Saturday, May 11, 2013

Exposing Islam Through CAIR's Lies about the Boston Marathon Bombing

Exposing Islam Through CAIR's Lies about the Boston Marathon Bombing Bare Naked Islam posted and commented on a CAIR OPED, from which I extracted a crucial phrase and did a search. The text turned up on CAIR's Facebook page.  I have reproduced it below, highlighting some important words, phrases & clauses which I will dissect below  the OPED.

http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/05/08/nihad-awad-of-crap-chief-spokesislamist-for-muslim-brotherhood-front-group-cair-claims-the-recent-islamic-terrorist-attacks-in-boston-are-unrelated-to-jihad/#comment-173841
https://www.facebook.com/CAIRNational
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151453581892695&set=a.92140837694.89999.42590232694&type=1

    Nihad Awad, like all lying Muslims, assumes that we are stupid, illiterate and gullible. With a smug smirk he plays semantic games, cherry picks scripture and misrepresents the damnable doctrines & practices of Islam. 

    The bothers who bombed the Boston Marathon were Muslims. The surviving bomber said that they were motivated by religion.  What component of Islam would motivate anyone to maim and mutilate as many people as possible?   After reading this post, you will be able to answer that question. 
[Qur'an & hadith links added. Superscripts are linked to my comments.]

#CAIR ISLAM-OPED: A Word of Truth on Jihad and Islam
By Nihad Awad

There is a growing attempt by some commentators to label the recent bombings in Boston as “jihad” and to blame the deadly blasts on a non-existent concept they call “radical Islam.”1

I call “radical Islam” non-existent because radicalism or extremism is not permissible in Islam. Islam prohibits extremism2 and an essential part of the faith is moderation. A more accurate term might be “Al-Qaeda ideology3.”

The Quran, Islam’s foundational holy text, states clearly: “We made you to be a community of the middle way, so that (with the example of your lives) you might bear witness to the truth before all mankind.” (Quran, 2:143)

The Quran also states: “O you who believe! Stand out firmly for justice, as witnesses to God, even against yourselves, or your parents, or your kin, and whether it be (against) rich or poor: for God can best protect both.” (Quran, 4:35)

There is no such thing as radical Islam4, but there are radical Muslims5 – just as there are extremists of every other religion6 or belief.

But there’s a huge difference between the existence of radical individuals and a religion that permits radical beliefs or actions. These radicals certainly do not represent the teachings of Islam or the behavior or beliefs of mainstream Muslims7.

In one Islamic tradition, called a “hadith,” the Prophet Muhammad said: "Religion is very easy and whoever overburdens himself in his religion will not be able to continue in that way. So you should not be extremists, but try to be near to perfection and receive the good tidings that you will be rewarded; and gain strength by worshipping in the mornings, the nights." [Bukhari 1.2.38]

In recent years, we have seen the term “jihadist” come to be used as if it means a person who kills people out of a religious motivation8, but this is terribly inaccurate.

“Jihad” does not mean “holy war.” 9Literally, jihad means to “struggle,” strive and exert effort. It is a central and broad Islamic concept that includes struggle against evil inclinations within oneself, struggle to improve the quality of life in society, struggle in the battlefield for self-defense 10(e.g., - having a standing army for national defense11), or fighting against tyranny or oppression.

For the sake of accuracy and to avoid spreading false information about a major world religion, extremist Muslims who commit crimes should be called criminals or, in cases where the definition fits, terrorists. We should not legitimize their actions by calling them jihadists, even if they attempt to call themselves by that label and seek a false religious connection or justification. These criminals should not be honored with a religious label.

Islam allows legitimate self defense, but prohibits the killing of innocent people12, even in times of war or conflict. Aggression is never permitted.13

"And fight in the cause of God those who
, and do not commit aggression. Indeed God does not love those who are aggressors," (The Quran, 2:190).

So yes, there are some Muslims who have extreme views, or mental illnesses, or political grievances, or a host of other reasons that lead them to kill people, and this is not only a tragedy and a crime but an egregious violation of the principles of Islam.

The difference between Muslim killers and killers from other backgrounds is often the way they are described by the media and viewed by the public: with Muslim killers, the crime is almost always attributed to their religion.14

Because the word “terrorism”15 is used almost exclusively to describe crimes whose perpetrators are Muslims, you might think that a majority of mass killings and acts of terrorism in the U.S. were committed by Muslims. But when we look at the facts, that perception does not hold up.

* According to FBI statistics, of all terrorist attacks on U.S. soil from 1980 to 2005, six percent were committed by Muslims. (Source: http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/terrorism-2002-2005/terror02_05#terror_05sum)

* According to a study from the Combating Terrorism Center at the US Military Academy, since 2011, politically-motivated attacks by Muslim Americans have killed 33 people, while terrorist attacks by white supremacists and other right-wing extremists killed more than 200 people. (Source: http://www.ctc.usma.edu/posts/challengers-from-the-sidelines-understanding-americas-violent-far-right)

* According to a report by the Triangle Center on Terrorism and Homeland Security, “66 Americans were killed in mass shootings by non-Muslims in 2012 alone, twice as many fatalities as from Muslim-American terrorism in all 11 years since 9/11.” (Source: http://kurzman.unc.edu/muslim-american-terrorism)

In a well-known hadith, a man asked the Prophet Muhammad, “What is the best jihad?” to which Prophet Muhammad replied, “Speaking a word of truth to an oppressive ruler.”

The constant misuse of terms like “jihad” and “radical Islam” is offensive to the truth and is counterproductive to our nation’s efforts to achieve security.

It is time we all speak a word of truth by applying the proper labels to criminals and their acts of violence, no matter their religious background.

[Nihad Awad is national executive director for the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the nation's largest Muslim civil liberties group. He may be contacted at: nawad@cair.com ]

-----

ISLAM-OPED is a syndication service of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) designed to offer an American Muslim perspective on current political, social and religious issues. ISLAM-OPED commentaries are offered free-of-charge to one media outlet in each market area. Permission for publication will be granted on a first-come-first-served basis.

Please consider the following commentary for publication.

CONTACT: CAIR National Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper, 202-744-7726, E-Mail: ihooper@cair.com


radical Islam

    To be effective, a professional liar will include some truth in his spew of malignant malarkey.  It is true that there is no such thing as radical Islam.  Islam is what it is; its standard was set 1400 years ago by Moe's recitation, which is recorded in the Qur'an and exemplified by Moe's sunnah & Sira.  Imperialism, terrorism, rape & pillage are intrinsic sacraments of Islam, not bida introduced by "extremists or radicals" 

    I disrespectfully direct doubters, deniers & dissenters to Craig Winn's The Prophet of Doom, which combines the most significant parts of the Qur'an, hadith, Sira & Tahrik in 1000 pages supplying the context & chronology lacking in the Qur'an.  If you lack the patience for 1000 pages, read the In His Own Words Appendix for the highlights.

extremism

    Normative Islam is extreme; it encompasses global imperialism, terrorism, genocide, rape and pillage.  Those intrinsic sacraments of Islam are not prohibited. Transgressing the limits is prohibited. 

    The limits are set in Sahih Muslim 19.4294, in which Moe commands his generals to make holy war. What would profane it? Embezzling spoils, killing children, mutilating bodies and fleeing from battle are the limits which must not be transgressed; which would profane Islam's holy war.

Al-Qaeda ideology

    Al-Qaeda is a subset of the Muslim Brotherhood, which is a subset of Islam; what is their ideology?  Islamic ideology is most clearly stated in the motto of the Brotherhood, which is copied in the Charter of HAMAS. 
Allah is its target, the Prophet is its model, the Koran its constitution: Jihad is its path and death for the sake of Allah is the loftiest of its wishes
  • Only Allah has the right to be worshiped.  3:2
  • Only Allah has the right to legislate & rule, which he delegated to Moe and his successors. 33:36
  • Jihad is ordained for Muslims. 2:216
  • War must be waged against pagans until only Allah is worshiped on a global scale. 8:39
  • War must be waged against Jews & Christians until they are subjugated & extorted. 9:29
  • The blood and property of infidels is not sacred to Muslims. Infidels only acquire human rights when they become Muslims. Bukhari 1.8.387
  • The basic penalty for "waging war against Allah and his Messenger" is execution. 5:33 

radical Islam

    This entry is redundant: see .Extremism.

radical Muslims

    The correct expression is: Believers.  Believers are defined in 8:1-5.  The meaning will not be clear until you look up the context of "spend" and "go out" at http://www.quranbrowser.com/ .  The definition in 9:111 is more explicit: they sold their souls to Allah for admission to his celestial bordello so they fight in his cause, killing and being killed.  In 49:15, they are described as only those who fight in Allah's cause.

extremists of other religions

    Tim McVeigh was a lapsed Catholic who acted out of political, not religious motives.  Christians who shoot abortionists or bomb abortion mills, like McVeigh, act in contravention of Christ's teaching and example.  Muslims engaged in terrorism act in obedience to Allah and emulation of Moe. 

mainstream Muslims

    Was Moe, the founder of Islam, a mainstream Muslim?  If not, then who is?  Moe revealed the Qur'an, which enshrines the doctrines of Islam; are those doctrines not mainstream? If Moe's sunnah does not define mainstream Muslims, what does? 
They said that when the apostle heard about Abu Sufyan
coming from Syria, he summoned the Muslims and said, 'This is the
Quraysh caravan containing their property. Go out to attack it, perhaps
God will give it as a prey.'
http://archive.org/stream/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah#page/n167/mode/1up

'Abdullah b. Abu Bakr told me that one of Aslam told him that B. Sahm
of Aslam came to the apostle and complained that they had fought and got
nothing and found nothing with the apostle which he could give them. He
said: ~O God, You know their condition and that they have no strength,
and that I have nothing to give them, so conquer for them the wealthiest
of the enemy's forts with the richest food.' The following day God conquered
the fort of al-Sa'b b. Mu'adh which contained the richest food in Khaybar.
http://archive.org/stream/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah#page/n279/mode/1up

    Moe was a predator. Predation is part of mainstream Islam.  In Tabari, Vol. VIII, page 122, we find the sad story of the death of Kinanah, chieftan of Khaibar Oasis.
Then he asked him for the rest of it. Kinanah refused to surrender
it; so the Messenger of God gave orders concerning him to al-Zubayr
b. al-'Awwam, saying, "Torture him until you root out what he has."
Al-Zubayr kept twirling his fires tick in his breast 510 until
Kinanah almost expired; then the Messenger of God gave him to
Muhammad b. Maslamah, who beheaded him to avenge his brother
Mahmud b. Maslamah.

religious motivation

    If your Lord issued divine imperatives commanding you to wage war against pagans and 'people of the book' and if he threatened you with eternal damnation if you refused to wage war and promised you admission to his celestial bordello if you join the jihad, that would be religious motivation to engage in offensive conquest.  What if your Lord promised you extra credit towards an upgrade in your seat in his celestial bordello for any step you take to injure or enrage disbelievers; would that be religious motivation?

    Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and his co-conspirators filed with the military tribunal a signed response to the
"nine accusations"
against them. In their document, they spill the beans.



 Many thanks to God, for his kind gesture, and choosing us to perform the act of
Jihad for his cause and to defend Islam and Muslims.
Therefore, killing you and fighting you, destroying you and terrorizing you,
responding back to your attacks, are all considered to be great legitimate duty in our religion. These
actions are our offerings to God. In addition, it is the imposed reality on Muslims in Palestine, Lebanon,
Afghanistan, Iraq, in the land of the two holy sites [Mecca and Medina, Saudi Arabia], and in the rest ofthe
world, where Muslims are suffering from your brutality, terrorism, killing ofthe innocent, and
occupying their lands and their holy sites. Nevertheless, it would have been the greatest religious duty
to fight you over your infidelity. However, today, we fight you over defending Muslims, their land, their
holy sites,and their religion as a whole.

That is neither radicalism nor extremism; that is normative Islam, as Moe preached and practiced it.  That is motivated by Allah's imperatives, threat and promise. Those are religious motivations.

Jihad

    Jihad means extreme exertion and striving.  It is not defined in the Qur'an, but it is defined in a footnote by Hilali & Khan in their translation of 2:190.
[1] (V.2:190) Al-Jihâd (holy fighting) in Allâh’s Cause (with full force of numbers and weaponry) is given the utmost importance in Islâm and is one of its pillar (on which it stands). By Jihâd Islâm is established, Allâh’s Word is made superior, (His Word being Lâ ilaha illallâh which means none has the right to be worshipped but Allâh), and His Religion (Islâm) is propagated. By abandoning Jihâd (may Allâh protect us from that) Islâm is destroyed and the Muslims fall into an inferior position; their honour is lost, their lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish. Jihâd is an obligatory duty in Islâm on every Muslim, and he who tries to escape from this duty, or does not in his innermost heart wish to fulfil this duty, dies with one of the qualities of a hypocrite.
Narrated ‘Abdullâh bin Mas‘ûd رضي الله عنه: I asked Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم "O Allâh’s Messenger! What is the best deed?" He replied, "To offer the Salât (prayers) at their early fixed stated times." I asked, "What is next in goodness?" He replied, "To be good and dutiful to your parents." I further asked, "What is next in goodness?" He replied, "To participate in Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause." I did not ask Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم anymore and if I had asked him more, he would have told me more. (Sahih Al-Bukhâri, Vol.4, Hadîth No.41).

holy fighting in Allah's cause

    What makes fighting holy?  Intentions: intending to please Allah.  What profanes it? Embezzling spoils, killing children, mutilating corpses and fleeing from battle.

    What is Allah's cause? To make Islam dominate the world.

legal definition

    The Reliance of the Traveller, the Shafi'i school's handbook of Shari'ah, certified as accurate and authentic by the Sheikhs of Al-Zzhar University, defines Jihad in Book O9.0.

(O: Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is the lesser jihad. As for the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare against the lower self (nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said as he was returning from jihad.

``We have returned from the lesser jihad to the greater jihad.''

The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such Koranic verses as:

-1- ``Fighting is prescribed for you'' (Koran 2:216);

-2- ``Slay them wherever you find them'' (Koran 4:89);

-3- ``Fight the idolators utterly'' (Koran 9:36);

and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari and Muslim that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:

``I have been commanded to fight people until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say it, they have saved their blood and possessions from me, except for the rights of Islam over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah'';

and the hadith reported by Muslim,

``To go forth in the morning or evening to fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and everything in it.''Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally attended, some twenty-seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent others to fight, himself remaining at Medina, and these were forty-seven in number.)

self-defense

    "Jihad is ordained for you" in 2:216 Allah says Jihad, not defense.  When Moe was weak, with no army, Allah prescribed patience and forbearance. When he moved to Medina and built a small force, Allah prescribed defensive and retaliatory fighting in 22:39. When his army grew strong enough to raid camel caravans and small settlements, Allah revealed the primary Jihad imperatives in Surahs Al-anfal & At-Taubah.

    The Reliance of the Traveller, in Book O9.1, sets forth two types of jihad: offensive and defensive. The former is required in every year, and if not performed when possible, all who know of the obligation are in sin.  The obligation is communal, binding on all eligible male Muslims until a su8fficient number has reported to the front. 

O9.1: The Obligatory Character of Jihad

Jihad is a communal obligation (def: c3.2).  When enough people perform it to successfully accomplish it, it is no longer obligatory upon others (O: the evidence for which is the Prophet's saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),

"He who provides the equipment for a soldier in jihad has himself performed jihad,"

and Allah Most High having said:

"Those of the believers who are unhurt but sit behind are not equal to those who fight in Allah's path with their property and lives. Allah has preferred those who fight with their property and lives a whole degree above those who sit behind. And to each, Allah has promised great good" (Koran 4:95).

If none of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there was a possibility of having performed it. In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims.

The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, "Jihad is a communal obligation," meaning upon the Muslims each year.

The second state is when non-Muslims invade a Muslim country or near to one, in which case jihad is personally obligatory (def: c3.2) upon the inhabitants of that country, who must repel the non-Muslims with whatever they can).

    Reliance O25.9 outlines the duties of subordinate rulers; one of them holds a clue for you: to wage war against neighboring infidels and distribute the spoils.  . 

    The Hanifi school adds some crucial clarity. 
Al-Hedaya Volume II, Book IX, Chapter 1, Page 141
The destruction of the sword is incurred by infidels, although they be not the
first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the sacred writings which are generally received this effect.

standing army

    The purpose of Islam's army is offensive, not defensive: to strike terror into the hearts of intended victims.  Note the expressions used in multiple translations of 8:60.

Islam prohibits killing innocent

    SnakeShit!!! 5:22 does no such thing!  Words have meanings, but Muslims have their own. They play a vicious semantic game which must be exposed.

5:32. Because of that We ordained for the Children of Israel that if anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread mischief in the land - it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind. And indeed, there came to them Our Messengers with clear proofs, evidences, and signs, even then after that many of them continued to exceed the limits (e.g. by doing oppression unjustly and exceeding beyond the limits set by Allâh by committing the major sins) in the land!.

Note the highlighted escape clause.  The prohibition is in 4:92.
4:92. It is not for a believer to kill a believer except (that it be) by mistake, and whosoever kills a believer by mistake, (it is ordained that) he must set free a believing slave and a compensation (blood money, i.e Diya) be given to the deceased's family, unless they remit it. If the deceased belonged to a people at war with you and he was a believer; the freeing of a believing slave (is prescribed), and if he belonged to a people with whom you have a treaty of mutual alliance, compensation (blood money - Diya) must be paid to his family, and a believing slave must be freed. And whoso finds this (the penance of freeing a slave) beyond his means, he must fast for two consecutive months in order to seek repentance from Allâh. And Allâh is Ever All­Knowing, All­Wise.

4:93. And whoever kills a believer intentionally, his recompense is Hell to abide therein, and the Wrath and the Curse of Allâh are upon him, and a great punishment is prepared for him.

    Who is innocent? Only Muslims!!!  If you ain't Muslim, you are a rebel against Allah and his Messenger, due to be killed for waging war against them. 
The truth is revealed in 5:33 and clarified by Tafsir Ibn Kathir. 
5:33. The recompense of those who wage war against Allâh and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter.

`Wage war' mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. Mischief in the land refers to various types of evil.  http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//5.13751.html

aggression is never permitted

    It is difficult to find a more egregious lie. You have already seen ample proof of the obvious objective factual reality if you have read this far.  Whether you read Reliance of the Traveller, Risala or Hedaya, the aggressive and offensive nature of Jihad is clear in Shari'ah.

    Moe dictated and dispatched extortion letters by private courier to his intended victims.  Two of those letters are extremely clear, leaving nothing to the imagination; I will link to them. You can find the others on those sites.
The quote to 2:190 is not accurate; the operative expression is transgress the limits, not commit aggression.
http://corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=2&verse=190

religion & crime

    Islam is a crime against humanity: a war crime.  Its mission is mercenary and its method is martial.

terrorism

    What did the terrorists say when they slit the throats of the flight crews?  What did Nidal Malik Hassan shout when he shot the soldiers at Fort Hood?  What did they say when they cut off Nick Berg's head?  What did they shout when they blew up children at Beslan? 

Mohammad Atta, in his final message to the Magnificent 19, directed them to shout the Takbir
while slaughtering because it terrifies disbelievers.

"When the confrontation begins, strike like champions who do not want to go back to this
world. Shout, 'Allahu Akbar,' because this strikes fear in the hearts of the non-believers."
    What did Allah say he would and did cast?  How did Moe say he was made victorious?


Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Rampant, All-Encompassing U.S. Government Domestic Spying is a Reality

Former FBI counter terrorism agent Tim Clemente just let the cat out of the bag about the universal scope of the United States government's illegal on-going domestic spying practice stating that 'No electronic communication is secure' in this recent report.

Of course his is not the first word about it. Rumors have been flying for quite some time about the National Security Agency's (NSA) massive data warehousing facility in Utah. (Google it.) And other sources have been saying it for a much longer time.

But has anyone looked in to the implications and ramifications and risks of such unprecedented power? RightHooks intends to do that right now.

Think about this - every electronic communication intercepted and stored. Every cell phone call. Every email. Every person. Every website. Every keystroke. Every electronic bank transaction  Recorded and stored  by the NSA or other spying elements of the United States government. Without warrants. Without suspicion. Illegal data seizure. Of everybody's everything.

Can you say monster?

Pressure
Likely born out of the post-911 security interests, such a behemoth is now in the hands of the anti-American political and ideological agenda of New Socialist Barack Obama and his godless affiliates to use in whatever way they think will advance their cause.

For example, remember when CIA Directory General David Petraeus wouldn't tow the party line on the Benghazi-gate and was indicating that he would testify before Congress? The usual threats and political pressure by the Obama criminal thugs did not work. So then what happened? Why, General Petraeus was conveniently found to be sending romantic emails to a woman who was not his wife, it all blew up in his face and he was forced to resign in the aftermath.

But who, exactly, found those emails? And how? What crime was he suspected of and what evidence was brought forth for a warrant for his electronic interactions to be searched?

And what about the strange turn-about of Supreme Court Justice John Roberts when the legality of the socialistic power-grab called Obamacare was being argued, how did his opinion all of a sudden flip-flop?

Does it not seem quite characteristic of the current criminal organization called the Obama administration to actually start sniffing out the profiles of potential political threats to find something to essentially blackmail them with?

"Excuse me, General, if you don't go along with the story we concocted about Benghazi, we are going to tell your wife that you had an affair with this woman whom you have been emailing..."

"Excuse me, Mr. Supreme Court Justice, we understand that you may rule against Obamacare. We would like to remind you that if you do, we will tell your family that you have visited X website. How do you think your wife would feel about that, sir? Is losing your marriage worth it?.."

Don't think these are the only possible instances. Imagine the ones you haven't heard about. And what about the ones who can't be flipped like Andrew Breitbart? What was his fate? Invisible deadly microwave pulses to the heart?

Profiles
So how would this godzilla-like ability to capture electronic data get all squeezed down in order to be useful for political tyrants? Easily - they simply develop a profile to define everything about you. If Facebook and Google can do it, imagine what the software programmers in classified projects with unlimited budgets and access to all electronic data and are capable of.

They have your specific, moment-by moment location data from your cell phone. Therefore they know where you live, where you work, what route you take to work, where you shop, where you spend your time, for how long, when and how often. Overlay these data points with a calendar and you begin to develop patterns.

Combine this with spending data, messaging data, internet search data, bank account information, communication data, the voice-transcribed logs of your cell phone calls, friends lists, email recipients' lists and associations and you can easily see how this profile can quite easily pinpoint much of what you are all about.

Now add in your IP addresses used, and all known usernames (forget about secure passwords...they record every keystroke, remember? They have, therefore every password you ever created) and accounts. They know and data mine them all. No doubt every time you log into anything from anywhere and type, it gets routed and stored directly into the appropriate category of the very personal profile they have in your name, for just you.

Then web things together by taking all the conversations, behavior, calls, etc. of your family, friends, contacts internet associations, etc. and you are now is a classification group and given a threat level value. That threat level value and all of your predictive behavior is sent through the algorithm of comparative behavior of actual "threats" to see where you really are at, what you might do and if they need to pay more attention to you.

Of course, "threat" is an interchangeable variable, isn't it? Threat to what, national security or perpetual political prominence? In the wrong hands, this machine can pull down enough dirt to blackmail nearly any American citizen unfortunate enough to be the political enemy of a current regime.


And who can hide from this monster? Can the author of this post presume some kind of anonymity from it? Hardly. And since this author so often writes about the blatant criminality of the illegal president and his illegal, un-Constutional, and, therefore un-American. behavior, no doubt this author is on the current political enemies list.

Pandora's Box
This illegal spying capability is of little comfort when such assets are focused on Janet Napitano's 'domestic enemies' who are returning war veterans, Christians, law-abiding gun owners and conservatives (principled people who won't swallow Obama and liberal B.S.) instead of actual national security threats like the Boston Bombers...and if it didn't stop them, it has proven itself useless.

But it should not be trashed because it was ineffective in stopping actual terrorist attacks; it should be stopped because it is illegal and just too big of an ugly tool. Such centralized information in the hands of a corrupt centralized government such as exists now, is plenty of proof that it needs to be taken down, dismantled immediately.

This spying beast should not be allowed to function, period. For it is indeed Pandora's Box to the greatest extent and to the largest degree. Humanity and a free people cannot and must not suffer its existence.



[Look for upcoming posts on this topic in the future.]

Wednesday, May 1, 2013

Be a Liberal: Kill the Babies, Save the Perverts

Be a liberal:

Kill the babies.

Save the perverts.

Preach tolerance to others, whom you don't tolerate.

Accept no limits on your behavior, but demand tyrannical limits on the behavior of others.

Call nothing immoral; except the mention of Jesus.

Make the holy profane, and the profane holy.

Pretend you are the offspring of apes, not of God your Creator, for then you think you have no accountability.

Demote God.

Deify man.

Deny sin.

Denigrate Scripture.

Devalue Jesus.

In all things, indulge.

Pretend YOU are the source of defining what is right and wrong.

Pretend there is no final judgement.

Call war veterans 'baby killers' and then go get another abortion.

Protect those killers; kill the innocent.

Blame the Christians, welcome the Muslims.

Forget about substance, it's all about style.

Pretend armed citizens will become your subjects.

Pretend there is no limit to how far you can push them.

Forget that hundreds of thousands of American patriots have already given their lives to combat tyranny such as your ideas are promoting in this country right now.

Forget that you are a domestic enemy of the U.S. Constitution.

Forget that millions of former armed forces took a non-expiring oath to defend the Constitution against its enemies - like you. Then take their jobs away, make them pay the way for sloths and illegals, and finally, try to take away their guns.

Pretend polite people like you.

Pretend Muslims like you.

One of your Muslim friends might even trust you enough to let you take one of their packages on to an airplane with you. You'll be the shining star of diversity. Literally.

Make it wrong for a 15-year old to wear a t-shirt to school with an image of a cross or a gun on it, or for him to have too large of a cup of soda, but if he gets sodomized behind the building after school, that's ok.

Protect the criminals, protect the perverse, punish the innocent.

Be sure to use your protected free-speech rights to work for the elimination of the Amendments that don't work for you, that you don't believe in.

Try to figure out what you can't see in this term: hypocrte.

Pretend Obama is a good president.

Pretend Obama is a good man.

Pretend those that do not support him do so because they are racists.

Pretend you know how you might know that. Please explain.

Pretend the pendulum will never swing the other way.

Pretend you will not reap what you sow.

Pretend it wasn't spoke from one old trucker
that payback sure will be a ________________.

Be a liberal : go back to sleep, keep dreaming. Those aren't footsteps you hear.

Sunday, April 28, 2013

Boston Bombing: Who and Why

The destruction of the sword  is incurred by Infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are generally received this effect.


The quote above comes from the Hnifi version of Islamic Law and is found in Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX, page 141. It means that infidels may be attacked without provocation.     

    The Qur'an verses1 behind that passage from Islamic Law have no expiry, they are open ended,. Thus, the communal obligation to wage Jihad against disbelievers continues to the end of the world. 

War must be carried on against the Infidels, at all times, by some party of the Mussulmans.

    The quote above comes from Page 140 of Hedaya's second volume; it is a translator's note  The Shafi'i school's Reliance of the Traveller, in Book O9.1. makes plain the fact that attacks against passive infidels are required annually; that all who know of the communal obligation are sinners if no attack is carried out when it is possible.

...If none of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there was a possibility of having performed it. In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims.

The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, "Jihad is a communal obligation," meaning upon the Muslims each year....

-

    Objectors declare that Islam is a religion, an equally valid pathway to God. They pray and they sway so it must be ok.  Was any legitimate religion founded for the personal emolument of its founder?  Does the deity of any legitimate religion sanctify and reward acts of terrorism?  Does the founder of any legitimate religion brag about winning wars by terrorism?  3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.  2   Does the deity of any legitimate religion demand genocide3 as the price of admitting its founder to Paradise?

    Is Islam a legitimate religion entitled to the umbra of protection afforded by the First Amendment's free exercise clause?

Why do they attack us?

    That is what Adams & Jefferson wanted to learn when they met Tripoli's Ambassador, so they asked him.  At that time, we had no boots on the ground in Arabia or Asia and Israel was dominated by the Ottoman Empire. 

The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven. 

    Anything and everything Moe said while reciting the Qur'an and everything he did in pursuit thereof is the "law of the Prophet"  After Moe died, Umar sent the army to fight nearby kingdoms. The Persians wanted to know why they were being attacked.

Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:-- "Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master." he


The orders to fight

    Surah Al-Baqarah 2:216 makes it plain that Jihad4 is ordained for Muslims; a communal obligation.  The next verse makes it plain that Jihad, in that context, means holy war.

2:216. Jihâd (holy fighting in Allâh's Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you. Allâh knows but you do not know.

2:217. They ask you concerning fighting in the Sacred Months (i.e. 1st, 7th, 11th and 12th months of the Islâmic calendar). Say, "Fighting therein is a great (transgression) but a greater (transgression) with Allâh is to prevent mankind from following the Way of Allâh, to disbelieve in Him, to prevent access to Al-Masjid-al-Harâm (at Makkah), and to drive out its inhabitants, and Al-Fitnah is worse than killing. And they will never cease fighting you until they turn you back from your religion (Islâmic Monotheism) if they can. And whosoever of you turns back from his religion and dies as a disbeliever, then his deeds will be lost in this life and in the Hereafter, and they will be the dwellers of the Fire. They will abide therein forever."

    The primary Jihad imperatives are found in Surah Al-Anfal and Surah At-Taubah.  Note that there is no mention of their being defensive in nature and no geographic or chronological limits on these imperatives.

8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

   

    Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387 is one of several hadith which confirm the Jihad imperatives. It also brings unpleasant facts to light:

  1. Our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims: The season is open and we can be attacked with impunity.
  2. As disbelievers, we have no human rights; we only obtain them by becoming Muslims. 
Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah." Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, "O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?" He replied, "Whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah', faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have."

    The Jihad imperatives are codified into Shari'ah, in The Reliance of the Traveller O9.8 & 9.9. 

The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,...

The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to settle with paying the poll tax (jizya) ) ...

    Where is the defensive or retaliatory element in those provisions of Islamic law?  To see clear confirmation of the obvious, turn to O25.9 where waging war against neighboring infidels is listed as an eighth duty of subordinate rulers.

What motivates Muslims?

    Terrorists are motivated by Allah's threat and promise because they are believers5.  If they were hypocrites, whose Islam goes no deeper than their throats, they would not be planting bombs.  On resurrection day, Allah will weigh their sins against their good deeds. The swing of the balance determines where they spend eternity, Paradise or Perdition. 

Allah's threat

    A Muslim who does not join the Jihad when called will be damned.

9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.

9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do all things.


Allah's promise

    A Muslim who joins the Jihad with good intentions will have his sins forgiven and be admitted into Paradise.

61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment.

61:11.  That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!

61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of 'Adn ­ Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.

61:13. And also (He will give you) another (blessing) which you love, help from Allâh (against your enemies) and a near victory. And give glad tidings (O Muhammad ) to the believers.

    The minimum number of wives in Paradise is two. The maximum number is 72.  The quantity and quality of food and wine the Muslim gets and the number of virgins he gets is a function of which of the 100 levels of Paradise he is admitted to, which is a function of the balance of his sins and good deeds.  How can a Muslim gain extra credit toward an upgrade in Paradise?  By any step taken to injure or enrage disbelievers: ACTS OF TERRORISM! .  This fact is clear on the face of the text in 9:120.

9:120. It was not becoming of the people of Al-Madinah and the bedouins of the neighbourhood to remain behind Allâh's Messenger (Muhammad  when fighting in Allâh's Cause) and (it was not becoming of them) to prefer their own lives to his life. That is because they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor hunger in the Cause of Allâh, nor they take any step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of righteousness. Surely, Allâh wastes not the reward of the Muhsinûn.


Why do they hate us?

    Muslims hate us because we are not them.  Why? Because Allah hates us; we are accursed, the worst of creatures who must be punished, defeated and gathered into Hell.  Muslims love what Allah loves and hates what Allah hates. The concept is called Wala Wal Bara.

    They hate us and attack us because we ain't Muslims; nothing short of sincere conversion to Islam will change that.  If we want to stop the attacks, we must deport all Muslims and exclude them from entering. There is no acceptable alternative.


  1. 8:39, 9:29, 9:123
  2. http://snooper.wordpress.com/2013/03/20/combatting-intolerance-negative-stereotyping-and-stigmatization/
    http://snooper.wordpress.com/2012/11/30/the-big-lie-terrorism-cannot-be-associated-with-islam/
  3. "until he has made a great slaughter"
    "until you have killed and wounded many of them"
  4. Translator's definition
    Jurist's definition
  5. 8:1-5, 9:111 & 49:15 define believers: those who fight in Allah's cause.

Thursday, April 25, 2013

Homeland Security Failed: Napolitano's Got to Go

It turns out that the two terrorist brothers in Boston slipped through the cracks of the security agencies in charge of protecting the country despite one of them having gone back to rub elbows with other terrorists in Russia.

And Russia even sent warnings to Washington. Multiple times. And having terrorist connections on their Facebook pages.

So how could these two get away with it?

Simple: Janet Napolitano, Obama and the untold resources of the alphabet agencies are looking not at terrorists, but what they consider the real enemy - us.

Remember this?:
"the return of military veterans facing significant challenges reintegrating into their communities could lead to the potential emergence of terrorist groups or lone wolf extremists capable of carrying out violent attacks"

Or this?:
"Returning veterans possess combat skills and experience that are attractive to right-wing extremists,” it says. “DHS/I&A is concerned that right-wing extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize veterans in order to boost their violent capacities"

Or this?:
"Proposed imposition of firearms restrictions and weapons bans likely would attract new members into the ranks of right-wing extremist groups as well as potentially spur some of them to begin planning and training for violence against the government...The high volume of purchases and stockpiling of weapons and ammunition by right-wing extremists in anticipation of restrictions and bans in some parts of the country continue to be a primary concern to law enforcement."

Those words are directly from the Department of Homeland Security, the agency that a.) supports illegal immigration b.) supports disarming Americans c.) is arming itself to the teeth to confront American citizens and control the market to keep ammunition out of Americans' hands and the agency that was supposed to have kept the homeland secure.

Guess what? They failed.

And they failed because they are too busy keeping their eyes on law-abiding American citizens who may own a gun, may be a veteran and may go to church instead of the terrorist enemy that has declared war on us.

All those resources and two snot-nosed punk kids get through their dragnet. Yet if I were to write certain phrases regarding Obama here on this webpage, the DHS would pay yet another visit to RightHooks and be sniffing up my backside hoping to find something that fits with their sick narrative.

They are not the Department of Homeland Security, they are Obama's Brownshirt biatches. Their goal is not homeland security, but political perpetual-monopoly for the twisted socialist machine.

The lying, ugly and fat Janet Napolitano has to go. She not only is complicit of Obama's current attempts to overthrow this country, she is one of his most useful tools (Eric Holder is also a tool. Harry Reid is another tool. Nancy Pelosi yet another tool.) If you or I failed at our jobs would we not be shown the door? Well? Did Fat Janet keep us safe or did we just get attacked in the homeland? If its the latter, she's got to go. She failed. We got hit. Her fault. Period.

Maye there is some saggy, pathetic, disease-ridden lumpy dyke in San Franciso who would be willing to take Fat Janet in and show her some good lesbian loving before Janet's entire face falls into her chin, who knows.

All I know is that while Janet Napolitano and her Brownshirts were counting your guns and your bullets and your Bibles and your friends and your posts and your emails and your calls and your spending and your whereabouts, the real enemy planted bombs in Boston and killed an innocent little boy (among others) right here in the Homeland.

If Napolitano, Obama or anyone in this administration could feel an ounce of shame, I'd say, 'Shame on you!' But their selfish, seared consciousness' feel no shame. Not a twinge.

It's all and only just about their political agenda.

Monday, April 15, 2013

Boston Marathon Bombing: Observe the Pattern!

 While it is possible that others have adopted the Islamic M.O., it is unlikely.  Multiple explosive devices set to detonate at the same time and disperse shrapnel into large crowds fits the pattern of Islamic terrorism.  A person of interest, described as a an exchange student from Saudi Arabia, was chased down and tackled by a witness.   Do you notice anything familiar?  Where were most of the Magnificent Nineteen from?  What kind of Visa did they use to gain admission?

    Why do Muslims need to hurt us?  Because we are not Muslims.  Everyone who is not Muslim is deemed to be a rebel against Allah, one who disbelieves, contradicts or opposes Allah & Moe. I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to Surah Al-Ma'idah  5:33 and  Ibn Kathir's Tafsir thereof. . Surah Al-Imran 3:12 informs us that we are to be "defeated and gathered together into Hell". Surah At-Taubah 9:29 commands Muslims to wage war against Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians until we are subjugated and submit to extortion.  9:120 promises Muslims that any step taken to injure or enrage disbelievers will be imputed to them as a righteous good deed. When Judgment Day comes, after Muslims murder the last Jew, Allah will weigh their sins against their good deeds. The swing of the balance will determine where they spend eternity.

    Of course, Goddamned fools know that terrorism is harram in Islam. They know that killing innocent persons is forbidden They know something that ain't true. They do not know, because they have not read 5:33 and Ibn Kathir's Tafsir, that only Muslims are innocent. The prohibition is on killing Muslims. Since they have not read Sahih Bukhari, damned fools do not know that no Muslim shall be killed for killing a disbeliever.  UN resolutions declare that Islam cannot and must not be associated with terrorism.  There are four little problems with that: Allah said that he would cast terror and did cast terror. Moe said that he was made victorious with terror. Allah commands Muslims to strike terror into the hearts of disbelievers. 

    Almighty God, who answers prayer, I beseech thee for the immediate death and eternal damnation of the perpetrators of the Boston bombing, and those who ordered, financed, facilitated, planned, aided, assisted and or approve of, celebrate, sympathize with or take pleasure in that most accursed crime against humanity.

    "Its Islam, stupid!"  And so long as there are believing Muslims on our soil; in our cities, it will not be possible to be safe and secure.  We must constantly anticipate the next flash of fire; the next blast, knifing, vehicular homicide or shooting.  Eventually, trust and comity will be completely shattered and normal life will be impossible. 

    Put an end to it. Disrespectfully and contumaciously demand proscription of the propagation & practice of Islam.  Tell your Congressman & Senators that, unless Muslims are expelled & excluded, they will be removed from office and replaced in the next election cycle.

Saturday, April 13, 2013

Jihad Debate: Is it Imperialism or Self-Improvement?

 Davi Barker, writing at Patheos, concentrates on attempting to discredit Pamela Geller with adhominem attacks while projecting that tactic onto her. 

  • "Anti-Muslim demagogue,Pam Geller"
    • "blows a wad of cash"
      • "on an ad (hominem) campaign against Islam,"
      • "critical of the boogeyman Muslims she imagines under her bed"

    Preferring to debate the issue rather than personalities and process, I left the following comment, which was not published.  Since I am writing on my own blog and a few friendly blogs where I can use html and won't be censored, I am adding hyperlinks to my sources so that readers can verify the quotes and examine their context.

Adhominem attack is against the debater not her facts: you labeled Geller "bigot".

You denounce 'violent extremists'; do you denounce Muhammad bin Abdullah, who dictated & dispatched extortion letters1 demanding Jizya, then followed up with his army, slaughtering, dispossessing and enslaving2 those who refused to submit ?  Muhammad said that he was "raised for jihad and not for tillage"3, "sent with a sword to see that none but Allah is worshiped4"  and "commanded to fight"5 with men.  He also said that he was "made victorious with terror"6 but you can not denounce him as a terrorist.  

Who is better qualified to define Jihad: you or two who translated the Qur'an?  "Al-Jihâd (holy fighting) in Allâh’s Cause" [Hilali/Khan 2:190]7.  Who is better qualified to define Jihad: you or the Shafi'i school of Islamic law?
 " Jihad means to war against non-Muslims,
and is etymologically derived from the word
mujahada, signifying warfare to establish the
religion." " [The Reliance of the Traveller, Book O9.0,  p. 599]8

Who said this: "(This is also a part of the war booty you earned. Verily, I have no share in it, except my own share, the fifth designated to me. Even that fifth will be given to you (indicating the Prophet's generosity). Therefore, surrender even the needle and the thread, and whatever is bigger or smaller than that (from the war spoils). Do not cheat with any of it, for stealing from the war booty before its distribution is Fire and a shame on its people in this life and the Hereafter. Perform Jihad against the people in Allah's cause, whether they are near or far, and do not fear the blame of the blamers, as long as you are in Allah's cause. Establish Allah's rules while in your area and while traveling. Perform Jihad in Allah's cause, for Jihad is a tremendous door leading to Paradise. Through it, Allah saves (one) from sadness and grief.)'' 9 ?

Who said this: "(The greatest of all things is Islam, its pillars are the prayers and its pinnacle is Jihad for the sake of Allah.)"10?   Who knows better what Jihad is, you or the founder of Islam? 

    If Jihad means Jihad an Nafs: struggle against ego & temptation, why are the various books of Jihad in hadith collections predominantly about raids & conquests?


  1. http://alquraan.net/letters/letters_1.html
  2. Surah Al-Ahzab 33:26-27
  3. Ibn Sa'd's KITAB AL-TABAQAT AL-KABIR Volume 1, Parts 1.25.7
  4. The Benefits of Iron, Tafsir Ibn Kathir  http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//57.52680.html
  5. http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/abudawud/014.html#014.2635 
    http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/bukhari/052.html#004.052.196
  6. http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/bukhari/052.html#004.052.552
    http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/bukhari/007.html#001.007.331
  7. http://www.qurancomplex.com/Quran/Targama/Targama.asp?nSora= 2&l=eng&nAya= 190# 2_ 190
  8. http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=617
  9. Ruling on the Spoils of War (Ghanimah and Fai ), Tafsir Ibn Kathir http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//8.20194.html
  10. The State of the People of Faith and Their Reward Allah states: Tafsir Ibn Kathir http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//32.41021.html

Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Combatting intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization

 The 2013 edition of "Combating Defamation of Islam" is entitled:  "Combatting intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization". The new resolution incorporates the boilerplate of previous resolutions reaching back to the Durban Declaration and Plan of Action by reference. Those wishing to read the entire pile of drek can find it here:  http://www.humanrightsvoices.org/site/developments/?d=11282

    This resolution contains one boilerplate paragraph which warrants detailed deliaring; I intend to concentrate on that paragraph. [Emphasis added,.]

Reaffirming that terrorism in all its forms and manifestations cannot and should not be associated with any religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group, (UNGA resolution 67/178, pp7)

 

Associated?

    Death & Damnation!!! Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam!! Who in Hell associated terrorism with Islam???

Allah!

    How did Allah associate Islam & terrorism?  Directly & explicitly in the Qur'an! [Translated by Hilali & Khan unless otherwise noted,]

  • 3:151. We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers).
  • 3:152. And Allâh did indeed fulfil His Promise to you when you were killing them (your enemy) with His Permission; until (the moment) you lost your courage and fell to disputing about the order, and disobeyed after He showed you (of the booty) which you love. Among you are some that desire this world and some that desire the Hereafter. Then He made you flee from them (your enemy), that He might test you. But surely, He forgave you, and Allâh is Most Gracious to the believers. 
    • Allah next conveys the good news that He will put fear of the Muslims, and feelings of subordination to the Muslims in the hearts of their disbelieving enemies, because of their Kufr and Shirk. And Allah has prepared torment and punishment for them in the Hereafter. http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//3.9541.html
  • 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, "Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes." 
  • 8:57.  If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember. [Pickthall]
  • 8:60. Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of God, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly. [Abdullah Yusuf Ali]
  • 33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.
  • 33:27. And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things.
  • 59:2. He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Banî An-Nadîr) from their homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from Allâh! But Allâh's (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they expected it not, and He cast terror into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you with eyes (to see). 
  • 59:13. Verily, you (believers in the Oneness of Allâh - Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear in their (Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh. That is because they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and Power of Allâh).

Moe!

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:
    Narrated Jabir bin 'Abdullah:
    The Prophet said, "I have been given five things which were not given to any one else before me.
    1. Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month's journey.
    2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for praying and a thing to perform Tayammum, therefore anyone of my followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due.
    3. The booty has been made Halal (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone else before me.
    4. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of Resurrection).
    5. Every Prophet used to be sent to his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind.
  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
     Narrated Abu Huraira:

        Allah's Apostle said, "I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand." Abu Huraira added: Allah's Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

Casting Terror

    Allah, in his Qur'an, said that he would and did cast terror into the hearts of disbelievers. Moe said that Allah made him victorious through terror.  How did Allah cast terror?  Lets look a little deeper below the surface. 

    On page 326 of The Life of Muhammad, Ishaq summarizes NQ8:57 & 60 thusly:

'If you come upon them in war, deal with them so forcibly as to terrify
those who follow them, haply they may take warning,' i.e.. make a severe
warning of them to those that come after, that haply they may understand.
'And prepare what you can against them, and cavalry by which
you may strike tenor ,"to the enemy of God and your enemy, as far as HIS
words. 'And whatever you spend in the way of God will hc repaid to you:
you will not be wronged; 1.e. you will not lose your reward which God in
the next life and a rapid recompense in this world.

Allah told Moe to threaten his victims with the strongest possible army and rough them up enough to terrify prospective victims.
Readers who are aware of current events will recall incidents of Muslims taunting Jews with cries of  "Khaybar", one of Moe's brutal genocidal conquests,. The practical application of 8:57 is exemplified by Khaybar's effect on Fadak, which is revealed on page 523 of The Life of Muhammad.

When the apostle had finished with Khaybar. God struck terror to the
hearts of the men of Fadak when they heard what the had done to
the men of Khaybar . They sent to him an offer of peace on condition that
they should keep half of their produce. Their messengers came to him in
Khaybar or an the road or after he came to Medina, and he accepted fheir
terms.Thus Fadak became his private property.because it had not been
attacked by horse or camel.'


    Kab Ashraf was the chief of a Jewish settlement and a poet who had mocked Moe, who commissioned his assassination.  The story of the assassination and its effect are told on page 368 of The Life of Muhammad.

Our attack upon God's enemy cast terror among the Jews, and there was no Jcw in Medina who did not fear far his rife."


    Asma bint Marwan was a poet  who mocked Moe and complained bitterly of his murders upon which he had her killed. The story is told on page 676 of The Life of Muhammad. Her murder, like that of Ashraf, had the intended effect:

The day after Bmt Marwan was klled the men of B. Khatma.  became Muslims bcuuse they saw the power of Idam.


    Assassination & genocide were not the only methods of casting terror; Moe's companions also destroyed date trees with the same objective in mind.  Turn to the commentary of Muhammad Shafi in the Mariful Qur'an for the details:  page 374 of Volume 8. . 

The reference in the verse is to the cutting, by the orders of the Holy Prophet , of the
palm trees of Banii Nadir who had shut themselves in their fortresses in
defiance of the Holy Prophet's orders to surrender. So, some of the blessed
Companions, in order to anger them or cast terror into their hearts, cut
and burned down some of their date trees.


    The OIC and their dhimmis demand that UN member states criminalize revelation of the fact that terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam. Allah said that he would cast terror and subsequently described the effects of casting terror: genocide, enslavement, dispossession & dispersion.  Moe bragged about being made victorious with terror but we should be fined, imprisoned or executed for telling you about their demonic ideology and deeds.

    When we declare that Allah is Satan, we are not stereotyping Muslims; we are stating the obvious: the deity they worship is demonic.  When we declare that Moe was a barbaric, genocidal, profiteer, murderer, lecher & child molester, we are stating the obvious, not stereotyping Muslims.  Every Muslim who does not want to be known as a demon worshiper and terrorist emulator need only apostatize, disassociating themselves from the demon and his profiteer.

    Freemen who wish to remain free and live in peace and security need to rise up as one disrespectfully demanding that effective action be taken to remove Islam from the face of the earth.  I exhort citizens of the USA to sign this on line petition which will email itself to your Representative & Senators.

    The annual UN resolutions passed by the HRC & GA have no legal force but international human rights covenants such as ICERD can be enforced against signatory member states. An ad hoc committee of the HRC meets for ten days twice each year to craft a binding protocol to inject the resolutions into ICERD so that they can be enforced.  Few people know about this parallel track and nobody is doing anything to derail it. 

    A good offense is the best defense, so we must disrespectfully demand that Islam be outlawed for its egregious violations of ICERD, ICCPR & CPPCG.