Friday, October 17, 2008

Drink the Kool-Aid

Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, ObamaObama,

Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, ObamaObama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama,

He's 'The One'..................

Friday, October 10, 2008

Obama's Advice to Call for Kenyan Voter Fraud Protests Claims 1,000 Lives

How does Barak Obama sleep at night?

His advice to Kenyan Prime Minister Odinga, who lost the Presidential election, to 'claim voter fraud and protest,' was taken up by Odinga and claimed the lives of a thousand people.

Never mind that the Prime Minister is going to bring in Islamic Sharia law into Kenya soon...probably is waiting for Obama to win his own election first...

The Kool-Aid gets stronger every day.

Read it here: http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=77508

Thursday, October 9, 2008

Louis Farrakhan Calls Obama, "The Messiah"

In a You Tube video released yesterday, Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan calls Barak Obama "The Messiah!"

Farrakhan's message, recorded in February, brings the insanity that is Barak Obama to a whole new level of madness.

Listen for yourself...and if you believe him, then drink the Kool-Aid...

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

Obama Brown-Shirts, er, Black-Shirts...SCARY

This brainwashing is scary...!

Like Hitler's Brown Shirts (Nazi militant youth club), here's Obama's Black Shirts...

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

Is Obama a Communist, Muslim, or Terrorist? Take Your Pick

Barak Hussein Obama has ties to Islam, in his roots and childhood education, Communism, with his self-proclaimed "mentor," Frank Marshall Davis a confirmed Communist, and terrorism with his close association to William Ayers, the Pentagon bomber from the 1970's.

So which is he?

It doesn't really matter.

Why? Because what matters is that this freak-show Obama is the rallying point for EVERYTHING ANTI-AMERICAN, and there is NO WAY that this man should become the President of the United States.

Obama is a HUGE threat to America.

Joe Crews explains nicely below:

Summary: Obama is apex of Fabian Revolution begun 100 + years ago.

Submitted by: Joe Crews

580 Warren Thomas Road

Texarkana, Texas 75501

Work No. 903.223.8000 extension 1450

Cell No. 903.748.9050

Confederate General Jeb Stuart once remarked that he did not want to survive the death of liberty in his country. On May 11th, 1864 Stuart was fatally wounded during a Calvary charge. On May 12th his wish was granted. In this time of immense challenge and opportunity, I think we all would do well to ponder the caliber of such a man, regardless of our political affiliations or heritage.

The reason is that if the current polls continue, we may soon elect the first candidate likely to preside over and usher in the death of the greatest political system the world has ever known.

The complicity of the mainstream media in ignoring the Marxist background and terrorist connections – including Islamic - of the leading presidential candidate speaks volumes; namely that the Fabian revolution began in the late 1800’s is not only well advanced but on the threshold of victory. Consider that the lifelong grooming of Manchurian candidate Obama began in Hawaii whereby his own admission he was “mentored” by the leader of a communist cell, Frank Marshall Davis. Even though Davis was sent to Hawaii to spy on U.S. military installations and edit the Hawaiian communist newspaper, the fellow travelers in the media only saw fit to report that Davis was a “poet”. Neglected was the revelation that the “poetry” of the pedophile Davis waxed full of praise to Joseph Stalin.

Further ignored is the credible evidence that money from radical Islamisists not only financed Obama’s education but his presidential campaign with what could possibly amount to hundreds of millions of dollars in illegal overseas contributions.

While the mainstream media fawn over Obama’s “eloquence” they ignore other credible evidence that the communist terrorist William Ayers ghostwrote “Dreams of My Father.” For his part, Obama refuses to release any of his university papers that could easily disprove this assertion if indeed it is untrue. Yet, the mainstream media just yawns. The hypocrisy is nearly incalculable. Imagine the furious non-stop assault upon McCain if it were suspected that a David Duke or similar pariah ghostwrote a memoir for him.

Ironically, McCain helped to craft the sword that Obama will wield to slay not only the McCain campaign but free and open political discourse. While McCain/Feingold expressly limits the very speech the first amendment sought to protect, the Orwellian “Fairness Doctrine” praised by democrats and embraced by Obama, will destroy any media source not willing to dispense politically correct propaganda. Yes, change IS coming.

Moreover, pastors, who from the days of our founders until the mid 1950’s, regularly opined on matters political, now face fines and imprisonment if they do not meekly acquiesce to a truncated exposition of the Word they claim is relevant to all arenas of life. To avoid these recriminations, one must either be a liberal, a minority, or both. The dearth of conservative pastors willing to challenge this unconstitutional abridgment contrasts markedly from the pastors who helped to found this country and served as leaders in the revolutionary war when the certain penalty for their civil disobedience was the loss of life, rather than a tax exemption.

Our culture, by tolerating and even celebrating degeneracy, has largely destroyed the only foundation upon which a free society can stand: moral turpitude. The communist founder of the ACLU, Roger Baldwin, knew this well. His legacy of well-trained agitators, front group forming fellow travelers, and the useful idiots they enlist have successfully obliterated the knowledge that civil liberty is inseparable from personal responsibility, while simultaneously inculcating the belief that civil liberty is a license for irresponsibility. The stated goal of communism, to destroy us from within, continues unabated.

Forgetting that the “Government big enough to give you everything you want is the government big enough to take away all that you have”, Americans leaders obligingly prostrate themselves before a beast of their own creation while it nationalizes the financial industry, devalues the currency and condemns generations yet unborn to serfdom. Just as Voltaire cried for “More Light!” in the final moments of his life, those who have set fire to the house of human freedom now cry out for “More Fuel!” With previous experience funding the communist Chinese military and the infrastructure of Iran while head of Goldman Sachs, Secretary Paulson is well suited to dispense the pyrotechnics.

Our founders did not delineate a comprehensive list of inalienable rights. Jefferson summarized them with the words, “Among these are..” then specified the principle three in descending order. The pursuit of happiness does not sanction the trespass of liberty while the exercise of liberty must honor the right to life. In 1973 when our highest court declared the pre-eminent inalienable right to be null and void it philosophically declared that rights themselves no longer exist; only temporary privileges granted by the state. Using Roe V. Wade as cover Obama seeks to extend the slaughter of the pre-born to those born alive. The principle crime of the latter was that they had the “audacity” to survive the attempt to kill them. Perhaps Obama could enlighten the world as to just how old a child must be before that child is endowed with inalienable rights.

The messianic character of the Obama Cult is a direct manifestation of deeply imbibing the proclamation of the Humanist Manifesto that mankind “must save itself”. This declaration, ala Hegel, is in essence a deification of the individual (god) and the collective (God). It makes the state the ultimate arbiter of good and evil, and thus makes the doctrine of enumerated powers so passé. This doctrine, espoused by our founders, is only rational if a transcendent moral authority exists whose jurisdiction supersedes human opinion.

Never mind that the all Utopian Revolutions so deceived have produced the worst tyrannies in the history of mankind. The press, having elevated Obama to the status of “Savior” must consider it a violation of protocol to either question or expose the Marxist and Islamic unseen hand in his rise to power.

For those inclined to believe that socialism is somehow either a compassionate or Christian form of civil government, I share the words of the great theologian Oswald Chambers. Chambers wrote that, “The vision of Socialism is magnificent; these are benedictions and blessings for mankind on the line of Socialism which have never been yet; but once the root is cut from Redemption, it will be one of the most frantic forms of despotic tyranny the human race has ever known. It looks like the lamb, but when the big crisis comes, it gives life to the beast."

Egalitarian propaganda works. Few Americans, especially democrats, are aware that Marx, Mao, Castro, et al, sang the praises of democracy. They viewed democracy as a fundamental precursor to socialism and therefore embraced democracy the same way that Obama and the modern democratic party embraces it; a vehicle to gain the attention support and participation of the masses in their own enslavement.

To those who plan to vote for Obama in November, do you really hate this country that much?

Monday, October 6, 2008

Clinton/Obama-Type Socialism Bred Financial Crisis

The truth finally becomes clear as to why the United States is in the financial mess that it is. Though the main stream (read:liberal) media, Obama himself and every Democrat who can find a microphone is blaming President GW Bush for the entire crisis (just like they blame him for everything, all the time), a revelation that is impossible to ignore points the finger directly where it all started.

The following New York Times article printed on September 30, 1999, leaves no misunderstandings as to how we got in this predicament. It was the Clinton administration and its normal socialist policies that can be proven to be responsible for opening the Pandora's Box of loans to people who logic said were not qualified.

The Clinton administration put tremendous pressure on financial markets to open themselves up to loans to people whom basically could not afford to carry such loans.

Such 'wisdom' is typical of the short-sighted, ignorant liberal party that does nothing except hurl us toward a socialist system. What else can you call it when the federal government is forced to bail out, and thus own, the commercial structure of this country?

And Obama blames Bush. Which is further evidence that no liberal is actually interested in anything close to the truth, rather simply blindly destroys this country in the name of an ignorant political agenda.

Here is that article from the NY Times from 1999:

Fannie Mae Eases Credit To Aid Mortgage Lending

By STEVEN A. HOLMES

Published: September 30, 1999

In a move that could help increase home ownership rates among minorities and low-income consumers, the Fannie Mae Corporation is easing the credit requirements on loans that it will purchase from banks and other lenders.

The action, which will begin as a pilot program involving 24 banks in 15 markets -- including the New York metropolitan region -- will encourage those banks to extend home mortgages to individuals whose credit is generally not good enough to qualify for conventional loans. Fannie Mae officials say they hope to make it a nationwide program by next spring.

Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits.

In addition, banks, thrift institutions and mortgage companies have been pressing Fannie Mae to help them make more loans to so-called subprime borrowers. These borrowers whose incomes, credit ratings and savings are not good enough to qualify for conventional loans, can only get loans from finance companies that charge much higher interest rates -- anywhere from three to four percentage points higher than conventional loans.

''Fannie Mae has expanded home ownership for millions of families in the 1990's by reducing down payment requirements,'' said Franklin D. Raines, Fannie Mae's chairman and chief executive officer. ''Yet there remain too many borrowers whose credit is just a notch below what our underwriting has required who have been relegated to paying significantly higher mortgage rates in the so-called subprime market.''

Demographic information on these borrowers is sketchy. But at least one study indicates that 18 percent of the loans in the subprime market went to black borrowers, compared to 5 per cent of loans in the conventional loan market.

In moving, even tentatively, into this new area of lending, Fannie Mae is taking on significantly more risk, which may not pose any difficulties during flush economic times. But the government-subsidized corporation may run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in the 1980's.

''From the perspective of many people, including me, this is another thrift industry growing up around us,'' said Peter Wallison a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. ''If they fail, the government will have to step up and bail them out the way it stepped up and bailed out the thrift industry.''

Under Fannie Mae's pilot program, consumers who qualify can secure a mortgage with an interest rate one percentage point above that of a conventional, 30-year fixed rate mortgage of less than $240,000 -- a rate that currently averages about 7.76 per cent. If the borrower makes his or her monthly payments on time for two years, the one percentage point premium is dropped.

Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, does not lend money directly to consumers. Instead, it purchases loans that banks make on what is called the secondary market. By expanding the type of loans that it will buy, Fannie Mae is hoping to spur banks to make more loans to people with less-than-stellar credit ratings.

Fannie Mae officials stress that the new mortgages will be extended to all potential borrowers who can qualify for a mortgage. But they add that the move is intended in part to increase the number of minority and low income home owners who tend to have worse credit ratings than non-Hispanic whites.

Home ownership has, in fact, exploded among minorities during the economic boom of the 1990's. The number of mortgages extended to Hispanic applicants jumped by 87.2 per cent from 1993 to 1998, according to Harvard University's Joint Center for Housing Studies. During that same period the number of African Americans who got mortgages to buy a home increased by 71.9 per cent and the number of Asian Americans by 46.3 per cent.

In contrast, the number of non-Hispanic whites who received loans for homes increased by 31.2 per cent.

Despite these gains, home ownership rates for minorities continue to lag behind non-Hispanic whites, in part because blacks and Hispanics in particular tend to have on average worse credit ratings.

In July, the Department of Housing and Urban Development proposed that by the year 2001, 50 percent of Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's portfolio be made up of loans to low and moderate-income borrowers. Last year, 44 percent of the loans Fannie Mae purchased were from these groups.

The change in policy also comes at the same time that HUD is investigating allegations of racial discrimination in the automated underwriting systems used by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to determine the credit-worthiness of credit applicants.

Ronald Reagan IS rolling over in his grave

Wednesday, October 1, 2008

Obama's Liberal Fascism Threatens Missouri

Taking a page right out of Benito Mussolini's 1940's Italy book, the Obama-Biden camp has recently threatened to prosecute media outlets in Missouri and other states who would broadcast certain McCain campaign ads that the Obama side feels are 'untruthful.'

With key state legislators and prosecuters in their hip pockets, the Biden-Obama folks actually intend to press charg

es should McCain ads that do not measure up to Obama's personal 'truth meter' be shown.

Obama's actions show exactly where he stands on the issue of Free Speech. Furthermore, he has already stated that he wants to take people's guns away. It is left only to the imagination how many other Constitutional rights Obama is willing to attempt to trample on to get himself elected.

For this scenario, that of using the state to limit free speech, is nothing but pure facscim, and Obama nothing but a pure liberal fascist.

So Obama thinks some things in McCain's ads might be 'untrue,' while at the same time Obama himself has put forth various versions of many things in his life, like where he was born, when he stopped being a Muslim, what his relationship to MANY nefarious people actually was or is, etc. So if Obama is so interested in the truth, why does he not apply this to his own campaign rather than to try to intimidate the free speech of others with the power of the state?

Is there no level that the morally- and Constitutionally-challenged Obama campaign will not sink to? Does he ex

pect every media manager to bow to Obama's version of the truth? Will the prosecutors be stepping forward in jack-boots and doing some kind of goose-step? What kind of nonsense is this?

If he can pull this kind of outrageous maniuplation against our Constitutional rights to get elected, Barak Obama is a dangerous, dangerous man. And if he acts more like Tony 'The Scar" Mascalletti in a campaign, imagine what he would do with the power of the Oval Office.

That cannot be allowed to happen. Americans need to see this man for who he is and respond accordingly.

Tuesday, September 9, 2008

Obama Admits He's a Muslim

Monday, September 8, 2008

Ayman Zawahri Celebrates the Deaths of Muslims

To celebrate the deaths of tens of thousands of his fellow Muslims since 911, Al Qaeda's number 2 punk Ayman Zawahri (where is the coward, Bin Laden, anyways?) has accused Iran of cooperating with 'the Crusader's war against Islam,' in a newly-released video tape.

Perhaps Ayman Zawahri has forgotten that it is he and his fellow Islamic demons who flew jets into American buildings seven years ago.

Oh yes, and one went into the ground in Pennsylvania or wherever.

That is the plane where Jeremy Glick, a former judo national champion, and Mark Burnett and others, stormed the skinny little Arab pukes who had already killed an innocent passenger in cold blood. I can imagine that before he got into the cockpit, which forced the insane pilot to drive the jet into the ground, well, I can imagine that Glick got to bust a few Muslim heads and let them learn a little about what America is all about before the little slime balls went straight to hell. Having some familiarity with judo and the national championships myself, I can only imagine that those little Arab chumps experienced some real pain, and probably some broken bones, if not broken necks, before the Americans got into the cockpit.

So if Zawahri thinks that the Americans started this war, then who were the weasels that Jeremy Glick got to rip apart before he got into that cockpit?

Sorry, Ayman, you've got it wrong. It is YOU and your fool Bin Laden who sentenced many of your fellow Muslims to death by starting an Islamic war against us. Yes, you are right that Hizbullah are a bunch of idiots, and so is Iran, but on this date, around 9-11-2008, it is you that we are hoping finds a special place in hell to join your dead Muslim brothers.

Because, you slug, we will never, ever forget 911. And it is soooo not over. Except, of course, for all those dead Muslims whose blood is on your hands.

Friday, August 29, 2008

McCain Drops the Nuclear Bomb: Sarah Palin

John McCain dropped the nuclear bomb on Barak Obama's campaign today; and her name is Sarah Palin.

Conservative, mother of five, including a newborn with Down's syndrome, wife of a fisherman/oil field worker, pro-life, pro-second amendment, member of National Rifle Association, point guard on her state championship basketball team, high school leader of the Fellowship of Christian Athletes, runner-up in the 1984 Miss Alaska beauty pageant, and also Miss Congeniality in the same pageant, authentic as your neighbor, mother of an infantryman in the United States Army, reformist, tax-cutter, 'Maverick,' "Sarah Barracuda," Washington outsider, individual with solid morals, values and character, and the current governor of Alaska, 44-year old Sarah Palin is the Bomb in every way.

And her husband is the second-luckiest man in the world. I'm the first.

Here she is, Sarah Palin Nuclear Bomb:

Wonkette.com declares, “This chick could be solely responsible for why polar bears have no icebergs to swim to.”

Monday, August 18, 2008

Tick, Tock, Tick, Tock, Tick: Iran's Fate Nears

You have to wonder just how many times a day Iran's President is wetting his pants lately. It must be many; and for a good reason.

Right now sitting off the shore of the little beligerent loud-mouth's country is the United States' aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln and her supporting battle group. Nearby is the USS Peleliu aircraft carrier and her battle group.

And on the way to the area are the USS Iwo Jima, USS Theodore Roosevelt and the USS Ronald Reagan, all aircraft carriers and all accompanied by their respective battle groups.

Since any single one of these groups carries enough firepower to eliminate Achmadinejad's entire country from the face of this planet, to have five of them coming over to Iran's Islamic Revolution for dinner certainly must mean the President is changing his diaper many times per day.

Not since the 1991 first Gulf War has there been this many American aircraft carriers in the region. And though the Pentagon is silent about the ships' missions, even a thick-skulled moron like Achmadinejad must understand what possibilities exist with the massive consolidation of such immense power.

Is it any coincidence that this assemblage of power is put in motion after Iran snubbed American offers to a negotiation, causing President Bush to issue Iran a 12-day warning a few short weeks ago? Is it any wonder that the aircraft carriers are rolling after Bush threatened to put a naval blockade against Iran if they failed to comply?

Bush had told Iran that they could choose "cooperation or confrontation," and the time limit has now passed for them to have chosen cooperation. It does not take a genius to see that 1+1+1+1+1=5 aircraft carrier groups which are about to make Achmadinejad's decisions for him. Iran's fate is now at sea and is getting closer and closer every moment.

The nations will have little pity on Iran and the mad ayatollahs and mullahs who are trying to exert hateful, murderous Islamic ideologies onto a world that did not become advanced by adhering to the slaveries of a 7th-century killing cult.

When Achmadinejad's arrogance pushes him to fire the first shot at a blockading US naval force, his own personal fate will be sealed as well as his country's. It will unleash an extremely powerful and lethal dose of 'you-asked-for-it,' and will call the wrath of the United States military down on his own head.

May that happen soon.

Monday, July 21, 2008

From Farce to Force, the West Finally Dictates Terms and Conditions to Iran

AT LAAST, the west has FINALLY opened its mouth and is showing its teeth to the pencil-necked president of Iran and his ayatollah buddies. If you haven't caught the news flash yet, you can find it here on the Debka File.

In short, that diplomatic meeting in Geneva a few days ago that Iran scoffed at, well apparently the west actually meant it this time because they are finally backing it up with very real force. The United States, Britain and France are currently engaging in Operation Brimstone in the Persian Gulf which is an exercise to rehearse the enforcement of a naval blockade of petrol-related shipping in and out of Iran. And it's about time!

With the US State Department telling Iran that it can choose either "cooperation or confrontation," it looks like Iran will no longer be able to plot its own devious, defiant quest to get the bomb, all the while thumbing its nose at the world. Iran has two weeks to comply.

After that, Iran's economy will be quickly and directly affected; their shipping for the most part will be halted by the western allied powers. They will no longer have the option to simply continue on their belligerent way, for they will be forced one way or another to certain terms and conditions.

This will be a textbook example of how to deal with the power-hungry Islamic supremacist ideology which both Sunni's and Iran's Shiite's adhere to and spread. This will be a lesson for Hezbollah, Hamas, Syria, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia, Al-Qaeda and every Islamic-empire-thinking Muslim on the planet. Because there are only a few ways that this can play out and Iran loses in all of them.

First scenario, the economic difficulties in Iran could prove to be enough for the Iranian population to finally rise up and overthrow the tyranny of Sharia Law and its Islamic leaders. Look for Ahmadineijad to be dragged through the streets or exile himself to the protection of Hezbollah's wing. In this case the people of Iran win, the Islamic Revolution, or the current leadership in Iran, loses and all other proponents of Islamic supremacy also lose because the writing will be on the wall.

Second possible scenario sees Iran's maniacal president actually confronting the military of the US, Britian and France. Iran would really lose in this case. They would be pounded mercilessly, all of it well-deserved, and some fifty years of relative progress would lie in rubbles. And again, other Muslim power-seekers would be losers as well.

Thirdly, Iran's moronic president would foolishly order Hezbollah and Hamas, and possibly Syria, to attack Israel; or launch some attacks itself apart from its proxies. This scenario would result in Iran's getting pounded back to the stone age. Very bad for Iran. Hezbollah and Hamas would also be annhilated, both of whom richly deserve such a reward.

Fourthly, Iran would actually appear to agree to concessions to save its own skin and then sit back and hope Barak Obama is elected President of the United States. Of course Ahmadineijad is wise enough to know that he can easily manipulate the rookie and wanna-be do-gooder Obama, so he is likely to play this card. But politically, the strong hand which Bush would finally be applying to Iran would be finally seen as an effective, perhaps the only effective, option on how to deal with Iran, and Republican nominee John McCain could benefit greatly by this in November's election.

But no matter which way it plays out, one lesson will be evidently clear to all: you deal with Islamic supremacism with power and strength. They will walk all over you every single time unless physically prevented from doing so. Do not expect that the Muslim supremacist will show you the same respect as a human that you might grant him because he has completely different values than you do and will exploit your kindness as weakness. Don't give him that opportunity. (For those who missed the related post, Confronting Evil right here on Right Hooks, the link to that is here.)

So though this show of strength by the United States and friends is about four years too late, Mr. Ahmadineijad will finally find out who is the power and who is the pretender. The farce that has been his belligerent defiance will finally be met with the force his own actions have summoned.

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Quagmire Alert! - Dead End Left Does It Again

What ever happened to We The People? How does a circus court in California get to establish a law? I thought that is what elected representatives did. While homosexuals from all over the country are likely racing to the state to pretend to get married, most people are enraged at the audacity and arrogance of the foolish judges who have greatly overstepped their bounds and we have all simply HAD ENOUGH.

Once again, we see liberal philosophy, spin, agenda, and (lack-of-) values on shining display.

This week's lesson is on How to Subvert Democracy and the Will of the People. No longer does the term, We The People, apply to this country; it is now evident that the more appropriate term should be, We the People and the Baboon We Are Chained To. Have you ever tried to get anything accomplished or go where you wanted to with a baboon tied to your arm?

We have example after example of the futility of the left's philosophy, the blindness of their causes, the lethality of their mindless policies and, frankly, the core of their ideologies which attack the very foundations of American social order. Hey, can we finally all wake up now? The sixties are over. The hippie, far-left, socialist, free-love, free-drugs, relativist, anti-establishment ideas that were the basis of all this 'free-thinking' and liberality just can no longer be accepted as viable in the grown-up world. It just doesn't work. Probably because it is not based on reality, but on fantasy and Utopian pipe dreams.

But a man MARRYING a man; or a woman MARRYING a woman? This is simply unreal. Bob Hellam, a razor-sharp truth-tender, explains the situation so very well in his recent letter to his county clerk in California. I will share the entire letter, sparing the specific names and places:

Dear Mr. [County Clerk]:

I could not reach you by telephone a few days ago, so I thought I would write a letter instead.

Government cannot create reality. A law or a court decision or a constitutional amendment that declared a circle to be square, or that attempted to repeal the law of gravity, or that stipulated that words would mean exactly what any given judge determined that they mean, would have no real validity. Hence, the millennia-old understanding of what marriage is cannot be invalidated by judicial fiat. There is no such thing as same-sex “marriage,” even if the State of California maintains that such a thing does exist.

Those who have argued that the California Supreme Court had no right to legislate on marriage, and that the Governor’s office also has no such right, make a convincing argument. Now is the time to stand for truth, even if it requires courage.

Please be courageous. Support the will of the people of California, and the people of [this] County, even if it means contradicting the opinion of the California Supreme Court and the Governor. The responsibility for maintaining the integrity of marriage records in our county is yours, not theirs.

Please do not allow same-sex “marriage” in [this] County.

Sincerely,
Robert Hellam

Mr. Hellam sees the truth, and says so quite plainly and elegantly; but such is apparently not clear to the baboon. Has it ever been more obvious to people who are not baboons that our culture and society is racing down a dead end road, toward a cataclysmic crash if we allow the baboon any more time at the wheel? The fact that they have led us into a social quagmire has never been more crystal clear.

Baboon policies demanded that we build no more oil refineries. Then they demanded that we not drill for oil off shore. Then they demanded that we not drill in Alaska. Where have their policies gotten us?

Baboons yelled and screamed that we not take out Sadaam Hussein himself when he invaded Kuwait in the early 1990's, whining that we should only expel him from Kuwait, and now look where we are. What, did they think he would go away? Was he going to change his colors or start being a nice guy to his neighbors? Baboons are nothing if not totally naieve.

But their solution was the oil-for-food program to be directed by the United Nations. Yeah, that sure went well, didn't it? Guys in the UN on the take. France on the take. Sadaam kicking weapons inspectors out. Sadaam violating cease-fire agreements that he made with General Schwartzkopf to prevent his annihilation. And the whole time, the baboon looks the other way. See no evil.

Now baboons are grumbling and complaining about how evil our own soldiers are, while at the same time trying to give American citizenship rights to our ENEMIES who are prisoners in Guantanamo. You know, people who have killed Americans and seek her overthrow...terrorists not killed in battle. Yes, the baboon is more concerned about the life of a murderer than he is about the life of a US soldier, an innocent unborn child, a redwood, or a baby seal.

It seems that every baboon, liberal policy has death at the end. Death for the unborns, death for our soldiers, death for our families (how do Adam and Steve produce children, by the way?), death to our values, death for our culture, death for Israel. The only people who the baboon doesn't want to die are the violent, aggressive and murdering cultures like [insert your favorite terrorist group here] who seek the overthrow of our country and of western society.

Are they willing to confront Iran? Of course not, Iran is not bad. Now, a few days after Iran uses its nuclear bombs on Israel or America, the baboons might awake from their slumber enough to say, 'Hey, that was wrong,' (and then blame conservatives, of course) but not long enough to keep them focussed on a sustained response. But, you see, it should never come to having to initiate a response; not since Germany and World War II, it shouldn't. The time to prevent a bellicose Iran from executing the Second Holocaust is NOW; yet the baboon resists this course of action at every turn. (He must be too busy performing all those homosexual 'marriages.')

There is no way that our society can or will survive any more of the lunacies arriving from a godless, ridiculous left-wing ideology. It is suicidal to our country, to our culture, and it has got to stop. We have got to stop it. They have led us into a despicable, perverted cultural quagmire. If our forefathers were here, they certainly would rebel against the liberal's fast track to hell that they are steering us toward.

It's time to yank back the wheel from the out-of-control left-wing baboon; no matter what it takes.

Friday, May 2, 2008

Hamas Caught in Another Lie

Hamas has once again demonstrated to the world its true colors.

After the mother and four small children were tragically killed last week when an Israeli air strike attacked several terrorists prowling the streets and neighborhoods of Gaza, the outcry by the muslim community was that Israel had killed an innocent family.

Israel maintained that the ordinance used in the air strike did not kill the family, rather, explosives that were being carried by the terrorists blew up in secondary explosions and were therefore responsible for the deaths of those inside the family's house.

Of course, Hamas got to chime in with it's obligatory litany against the Jewish state's perpetual evilness. Hamas then declared that Palestinian gunmen were not operating near the home of the unfortunate family.

And now Israel's military has released drone video footage from that very attack. Either there are zombies walking the city streets in Gaza at night or there were Palestinian soldiers operating right next to the home of the deceased mother and her children. As a matter of fact the video shows exactly what Israel had claimed.

The video, therefore, totally discredits Hamas' claim and once again shows that Hamas has no interest, relationship, perception, concept or practice involving the truth. We may, therefore, assume that whatever comes out of its poison mouth will be nothing more than myth, fairy tale and manipulation.

Wednesday, April 30, 2008

"Jews Planned the Holocaust"

You can't make this kind of idiocy up...but leave it to Hamas to declare that the Jooooooooos planned the Holocaust, and broadcast it on the official Hamas television channel seen throughout the middle east.

What planet do these people live on?? (Full story here from the Jerusalem Post.)

Friday, April 18, 2008

Inches From Holocaust II

It is complete irony and utter farce that the very institutional guardians who assigned Israel back to its ancestral home after the Holocaust now promote policies which threaten its very existence.

The United Nations, full of consciousness and compassion after the revelations of the fate of countless Jews horribly murdered in Nazi death camps, felt it appropriate that the Israeli people return to their homeland. In 1948 Israeli's began moving back to the land that they had been pushed out of in 70 A.D. by the Romans. The Holocaust was never to be forgotten and the world understood how these people had suffered unspeakable loss. Victorious Allied powers also offered strong and full support of this reunification.

Immediately, however, it was apparent that the Jewish people had been thrown into the lion's cage as all of her Muslim neighbors rallied to war to bring about Israel's swift destruction. Syria, Jordan and Egypt warned other Muslims living within Israel to flee their homes until the annihilation was complete, and then it would be safe for them to come back. Unlike the U.N., apparently not everyone felt that the Jews had lost enough people to the Holocaust, that many more needed to be killed.

Unfortunately for her discontent Muslim neighbors, Israel was not defeated by their aggression. In fact Israel handed her warring neighbors their lunch. What's more, those local Muslims who chose to flee the land until all the Jews were killed, well, not surprisingly, they were not allowed to come back in, for they clearly had sided with Israel's enemy. What is surprising is that none of the countries who hosted the war were neighborly enough to allow the now-homeless Muslim enemies of Israel to live in their own counties. These people, who voluntarily expatriated themselves, but were not allowed back in to the country they had betrayed, are now known as the 'Palestinian Arabs,' or simply 'Palestinians.'

After several more decades and several more wars, all of which saw Israel surrounded, outnumbered and her existence threatened, Israel proved to be a bigger bone than her Muslim neighbors could bite. Furthermore, with every conflict, Israel gained strategic territory that her war-minded neighbors used for their attacks, like the Golan Heights. Israel possessed this land to deny its use to her enemy for their aggression, the outlet of their hatred for Jews, which continued to seethe.

Now, of course, we are in an age of revisionist history. The President of Iran is claiming that the Holocaust never happened. Muslim clerics are preaching and teaching that the Jewish people have no historic claim to the land of Israel, there was no king David, there was no king Solomon, there was no temple, no Israeli people ever lived there, it was always Arabs. To help bolster this claim Muslims are also destroying historical archaeological places that might contradict their fairy tale. And most still refuse to recognize Israel's right to exist.

Israel has been pressured, since the 'intifada' began early this decade, to give up precious land to the Palestinian Arabs for the Arab's autonomous use. "Land for peace!" went the chant, "No land, no peace." The leaders of the insurrection stated that there would be no cessation of violence unless and until Israel gave the Palestinians some land of their own.

Reluctantly, and against sage advice from within Israel, the leaders of Israel sought peace and gave up the Gaza Strip to the Palestinians. So what has the result been? Have the Palestinian Arabs lived up to their word? Have they taken their land and made it into a thriving example of industrious thrift and developed a growing economy?

Well, not exactly. They have taken the established, productive Israeli agricultural fields and turned them into something of a 7th-century, third-world barrenness; the rest of the strip is also similarly trashed. Have they lived peacefully with their neighbors? Well, if you call launching thousands and thousands of rockets at innocent Israeli civilians peaceful, then yes, they have.

And now there is the likes of Condoleezza Rice telling Israeli leaders that not only must they give up more land, which the Palestinians can use as platforms for terror attacks, but to also allow the Palestinians to have their own sovereign state within the bounds of Israel's country. Some are going so far as saying that Israel should give up Jerusalem for a Palestinian capital city.

So do the Palestinians really want peace? Or do they want the destruction of Israel? Their actions over the last 60 years would demonstrate that peace is not their goal, rather, it is conquest.

They claim that they have ancestral rights to the land of Palestine. However, so many have forgotten that their land and people were allied with Germany on the 20th century war stage and the Germans did not win either war, which means that Arabs lost as well; to the victor go the spoils. Hence, Britain, France and the United States, enemies of Germany and her allies, gained control over the land with German surrender.

Therefore, was it Israel's fault that she was subjected to the worst genocide in history? Was it Israel's fault that the powers-that-be planted her back in her former home? Is Israel to be blamed for defending herself against unrelenting enemies? Is it Israel's fault that Palestinian Arabs chose to leave the country so that Israel could be mercilessly wiped out?

And on the other front, when Israel was attacked by the ultra-misguided-Hezbollah's fighters in 2006, it was the United Nations that demanded a cease-fire and guaranteed that the U.N.'s own troops would stop Hezbollah from smuggling more arms into southern Lebanon. They also promised that they would secure the southern border and prevent Hezbollah fighters access to that territory. Israel, under tremendous international pressure to conform, once again relented and ceased their pounding of the Hezbollah army.

But what has become of this situation? Has the shipment of rockets into Lebanon ceased? Are Hezbollah fighters being kept away from the border? The sad answer to both is no. Hezbollah now has thousands more rockets than it did in its pre-war status. Its soldiers have bullied U.N. soldiers and are in battle positions in much of the land.

The United Nations, therefore, is trying to handcuff Israel's ability to defend itself, which threatens the very existence of this seed that the UN planted. And everybody else, it seems is piling on.

It would only take a few Muslim nuclear detonations in Israel to usher in Holocaust II, and it seems that those who hated the first Holocaust the most are setting themselves up to be the ones most culpable in allowing a second. We are mere inches from this being allowed to happen.

May it never be.

Monday, April 14, 2008

Hey Barak, NOW They're Bitter

Barak Obama, if you thought small-town people were bitter before, I dare you to go take their pulse now.

Not only have you mis-judged and stereo-typed an entire nation of honest, hard-working Americans, who are the backbone of this country, you have pretty much declared that you are completely unqualified to be their president.

Because, you see, while they were learning American values and the culture, you were bowing to Allah in some mosque in Indonesia or Malaysia or wherever Muslim country you went to school in. No wonder you don't know them.

And as far as the 'they take refuge in guns and religion' stereo-type, or whatever you said, well, I think you have got Americans confused with those people you are trying to appease and surrender to, you know: Muslims. Yes, THEY are the ones that are bitter and find security in religion and guns, yet I do not hear you condemning OUR ENEMY, I see you judging and condemning our AMERICAN CITIZENS. Exactly whose side are you on, Mr. Obama?

But I suppose anyone who has spent a few decades in that racist and hate-preaching church that you go to with that racist preacher is bound to cast stereo-typical judgments on small-town white people; they teach the 'hate-whitey' doctrine pretty good, there, don't they?

Mr. Obama, you have NO IDEA what the small town culture is all about. Your stereotypes are are sickening. Furthermore, they reveal that you are no more qualified to be an American president than you would be the president of Russia. You are not one of them, neither are you one of us. You have got caught with your arrogance showing again, and this time it will cost you the election.

But don't be bitter; that's only for small-town white people, right?

Thursday, March 27, 2008

Dutch Lawmaker Geert Wilders' Film, Fitna, Exposes Islam as the Bloodthirsty Cult That it Is

Courageous Dutch lawmaker Geert Wilders has produced a film called Fitna, which exposes the Quran and what it teaches. All these things are currently being taught in mosques in Europe and in the USA. This is a MUST-SEE video and it is available at LiveLink.com found on the link here

or you can view it below: (Because of high traffic volume, it takes a few moments to load...)

.

Islam is SUBVERSIVE and TRAITOROUS to all western constitutions and governments. They are preaching that they should kill us all. We MUST OUTLAW ISLAM NOW!!!

Monday, March 17, 2008

Confronting Evil: The Big Stick

Though I strongly disagree on his policy concerning Israel and his appeasement of the wicked Palestinians, I do love President George Bush. I admire his tenacity and resolve as Commander in Chief as it applies to Afghanistan and Iraq. He has fought our outward enemy and our enemy within, the liberals, at the same time.

The liberals, who attempted to sacrifice our nation's well-being for the sake of gaining political power, and who are blind to the very real threats against us, created an anti-Iraq War platform from which to undermine our nation's stability. They stated that there was no rationale for us going into Iraq which was COMPLETELY IGNORANT of Sadaam Hussein's VIOLATION of the cease-fire AGREEMENTS he made with General Schwartzkopf that ended the first Gulf War.

It is completely mystifying why there ever has been even a single question as to our justification for entering Iraq and why this legal basis has not appeared in the media AT ALL: Sadaam Hussein violated the cease-fire agreement when he kicked out the international inspection teams, period. That was enough legal reason for us to enter Iraq and finish the job we should have in the early 1990's.

And, of course, it was liberal policies that actually KEPT us from finishing the job in the first Gulf War. You remember, the UN and the world's liberal, appeasing minions, crying out how we couldn't go after Sadaam personally, how we just could expel his army from Kuwait. Heaven forbid if we should actually stamp out a wicked tool of evil instead of subjecting his people to another decade of sadistic torture and manipulation.

And President Bush, Sr. had to deal with a Democratic Congress, so he only could get away with certain amounts of force and could not overtly go after Hussein. But go after him he did. Though perhaps it has not been widely publicized, this author knows for a fact that Bush, Sr. did make attempts to eliminate Sadaam Hussein. How do I know? Because my cousin was a Navy SEAL at the time (my uncle was a SEAL/BeachJumper in Vietnam) and when asked if he knew if we went after Hussein, he said "We sure did." When asked how he knew he said, "Because I was in Baghdad hunting him." When pressed for details, this cousin replied, " Do you know how many people over there look like Sadaam Hussein? So many that I ran out of bullets."

So despite suicidal liberal whining and policies, Bush, Sr. actually tried to end it back then. But it took his son, George W. Bush to actually have the moral fortitude to go and confront a wicked man. That is because President Bill Clinton, of course, knew nothing of moral fortitude. Perhaps he was too busy entertaining Monica Lewinsky to notice that Sadaam Hussein was not cooperating with the very cease-fire agreements that he had agreed to to stop our Army from swallowing Iraq.

Oh, sure, Clinton sent over a few cruise missiles, but dictators and despots know when a threat is real and when it is just for show. Clinton's was just for show; simple saber-rattling. Hussein knew that Clinton lacked the will to actually engage him head-on, he knew that Clinton wouldn't use the big stick, and so the Sadaam the monster grew.

Iran did the same thing to President Carter in 1979 when they audaciously swarmed the US Embassy in Tehran and took all the Americans hostage. Carter was inept. Iranian fanatics knew that Carter wouldn't use the big stick, so evil reigned.

How should one deal with evil regimes who bully other societies or even their own people? Well do you remember Muammar Qaddafi, the once-belligerent dictator from Libya? Remember how he used to spout off incessantly (much like Iran's current pip-squeak President Ahmadinejad) about the USA, the 'evil Satan'? But then the Reagan Administration tied Qaddafi to the downing of an American jetliner, and do you remember what Ronald Reagan did? He sent some F-15's in and BOMBED Qaddafi's HOUSE. And Mr. Qaddafi was very, very quiet for many years after that.

So why did Qaddafi shut up, all of a sudden? Well, unlike Carter and Clinton, Qaddafi knew that Ronald Reagan not only had the big stick, but that he was willing to use it.

Confronting evil is necessary only for those societies who wish to survive. It is needed only if a people decide that they do not want to get swallowed up and conquered by warring, aggressive plagues such as Islam is. Islam will gladly come and subjugate those who will not stand in its way. That's why Osama and every other Muslim extreme disciple out there wanted Gore, Kerry and now Obama or Hillary to win the U.S. Presidential election, because they all know that Democrats do not have the courage to stand in Islam's way for more than a minute or two.

In fact, Democrats are not even convinced that Islam IS evil because their world-view of relative morality. That is, they think truth is relative, that it changes depending on the person. Therefore good and evil are relative and the liberal is probably more likely to think western Judeo-Christian values are evil than they are to see that Islam is a wicked, murdering hate-cult.

Aggressive evil, which Islam is, or any other evil for that matter, can be stopped only one way, and that way is a two-step formula. First, you must have a big stick; second, you must be willing to use it.

Did Jimmy Carter have a big stick? Yes, he did. Was he willing to use it on Iran? No, he wasn't. So if you have a big stick yet are unwilling to use it, aggressive evil views that as the same as not having one. Ron Reagan had a big stick too, only he was willing to use it on Muammar Qaddafi. Look at the different results based on use of the big stick.

Granted, Reagan did not use it when the US Marines were killed in their quarters by the bombing in Lebanon, but he should have.

If that is confusing (i.e. you are a liberal and still do not understand), think of a mad dog biting your kid's leg. Is that dog suddenly going to stop if you negotiate with it? If you tell it to stop will it stop? If you yell at it or warn it will it stop? No it won't. But if you reach over in the corner where you keep your big stick, grab it and then thump the dog on the head with it, the biting beast will stop then, won't it? He most certainly will and then he will run away as fast as he can.

That dog knows what is painful to it and if you did not have a big stick your child might have suffered profound injury. Furthermore, the next time that dog comes around and he sees you with that stick, do you think he will try to bite your child again? No, he will steer clear.

So the big stick represents the power to inflict damage on wanton aggressiveness and the willingness to use it can then act as a deterrence; but only if the aggressor understands that you will use it.

President Bush, thank goodness, is willing to use the Big Stick. That is the only thing keeping Islamic aggression from making great advances. The Democratic Congress, however, and its legion of liberal media dupes, are fighting against using the big stick, which, of course, if such a path were to be taken, our enemies would win; the dog would keep on biting.

The liberal world must wake up and recognize the threat that we face in this new millennium. No, we cannot make peace with Islamic terrorist governments simply for one reason: THEY WANT TO KILL US ALL. Until a liberal understands this, he remains a pawn in the hands of our enemy and is himself a traitor to this nation and an enemy of our own Constitution.

I am also confident that John McCain will do the right thing as Commander in Chief for the United States. He would not appease Islamic aggression by caving in like Hillary would and so would Obama. With his war experience, McCain definitely knows that we have a big stick, and he would be quite willing to use it when necessary.

Friday, March 14, 2008

Palestinian Terrorist Murderer Learns the Hard Way

The Palestinian coward who opened up on Jerusalem seminary students at Jerusalem's Mercaz Harav Yeshiva on their campus last week, killing eight of them, thought he was doing a great service to the false god he believes in, Allah.

Allah, you see, inspires all of his followers to have a deep, seething, almost un-earthly hate for the people of Israel. It is taught throughout the Muslim false-religion and culture. These people HATE Israelis world-wide. (Actually, they hate everybody else too, but that's another post.)

Claiming that the Jews corrupted God's revelation to them, the Torah, or as we know it, the Old Testament, requiring a re-do by revelations to the false-prophet Mohammed, yet offering not one molecule of evidence, the Muslims figure that they are the chosen people of God instead of the children of Israel. They are revising history to make it seem like Israel never had a country, a king, or a temple. They tell lie after lie about this hoping their babble will somehow make it all true.

Of course the only ones who believe the nonsense, besides themselves, is the western liberals and its media wing. You can always count on a liberal reporter to mark the hating, attacking, murdering Palestinians as the victims and Israel, who seeks only to defend herself, as the monster.

Well, several moments after Palestinian murderer, Ala Abu Dhaim was himself killed by someone fighting back, Mr. Dhaim (or is that Dumb?) learned for himself the terrible truth that Allah does not exist. He learned that Allah is just a cover-name for the father of evil, the father of lies and the father of all those who hate God's children, the Jews, Satan.

Unfortunately, as it seems the only way a Palestinian can ever learn anything, he had to learn it the hard way: