother of an infantryman in the United States Army, reformist, tax-cutter, 'Maverick,' "Sarah Barracuda," Washington outsider, individual with solid morals, values and character, and the current governor of Alaska, 44-year old Sarah Palin is the Bomb in every way.

And her husband is the second-luckiest man in the world. I'm the first.

Here she is, Sarah Palin Nuclear Bomb:

Wonkette.com declares, “This chick could be solely responsible for why polar bears have no icebergs to swim to.”

Tick, Tock, Tick, Tock, Tick: Iran's Fate Nears

You have to wonder just how many times a day Iran's President is wetting his pants lately. It must be many; and for a good reason.

Right now sitting off the shore of the little beligerent loud-mouth's country is the United States' aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln and her supporting battle group. Nearby is the USS Peleliu aircraft carrier and her battle group.

And on the way to the area are the USS Iwo Jima, USS Theodore Roosevelt and the USS Ronald Reagan, all aircraft carriers and all accompanied by their respective battle groups.

Since any single one of these groups carries enough firepower to eliminate Achmadinejad's entire country from the face of this planet, to have five of them coming over to Iran's Islamic Revolution for dinner certainly must mean the President is changing his diaper many times per day.

Not since the 1991 first Gulf War has there been this many American aircraft carriers in the region. And though the Pentagon is silent about the ships' missions, even a thick-skulled moron like Achmadinejad must understand what possibilities exist with the massive consolidation of such immense power.

Is it any coincidence that this assemblage of power is put in motion after Iran snubbed American offers to a negotiation, causing President Bush to issue Iran a 12-day warning a few short weeks ago? Is it any wonder that the aircraft carriers are rolling after Bush threatened to put a naval blockade against Iran if they failed to comply?

Bush had told Iran that they could choose "cooperation or confrontation," and the time limit has now passed for them to have chosen cooperation. It does not take a genius to see that 1+1+1+1+1=5 aircraft carrier groups which are about to make Achmadinejad's decisions for him. Iran's fate is now at sea and is getting closer and closer every moment.

The nations will have little pity on Iran and the mad ayatollahs and mullahs who are trying to exert hateful, murderous Islamic ideologies onto a world that did not become advanced by adhering to the slaveries of a 7th-century killing cult.

When Achmadinejad's arrogance pushes him to fire the first shot at a blockading US naval force, his own personal fate will be sealed as well as his country's. It will unleash an extremely powerful and lethal dose of 'you-asked-for-it,' and will call the wrath of the United States military down on his own head.

May that happen soon.

From Farce to Force, the West Finally Dictates Terms and Conditions to Iran

AT LAAST, the west has FINALLY opened its mouth and is showing its teeth to the pencil-necked president of Iran and his ayatollah buddies. If you haven't caught the news flash yet, you can find it here on the Debka File.

In short, that diplomatic meeting in Geneva a few days ago that Iran scoffed at, well apparently the west actually meant it this time because they are finally backing it up with very real force. The United States, Britain and France are currently engaging in Operation Brimstone in the Persian Gulf which is an exercise to rehearse the enforcement of a naval blockade of petrol-related shipping in and out of Iran. And it's about time!

With the US State Department telling Iran that it can choose either "cooperation or confrontation," it looks like Iran will no longer be able to plot its own devious, defiant quest to get the bomb, all the while thumbing its nose at the world. Iran has two weeks to comply.

After that, Iran's economy will be quickly and directly affected; their shipping for the most part will be halted by the western allied powers. They will no longer have the option to simply continue on their belligerent way, for they will be forced one way or another to certain terms and conditions.

This will be a textbook example of how to deal with the power-hungry Islamic supremacist ideology which both Sunni's and Iran's Shiite's adhere to and spread. This will be a lesson for Hezbollah, Hamas, Syria, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia, Al-Qaeda and every Islamic-empire-thinking Muslim on the planet. Because there are only a few ways that this can play out and Iran loses in all of them.

First scenario, the economic difficulties in Iran could prove to be enough for the Iranian population to finally rise up and overthrow the tyranny of Sharia Law and its Islamic leaders. Look for Ahmadineijad to be dragged through the streets or exile himself to the protection of Hezbollah's wing. In this case the people of Iran win, the Islamic Revolution, or the current leadership in Iran, loses and all other proponents of Islamic supremacy also lose because the writing will be on the wall.

Second possible scenario sees Iran's maniacal president actually confronting the military of the US, Britian and France. Iran would really lose in this case. They would be pounded mercilessly, all of it well-deserved, and some fifty years of relative progress would lie in rubbles. And again, other Muslim power-seekers would be losers as well.

Thirdly, Iran's moronic president would foolishly order Hezbollah and Hamas, and possibly Syria, to attack Israel; or launch some attacks itself apart from its proxies. This scenario would result in Iran's getting pounded back to the stone age. Very bad for Iran. Hezbollah and Hamas would also be annhilated, both of whom richly deserve such a reward.

Fourthly, Iran would actually appear to agree to concessions to save its own skin and then sit back and hope Barak Obama is elected President of the United States. Of course Ahmadineijad is wise enough to know that he can easily manipulate the rookie and wanna-be do-gooder Obama, so he is likely to play this card. But politically, the strong hand which Bush would finally be applying to Iran would be finally seen as an effective, perhaps the only effective, option on how to deal with Iran, and Republican nominee John McCain could benefit greatly by this in November's election.

But no matter which way it plays out, one lesson will be evidently clear to all: you deal with Islamic supremacism with power and strength. They will walk all over you every single time unless physically prevented from doing so. Do not expect that the Muslim supremacist will show you the same respect as a human that you might grant him because he has completely different values than you do and will exploit your kindness as weakness. Don't give him that opportunity. (For those who missed the related post, Confronting Evil right here on Right Hooks, the link to that is here.)

So though this show of strength by the United States and friends is about four years too late, Mr. Ahmadineijad will finally find out who is the power and who is the pretender. The farce that has been his belligerent defiance will finally be met with the force his own actions have summoned.

Quagmire Alert! - Dead End Left Does It Again

What ever happened to We The People? How does a circus court in California get to establish a law? I thought that is what elected representatives did. While homosexuals from all over the country are likely racing to the state to pretend to get married, most people are enraged at the audacity and arrogance of the foolish judges who have greatly overstepped their bounds and we have all simply HAD ENOUGH.

Once again, we see liberal philosophy, spin, agenda, and (lack-of-) values on shining display. This week's lesson is on How to Subvert Democracy and the Will of the People. No longer does the term, We The People, apply to this country; it is now evident that the more appropriate term should be, We the People and the Baboon We Are Chained To. Have you ever tried to get anything accomplished or go where you wanted to with a baboon tied to your arm?

We have example after example of the futility of the left's philosophy, the blindness of their causes, the lethality of their mindless policies and, frankly, the core of their ideologies which attack the very foundations of American social order. Hey, can we finally all wake up now? The sixties are over. The hippie, far-left, socialist, free-love, free-drugs, relativist, anti-establishment ideas that were the basis of all this 'free-thinking' and liberality just can no longer be accepted as viable in the grown-up world. It just doesn't work. Probably because it is not based on reality, but on fantasy and Utopian pipe dreams.

But a man MARRYING a man; or a woman MARRYING a woman? This is simply unreal. Bob Hellam, a razor-sharp truth-tender, explains the situation so very well in his recent letter to his county clerk in California. I will share the entire letter, sparing the specific names and places:

Dear Mr. [County Clerk]:

I could not reach you by telephone a few days ago, so I thought I would write a letter instead.

Government cannot create reality. A law or a court decision or a constitutional amendment that declared a circle to be square, or that attempted to repeal the law of gravity, or that stipulated that words would mean exactly what any given judge determined that they mean, would have no real validity. Hence, the millennia-old understanding of what marriage is cannot be invalidated by judicial fiat. There is no such thing as same-sex “marriage,” even if the State of California maintains that such a thing does exist.

Those who have argued that the California Supreme Court had no right to legislate on marriage, and that the Governor’s office also has no such right, make a convincing argument. Now is the time to stand for truth, even if it requires courage.

Please be courageous. Support the will of the people of California, and the people of [this] County, even if it means contradicting the opinion of the California Supreme Court and the Governor. The responsibility for maintaining the integrity of marriage records in our county is yours, not theirs.

Please do not allow same-sex “marriage” in [this] County.

Sincerely,

Robert Hellam

Mr. Hellam sees the truth, and says so quite plainly and elegantly; but such is apparently not clear to the baboon. Has it ever been more obvious to people who are not baboons that our culture and society is racing down a dead end road, toward a cataclysmic crash if we allow the baboon any more time at the wheel? The fact that they have led us into a social quagmire has never been more crystal clear.

Baboon policies demanded that we build no more oil refineries. Then they demanded that we not drill for oil off shore. Then they demanded that we not drill in Alaska. Where have their policies gotten us?

Baboons yelled and screamed that we not take out Sadaam Hussein himself when he invaded Kuwait in the early 1990's, whining that we should only expel him from Kuwait, and now look where we are. What, did they think he would go away? Was he going to change his colors or start being a nice guy to his neighbors? Baboons are nothing if not totally naieve.

But their solution was the oil-for-food program to be directed by the United Nations. Yeah, that sure went well, didn't it? Guys in the UN on the take. France on the take. Sadaam kicking weapons inspectors out. Sadaam violating cease-fire agreements that he made with General Schwartzkopf to prevent his annihilation. And the whole time, the baboon looks the other way. See no evil.

Now baboons are grumbling and complaining about how evil our own soldiers are, while at the same time trying to give American citizenship rights to our ENEMIES who are prisoners in Guantanamo. You know, people who have killed Americans and seek her overthrow...terrorists not killed in battle. Yes, the baboon is more concerned about the life of a murderer than he is about the life of a US soldier, an innocent unborn child, a redwood, or a baby seal.

It seems that every baboon, liberal policy has death at the end. Death for the unborns, death for our soldiers, death for our families (how do Adam and Steve produce children, by the way?), death to our values, death for our culture, death for Israel. The only people who the baboon doesn't want to die are the violent, aggressive and murdering cultures like [insert your favorite terrorist group here] who seek the overthrow of our country and of western society.

Are they willing to confront Iran? Of course not, Iran is not bad. Now, a few days after Iran uses its nuclear bombs on Israel or America, the baboons might awake from their slumber enough to say, 'Hey, that was wrong,' (and then blame conservatives, of course) but not long enough to keep them focussed on a sustained response. But, you see, it should never come to having to initiate a response; not since Germany and World War II, it shouldn't. The time to prevent a bellicose Iran from executing the Second Holocaust is NOW; yet the baboon resists this course of action at every turn. (He must be too busy performing all those homosexual 'marriages.')

There is no way that our society can or will survive any more of the lunacies arriving from a godless, ridiculous left-wing ideology. It is suicidal to our country, to our culture, and it has got to stop. We have got to stop it. They have led us into a despicable, perverted cultural quagmire. If our forefathers were here, they certainly would rebel against the liberal's fast track to hell that they are steering us toward.

It's time to yank back the wheel from the out-of-control left-wing baboon; no matter what it takes.

Hamas Caught in Another Lie

Hamas has once again demonstrated to the world its true colors.

After the mother and four small children were tragically killed last week when an Israeli air strike attacked several terrorists prowling the streets and neighborhoods of Gaza, the outcry by the muslim community was that Israel had killed an innocent family.

Israel maintained that the ordinance used in the air strike did not kill the family, rather, explosives that were being carried by the terrorists blew up in secondary explosions and were therefore responsible for the deaths of those inside the family's house.

Of course, Hamas got to chime in with it's obligatory litany against the Jewish state's perpetual evilness. Hamas then declared that Palestinian gunmen were not operating near the home of the unfortunate family.

And now Israel's military has released drone video footage from that very attack. Either there are zombies walking the city streets in Gaza at night or there were Palestinian soldiers operating right next to the home of the deceased mother and her children. As a matter of fact the video shows exactly what Israel had claimed.

The video, therefore, totally discredits Hamas' claim and once again shows that Hamas has no interest, relationship, perception, concept or practice involving the truth. We may, therefore, assume that whatever comes out of its poison mouth will be nothing more than myth, fairy tale and manipulation.

"Jews Planned the Holocaust"

You can't make this kind of idiocy up...but leave it to Hamas to declare that the Jooooooooos planned the Holocaust, and broadcast it on the official Hamas television channel seen throughout the middle east.

What planet do these people live on?? (Full story here from the Jerusalem Post.)

Inches From Holocaust II

It is complete irony and utter farce that the very institutional guardians who assigned Israel back to its ancestral home after the Holocaust now promote policies which threaten its very existence.

The United Nations, full of consciousness and compassion after the revelations of the fate of countless Jews horribly murdered in Nazi death camps, felt it appropriate that the Israeli people return to their homeland. In 1948 Israeli's began moving back to the land that they had been pushed out of in 70 A.D. by the Romans. The Holocaust was never to be forgotten and the world understood how these people had suffered unspeakable loss. Victorious Allied powers also offered strong and full support of this reunification.

Immediately, however, it was apparent that the Jewish people had been thrown into the lion's cage as all of her Muslim neighbors rallied to war to bring about Israel's swift destruction. Syria, Jordan and Egypt warned other Muslims living within Israel to flee their homes until the annihilation was complete, and then it would be safe for them to come back. Unlike the U.N., apparently not everyone felt that the Jews had lost enough people to the Holocaust, that many more needed to be killed.

Unfortunately for her discontent Muslim neighbors, Israel was not defeated by their aggression. In fact Israel handed her warring neighbors their lunch. What's more, those local Muslims who chose to flee the land until all the Jews were killed, well, not surprisingly, they were not allowed to come back in, for they clearly had sided with Israel's enemy. What is surprising is that none of the countries who hosted the war were neighborly enough to allow the now-homeless Muslim enemies of Israel to live in their own counties. These people, who voluntarily expatriated themselves, but were not allowed back in to the country they had betrayed, are now known as the 'Palestinian Arabs,' or simply 'Palestinians.'

After several more decades and several more wars, all of which saw Israel surrounded, outnumbered and her existence threatened, Israel proved to be a bigger bone than her Muslim neighbors could bite. Furthermore, with every conflict, Israel gained strategic territory that her war-minded neighbors used for their attacks, like the Golan Heights. Israel possessed this land to deny its use to her enemy for their aggression, the outlet of their hatred for Jews, which continued to seethe.

Now, of course, we are in an age of revisionist history. The President of Iran is claiming that the Holocaust never happened. Muslim clerics are preaching and teaching that the Jewish people have no historic claim to the land of Israel, there was no king David, there was no king Solomon, there was no temple, no Israeli people ever lived there, it was always Arabs. To help bolster this claim Muslims are also destroying historical archaeological places that might contradict their fairy tale. And most still refuse to recognize Israel's right to exist.

Israel has been pressured, since the 'intifada' began early this decade, to give up precious land to the Palestinian Arabs for the Arab's autonomous use. "Land for peace!" went the chant, "No land, no peace." The leaders of the insurrection stated that there would be no cessation of violence unless and until Israel gave the Palestinians some land of their own.

Reluctantly, and against sage advice from within Israel, the leaders of Israel sought peace and gave up the Gaza Strip to the Palestinians. So what has the result been? Have the Palestinian Arabs lived up to their word? Have they taken their land and made it into a thriving example of industrious thrift and developed a growing economy?

Well, not exactly. They have taken the established, productive Israeli agricultural fields and turned them into something of a 7th-century, third-world barrenness; the rest of the strip is also similarly trashed. Have they lived peacefully with their neighbors? Well, if you call launching thousands and thousands of rockets at innocent Israeli civilians peaceful, then yes, they have.

And now there is the likes of Condoleezza Rice telling Israeli leaders that not only must they give up more land, which the Palestinians can use as platforms for terror attacks, but to also allow the Palestinians to have their own sovereign state within the bounds of Israel's country. Some are going so far as saying that Israel should give up Jerusalem for a Palestinian capital city.

So do the Palestinians really want peace? Or do they want the destruction of Israel? Their actions over the last 60 years would demonstrate that peace is not their goal, rather, it is conquest.

They claim that they have ancestral rights to the land of Palestine. However, so many have forgotten that their land and people were allied with Germany on the 20th century war stage and the Germans did not win either war, which means that Arabs lost as well; to the victor go the spoils. Hence, Britain, France and the United States, enemies of Germany and her allies, gained control over the land with German surrender.

Therefore, was it Israel's fault that she was subjected to the worst genocide in history? Was it Israel's fault that the powers-that-be planted her back in her former home? Is Israel to be blamed for defending herself against unrelenting enemies? Is it Israel's fault that Palestinian Arabs chose to leave the country so that Israel could be mercilessly wiped out?

And on the other front, when Israel was attacked by the ultra-misguided-Hezbollah's fighters in 2006, it was the United Nations that demanded a cease-fire and guaranteed that the U.N.'s own troops would stop Hezbollah from smuggling more arms into southern Lebanon. They also promised that they would secure the southern border and prevent Hezbollah fighters access to that territory. Israel, under tremendous international pressure to conform, once again relented and ceased their pounding of the Hezbollah army.

But what has become of this situation? Has the shipment of rockets into Lebanon ceased? Are Hezbollah fighters being kept away from the border? The sad answer to both is no. Hezbollah now has thousands more rockets than it did in its pre-war status. Its soldiers have bullied U.N. soldiers and are in battle positions in much of the land.

The United Nations, therefore, is trying to handcuff Israel's ability to defend itself, which threatens the very existence of this seed that the UN planted. And everybody else, it seems is piling on.

It would only take a few Muslim nuclear detonations in Israel to usher in Holocaust II, and it seems that those who hated the first Holocaust the most are setting themselves up to be the ones most culpable in allowing a second. We are mere inches from this being allowed to happen.

May it never be.

Hey Barak, NOW They're Bitter

Barak Obama, if you thought small-town people were bitter before, I dare you to go take their pulse now.

Not only have you mis-judged and stereo-typed an entire nation of honest, hard-working Americans, who are the backbone of this country, you have pretty much declared that you are completely unqualified to be their president.

Because, you see, while they were learning American values and the culture, you were bowing to Allah in some mosque in Indonesia or Malaysia or wherever Muslim country you went to school in. No wonder you don't know them.

And as far as the 'they take refuge in guns and religion' stereo-type, or whatever you said, well, I think you have got Americans confused with those people you are trying to appease and surrender to, you know: Muslims. Yes, THEY are the ones that are bitter and find security in religion and guns, yet I do not hear you condemning OUR ENEMY, I see you judging and condemning our AMERICAN CITIZENS. Exactly whose side are you on, Mr. Obama?

But I suppose anyone who has spent a few decades in that racist and hate-preaching church that you go to with that racist preacher is bound to cast stereo-typical judgments on small-town white people; they teach the 'hate-whitey' doctrine pretty good, there, don't they?

Mr. Obama, you have NO IDEA what the small town culture is all about. Your stereotypes are are sickening. Furthermore, they reveal that you are no more qualified to be an American president than you would be the president of Russia. You are not one of them, neither are you one of us. You have got caught with your arrogance showing again, and this time it will cost you the election.

But don't be bitter; that's only for small-town white people, right?

Dutch Lawmaker Geert Wilders' Film, Fitna, Exposes Islam as the Bloodthirsty Cult That it Is

Courageous Dutch lawmaker Geert Wilders has produced a film called Fitna, which exposes the Quran and what it teaches. All these things are currently being taught in mosques in Europe and in the USA. This is a MUST-SEE video and it is available at LiveLink.com found on the link here

or you can view it below: (Because of high traffic volume, it takes a few moments to load...).

Islam is SUBVERSIVE and TRAITOROUS to all western constitutions and governments. They are preaching that they should kill us all. We MUST OUTLAW ISLAM NOW!!!

Confronting Evil: The Big Stick

Though I strongly disagree on his policy concerning Israel and his appeasement of the wicked Palestinians, I do love President George Bush. I admire his tenacity and resolve as Commander in Chief as it applies to Afghanistan and Iraq. He has fought our outward enemy and our enemy within, the liberals, at the same time.

The liberals, who attempted to sacrifice our nation's well-being for the sake of gaining political power, and who are blind to the very real threats against us, created an anti-Iraq War platform from which to undermine our nation's stability. They stated that there was no rationale for us going into Iraq which was COMPLETELY IGNORANT of Sadaam Hussein's VIOLATION of the cease-fire AGREEMENTS he made with General Schwartzkopf that ended the first Gulf War.

It is completely mystifying why there ever has been even a single question as to our justification for entering Iraq and why this legal basis has not appeared in the media AT ALL: Sadaam Hussein violated the cease-fire agreement when he kicked out the international inspection teams, period. That was enough legal reason for us to enter Iraq and finish the job we should have in the early 1990's.

And, of course, it was liberal policies that actually KEPT us from finishing the job in the first Gulf War. You remember, the UN and the world's liberal, appeasing minions, crying out how we couldn't go after Sadaam personally, how we just could expel his army from Kuwait. Heaven forbid if we should actually stamp out a wicked tool of evil instead of subjecting his people to another decade of sadistic torture and manipulation.

And President Bush, Sr. had to deal with a Democratic Congress, so he only could get away with certain amounts of force and could not overtly go after Hussein. But go after him he did. Though perhaps it has not been widely publicized, this author knows for a fact that Bush, Sr. did make attempts to eliminate Sadaam Hussein. How do I know? Because my cousin was a Navy SEAL at the time (my uncle was a SEAL/BeachJumper in Vietnam) and when asked if he knew if we went after Hussein, he said "We sure did." When asked how he knew he said, "Because I was in Baghdad hunting him." When pressed for details, this cousin replied, " Do you know how many people over there look like Sadaam Hussein? So many that I ran out of bullets."

So despite suicidal liberal whining and policies, Bush, Sr. actually tried to end it back then. But it took his son, George W. Bush to actually have the moral fortitude to go and confront a wicked man. That is because President Bill Clinton, of course, knew nothing of moral fortitude. Perhaps he was too busy entertaining Monica Lewinsky to notice that Sadaam Hussein was not cooperating with the very cease-fire agreements that he had agreed to to stop our Army from swallowing Iraq.

Oh, sure, Clinton sent over a few cruise missiles, but dictators and despots know when a threat is real and when it is just for show. Clinton's was just for show; simple saber-rattling. Hussein knew that Clinton lacked the will to actually engage him head-on, he knew that Clinton wouldn't use the big stick, and so the Sadaam the monster grew.

Iran did the same thing to President Carter in 1979 when they audaciously swarmed the US Embassy in Tehran and took all the Americans hostage. Carter was inept. Iranian fanatics knew that Carter wouldn't use the big stick, so evil reigned.

How should one deal with evil regimes who bully other societies or even their own people? Well do you remember Muammar Qaddafi, the once-belligerent dictator from Libya? Remember how he used to spout off incessantly (much like Iran's current pip-squeak President Ahmadinejad) about the USA, the 'evil Satan'? But then the Reagan Administration tied Qaddafi to the downing of an American jetliner, and do you remember what Ronald Reagan did? He sent some F-15's in and BOMBED Qaddafi's HOUSE. And Mr. Qaddafi was very, very quiet for many years after that.

So why did Qaddafi shut up, all of a sudden? Well, unlike Carter and Clinton, Qaddafi knew that Ronald Reagan not only had the big stick, but that he was willing to use it.

Confronting evil is necessary only for those societies who wish to survive. It is needed only if a people decide that they do not want to get swallowed up and conquered by warring, aggressive plagues such as Islam is. Islam will gladly come and subjugate those who will not stand in its way. That's why Osama and every other Muslim extreme disciple out there wanted Gore, Kerry and now Obama or Hillary to win the U.S. Presidential election, because they all know that Democrats do not have the courage to stand in Islam's way for more than a minute or two.

In fact, Democrats are not even convinced that Islam IS evil because their world-view of relative morality. That is, they think truth is relative, that it changes depending on the person. Therefore good and evil are relative and the liberal is probably more likely to think western Judeo-Christian values are evil than they are to see that Islam is a wicked, murdering hate-cult.

Aggressive evil, which Islam is, or any other evil for that matter, can be stopped only one way, and that way is a two-step formula. First, you must have a big stick; second, you must be willing to use it.

Did Jimmy Carter have a big stick? Yes, he did. Was he willing to use it on Iran? No, he wasn't. So if you have a big stick yet are unwilling to use it, aggressive evil views that as the same as not having one. Ron Reagan had a big stick too, only he was willing to use it on Muammar Qaddafi. Look at the different results based on use of the big stick.

Granted, Reagan did not use it when the US Marines were killed in their quarters by the bombing in Lebanon, but he should have.

If that is confusing (i.e. you are a liberal and still do not understand), think of a mad dog biting your kid's leg. Is that dog suddenly going to stop if you negotiate with it? If you tell it to stop will it stop? If you yell at it or warn it will it stop? No it won't. But if you reach over in the corner where you keep your big stick, grab it and then thump the dog on the head with it, the biting beast will stop then, won't it? He most certainly will and then he will run away as fast as he can.

That dog knows what is painful to it and if you did not have a big stick your child might have suffered profound injury. Furthermore, the next time that dog comes around and he sees you with that stick, do you think he will try to bite your child again? No, he will steer clear.

So the big stick represents the power to inflict damage on wanton aggressiveness and the willingness to use it can then act as a deterrence; but only if the aggressor understands that you will use it.

President Bush, thank goodness, is willing to use the Big Stick. That is the only thing keeping Islamic aggression from making great advances. The Democratic Congress, however, and its legion of liberal media dupes, are fighting against using the big stick, which, of course, if such a path were to be taken, our enemies would win; the dog would keep on biting.

The liberal world must wake up and recognize the threat that we face in this new millennium. No, we cannot make peace with Islamic terrorist governments simply for one reason: THEY WANT TO KILL US ALL. Until a liberal understands this, he remains a pawn in the hands of our enemy and is himself a traitor to this nation and an enemy of our own Constitution.

I am also confident that John McCain will do the right thing as Commander in Chief for the United States. He would not appease Islamic aggression by caving in like Hillary would and so would Obama. With his war experience, McCain definitely knows that we have a big stick, and he would be quite willing to use it when necessary.

Palestinian Terrorist Murderer Learns the Hard Way

The Palestinian coward who opened up on Jerusalem seminary students at Jerusalem's Mercaz Harav Yeshiva on their campus last week, killing eight of them, thought he was doing a great service to the false god he believes in, Allah.

Allah, you see, inspires all of his followers to have a deep, seething, almost un-earthly hate for the people of Israel. It is taught throughout the Muslim false-religion and culture. These people HATE Israelis world-wide. (Actually, they hate everybody else too, but that's another post.)

Claiming that the Jews corrupted God's revelation to them, the Torah, or as we know it, the Old Testament, requiring a re-do by revelations to the false-prophet Mohammed, yet offering not one molecule of evidence, the Muslims figure that they are the chosen people of God instead of the children of Israel. They are revising history to make it seem like Israel never had a country, a king, or a temple. They tell lie after lie about this hoping their babble will somehow make it all true.

Of course the only ones who believe the nonsense, besides themselves, is the western liberals and its media wing. You can always count on a liberal reporter to mark the hating, attacking, murdering Palestinians as the victims and Israel, who seeks only to defend herself, as the monster.

Well, several moments after Palestinian murderer, Ala Abu Dhaim was himself killed by someone fighting back, Mr. Dhaim (or is that Dumb?) learned for himself the terrible truth that Allah does not exist. He learned that Allah is just a cover-name for the father of evil, the father of lies and the father of all those who hate God's children, the Jews, Satan.

Unfortunately, as it seems the only way a Palestinian can ever learn anything, he had to learn it the hard way:

The Question Obama Cannot Answer

Barack Hussein Obama, who is 43% Arab, and 6% black, spent many years in a Muslim home, his step-father's, and several years in a Muslim madrasa [school.]

Some say that he went to a Wahabbi school which, ideologically, teaches the particularly violent, supremacist portions of Islam and is also embraced by Osama Bin Laden and terrorists everywhere.

Part of what is taught in Islam, including this branch, is that it is suitable to lie to your enemy if it will gain you an advantage. This is called, taqiyya.

So now Barack Obama sits in an American protestant church, the Trinity United Church and claims to be a Christian. But, why?

Does he embrace genuine Christian faith like millions of Americans? Or is this part of his taqiyya?

Are you willing to stake the lives of your family on this issue? Because if this is part of his Islamic taqiyya, which we know is taught in Islamic schools, then were he to get into the White House, like all Muslims, his loyalties would be to Sharia law, not the U.S. Constitution, regardless of what comes out of his mouth. It would be like Hitler taking over as President of the United States when FDR died. It would be the fox in the hen-house. It would be bad; very, very bad.

If indeed he is just another deceptive Muslim lying through his teeth, handing him the kind of power that the President of the United States has, or the Secretary-General of the U.N., has the potential of qualifying him as a candidate to be the Anti-Christ.

If Barack Obama is not practicing taqiyya, why then is he unwilling to place his hand over his heart while saying the Pledge of Allegiance? Why is he unwilling to wear a U.S. flag lapel pin? Could it be that his allegiance lies not to the U.S. Constitution but with the goals of Islam?

So there is a question that needs to be posed to Mr. Obama. It is a question that he cannot skate around, he cannot slip through, he cannot dodge. Somewhere, some time between now and election day, somebody needs to ask him this question. I'll bet he cannot answer. I'll bet he'll try to snake past it:

"Mr. Obama, you were raised in a Muslim home, you understand Islamic teachings, and yet you say now that you are a Christian. Exactly what part of Mohammed's message in the Qu'ran did you reject, and consider to be false, which caused you to personally turn away from Islam and end up in the church?"

Never, Ever Forget 911

Never forget 911. Never forget the murders. Never forget the vile that is Islam. Liars. Deceivers. Killers. Pigs!

Never forget how they deceived their way into position to be able to murder innocent Americans. These demons show Islam for exactly what it is, the darkest, most hateful, uncivilized slur of lies from the pit of hell.

These murderers, Islam's truest disciples, have shown us everything that we need to know about Islam. And we know that we must confront its lying ideas in every form, in every way, on every continent, and with every means of power available to us Americans. We must show them the same level of mercy they exhibited to our 3000 innocent victims.

No mercy, no let up, no quarter, no comfort. These people want us dead, regardless of what the liberal lackeys say or don't see. Their false religion and their book of lies tells them to fight us and kill us. See chapter 5 and chapter 9 in their koran. They believe that this is God's word to them. They believe that God wants them to kill us. It doesn't get more irreconcilable than that.

No talking, no discussing, no agreements, no conditions, no deals. Islam has proven that it cannot partake in world civilization; it simply seeks to conquer and dominate. Therefore, Islam needs to be outlawed from the world stage. It needs to be universally banned immediately. It needs to be forbidden in the United States, its mosques flattened and its followers either arrested for sedition or deported to Saudi Arabia.

Furthermore, it needs to be militarily confronted in every aspect, every way and in every place immediately. Never forget 911. Never, ever forget it! They already hate us and want to kill our children, so accommodation or appeasement will accomplish nothing except to embolden them, give them more time to plan our family's murder, and give them more time to hate us more, if that is possible.

No Muslim should be allowed a moment of comfort within the borders of the United States. Not one moment. We are his stated enemy. His holy book tells him to kill us. And he knows it. If he tells you something different, he is lying to you like Mohammed Atta lied to the passengers in flight 11, "We are going back to the airport. Everyone will be fine." Filthy liar. Filthy liars!

We must never forget 911. We must not rest in our continual battle against this Satanic murdering cult until it ceases to exist from this country. These people hate us and want to kill us. We either confront them with the power of our laws or we lose. Because as long as one Muslim and his book of hate remains in this country, filled with his murderous delusions, your child is not safe.

Until you understand this, the Muslim demon will get closer and closer and closer to your front door. Remember, murdering is all they do. Of all the contributions to the civilized world in the past 2000 years, not ONE of them has come from a Muslim or a Muslim country. Do the math. All their miserable, inhuman, black hearts know how to do is deceive, to destroy and to kill. That's all they've been doing since 630 A.D. "Tolerance" won't change that; it will only play into its hands.

We must never forget 911. We must ban Islam now. We must attack Islam everywhere with overwhelming, debilitating force. Americans who do not have the stomach for that only invite many more 911's. There is no other way, for Islam believes that God commands them to kill us all.

Do you get it? It really is either them, or your kids. Are you willing to allow these monsters to sacrifice your child to Allah? They will gladly spill the blood of your child to please their false god; they are eager to do so. They are plotting to do so!

Islam has declared war on the west. If you doubt this you are blind, deaf and in severe, near-fatal denial. If you think we can reason with them, ask how the flight attendants who died on 911 did with that approach. No, the only thing an uncivilized cave-man Muslim understands is the power that can stop him from his murdering agenda. Nothing else. Unless he is stopped, forever, the Muslim maniac will keep on coming.

Remember 911. Remember it with your actions. Remember it with your laws. Remember it when you pass by a mosque. Get that mosque outlawed from your community. Go walk in and make them feel like they aren't welcome in your city, because they are not. They want to kill your children, why would you welcome them?

Never, ever, ever forget 911!

Confronting Lawless Border Chaos

Since last October there have been 187 assaults on US Border Patrol agents in the San Diego sector alone. What is that, about six months? That would make it about one attack per day on those American authorities who are enforcing American laws and trying to protect American citizens.

Now stretch that number out across the rest of the southern border and ask yourself how many agents need to suffer, how many attacks have to happen before we begin seriously confronting the lawlessness and chaos that drug and human-traffickers are laying on our plates?

Recently a wire cable was found strung across a patrol road by murderous smugglers that targeted border patrol agents on four-wheelers. Had the wire not been spotted, it certainly could have decapitated our law enforcement officials.

Yet groups such as the American Friends Service Committee, and their spokesperson, Pedro Rios, say that we "need to hear the other side of the story as well." This group monitors law enforcement activity and documents suspected human rights abuses by law enforcement officials.

Once again we see an example of a blind eye given to repeated, habitual, gross and violent violations of US law while the microscope of scrutiny is laid upon those who are confronting the lawlessness. It is the same 'protect-the-criminal' mentality that not too long ago sent Border Patrol Agents to jail who shot an armed convicted drug-smuggler.

The violence is increasing on our borders. The risk is greater for our agents. Bad, ruthless criminals are waging war against our borders and against those who enforce our laws. They are getting more bold in their quest to exert their own self-serving agenda on our border as opposed to American agenda and American law. They want their rules to control the border, not our own, and they will use deadly force to accomplish their agenda.

Look, either we have a boundary on our southern border or we don't. Frankly, if it is not a boundary all the time, it is no boundary at all; ask any cow near a hole in the fence about that. If border lawlessness and chaos is not confronted, and in measure relative to the threat, then it is no longer our border, it belongs to the criminals.

Either you fill the moat around your castle with crocodiles or you drain the water out, for it does not do you any good without them. Either your moat is filled with crocodiles or the castle will not be yours for long.

Those who would point fingers at border patrol agents instead of the criminals should understand that if it weren't for the current limited enforcement of law, that the criminals which such fools protect would storm across en masse and likely as not victimize these very whiners.

Enough of letting the tail wag the dog. Get the crocs. Warn everybody that there are indeed crocodiles in the water. Then don't listen to such people as Pedro Rios when would-be criminals start getting bit. Crossing a moat filled with crocodiles is stupid and can be painful. Perhaps they shouldn't try to do it.

But until and unless there are crocodiles in our moat, law-breakers will continue to try. And if they succeed, it is no longer our border, it is theirs; we have ceded it to the more powerful, wicked men because we didn't have the courage to confront them with strength enough to deter. Our timidity will have been a bigger part of our character than our strength; and we will have lost.

The taller lawlessness stands, the taller in strength we ourselves need to stand to prevent it from overwhelming us and conquering us. People who don't understand this are, always have been, and always will be simple patsies for our prowling, conniving opponents. They are not leaders, they are spineless lackeys who deny a real threat, to their and our peril, because they are unwilling to confront a real threat.

Crocs don't have that problem.


K.O. (Knock Out)

Barak Obama Exposed

So just where does Barak Obama stand on the abortion issue? How about gun laws? How about most of the issues? It seems he is big enough on splash that nobody really has to know who he is or what he really stands for. Seems kind of teflon. Not Al-Gore-plasticman-teflon, but not exactly forthcoming.

One of Obama's recent speeches, this one quite lengthy, was finally meaty enough to begin to nail him down on just where he really is at on some controversial issues. The speech was then reviewed and evaluated by a highly-educated, conservative, patriotic and analytical Christian leader who looks at Obama here for who he is from an American Christian's perspective.

Though the onion has many more yet-to-be uncovered layers, the ones peeled back in this summary are already enough to make you cry. It is very revealing and could well define how the Christain Right identifies this pretender from Illinois (all emphasis and colored text is mine and not the author's):

"I listened to the whole thing. If I were teaching speech this school year and Obama were in my class, he would get an A for sure. He is personable, poised, articulate, likable, and eloquent.

But what did he really say of substance? He began by quoting Alan Keyes, his opponent in his Senate race. It was not till minute 36 (of 39) that he admitted to one of Keyes's apparent criticisms (he didn't really specify what Keyes's objections had been, just that Keyes was convinced that Jesus wouldn't have voted for Obama)--he finally admitted that he, Obama, is pro-abortion. He danced all around the question whether he supports homosexual "marriage." His remarks about Keyes, Pat Robertson, and the late Jerry Falwell were entirely ad hominem, completely devoid of meaningful content.

Not until minute 14 did he mention his having walked the aisle of a church to receive Jesus as Savior, but he immediately undercut that testimony by saying that Jews and Muslims are "on the same path." No serious and honest Jew or Muslim would agree with him, of course. A few minutes later, he claimed that "we need Christians, Jews, and Muslims on Capitol Hill."

Finally, after minute 18, we hear some of his views for the first time. He is anti-gun, so he apparently does not support--or does not understand--the Second Amendment. (Later on, he says some good things about the First Amendment, but without reference to anybody specific who he thinks opposes the principles of the First Amendment.) He wants more tax money to be spent on education. He claims that simply giving more information about contraception will ameliorate, if not solve, the problems of teenage pregnancy and abortion. He is against cuts in the Federal budget.

In minute 26, he finally tells this crowd (containing, apparently, mainly self-described Christians) that he believes America is "no longer a Christian nation," and he makes that statement with apparent approval. He asks a meaningless rhetorical question after minute 27, "Whose Christianity should we teach in the public schools?" (Who in American politics is recommending that we teach Christianity in the public schools? He doesn't say.) Right afterward, he gives some near-sarcastic commentary based on distorted views of the Torah like those popularized by Martin Sheen's character on a popular TV show.

After minute 29, he insists that Christians cannot oppose abortion meaningfully and effectively unless they can justify their opposition to unbelievers, and after minute 31 he says that people of faith must submit to pure reason (that is, reason as defined by those who are not people of faith). In other words, if we can't make our positions palatable and sensible to those who have a completely different (and even hostile) worldview, then we have no business setting our positions forward in the public square.

He concedes that the Pledge of Allegiance, even with "under God," is OK--especially since most kids don't even say it with conviction anyway--and that voluntary prayer groups in public schools would probably be all right.

In sum, this speech contained a lot of effective rhetoric, given in a winning way--a lot of charm--but very little in the way of "real ideas" beyond tactical advice to the left wing on how they can win over people of faith.

Bob Hellam"



Very well said, Bob! Thank you for those important insights.


K.O. (Knock Out)

Who's Yer Gaza?

Irresponsibility invites bad things. Most people understand that. Most people can also apply that to many situations and point and say, 'ah-ha,' that was a result of poor choices and decisions. But why can this same human standard not be understood as the world looks at the Palestinians?

Look, when you start crossing boundaries, you start affecting other people's lives. And when you start raining down rockets onto a civilization, you are forcing them into a position of deciding upon three alternatives. Either they could, first of all, let you kill their people and do nothing. This would allow you to grow in power and strength until you eventually conquered them.

Or they could exercise restraint and exert a limited reaction upon you. This would contribute to a prolonged continuous tit-for-tat affair.

Finally, they could cross over and knock the crap out of you. If you have crossed the boundary of attempting to inflict harm and death upon them, then such a mauling would be one that you most certainly have deserved.

As this applies to the Palestinians (the Biblical Phillistines), the world today is rich with enablers and very short on responsibility-enforcers. The United Nations continually surmises that both Israel and the Palestinians are morally-equivalent cultures and creates resolutions which expect Israel to behave humanely, yet it ignores the great depravity of the Palestinian Muslim culture. (This tendency alone should be enough evidence to abolish the farce that is the UN.)

Egypt recently jumped in as the most recent enabler by allowing the Palestinians to cross its national border, barge into the country, and rampage about as they chose. How did the Palestinians respond? Well, they flooded Egyptian soil with armed terrorists, they sent in suicide-bomber teams into Israel, and they purchased millions of dollars worth of goods from Egyptian vendors with counterfeited money! That's how the Palestinians treated Egypt, their welcoming host, by fleecing its merchants with toy money to the tune of over two million dollars!

Is it ever incumbent upon a guest to actually behave and act respectfully to its host? Is that ever appropriate in this world? Of course it is, it is universally understood. For all cultures except the Palestinians, of course. Surely there are those who will still flock to their bankrupt cause; maybe a few will be standing in front of Israeli tanks, who can't be that many days away from exercising a few moves of their own.

The world has gone blind. It is drunk with moral equivalency and multi-culturalism and is reeling badly. It has put pagan third-world misery-pits on the same footing as advanced industrial societies. It has given the voices of murdering despots, deluded dictators and demonic megalomaniacs a platform upon which to speak and treated their dark agendas as if they were legitimate propositions worthy of option or consideration.

The world is blind because it cannot tell good from evil. It gives evil's ideas and manipulations as much credence as good's. It cannot make a value judgment on something because, it says, the value is relative to the evaluator. There is no absolute standard of right and wrong, good and evil, in the world's eyes.

The same world that was absent as rocket after rocket slammed into Israeli towns, will certainly be in every Palestinian household here in a few days when Israel rolls in, and reporting on the terrible ordeal Palestinian families had to undergo at the hands of the mean Israeli soldiers.

But nobody wants to say that the way for a society to keep another out of its neighborhoods is to behave responsibly and stop trying to kill citizens of that other society. Nobody wants to point out that leadership is a tremendous responsibility and when the leaders do not confront and restrict the evil of its citizens, bad things are going to fall upon the heads of all its citizens. Ask Sadaam Hussein about that principle. Much of one's power is ahead of the irresponsible decision, not after it.

When are people going to recognize that the Palestinians' power is related to the decisions that they make that establish them as a good friend and neighbor? Once they have murdered their neighbors, or stolen from them, the choices about their future are no longer in their hands; they are in the hands of those they have offended. And it will only be the extension of undeserved mercy that keeps this culture from getting the severe pounding their actions have asked for.

People better hope that Israel has more compassion and mercy that the Palestinians.

But that, of course, would mean that they were not morally-equivalent societies....!


K. O. (Knock Out)

It's the Qu'ran, Stupid!

All over the world attacks are happening with one common theme: Islam. A bombing here, a suicide attack there, assassinations, kidnapping, torture; this pagan religion is clearly showing its nature to an international audience.

But, frankly, there are about as many attacks of confusion about what is going on as there are Islamic assaults themselves. Especially from surrendering liberals. For incredulous reasons, so many have cloudy thinking on what the terrorist and his agenda is all about.

It's really quite simple. The terrorist is a true believer. He is totally committed. Although he is misguided and does the works of pure evil, there is logical motivation to his delusion and, thus, to his murderous actions.

To find the motivation behind the terrorist's continuing practice of murdering people, one need look no further than the inspiration found in the teachings of the false prophet Mohammed (7^th century A.D.) who’s supposed revelations are gathered in a book called the Qu’ran, holy to the Muslim. The Muslim believes this to be the word of Allah.

The Qu’ran vociferously denies the virgin birth of Christ as well as His death, resurrection and Deity. It does refer to Him as a prophet, but inferior to Mohammed. Bible believers will know that this is not actual revelation from God, for 1 John 4 describes this type of revelation as coming from the anti-Christ! But what part of this false revelation inspires such things as suicide Bomb-murders and other sub-human acts?

Mohammed describes the Jews as a people to whom Scripture was given, but who then lost the original intent and meaning of Scripture (though not a slice of proof or evidence is presented which substantiates this accusation). Distortion and misinterpretation of revelation by the Jews (and Christians as well, you see) made Mohammed’s “final” revelation a necessity to clarify truth and to reestablish God’s true and final word to mankind. Early in his “revelations,” when Mohammed was more amiable, on his way into power, he shows a measure of tolerance for the Jew and the Christian.

Later, however, when he had enjoyed religious notoriety and a powerful band of fighters to back him up, Mohammed was more bold, morphing in to the very first Islamic terrorist. He murdered many innocents. He describes unbelievers as infidels. He exhorts his followers to fight the infidels. He commands them to act in ruthless ways to create terror and fear in the hearts of those behind the ranks of the enemy fighters. To not fight makes one an enemy of the god of Mohammed’s revelations, Allah. To recoil from such a fight brings down Allah’s judgment on oneself.

Conversely, to fight and die in this struggle, or jihad, against infidels brings about for the martyr a guaranteed pass into paradise. Such a paradise is complete with milk, honey and numerous young maidens available to meet the faithful’s every need. (Interestingly, no other guarantee of salvation is given in the Qu’ran!)

So it is not hard to understand how a believing Muslim might be motivated to self-detonate himself so as to kill an American or an Israeli, clearly unbelievers in his distorted, brainwashed mind, and therefore enemies. His Qu’ran tells him that both are infidels. His Qu’ran tells him to fight against such infidels. His clerics and mullahs declare jihad on Israel and America. He must fight or he, himself will be judged by Allah.

So with these ideas cooking in his mind, the scenario of the suicide bomber, for example, courageously fighting the hated infidel, is the ultimate selfless act of obedience, is as honorable of a contribution as he can make to Allah. And the benefits extend beyond this world because, according to Mohammed’s “revelations,” he is richly and greatly rewarded in paradise.

This also helps to explain how a committed Muslim could hijack a fully-loaded passenger aircraft and slam it into a building. He will kill many infidels and be in paradise soon for his heroic efforts.

Remember, however, sincerity does not equal truth. No matter how hard we believe something does not make it inherently true or false. Regardless how sincere the terrorist is and how much he believes that the Qu'ran is the word of god, his assent to it does not make it true or good.

In fact the acts themselves provide plenty of evidence, on the world's stage, as to if Islam is good or evil. We should all be seeing it for what it is : entirely evil to its core. If you cannot see this, you are a pawn to be used by the devouring plague of Islam.

It's not about the terrorist; it's about the evil lies that motivates and inspires the terrorist, the Qu'ran. Until the Qu'ran goes away, Mohammedans (Muslims) will continue to kill innocent people as they have since 650 A.D.

And though our military should continue to hunt them down on a world-wide scale, and even should expand our offensive, we also need to kill the terrorist's inspiration. The Qu'ran needs to be outlawed, denied, opposed, confronted, banned and destroyed at every level in every society for anything to change, for it is the teachings in this that is the root of this world-wide problem.

T.K.O. (Technical Knock Out)

Church of England Surrenders to Islam

In one of the most stunning remarks in the Church of England's 1500 year history, current Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams ceded centuries of ideological ground to marauding Muslim demands without even a fight.

Rowan actually said that, "the introduction in Britain of some aspects of sharia law was unavoidable."

Britons are rightfully outraged. Based on the high volume of protest hurled at the Archbishop, many are not only convinced his statements are untrue, but are quite willing to take action to prevent such paganry to rule the people of England.

Williams later defended his statements by saying, he was "exploring ways in which reasonable accommodation might be made within existing arrangements for religious conscience" and his core aim was "to tease out some of the broader issues around the rights of religious groups within a secular state".

What the good, most and right reverend ought to do is check his history books a little and see that Islam does not have the heretofore: "conscience." Or perhaps he could simply turn on the news - any channel, any day.

As for the "rights of religious groups within a secular state, " what about a group that hates the state, that is diligently seeking to overthrow the state and would love to kill all its citizens; how many rights should such people have, according to the good bishop?

Though Mr. William's kindness is noble, it seems that he is blissfully unaware of the nature of the snake that has woven its way into many aspects of British society, and he is bending over backwards to try to make accommodations for it. "Sure, Mr. Snaik," says the archbishop, "Come in and lie down and make yourself comfortable. Why, you can sleep right here in this young child's crib."

Why should any society make accommodations for those who would seek to overthrow it? In fact are not those people who seek to overthrow England and other western countries actually, then, the enemies of the host country? And how should a state deal with its enemies, from those who seek to change its laws or kill its citizens? Should the state invite such enemies into the homes of her people?

A millennia ago, the Archbishop's forerunners also were confronted with the scourge of Islam, when it once before sought to conquer Europe. Fortunately previous generations of Brits were braver and more insightful than Mr. Williams as they aggressively went to the middle east and gave the muslims the kind of whatfor that they were asking for.

I doubt many of those who gave their lives on such battlefields would be too proud of the Archbishop's current attempts at secession or surrender.


(Cartoon from Red Planet Cartoons, http://www.redplanetcartoons.com/) :
T.K.O. (Technical Knock Out)