NPR Propaganda Misrepresents Islam

While I was composing another post, NPR's Morning Edition was spewing the standard lies, denying the fatal facts of Islam and condemning FBI training materials which accurately describe Islamic doctrine & practice.  The printed word can not reproduce the arrogant condescension dripping from the narrator's lips as she condemned the training program without demonstrating fallacy or bias.  Lets start with the transcript, when Steve Inskeep introduces the subject.

 Material from FBI courses gives agents a particular view of Muslims in America. It suggests that even mainstream Muslim Americans could be suspect. Rather than being told that terrorists were the problem, some agents were apparently told that Muslims were the problem.

even mainstream Muslim Americans could be suspect

    Define "mainstream Muslim" and enumerate the distinguishing characteristics by which distinguish them from potential suspects.  Do they know and believe Allah's word; his threat and promise? Do they obey Allah and emulate Moe or not?  Can you tell by sight or smell?

terrorists were the problem

    Were the Magnificent 19 Muslims?  The confession of Khalid Sheikh Mohammad indicates that the plotters are Muslims and proud of what they did in Allah's name. The confession indicates that they acted in conformity to religious obligation: Allah's imperatives and Moe's exemplary conduct.

    Was Muhammad bin Abdullah a Muslim?   His bragging about being a terrorist: victory through casting terror, is recorded in two hadith in the collection of Sahih Bukhari: 1.7.331 & 4.52.220. Is mainstream Islam anything other than what he preached and practiced as recorded in the Qur'an [3:151, 8:12, 57, 60; 33:26, 27; 59:2, 13   & hadith?  Allah said that he would cast terror and that he did cast terror, resulting in the death of the men of a Jewish tribe and the enslavement of their widows and orphans. He said that the Jews were more afraid of Moe and his army than they were of him. He commanded Muslims to deal harshly with their victims to strike terror into "those behind them". He commanded them to maximize their military strenth to "strike terror".  But the self-annointed experts of NPR instruct us  that terrorism is not an element of mainstream Islam.  If Islam's canonical texts do not define Islam, what does?

Muslims were the problem

    Without Muslims, Islam would be nothing more than musty books on library shelves. It is Muslims who are the foot soldiers of  Islam. It is Muslims who, in obedience to Allah; in emulation of Moe, stage terror attacks all over the world.

And it came out recently in Wired magazine that a counterterrorism training session at the FBI training center in Quantico, Virginia was teaching agents that Islam was a violent religion and that basically if you are a Muslim and religious, you should be seen as suspect.

Islam was a violent religion

    Where did the instructors get that idea?  Could it be from the Qur'an? [2:216, 190, 8:39,67;  9:29, 111, 123, 47:4, 48:15-20]  Could it be from the hadith? [Riyad-us-Saliheen Book 11, Chapter 234] Could it be Islamic law? [Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9, Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX, Chapter 1] Could it be from Moe's biography? [The Sealed Nectar]

Muslim and religious: suspect

    Exactly why should we suspect anyone who is not a Muslim of plotting an act of Islamic terrorism?  Why should we not be suspicious of Muslims?  Who is more likely than a Muslim to obey Allah and emulate Moe by attempting to cast terror into the hearts of disbelievers?  When you hear hoof beats, do you look for horses or unicorns? 

[...] these were classes on Islamic doctrine that talked about the relationship between Islam and terrorism.

relationship between Islam and terrorism

    Apparently there is something wrong with teaching FBI agents about the relationship between Islam and terrorism. FBI agents must be kept ignorant of Allah's sanctification, imperative & Moe's example of casting terror into the hearts of disbelievers.  Of course, they have no need to know about it.

And let's be fair here, there are different interpretations of Islam, some of them certainly would seem to be violent interpretations of Islam, but most Muslims have argued that overwhelming majorities of Muslims are peaceful and that they have a peaceful religion. So did the training overstate what you can know about the different varieties of this religion?

different interpretations of Islam

    What is the difference between Sunni, Shi'ia & Sufi concerning jihad & terrorism?  Which mainstream school of Islamic law rejects offensive warfare against disbelievers and terrorism?  Al-Shafi'i had something to say about the obligation to perform jihad.Compare what he said to Reliance O9.1.

"The least that the imam must do is that he allow no year to pass without having organised a military expedition by himself, or by his raiding parties, according to the Muslims' interest, so that the jihad will only be stopped in a year for a (reasonable) excuse."

    How does that Shafi'ite fiqh differ from that of Al-Ghazali, a Sufi?

…one must go on jihad (i.e., warlike razzias or raids) at least once a year...

violent interpretations of Islam

    Is anyone better qualified to interpret the Qur'an than the man who first recited it?  How did he interpret it?

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah." Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, "O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?" He replied, "Whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah', faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have."

    Allah said "fight them until" Moe said "I have been ordered to fight".  Exactly how can anyone dispute and disprove the obvious?  Would you prefer a second opinion? [Sahih Bukhari 9.84.89, Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2635 ]

majorities of Muslims are peaceful

    Have they not been called to fight yet [48:16, Sahih Bukhari 4.52.79] , or are they hypocrites [9:91...129]? How did the conquests of Syria, Yemen, Egypt, North Africa and India happen if most Muslims are peaceful?

they have a peaceful religion

    If they do, it ain't Islam!  Jihad is defined in Islamic law as "to war against non-Muslims". Islam is not a religion, it is a way of life: intra-species predation. Its religious component is jihad.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.

    Jihad, commerce and agriculture are viewed as alternative economic systems; jihad is preferred over the other two. It becomes clear that jihad is their "original religion".

    The outline below has some quotes from the article in the outer node and the reality in inner nodes.

• One email said that the Prophet Muhammad was being portrayed as a warring military leader.
  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 285:

    Narrated Abu Ishaq:

    Once, while I was sitting beside Zaid bin Al-Arqam, he was asked, "How many Ghazwat did the Prophet undertake?" Zaid replied, "Nineteen." [...]

  • This Wikepedia page contains a list of Moe's ghazwat & sariyas, paralleling the table of contents of Guillaume's The Life of Muhammad.
  • According to one calculation, Muhammad himself engaged in 78 battles, of which just one (the Battle of the Ditch) was defensive. 
•  It also cited an instructor as saying that a "true Muslim" had to support or take part in the killing of non-Muslims.
  
  • 3:140. If a wound (and killing) has touched you, be sure a similar wound (and killing) has touched the others. And so are the days (good and not so good), We give to men by turns, that Allâh may test those who believe, and that He may take martyrs from among you. And Allâh likes not the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers).[Read the context through #186; testing the believers is one purpose of jihad.]
  • 9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâh's Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur'ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success . 
  • Sunun Abu Dawud Book 14, Number 2497:

    Narrated AbuUmamah:

    The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: He who does not join the warlike expedition (jihad), or equip, or looks well after a warrior's family when he is away, will be smitten by Allah with a sudden calamity. Yazid ibn Abdu Rabbihi said in his tradition: 'before the Day of Resurrection".  [See 9:38-39.]

  • Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9.1 [...]Jihad is a communal obligation (def: c3.2).  When enough people perform it to successfully accomplish it, it is no longer obligatory upon others [...] If none of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there was a possibility of having performed it. [...]  As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims.  The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, "Jihad is a communal obligation," meaning upon the Muslims each year.[...]
• The instructor also told the class, according to a handful of attendees, that Muhammad was an epileptic and the Quran didn't come to him in a series of heavenly visions, but instead was actually part of an epileptic fit.
  • Sahih Muslim Book 007, Number 2654: [...] 'Umar lifted a corner of the cloth and I looked at him and he was emitting a sound of snorting. He (the narrator) said: I thought it was the sound of a camel. When he was relieved of this he said: Where is he who asked about Umra? [...]
  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 3, Book 48, Number 829: [...]By Allah, Allah's Apostle had not got up and nobody had left the house before the Divine Inspiration came to Allah's Apostle. So, there overtook him the same state which used to overtake him, (when he used to have, on being inspired divinely). He was sweating so much so that the drops of the sweat were dropping like pearls though it was a (cold) wintry day. When that state of Allah's Apostle was over, he was smiling and the first word he said, 'Aisha! Thank Allah, for Allah has declared your innocence.' [...] 
  • Sahih Muslim Book 030, Number 5765: [...] How does the the wahi (inspiration) come to you? He said: At times it comes to me like the ringing of a bell and that is most severe for me and when it is over I retain that (what I had received in the form of wahi), and at times an Angel in the form of a human being comes to me (and speaks) and I retain whatever he speaks.[...]
  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 5, Book 57, Number 119: [...] the Prophet said, "O Um Salama! Don't trouble me by harming 'Aisha, for by Allah, the Divine Inspiration never came to me while I was under the blanket of any woman amongst you except her." 

Unholy Derision

I outgrew comic books more than forty years ago, but was drawn to a review of Frank Miller’s Holy Terror  by a Google Alert "Defamation of Islam".  The review by  Spencer Ackerman takes a mocking and dismissive tone towards critics of Islam. 

    One long sentence from the review exemplifies one tactic of al-Taqiyya.

That sentiment has made its way into the halls of the FBI. In January, one of its field offices entertained a lecture on Islamic law from Stephen Coughlin, a former Pentagon consultant on the subject. Coughlin’s typical spiel contends that there’s a “ten-year plan” to make “defamation of Islam a crime” around the world.

    The reference to sentiment is passed forward from the preceding paragraph which labels Pamela Geller as "self-righteous" and rejected by the mainstream. which her ilk supposedly consider as proof of their "self-evident virtue", "a reminder that the rest of the country just can’t handle the reality of the “Muslim threat.”

“ten-year plan”

    It appears that Spencer Ackerman wants his readers to believe that the "ten-year plan" to criminalize criticism of Islam is a fiction invented by a Shari'ah expert. Unfortunately, it is no fiction, it is very real.  While the remainder of the paragraph dismisses the plan, it links to another article in which Ackerman has embedded  video of a lecture by Stephen Coughlin.

    In reality, the OIC formulated a Ten Year Plan of Action in 2005.  The sixth point of that plan bears directly on the issue at hand. [Bold font original, highlight added for emphasis.]

VI.  Combating Islamophobia

1. Emphasize the responsibility of the international community, including all governments, to ensure respect for all religions and combat their defamation.
2. Affirm the need to counter Islamophobia, through establishing an observatory at the OIC General Secretariat to monitor all forms of Islamophobia, issue an annual report thereon, and ensure cooperation with international Non-Governmental Organization (NGOs) in the West in order to counter Islamophobia.
3. Endeavor to have the United Nations adopt an international resolution to counter Islamophobia, and call upon all States to enact laws to counter it, including deterrent punishments.
4. Initiate a structured and sustained dialogue with the parties concerned in order to project the true values of Islam and empower Muslim countries to help in the war against extremism and terrorism.

    Examine the first and third items in that list. They posit international and national responsibility to ensure respect for Islam. They want the UN to call on all members to enact laws to criminalize "Islamophobia".  In that same year the U.N. Commission on Human Rights passed a resolution "Combating Defamation of Islam". In later years, the CHR,  its HRC successor   and the General Assembly have passed similar annual resolutions.   See this blog post for more detail about one typical resolution.

    Those resolutions are non-binding; they have no enforcement mechanism. But international human rights covenants such as ICERD can be enforced against signatories. In 2007, the HRC formed an ad hoc committee to elaborate complementary standards to be inserted into ICERD through a binding protocol. On September 27, 2012, the committee presented the report on their third session in which they remained bogged down in procedural matters.  For the dirty details, see these blog posts:

• Ad Hoc Cmte: Non-Paper  08/04/09  The cmte. President's outline of the program of censorship. This document is crucial to comprehending the related posts which follow in this list.
• AdHoc Committee: African Submission  08/03/09  Detailed analysis of the Africa group's proposal to censor critics of Islam.
• AdHoc Cmte USA Submission  08/03/09 This nation is governed by irrational idiots & traitors. Read it and weep.
• AdHoc Cmte: Pakistani Submission  08/03/09  Detailed analysis of the OIC's proposal to censor critics of Islam.
• Ad Hoc Committee: Iranian Submission  08/03/09 Detailed analysis of Iran's proposal to censor critics of Islam.
• Ad Hoc Committee on Complementary Standards 08/01/09  They aim to add a protocol to ICERD to criminalize these blog posts.
•  Ad Hoc Committee: New Resolutions  03/20/10  Competing Nigerian & American drafts in  pursuit of a binding protocol to ICERD for the purpose of outlawing these blog posts.

Islamophobia Observatory

   One result of the ten year plan was the creation of the OIC's Islamophobia Observatory which issues monthly reports. By reading those reports you can discover the fact that their primary concern is centered on criticism of Islam, particularly Fitna & the Motoons.

basis in Shari'ah

    Fitna juxtaposes Qur'an verses and ranting clerics with  the terror attacks & riots they incite.  The Motoons depict Muhammad as a terrorist, which he bragged about. He died before the invention of gunpowder, but he said that he was made victorious with terror; see Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.

The prohibition on criticism of Islam comes from Shari'ah. Reliance of the Traveller, the handbook of Shafi'ite fiqh,  specifies the death penalty for apostasy in Book O, Chapter 8, Sections 1 &2.

• O8.1

  When a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed.

• O8.2

  In such a case, it is obligatory for the caliph (A: or his representative) to ask him to repent and return to Islam. If he does, it is accepted from him, but if he refuses, he is immediately killed.

    But we are discussing criticism of Islam; what's the relevance of the penalty for apostasy?  The relevance is in the definition of apostasy, which is given in O8.7, which includes a list of 20 "Acts that Entail Leaving Islam". Several of those acts are directly related to our issue.

• -4- to revile Allah or His messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace);

• -5- to deny the existence of Allah, His beginingless eternality, His endless eternality, or to deny any of His attributes which the consensus of Muslims ascribes to Him (dis: v1);

• -6- to be sarcastic about Allah's name, His command, His interdiction, His promise, or His threat;

• -7- to deny any verse of the Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does belong to it;

• -16- to revile the religion of Islam;

• -19- to be sarcastic about any ruling of the Sacred Law;

    What is the relevance of those rulings; we are not Muslims so apostasy law does not apply to us?  Jews & Christians conquered or intimidated by Muslims and not embracing Islam remain in the Islamic state under a treaty of protection from Islam, for which they pay jizya. Certain acts violate the treaty, subjecting the violator to a harsh penalty. Five items are listed; one is relevant.

• O11.10
  

  The agreement is also violated (A: with respect to the offender alone) if the state has stipulated that any of the following things break it, and one of the subjects does so anyway, though if the state has not stipulated that these break the agreement, then they do not; namely, if one of the subject people:

• -5- or mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam.

• O11.11

  When a subject's agreement with the state has been violated, the caliph chooses between the four alternatives mentioned above in connection with prisoners of war (o9.14).

• O9.14

  When an adult male is taken captive, the caliph (def: o25) considers the interests (O: of Islam and the Muslims) and decides between the prisoner's death, slavery, release without paying anything, or ransoming himself in exchange for money or for a Muslim captive held by the enemy.

  If the prisoner becomes a Muslim (O: before the caliph chooses any of the four alternatives) then he may not be killed, and one of the other three alternatives is chosen.

    What would be impermissible to mention about Islam? The items listed in O8.7, of course.  By trivializing the ten year action plan and sending us off to a half hour video which details the relevant part of the plan near the 25 minute mark, Ackerman tries to divert our attention from the fact that the OIC is pressing hard to criminalize truthful criticism of Islam. 

    The UN resolutions specifically condemn associating Islam with "terrorism and human rights violations". When we cite the numerous ayat & ahadith  which sanctify & exemplify terrorism or those which sanction the rape of captive women or the slaughter of men who had surrendered, we would be subject to persecution if those resolutions were binding or if ICERD is amended to include their provisions.

    In his concluding paragraph, Ackerman once again engages in mockery as a an instrument of diversion.

But it wasn’t God who knocked down the Towers. It was fanatics who believed themselves to have deciphered His true message. Miller doesn’t realize that by portraying them as true disciples of Islam, he’s giving the murderers what they want most. That’s the real terror of Holy Terror, the real lie, and the real naïveté.

    Who claims that Allah knocked down the WTC? Atta and his associates were not fanatics, they were believers as defined in 9:111 & 49:15.  The terrorists do not want adulation, they want rivers of wine & honey and 72 virgins to sport with. They believe in Allah's threat & promise.  

    The real lie is in Ackerman's last paragraph.  To fully comprehend it you need to read the statement of Khalid Sheik Mohammad and his four co-conspirators, which they submitted to a military tribunal in response to the nine accusations against them.  Muslims do not decipher Allah's message; it is not encrypted. His imperatives are contained in clear verses whose meaning is exemplified by Muhammad's sunnah.  It is confirmed by Islamic exegesis and codified in Islamic law.  Jihad: genocidal conquest which terrorizes its victims is not extremism, neither is it a perversion of normative Islam.  It is normative Islam. Islamic law defines jihad and details the religious obligation to perform it in every year.  Open Reliance of the Traveller to Book O, Chapter 9 and read through 9.9. Of course, you will need confirmation, so open Hedaya to Volume II, Book IX, Chapter 1 and read it, too. 

    The useful idiots swear that terrorists are the problem, Islam and Muslims are not the problem. In reality, the doctrines of Islam, revealed in the Qur'an and exemplified by Muhammad's sunnah are the problem. Of course, without believers, they would be no problem. As I write this, NPR's Morning Edition is spewing the standard lies, denying the fatal facts of Islam and condemning FBI training materials which accurately describe Islamic doctrine & practice.

• The Good News that Islam shall prevail
• The Good News that Muslims will conquer the Known World, and ultimately the Entire World
• The Good News that Muslims will Dominate the People of the Book

Islamophobia in the Light of Hypocrisy

A Huffington Post article by Michael Shank triggered one of my Google Alerts. I have selected two excerpts for dissection.

The first excerpt follows a litany of "scares", ending with Islamophobia.

 There is purpose here. When entire races, religions or regions are dehumanized, it is easier to wage war, expel immigrants, and forge new, discriminatory (or oppressive) domestic and foreign policies to deal with these vilified populations.

Which of those things did we do?  Did we wage war against Communism? Did we outlaw the Communist Party?  Did we arbitrarily expel Communists?  How about Catholics & Jews?   We did go to war against Japan, seems like there was some valid reason for that action. I do not remember Pearl Harbor, but some of my readers might.  The issue of internment is highly charged, but I have seen indications that the policy had some grounding in reality.

    Next, we get down to the issue: Islamic violence.

We have few notions of Islam and nonviolence, in large part because our fear has focused on the extreme outliers and because our largely Christian nation has not yet fully embraced -- in media, policy, education or law -- religious diversity, no matter how nonviolent, peaceful and tolerant the religion's majority. It is time we do so. There is much to embrace -- if only we open our eyes to it.

dehumanized

    Islam depicts Jews as those who "earned Allah's anger"; Christians as those who "went astray". It describes Jews as the "worst of living creatures"; "apes and swine".  It curses us  and declares war on us.

notions of Islam and nonviolence

Are notions of nonviolent Islam grounded in reality?   Here is a list of the Islamic episodes of violence  in the table of contents of Guillaume's The Life of Muhammad. 

The first raid: on Waddan 281
Hamza's raid to the coast 283
Raid on Buwat 285
Raid on al-'Ushayra 285
Raid on al-Kharrar 286
Raid on Safawan 286
Fighting in the sacred month 286
The change of the Qibla 289
Battle of Badr
Raid on B. Sulaym 360
Raid called al-Sawiq 361
Raid on Dhu Amarr 362
Raid on al-Furu' 362
Attack on B. Qaynuqa' 363
Raid on al-Qarada 364
Killing of Ka'b b. al-Ashraf 364
Muhayyisa and Huwayyisa 369
Battle of Uhud 370
The Quran on UQud 391
The day of al-Raji' 426
Treachery at Bi'r Ma'una 433
B. al-Nadir exiled 437
Raid of Dhatu'l-Riqa' 445
Last expedition to Badr
Raid on Dumatu'l-Jandal 449
Battle of the Ditch 456
Attack on B. Qurayza 461
Killing of Sallam 482
Attack on B. Lihyan 485
Attack on Dhu Qarad 486
Attack on B. al-Mustaliq
Raid on Mu'ta 531
The occupation of Mecca 540
Khalid followed by 'Ali go forth as missionaries 561
Khalid destroys al-'Uzza 565
Battle of Hunayn 566
Capture of al-Ta'if 587
Division of the spoils of Hawazin
Raid on TabUk
Ghalib's raid on B. al-Mulawwah 660
Zayd's raid on Judham 662
Zayd's raid on B. Fazara 664
'Abdullah b. Rawaha's raid to kill al- Yusayr 665
'Abdullah b. Unays's raid to kill Khalid b. Sufyan 666
'Uyayna's raid on B. al-' Anbar 667
Ghalib's raid on B. Murra 667
'Amr b. al-' As's raid on Dhatu'l-Salasil 668
Ibn Abu Hadrad's raid on Idam 669
His raid on al-Ghaba 671
'Abdu'l-Rabznan's raid on Dumatu'l-Jandal 672
Abu 'Ubayda's raid to the coast 673
Salim b. 'Umayr's raid to kill Abu' Afak
'Umayr b. 'Adiy's raid to kill' Asma' 675
Capture of Thumama b. Athal 676
'Alqama's raid 677
Kurz's raid on the Bajilis 677
'Ali's raid on the Yaman 678

extreme outliers

    Was the founder of Islam an extreme outlier?   He said that he was "ordered to fight the people". He said that he was "made victorious with terror".  No, Muhammad defined Islam, and set its standard with the exemplary conduct listed in the contents of his biography.

    Is Allah, Islam's deity, an extreme outlier?  He ordained jihad for Muslims. He commanded Muslims to wage war against pagans until resistance ceases and only Allah is worshiped on a global scale.  Allah commanded Muslims to wage war against Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians until they are subjugated and extorted. 

    Are Al-Qaeda, HAMAS & Hezbollah extreme outliers or are they Salafists, obedient to Allah and emulating Muhammad? 

religious diversity

    Muhammad said "I will expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but Muslim.".

nonviolent, peaceful

    Are they believers? Or are they hypocrites? If they are believers, they are neither nonviolent nor peaceful. 

9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâh's Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur'ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success .

If they are nonviolent and peaceful, then: [See 9:84...89 for the definition of hypocrites.]

4:88. Then what is the matter with you that you are divided into two parties about the hypocrites? Allâh has cast them back (to disbelief) because of what they have earned. Do you want to guide him whom Allâh has made to go astray? And he whom Allâh has made to go astray, you will never find for him any way (of guidance).

4:89. They wish that you reject Faith, as they have rejected (Faith), and thus that you all become equal (like one another). So take not Auliyâ' (protectors or friends) from them, till they emigrate in the Way of Allâh (to Muhammad ). But if they turn back (from Islâm), take (hold) of them and kill them wherever you find them, and take neither Auliyâ' (protectors or friends) nor helpers from them.

9:68. Allâh has promised the hypocrites; men and women, and the disbelievers, the Fire of Hell, therein shall they abide. It will suffice them. Allâh has cursed them and for them is the lasting torment.

tolerant

    Why are there no churches in Saudi Arabia?  Why are Christians murdered, their churches & homes destroyed with impunity in Egypt, Indonesia, Kenya & Nigeria?

much to embrace

    Does that include genocidal conquest & terrorism?  Do you embrace child brides, who can be divorced before they reach menarche?  Do you embrace a legal code in which a woman's testimony is worth half that of her husband?  Do you embrace the return of Jesus Christ as a genocidal warlord?

Spew of Feces: Mahmoud Abbas at the General Assembly

Spew of Feces: Mahmoud Abbas at the General Assembly The President of the Falestinian Authority, during an illegal extension of his term, desecrated the City of New York with his evil presence and spewed feces at the General Assembly of the United Nations.

    As with Prime Minister Netanyahu's address, I have highlighted the most important parts and inserted superscripts linked to my comments which follow the screed. Click the superscripts to read my comments and press your Backspace key to return to your place in the screed. 

    Update: publication of this post was delayed by interruption of my internet connection. After the technical difficulty was fixed, I discovered that Abbas has declared that he will not negotiate until "settlement activity" is ended. It becomes ever more obvious that Islam is interested in conquest, not in peace.

In a Reuters story on Yahoo News, Abbas is quoted as follows:

"We will not accept (negotiations) until legitimacy is the foundation and they cease settlement completely,"

H.E. Mr. Mahmoud Abbas  United Nations General Assembly Sixty-sixth Session

Mr. President of the General Assembly of the United Nations,
Mr. Secretary-General of the United Nations,
Excellencies,
Ladies and Gentlemen,

    At the outset, I extend my congratulations to H.E. Mr. Nassir Abdulaziz AI-Nasser on his
assumption of the Presidency of the Assembly for this session, and wish him all success.

    I extend today my sincere congratulations, on behalf of the Palestine Liberation
Organization and the Palestinian people, to the government and people of South Sudan for its
deserved admission as a full member of the United Nations, wishing them progress and
prosperity.

    I also congratulate the Secretary-General, H.E. Mr. Ban Ki-moon, on his election for a
new term at the helm of the United Nations. This renewal of confidence reflects the world's
appreciation for his efforts, which have strengthened the role of the United Nations.

Excellencies,
Ladies and Gentlemen,

    The Question Palestine is intricately linked with the United Nations via the resolutions
adopted by its various organs and agencies and via the essential and lauded role of the United
Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East - UNRWA - which
embodies the international responsibility¹ towards the plight of Palestine refugees², who are the
victims of Al-Nakba ³(Catastrophe) that occurred in 1948. We aspire for and seek a greater and
more effective role for the United Nations in working to achieve a just and comprehensive peace⁴
in our region that ensures the inalienable, legitimate national rights⁵ of the Palestinian people⁶ as
defined by the resolutions of international legitimacy of the United Nations.

Excellencies,
Ladies and Gentlemen,

    A year ago, at this same time, distinguished leaders in this hall addressed the stalled
peace efforts in our region. Everyone had high hopes for a new round of final status negotiations,
which had begun in early September in Washington under the direct auspices of President
Barack Obama and with participation of the Quartet, and with Egyptian and Jordanian
participation, to reach a peace agreement within one year. We entered those negotiations with
open hearts and attentive ears and sincere intentions, and we were ready with our documents,
papers and proposals. But the negotiations broke down⁷ just weeks after their launch.

    After this, we did not give up and did not cease our efforts for initiatives and contacts.
Over the past year we did not leave a door to be knocked or channel to be tested or path to be
taken and we did not ignore any formal or informal party of influence and stature to be
addressed. We positively considered the various ideas and proposals and initiatives presented
from many countries and parties. But all of these sincere efforts and endeavors undertaken by
international parties were repeatedly wrecked by the positions of the Israeli government,⁸ which
quickly dashed the hopes raised by the launch of negotiations last September.

    The core issue here is that the Israeli government refuses to commit to terms of reference
for the negotiations that are based on international law and United Nations resolutions, and that it
frantically continues to intensify building of settlements on the territory of the State of Palestine.
Settlement activities embody the core of the policy of colonial military occupation⁹ of the
land of the Palestinian people and all of the brutality of aggression¹⁰ and racial discrimination
against our people that this policy entails. This policy, which constitutes a breach of
international humanitarian law and United Nations resolutions, is the primary cause for the
failure of the peace process, the collapse of dozens of opportunities, and the burial of the great
hopes that arose from the signing of the Declaration of Principles in 1993 between the Palestine
Liberation Organization and Israel to achieve a just peace that would begin a new era for our
region.

    The reports of United Nations missions as well as by several Israeli institutions and civil
societies convey a horrific picture about the size of the settlement campaign, which the Israeli
government does not hesitate to boast about and which it continues to execute through the
systematic confiscation of the Palestinian lands¹¹ and the construction of thousands of new
settlement units in various areas of the West Bank, particularly in East Jerusalem¹², and
accelerated construction of the annexation Wall¹³ that is eating up large tracts of our land, dividing
it into separate and isolated islands and cantons, destroying family life and communities and the
livelihoods of tens of thousands of families. The occupying Power also continues to refuse
permits for our people to build in Occupied East Jerusalem, at the same time that it intensifies its
decades-long campaign of demolition and confiscation of homes, displacing Palestinian owners
and residents under a multi-pronged policy of ethnic cleansing¹⁴ aimed at pushing them away from
their ancestral homeland. In addition, orders have been issued to deport elected representatives
from the city of Jerusalem. The occupying Power also continues to undertake excavations that
threaten our holy places¹⁵, and its military checkpoints prevent our citizens from getting access to
their mosques and churches, and it continues to besiege the Holy City with a ring of settlements
imposed to separate the Holy City from the rest of the Palestinian cities¹⁶.

    The occupation is racing against time to redraw the borders on our land according to what
it wants and to impose a fait accompli on the ground that changes the realities and that is
undermining the realistic potential for the existence of the State of Palestine.¹⁷

    At the same time, the occupying Power continues to impose its blockade on the Gaza
Strip and to target Palestinian civilians by assassinations, air strikes and artillery shelling,
persisting with its war of aggression of three years ago on Gaza, which resulted in massive
destruction of homes, schools, hospitals, and mosques, and the thousands of martyrs¹⁸ and
wounded.

    The occupying Power also continues its incursions in areas of the Palestinian National
Authority through raids, arrests and killings at the checkpoints.¹⁹ In recent years, the criminal
actions of armed settler militias, who enjoy the special protection of the occupation army, has
intensified with the perpetration of frequent attacks against our people, targeting their homes,
schools, universities, mosques, fields, crops and trees. Despite our repeated warnings, the
occupying Power has not acted to curb these attacks and we hold them fully responsible for the
crimes of the settlers.

    These are just a few examples of the policy of the Israeli colonial settlement occupation²⁰,
and this policy is responsible for the continued failure of the successive international attempts to
salvage the peace process.

    This policy will destroy the chances of achieving a two-State solution²¹ upon which there is
an international consensus, and here I caution aloud: This settlement policy threatens to also
undermine the structure of the Palestinian National Authority and even end its existence.

    In addition, we now face the imposition new conditions not previously raised, conditions
that will transform the raging conflict in our inflamed region into a religious conflict²² and a threat
to the future of a million and a half Christian and Muslim Palestinians, citizens of Israel, a matter
which we reject and which is impossible for us to accept being dragged into.

    All of these actions taken by Israel in our country²³ are unilateral actions and are not based
on any earlier agreements. Indeed, what we witness is a selective application of the agreements
aimed at perpetuating the occupation. Israel reoccupied the cities of the West Bank by a
unilateral action, and reestablished the civil and military occupation by a unilateral action, and it
is the one that detennines whether or not a Palestinian citizen has the right to reside in any part
of the Palestinian Territory. And it is confiscating our land and our water and obstructing our
movement as well as the movement of goods. And it is the one obstructing our whole destiny.
All of this is unilateral.

Excellencies,
Ladies and Gentlemen,

    In 1974, our deceased leader Yasser Arafat came to this hall and assured the Members of
the General Assembly of our affinnative pursuit for peace²⁴, urging the United Nations to realize
the inalienable national rights of the Palestinian people²⁵, stating: "Do not let the olive branch fall
from my hand".

    In 1988, President Arafat again addressed the General Assembly, which convened in
Geneva to hear him, where he submitted the Palestinian peace program adopted by the Palestine
National Council at its session held that year in Algeria.

    When we adopted this program, we were taking a painful and very difficult step for all of
us, especially those, including myself, who were forced to leave their homes and their towns and
villages, carrying only some of our belongings and our grief and our memories and the keys of
our homes to the camps of exile and the Diaspora in the 1948 AI-Nakba²⁶, one of the worst
operations of uprooting, destruction and removal of a vibrant and cohesive society that had been
contributing in a pioneering and leading way m the cultural, educational and economic
renaissance of the Arab Middle East.

    Yet, because we believe in peace²⁷ and because of our conviction in international
legitimacy, and because we had the courage to make difficult decisions for our people, and in the
absence of absolute justice, we decided to adopt the path of relative justice - justice that is
possible and could correct part of the grave historical injustice committed against our people.
Thus, we agreed to establish the State of Palestine on only 22% of the territory of historical
Palestine - on all the Palestinian Territory occupied by Israel in 1967.²⁸

    We, by taking that historic step, which was welcomed by the States of the world, made a
major concession in order to achieve a historic compromise that would allow peace to be made in
the land of peace.²⁹

    In the years that followed - from the Madrid Conference and the Washington negotiations
leading to the Oslo agreement, which was signed 18 years ago in the garden of the White House
and was linked with the letters of mutual recognition between the PLO and Israel, we persevered
and dealt positively and responsibly with all efforts aimed at the achievement of a lasting peace
agreement. Yet, as we said earlier, every initiative and every conference and every new round of
negotiations and every movement was shattered on the rock of the Israeli settlement expansion
project.

Excellencies,
Ladies and Gentlemen,

    I confirm, on behalf of the Palestine Liberation Organization, the sole legitimate
representative of the Palestinian people, which will remain so until the end of the conflict in all
its aspects and until the resolution of all final status issues, the following:

    I. The goal of the Palestinian people is the realization of their inalienable national rights in their
independent State of Palestine, with East Jerusalem as its capital, on all the land of the West
Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip, which Israel occupied in the June 1967 war,
in conformity with the resolutions of international legitimacy and with the achievement of a just
and agreed upon solution to the Palestine refugee issue in accordance with resolution 194, as
stipulated in the Arab Peace Initiative which presented the consensus Arab vision to resolve the
core the Arab-Israeli conflict and to achieve a just and comprehensive peace. To this we adhere
and this is what we are working to achieve. Achieving this desired peace also requires the
release of political prisoners and detainees in Israeli prisons without delay.

2. The PLO and the Palestinian people adhere to the renouncement of violence³⁰ and rejection and
condemning of terrorism³¹ in all its forms, especially State terrorism, and adhere to all agreements
signed between the Palestine Liberation Organization and Israel.

3. We adhere to the option of negotiating a lasting solution to the conflict in accordance with
resolutions of international legitimacy. Here, I declare that the Palestine Liberation Organization
is ready to return immediately to the negotiating table on the basis of the adopted terms of
reference based on international legitimacy and a complete cessation of settlement activities.³²

4. Our people will continue their popular peaceful resistance to the Israeli occupation³³ and its
settlement and apartheid policies³⁴ and its construction of the racist annexation Wall³⁵, and they
receive support for their resistance, which is consistent with international humanitarian law and
international conventions and has the support of peace activists from Israel and around the world,
reflecting an impressive, inspiring and courageous example of the strength of this defenseless
people, armed only with their dreams, courage, hope and slogans in the face of bullets, tanks,
tear gas and bulldozers.

5. When we bring our plight and our case to this international podium, it is a confirmation of our
reliance on the political and diplomatic option and is a confirmation that we do not undertake
unilateral steps³⁶. Our efforts are not aimed at isolating Israel or de-legitimizing it; rather we want
to gain legitimacy³⁷ for the cause of the people of Palestine. We only aim to de-legitimize the
settlement activities, the occupation and apartheid and the logic of ruthless force, and we believe
that all the countries of the world stand with us in this regard.

    I am here to say on behalf of the Palestinian people and the Palestine Liberation
Organization: We extend our hands to the Israeli government and the Israeli people for peacemaking.
I say to them: Let us urgently build together a future for our children where they can
enjoy freedom³⁸, security and prosperity. Let us build the bridges of dialogue instead of
checkpoints and walls of separation, and build cooperative relations based on parity and equity
between two neighboring States - Palestine and Israel - instead of policies of occupation,
settlement, war and eliminating the other³⁹.

Excellencies,
Ladies and Gentlemen,

    Despite the unquestionable right of our people to self-determination and to the
independence of our State as stipulated in international resolutions, we have accepted in the past
few years to engage in what appeared to be a test of our worthiness, entitlement and eligibility.
During the last two years our national authority has implemented a program to build our State
institutions. Despite the extraordinary situation and the Israeli obstacles imposed, a serious
extensive project was launched that has included the implementation of plans to enhance and
advance the judiciary and the apparatus for maintenance of order and security, to develop the
administrative, financial, and oversight systems, to upgrade the performance of institutions, and
to enhance self-reliance to reduce the need for foreign aid. With the thankful support of Arab
countries and donors from friendly countries, a number of large infrastructure projects have been
implemented, focused on various aspects of service, with special attention to rural and
marginalized areas.

    In the midst of this massive national project, we have been strengthening what we
seeking to be the features of our State: from the preservation of security for the citizen and public
order; to the promotion of judicial authority and rule of law; to strengthening the role of women
via legislation, laws and participation; to ensuring the protection of public freedoms and
strengthening the role of civil society institutions; to institutionalizing rules and regulations for
ensuring accountability and transparency in the work of our Ministries and departments; to
entrenching the pillars of democracy as the basis for the Palestinian political life.

    When division struck the unity of our homeland, people and institutions, we were
determined to adopt dialogue for restoration of our unity. We succeeded months ago in
achieving national reconciliation and we hope that its implementation will be accelerated in the
coming weeks. The core pillar of this reconciliation was to turn to the people through legislative
and presidential elections within a year, because the State we want will be a State characterized
by the rule of law, democratic exercise and protection of the freedoms and equality of all citizens
without any discrimination and the transfer of power through the ballot box.

    The reports issued recently by the United Nations, the World Bank, the Ad Hoc Liaison
Committee (AHLC) and the International Monetary Fund confirm and laud what has been
accomplished, considering it a remarkable and unprecedented model. The consensus conclusion
by the AHLC a few days ago here described what has been accomplished as a "remarkable
international success story" and confirmed the readiness of the Palestinian people and their
institutions for the immediate independence of the State of Palestine.

Excellencies,
Ladies and Gentlemen,

    It is no longer possible to redress the issue of the blockage of the horizon of the peace
talks with the same means and methods that have been repeatedly tried and proven unsuccessful
over the past years. The crisis is far too deep to be neglected, and what is more dangerous are
attempts to simply circumvent it or postpone its explosion.⁴⁰

    It is neither possible, nor practical, nor acceptable to return to conducting business as
usual, as if everything is fine. It is futile to go into negotiations without clear parameters⁴¹ and in
the absence of credibility⁴² and a specific timetable. Negotiations will be meaningless as long as
the occupation army on the ground continues to entrench its occupation⁴³, instead of rolling it
back, and continues to change the demography of our country⁴⁴ in order to create a new basis on
which to alter the borders.

Excellencies,
Ladies and Gentlemen,

    It is a moment of truth and my people are waiting to hear the answer of the world. Will it
allow Israel to continue its occupation, the only occupation in the world? Will it allow Israel to
remain a State above the law and accountability? Will it allow Israel to continue rejecting the
resolutions of the Security Council and the General Assembly of the United Nations and the
International Court of Justice and the positions of the overwhelming majority of countries in the
world?

Excellencies,
Ladies and Gentlemen,

    I come before you today from the Holy Land, the land of Palestine, the land of divine
messages, ascension of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and the birthplace of Jesus
Christ (peace be upon him), to speak on behalf of the Palestinian people in the homeland and in
the Diaspora, to say, after 63 years of suffering of an ongoing Nakba: Enough. It is time for the
Palestinian people to gain their freedom and independence.

    The time has come to end the suffering and the plight of millions of Palestine refugees in
the homeland and the Diaspora, to end their displacement and to realize their rights, some of
them forced to take refuge more than once in different places of the world.

    At a time when the Arab peoples affirm their quest for democracy⁴⁵ - the Arab Spring - the
time is now for the Palestinian Spring, the time for independence.

    The time has come for our men, women and children to live normal lives⁴⁶, for them to be
able to sleep without waiting for the worst that the next day will bring; for mothers to be assured
that their children will return home without fear of suffering killing, arrest or humiliation⁴⁷; for
students to be able to go to their schools and universities without checkpoints obstructing them.
The time has come for sick people to be able to reach hospitals normally⁴⁸, and for our farmers to
be able to take care of their good land without fear of the occupation seizing the land and its
water, which the wall prevents access to, or fear of the settlers, for whom settlements are being
built on our land and who are uprooting and burning the olive trees that have existed for
hundreds of years. The time has come for the thousands of prisoners⁴⁹ to be released from the
prisons to return to their families and their children to become a part of building their homeland,
for the freedom of which they have sacrificed.

My people desire to exercise their right to enjoy a normal life like the rest of humanity.
They believe what the great poet Mahmoud Darwish said: Standing here, staying here,
permanent here, eternal here, and we have one goal, one, one: to be.

Excellencies,
Ladies and Gentlemen,

    We profoundly appreciate and value the positions of all States that have supported our
struggle and our rights and recognized the State of Palestine following the Declaration of
Independence in 1988, as well as the countries that have recently recognized the State of
Palestine and those that have upgraded the level of Palestine's representation in their capitals. I
also salute the Secretary-General, who said a few days ago that the Palestinian State should have
been established years ago.

    Be assured that this support for our people is more valuable to them than you can
imagine, for it makes them feel that someone is listening to their narrative⁵⁰and that their tragedy
and the horrors of Al-Nakba and the occupation, from which they have so suffered, are not being
ignored. And, it reinforces their hope that stems from the belief that justice is possible in this in
this world. The loss of hope is the most ferocious enemy of peace and despair is the strongest
ally of extremism.

    I say: The time has come for my courageous and proud people, after decades of
displacement and colonial occupation and ceaseless suffering, to live like other peoples of the
earth, free in a sovereign and independent homeland.

Excellencies,
Ladies and Gentlemen,

    I would like to inform you that, before delivering this statement, I, in my capacity as
President of the State of Palestine and Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Palestine
Liberation Organization, submitted to H.E. Mr. Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General of the United
Nations, an application for the admission of Palestine on the basis of the 4 June 1967 borders,
with AI-Quds AI-Sharif as its capital, as a full member of the United Nations.

    I call upon Mr. Secretary-General to expedite transmittal of our request to the Security
Council, and I call upon the distinguished members of the Security Council to vote in favor of
our full membership. I also appeal to the States that have not yet recognized the State of
Palestine to do so.

Excellencies,
Ladies and Gentlemen,

    The support of the countries of the world for our endeavor is a victory for truth, freedom,
justice, law and international legitimacy, and it provides tremendous support for the peace option
and enhances the chances of success of the negotiations.

Excellencies,
Ladies and Gentlemen,

    Your support for the establishment of the State of Palestine and for its admission to the
United Nations as a full member is the greatest contribution to peacemaking in the Holy Land.
I thank you.

 

---

1. Responsibility for the Falestinians lies entirely with the membership of the Arab League, who staged a  series of genocidal attack on Israel, beginning in modern times, in 1948. Any broader responsibility is limited to Ummah al-Islamiyya, to pay Zakat to their distressed brethren.  Had the Arabs lived up to their responsibility, there would be no refugee problem for the Falestinians.
2. The geographic region called Palestine was, prior to the Destruction of the Second Temple, known as Israel. The Romans renamed the occupied territory after the Philistines as an insult to the Jews whom they had thrown out of their homeland. The Jewish diaspora are the real Palestinian refugees.
3. In 632, four years after Moe departed for his richly deserved eternal damnation,{fire be upon him) caliph Umar completed the conquest of the Roman Province of Syria, the indigenous population of which was Christian & Jewish, neither Arab nor Muslim.

        In World War 1, the Ottoman Empire fought on the losing side, losing the desert to Great Britain. Following the Balfour Doctrine, the League of Nations gave Great Britain a mandate to restore the Jews to their ancient homeland which had been stolen from them. Great Britain reneged on the deal, forcing Israel to rise up against the occupying force and restored her sovereignty in 1948. The Arabs rejected the partition plan and Falestinian statehood, preferring  to launch a genocidal attack. To learn more about the relevant  history of the Levant, follow the links in the left sidebar of http://www.palestinefacts.org/ .
   

4. Just, comprehensive and lasting peace is a function of your apostasy or death. If you abandon Islam or go to Hell, there will be peace in the region.  Until you follow one of those courses of action, there can be no peace.  If you wanted peace, you would have it. Instead, you want conquest, because it is the commandment of the demon to whom you are enslaved. You hope that we do not know about the Qur'an, but a few of us know, and we are sharing our knowledge with others. Comprehension of the true nature of Islam is propagating at an accelerating pace.

        We know about Noble Qur'an 2:216, which ordains jihad for you. We know about 2:190 which commands you to drive out those who drove you out; a command to reconquer lost territory, which motivates your reconquest of Israel. We know about 8:57, which commands you to deal harshly with those you defeat so as to terrorize prospective victims behind them.  We know about 8:60, which commands you to build the strongest possible army with which to terrify your intended victims.  We know about 8:67, which sets "great slaughter" as the price of admission to Allah's celestial bordello.

        We know about how Allah terrified Jews so that you killed them, enslaved their widows & orphans and seized their real and personal property.  We know how Moe committed genocide, slaughtering 800 Jews who had surrendered; how he inspected their sons for pubic hair and slew those who had developed it.  And we know about Moe instructing his companions to invade Syria first because "Allah has on my account taken special charge of Syria and its people." We also read 7:167 so we know that Allah will "certainly keep on sending against them (i.e. the Jews), till the Day of Resurrection, those who would afflict them with a humiliating torment."  We even know that the gates of Paradise will not swing open for you until you hunt down and kill the last Jew.

        Nay more! We have read Islamic law, so we know that jihad is "war against non-Muslims".  We know that it must be performed in every year, and that, if it is abandoned in a year without good cause, that all who knew of the obligation are in sin. We know that "The caliph makes war against Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians".

        We are not so stupid, ignorant and gullible as you hope.  We know that Allah promised you victory. We know that Allah promised that you would take over the land.  We also know by 13:41, that your conquest is irreversible.  That is how we know that Allah is an impotent idol: The Jews got part of their land back and you tried to exterminate them and failed several times.  I know that you will never tolerate the existence of Israel because she testifies to the fact that you worship an impotent idol, and I am telling everyone who will read this blog post.

5. According to sacred and secular history, Judea & Israel were ancient kingdoms in the region now referred to as Palestine. We know that Jerusalem was the capitol, where King Solomon erected the Temple, the Assyrians destroyed it, Herod rebuilt it and the Romans destroyed it again.  When did you ever have a nation of Palestine? Who were its rulers? What was its unit of currency? What was its capitol city? How and when did it cease to exist as a sovereign nation?
6. One terrorist's admission to a newspaper spilled the beans.  Falestinians are not a distinct people with a national history. No people, no nationality, no historical basis for a nation of their own on Israel's territory. Your lies are exposed and the game is up; sit down and shut up!

   Way back on March 31, 1977, the Dutch newspaper Trouw published an interview with Palestine Liberation Organization executive committee member Zahir Muhsein. Here's what he said:

   The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct "Palestinian people" to oppose Zionism.

   For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan.

7. Abbas demanded a construction freeze as a precondition for negotiations. Netanyahu stupidly imposed the freeze for ten months. Abbas delayed talks until the last two weeks of the freeze, then he walked away.  Muslims only negotiate from a position of strength. When too weak to fight, they only grant a ten year truce during which they rearm and regroup for their next attack. 
8. There were no negotiations because you refuse to negotiate; you demand surrender as a precondition for peace talks. Go to Hell.
9. Its Israel, stupid. It ain't Palestine, it is Israel, the Jewish homeland. Muslims are the interlopers & illegal occupiers, since Umar's conquest in 638. 
10. The projection continues; Muslims accuse their victims of their own offenses.  You killed a student and wounded a school bus driver with an expensive anti-tank rocket yet you accuse Israel of brutal aggression. Muslims were the aggressors in a series of four wars. Its time for the world to get a clue.
11. It ain't your land; you stole it in 638.  You stole it again in 1948. Israel recovered it when you attacked again in 1967. Live by the sword, die by the sword. Quit kvetching, losers.
12. Jerusalem is Israel's capitol.  King Hussein illegally seized half of it and excluded Jews from it in 1948, in violation of international law and his oath. You have no right or claim in Jerusalem. Drop the fantasy. Islam's so called claim on Jerusalem is founded in fabulism, a mirage. 
13. There would be no wall if you were not continually attempting to murder Jews.  The wall is necessary to slow down and deter genocidal attackers motivated by the damnable doctrine of Islam.  Everything you bitterly bitch about is a consequence of your genocidal aggression.
14. AssWhole: you rival Barack Hussein Obama in arrogance & al-Taqiyya! You demand that the Falestinian state be Judenrein; that all Jews be expelled from Judea & Samaria. You enforce a law prescribing the death penalty for selling land to Jews.  May Satan take you soon in your hypocrisy!
15. There are no Jewish excavations near Mecca. The excavations near the Temple Mount do not threaten anything except your malignant narrative. Your removal and dumping of rubble containing Jewish artifacts from the Temple Mount stands out as a real threat to archeology. 
16. Its Israel, stupid!  Jerusalem was the capitol, ruled over by David and Solomon, who were Jews, not Muslims. Jesus Christ worshiped in the Temple at Jerusalem; he, too is a Jew.  Jerusalem was never the capitol of any Arab or Muslim nation.  It was neglected by the Ottoman Empire, falling into decay during their occupation. 
17. Any fool with eyes can see that there is not sufficient land there for one state; Israel is far too small for long term survival. There is not enough real estate there for two nations. 
18. Yasser Arafat was fond of chanting "A million martyrs marching to Jerusalem". You worship martyrs, naming schools and public places after those who die in the act of murdering Jews.  Martyrs are a great thing, they gain instant admission to Alllah's celestial bordello and take 70 close relatives with them. Quit bitching about making martyrs.
19. If you would implement and enforce your obligations under the Oslo Accords, there would be no need for Israeli incursions. You will not enforce them because murder is your way of life.
20. 'Umar sent the Muslims to the great countries to fight the pagans. Islam, not Israel invaded, conquered and occupied the Levant. It happened in 632. It is time to shut off the projector.
21. Two states are not a solution. Statehood will not diminish your genocidal aggression, if anything, it would exacerbate your aggression.  There is absolutely no excuse for giving you a staging area for further attacks. If Israel moves for peace, she will usher you into Hell. Until she does, she will have no peace.
22. Allah said: "Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. ". Moe said: "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah."  Israel's demand for recognition as the Jewish state turns the war into a religious conflict. Yeah, right. 
23. It ain't your country, it is Israel! You had a chance for a country in 1948; you rejected that chance, preferring  to drive the Jews into the sea. Your genocidal attack was a failure, proving to all who will observe the truth that Allah is an impotent idol.
24. You had a fine way of pursuing peace in 1948, 1967 & 1973. Why did you repeatedly fail to capture it? You do not want peace, you want genocidal conquest. Arafat is lonely in Hell, be swift to join him.
25. You ain't a people, you ain't a nation and you have no historical, legal or moral right to Israel's land nor to a nation.  You could have had a nation, but you did not want one.
26. Egyptian radio broadcast orders to evacuate; clearing the way for their army to push the Jews into the sea. You left to clear a path for genocide. You have no right to return.  Losing aggressors do not write the rules.
27.  If you are a Muslim, you believe in Allah, not in peace.  Allah said that he purchased your lives so that you fight in his cause, killing others and being killed. His cause is to make Islam dominant; global conquest. "The Good News that Muslims will conquer the Known World, and ultimately the Entire World". Kiss my big, smelly, deformed, ulcerated foot.
28. Israel recovered that land, stolen from her in 638 & 1948, only because you attacked her again with genocidal intent and lost. You bitch bitterly about the consequences of your own genocidal aggression. Go to Hell.
29. What historic step did you take?  Did you make a good faith effort to stop terror attacks?  Did you end the inculcation of hatred in your schools, public television and Mosques?  Did you end incitement to violence against Israel?  Did you meet any of your obligations under the Oslo Accords?  Go to Hell.
30. In a pig's anus you do! If you renounce violence, you must abjure & denounce Allah's damnable words including, but not limited to 2:216, 8:39, 8:60, 8:65, 9:29 & 9:123. By renouncing those ayat, you would become apostates, subject to execution. I disrespectfully direct doubters & dissenters to Reliance of the Traveller O8.1 & O8.7 [on the next page of the pdf.].
31. In a pig's anus you do! If you renounce terrorism, you must abjure & denounce Allah's damnable words including, but not limited to 3:151, 8:12, 8:57, 8:60, 33:26, 33:27, 59:2 & 59:13, subjecting yourselves, under the Islamic law cited above, to execution as apostates. 
32. Building apartments for Jews in Jerusalem is not settlement activity. Jerusalem is their capitol city. It belongs to Israel, not to you.
33. Throwing rocks is not peaceful resistance. Launching mortar shells is not peaceful resistance. Launching rockets is not peaceful resistance. Blowing up buses is not peaceful resistance. Slaughtering families as they sleep is not peaceful resistance. You are occupying Israel; end the occupation immediately.  Go to Hell!
34. You demand that your state be Judenrein and accuse Israel of apartheid. Go to Hell, hypocrite!
35. You demand the exclusion of Jews from Jerusalem and call Israel racist. Go to Hell, hypocrite!
36. Usurpation of Israel's sovereign territory and declaration of a state without due process; in the absence of a functional government ain't unilateral action. Yeah, right.
37. Legitimacy? Either you have it or you don't.  Israel has it, you don't.  Your cause is illegitimate and can not be legitimatized. 
38. Your children can not enjoy freedom while enslaved to Allah. First, they must be emancipated from Allah, then from your satrapy.
39. Allah's Apostle said that the gates of the celestial bordello will not swing open for you until you kill the last Jew.  The genocidal statement is recorded in several ahadith including Sahih Bukhari 4.52.177 and Sahih Muslim 41.6985. 
40. Your intransigence in demanding surrender prior to peace talks is building pressure for your eradication.   Justice will only be served by the explosion.
41.  Recognition of Israel as the Jewish state, genuine denunciation of violence, complete & permanent disarmament & demilitarization and Israel's unquestioned right and duty to usher you into Hell at the first violation of those clear parameters; sounds like a plan.
42. You have no credibility and can obtain none because you never implemented the Oslo Accords. Until you quit inculcating hatred and inciting violence, you have no credibility.
43. Yes, it certainly is unreasonable to expect Israel to negotiate while you occupy her sovereign territory. Go home!
44. Israel is not your country, and you are breeding like rats in it, changing the demography.
45. "One man, one vote, one time." "It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allâh and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any option in their decision. "[33:36] The quest is for domination, not democracy; its about who sits on the throne.
46. Then let them denounce Islam, join the human race and abandon genocidal conquest. You can quit making war any day of the week, any week of the year but you will not because you are slaves of Allah. But I know something you wish I did not know: "And the life of this world is nothing but play and amusement. But far better is the house in the Hereafter for those who are Al­Muttaqûn (the pious - see V.2:2). Will you not then understand?" [6:32]  Muslims do not want normal lives, they seek war and martyrdom as a guarantee of admission to the celestial bordello.
47. They send their brats off to murder Jews, telling them not to shame their mothers by returning alive. Do you think we do not see the pictures of little boys carrying rifles and wearing bomb vests?  Do you think we do not read about teenagers being caught carrying knives and bombs into Israel or wearing bomb vests to the border? 
48. If you built hospitals instead of arsenals, buying medicine instead of explosives, that would not be a problem.
49. Israel should execute one of those prisoners every day until Shalit is freed alive and unharmed. Of course, they will go directly to the celestial bordello, won't they. Their relatives will celebrate their wedding to 72 houris.
50. We have been listening for 62 years and we know it is a false narrative.