The Question Obama Cannot Answer

Barack Hussein Obama, who is 43% Arab, and 6% black, spent many years in a Muslim home, his step-father's, and several years in a Muslim madrasa [school.]

Some say that he went to a Wahabbi school which, ideologically, teaches the particularly violent, supremacist portions of Islam and is also embraced by Osama Bin Laden and terrorists everywhere.

Part of what is taught in Islam, including this branch, is that it is suitable to lie to your enemy if it will gain you an advantage. This is called, taqiyya.

So now Barack Obama sits in an American protestant church, the Trinity United Church and claims to be a Christian. But, why?

Does he embrace genuine Christian faith like millions of Americans? Or is this part of his taqiyya?

Are you willing to stake the lives of your family on this issue? Because if this is part of his Islamic taqiyya, which we know is taught in Islamic schools, then were he to get into the White House, like all Muslims, his loyalties would be to Sharia law, not the U.S. Constitution, regardless of what comes out of his mouth. It would be like Hitler taking over as President of the United States when FDR died. It would be the fox in the hen-house. It would be bad; very, very bad.

If indeed he is just another deceptive Muslim lying through his teeth, handing him the kind of power that the President of the United States has, or the Secretary-General of the U.N., has the potential of qualifying him as a candidate to be the Anti-Christ.

If Barack Obama is not practicing taqiyya, why then is he unwilling to place his hand over his heart while saying the Pledge of Allegiance? Why is he unwilling to wear a U.S. flag lapel pin? Could it be that his allegiance lies not to the U.S. Constitution but with the goals of Islam?

So there is a question that needs to be posed to Mr. Obama. It is a question that he cannot skate around, he cannot slip through, he cannot dodge. Somewhere, some time between now and election day, somebody needs to ask him this question. I'll bet he cannot answer. I'll bet he'll try to snake past it:

"Mr. Obama, you were raised in a Muslim home, you understand Islamic teachings, and yet you say now that you are a Christian. Exactly what part of Mohammed's message in the Qu'ran did you reject, and consider to be false, which caused you to personally turn away from Islam and end up in the church?"

Never, Ever Forget 911

Never forget 911. Never forget the murders. Never forget the vile that is Islam. Liars. Deceivers. Killers. Pigs!

Never forget how they deceived their way into position to be able to murder innocent Americans. These demons show Islam for exactly what it is, the darkest, most hateful, uncivilized slur of lies from the pit of hell.

These murderers, Islam's truest disciples, have shown us everything that we need to know about Islam. And we know that we must confront its lying ideas in every form, in every way, on every continent, and with every means of power available to us Americans. We must show them the same level of mercy they exhibited to our 3000 innocent victims.

No mercy, no let up, no quarter, no comfort. These people want us dead, regardless of what the liberal lackeys say or don't see. Their false religion and their book of lies tells them to fight us and kill us. See chapter 5 and chapter 9 in their koran. They believe that this is God's word to them. They believe that God wants them to kill us. It doesn't get more irreconcilable than that.

No talking, no discussing, no agreements, no conditions, no deals. Islam has proven that it cannot partake in world civilization; it simply seeks to conquer and dominate. Therefore, Islam needs to be outlawed from the world stage. It needs to be universally banned immediately. It needs to be forbidden in the United States, its mosques flattened and its followers either arrested for sedition or deported to Saudi Arabia.

Furthermore, it needs to be militarily confronted in every aspect, every way and in every place immediately. Never forget 911. Never, ever forget it! They already hate us and want to kill our children, so accommodation or appeasement will accomplish nothing except to embolden them, give them more time to plan our family's murder, and give them more time to hate us more, if that is possible.

No Muslim should be allowed a moment of comfort within the borders of the United States. Not one moment. We are his stated enemy. His holy book tells him to kill us. And he knows it. If he tells you something different, he is lying to you like Mohammed Atta lied to the passengers in flight 11, "We are going back to the airport. Everyone will be fine." Filthy liar. Filthy liars!

We must never forget 911. We must not rest in our continual battle against this Satanic murdering cult until it ceases to exist from this country. These people hate us and want to kill us. We either confront them with the power of our laws or we lose. Because as long as one Muslim and his book of hate remains in this country, filled with his murderous delusions, your child is not safe.

Until you understand this, the Muslim demon will get closer and closer and closer to your front door. Remember, murdering is all they do. Of all the contributions to the civilized world in the past 2000 years, not ONE of them has come from a Muslim or a Muslim country. Do the math. All their miserable, inhuman, black hearts know how to do is deceive, to destroy and to kill. That's all they've been doing since 630 A.D. "Tolerance" won't change that; it will only play into its hands.

We must never forget 911. We must ban Islam now. We must attack Islam everywhere with overwhelming, debilitating force. Americans who do not have the stomach for that only invite many more 911's. There is no other way, for Islam believes that God commands them to kill us all.

Do you get it? It really is either them, or your kids. Are you willing to allow these monsters to sacrifice your child to Allah? They will gladly spill the blood of your child to please their false god; they are eager to do so. They are plotting to do so!

Islam has declared war on the west. If you doubt this you are blind, deaf and in severe, near-fatal denial. If you think we can reason with them, ask how the flight attendants who died on 911 did with that approach. No, the only thing an uncivilized cave-man Muslim understands is the power that can stop him from his murdering agenda. Nothing else. Unless he is stopped, forever, the Muslim maniac will keep on coming.

Remember 911. Remember it with your actions. Remember it with your laws. Remember it when you pass by a mosque. Get that mosque outlawed from your community. Go walk in and make them feel like they aren't welcome in your city, because they are not. They want to kill your children, why would you welcome them?

Never, ever, ever forget 911!

Confronting Lawless Border Chaos

Since last October there have been 187 assaults on US Border Patrol agents in the San Diego sector alone. What is that, about six months? That would make it about one attack per day on those American authorities who are enforcing American laws and trying to protect American citizens.

Now stretch that number out across the rest of the southern border and ask yourself how many agents need to suffer, how many attacks have to happen before we begin seriously confronting the lawlessness and chaos that drug and human-traffickers are laying on our plates?

Recently a wire cable was found strung across a patrol road by murderous smugglers that targeted border patrol agents on four-wheelers. Had the wire not been spotted, it certainly could have decapitated our law enforcement officials.

Yet groups such as the American Friends Service Committee, and their spokesperson, Pedro Rios, say that we "need to hear the other side of the story as well." This group monitors law enforcement activity and documents suspected human rights abuses by law enforcement officials.

Once again we see an example of a blind eye given to repeated, habitual, gross and violent violations of US law while the microscope of scrutiny is laid upon those who are confronting the lawlessness. It is the same 'protect-the-criminal' mentality that not too long ago sent Border Patrol Agents to jail who shot an armed convicted drug-smuggler.

The violence is increasing on our borders. The risk is greater for our agents. Bad, ruthless criminals are waging war against our borders and against those who enforce our laws. They are getting more bold in their quest to exert their own self-serving agenda on our border as opposed to American agenda and American law. They want their rules to control the border, not our own, and they will use deadly force to accomplish their agenda.

Look, either we have a boundary on our southern border or we don't. Frankly, if it is not a boundary all the time, it is no boundary at all; ask any cow near a hole in the fence about that. If border lawlessness and chaos is not confronted, and in measure relative to the threat, then it is no longer our border, it belongs to the criminals.

Either you fill the moat around your castle with crocodiles or you drain the water out, for it does not do you any good without them. Either your moat is filled with crocodiles or the castle will not be yours for long.

Those who would point fingers at border patrol agents instead of the criminals should understand that if it weren't for the current limited enforcement of law, that the criminals which such fools protect would storm across en masse and likely as not victimize these very whiners.

Enough of letting the tail wag the dog. Get the crocs. Warn everybody that there are indeed crocodiles in the water. Then don't listen to such people as Pedro Rios when would-be criminals start getting bit. Crossing a moat filled with crocodiles is stupid and can be painful. Perhaps they shouldn't try to do it.

But until and unless there are crocodiles in our moat, law-breakers will continue to try. And if they succeed, it is no longer our border, it is theirs; we have ceded it to the more powerful, wicked men because we didn't have the courage to confront them with strength enough to deter. Our timidity will have been a bigger part of our character than our strength; and we will have lost.

The taller lawlessness stands, the taller in strength we ourselves need to stand to prevent it from overwhelming us and conquering us. People who don't understand this are, always have been, and always will be simple patsies for our prowling, conniving opponents. They are not leaders, they are spineless lackeys who deny a real threat, to their and our peril, because they are unwilling to confront a real threat.

Crocs don't have that problem.


K.O. (Knock Out)

Barak Obama Exposed

So just where does Barak Obama stand on the abortion issue? How about gun laws? How about most of the issues? It seems he is big enough on splash that nobody really has to know who he is or what he really stands for. Seems kind of teflon. Not Al-Gore-plasticman-teflon, but not exactly forthcoming.

One of Obama's recent speeches, this one quite lengthy, was finally meaty enough to begin to nail him down on just where he really is at on some controversial issues. The speech was then reviewed and evaluated by a highly-educated, conservative, patriotic and analytical Christian leader who looks at Obama here for who he is from an American Christian's perspective.

Though the onion has many more yet-to-be uncovered layers, the ones peeled back in this summary are already enough to make you cry. It is very revealing and could well define how the Christain Right identifies this pretender from Illinois (all emphasis and colored text is mine and not the author's):

"I listened to the whole thing. If I were teaching speech this school year and Obama were in my class, he would get an A for sure. He is personable, poised, articulate, likable, and eloquent.

But what did he really say of substance? He began by quoting Alan Keyes, his opponent in his Senate race. It was not till minute 36 (of 39) that he admitted to one of Keyes's apparent criticisms (he didn't really specify what Keyes's objections had been, just that Keyes was convinced that Jesus wouldn't have voted for Obama)--he finally admitted that he, Obama, is pro-abortion. He danced all around the question whether he supports homosexual "marriage." His remarks about Keyes, Pat Robertson, and the late Jerry Falwell were entirely ad hominem, completely devoid of meaningful content.

Not until minute 14 did he mention his having walked the aisle of a church to receive Jesus as Savior, but he immediately undercut that testimony by saying that Jews and Muslims are "on the same path." No serious and honest Jew or Muslim would agree with him, of course. A few minutes later, he claimed that "we need Christians, Jews, and Muslims on Capitol Hill."

Finally, after minute 18, we hear some of his views for the first time. He is anti-gun, so he apparently does not support--or does not understand--the Second Amendment. (Later on, he says some good things about the First Amendment, but without reference to anybody specific who he thinks opposes the principles of the First Amendment.) He wants more tax money to be spent on education. He claims that simply giving more information about contraception will ameliorate, if not solve, the problems of teenage pregnancy and abortion. He is against cuts in the Federal budget.

In minute 26, he finally tells this crowd (containing, apparently, mainly self-described Christians) that he believes America is "no longer a Christian nation," and he makes that statement with apparent approval. He asks a meaningless rhetorical question after minute 27, "Whose Christianity should we teach in the public schools?" (Who in American politics is recommending that we teach Christianity in the public schools? He doesn't say.) Right afterward, he gives some near-sarcastic commentary based on distorted views of the Torah like those popularized by Martin Sheen's character on a popular TV show.

After minute 29, he insists that Christians cannot oppose abortion meaningfully and effectively unless they can justify their opposition to unbelievers, and after minute 31 he says that people of faith must submit to pure reason (that is, reason as defined by those who are not people of faith). In other words, if we can't make our positions palatable and sensible to those who have a completely different (and even hostile) worldview, then we have no business setting our positions forward in the public square.

He concedes that the Pledge of Allegiance, even with "under God," is OK--especially since most kids don't even say it with conviction anyway--and that voluntary prayer groups in public schools would probably be all right.

In sum, this speech contained a lot of effective rhetoric, given in a winning way--a lot of charm--but very little in the way of "real ideas" beyond tactical advice to the left wing on how they can win over people of faith.

Bob Hellam"



Very well said, Bob! Thank you for those important insights.


K.O. (Knock Out)

Who's Yer Gaza?

Irresponsibility invites bad things. Most people understand that. Most people can also apply that to many situations and point and say, 'ah-ha,' that was a result of poor choices and decisions. But why can this same human standard not be understood as the world looks at the Palestinians?

Look, when you start crossing boundaries, you start affecting other people's lives. And when you start raining down rockets onto a civilization, you are forcing them into a position of deciding upon three alternatives. Either they could, first of all, let you kill their people and do nothing. This would allow you to grow in power and strength until you eventually conquered them.

Or they could exercise restraint and exert a limited reaction upon you. This would contribute to a prolonged continuous tit-for-tat affair.

Finally, they could cross over and knock the crap out of you. If you have crossed the boundary of attempting to inflict harm and death upon them, then such a mauling would be one that you most certainly have deserved.

As this applies to the Palestinians (the Biblical Phillistines), the world today is rich with enablers and very short on responsibility-enforcers. The United Nations continually surmises that both Israel and the Palestinians are morally-equivalent cultures and creates resolutions which expect Israel to behave humanely, yet it ignores the great depravity of the Palestinian Muslim culture. (This tendency alone should be enough evidence to abolish the farce that is the UN.)

Egypt recently jumped in as the most recent enabler by allowing the Palestinians to cross its national border, barge into the country, and rampage about as they chose. How did the Palestinians respond? Well, they flooded Egyptian soil with armed terrorists, they sent in suicide-bomber teams into Israel, and they purchased millions of dollars worth of goods from Egyptian vendors with counterfeited money! That's how the Palestinians treated Egypt, their welcoming host, by fleecing its merchants with toy money to the tune of over two million dollars!

Is it ever incumbent upon a guest to actually behave and act respectfully to its host? Is that ever appropriate in this world? Of course it is, it is universally understood. For all cultures except the Palestinians, of course. Surely there are those who will still flock to their bankrupt cause; maybe a few will be standing in front of Israeli tanks, who can't be that many days away from exercising a few moves of their own.

The world has gone blind. It is drunk with moral equivalency and multi-culturalism and is reeling badly. It has put pagan third-world misery-pits on the same footing as advanced industrial societies. It has given the voices of murdering despots, deluded dictators and demonic megalomaniacs a platform upon which to speak and treated their dark agendas as if they were legitimate propositions worthy of option or consideration.

The world is blind because it cannot tell good from evil. It gives evil's ideas and manipulations as much credence as good's. It cannot make a value judgment on something because, it says, the value is relative to the evaluator. There is no absolute standard of right and wrong, good and evil, in the world's eyes.

The same world that was absent as rocket after rocket slammed into Israeli towns, will certainly be in every Palestinian household here in a few days when Israel rolls in, and reporting on the terrible ordeal Palestinian families had to undergo at the hands of the mean Israeli soldiers.

But nobody wants to say that the way for a society to keep another out of its neighborhoods is to behave responsibly and stop trying to kill citizens of that other society. Nobody wants to point out that leadership is a tremendous responsibility and when the leaders do not confront and restrict the evil of its citizens, bad things are going to fall upon the heads of all its citizens. Ask Sadaam Hussein about that principle. Much of one's power is ahead of the irresponsible decision, not after it.

When are people going to recognize that the Palestinians' power is related to the decisions that they make that establish them as a good friend and neighbor? Once they have murdered their neighbors, or stolen from them, the choices about their future are no longer in their hands; they are in the hands of those they have offended. And it will only be the extension of undeserved mercy that keeps this culture from getting the severe pounding their actions have asked for.

People better hope that Israel has more compassion and mercy that the Palestinians.

But that, of course, would mean that they were not morally-equivalent societies....!


K. O. (Knock Out)

It's the Qu'ran, Stupid!

All over the world attacks are happening with one common theme: Islam. A bombing here, a suicide attack there, assassinations, kidnapping, torture; this pagan religion is clearly showing its nature to an international audience.

But, frankly, there are about as many attacks of confusion about what is going on as there are Islamic assaults themselves. Especially from surrendering liberals. For incredulous reasons, so many have cloudy thinking on what the terrorist and his agenda is all about.

It's really quite simple. The terrorist is a true believer. He is totally committed. Although he is misguided and does the works of pure evil, there is logical motivation to his delusion and, thus, to his murderous actions.

To find the motivation behind the terrorist's continuing practice of murdering people, one need look no further than the inspiration found in the teachings of the false prophet Mohammed (7^th century A.D.) who’s supposed revelations are gathered in a book called the Qu’ran, holy to the Muslim. The Muslim believes this to be the word of Allah.

The Qu’ran vociferously denies the virgin birth of Christ as well as His death, resurrection and Deity. It does refer to Him as a prophet, but inferior to Mohammed. Bible believers will know that this is not actual revelation from God, for 1 John 4 describes this type of revelation as coming from the anti-Christ! But what part of this false revelation inspires such things as suicide Bomb-murders and other sub-human acts?

Mohammed describes the Jews as a people to whom Scripture was given, but who then lost the original intent and meaning of Scripture (though not a slice of proof or evidence is presented which substantiates this accusation). Distortion and misinterpretation of revelation by the Jews (and Christians as well, you see) made Mohammed’s “final” revelation a necessity to clarify truth and to reestablish God’s true and final word to mankind. Early in his “revelations,” when Mohammed was more amiable, on his way into power, he shows a measure of tolerance for the Jew and the Christian.

Later, however, when he had enjoyed religious notoriety and a powerful band of fighters to back him up, Mohammed was more bold, morphing in to the very first Islamic terrorist. He murdered many innocents. He describes unbelievers as infidels. He exhorts his followers to fight the infidels. He commands them to act in ruthless ways to create terror and fear in the hearts of those behind the ranks of the enemy fighters. To not fight makes one an enemy of the god of Mohammed’s revelations, Allah. To recoil from such a fight brings down Allah’s judgment on oneself.

Conversely, to fight and die in this struggle, or jihad, against infidels brings about for the martyr a guaranteed pass into paradise. Such a paradise is complete with milk, honey and numerous young maidens available to meet the faithful’s every need. (Interestingly, no other guarantee of salvation is given in the Qu’ran!)

So it is not hard to understand how a believing Muslim might be motivated to self-detonate himself so as to kill an American or an Israeli, clearly unbelievers in his distorted, brainwashed mind, and therefore enemies. His Qu’ran tells him that both are infidels. His Qu’ran tells him to fight against such infidels. His clerics and mullahs declare jihad on Israel and America. He must fight or he, himself will be judged by Allah.

So with these ideas cooking in his mind, the scenario of the suicide bomber, for example, courageously fighting the hated infidel, is the ultimate selfless act of obedience, is as honorable of a contribution as he can make to Allah. And the benefits extend beyond this world because, according to Mohammed’s “revelations,” he is richly and greatly rewarded in paradise.

This also helps to explain how a committed Muslim could hijack a fully-loaded passenger aircraft and slam it into a building. He will kill many infidels and be in paradise soon for his heroic efforts.

Remember, however, sincerity does not equal truth. No matter how hard we believe something does not make it inherently true or false. Regardless how sincere the terrorist is and how much he believes that the Qu'ran is the word of god, his assent to it does not make it true or good.

In fact the acts themselves provide plenty of evidence, on the world's stage, as to if Islam is good or evil. We should all be seeing it for what it is : entirely evil to its core. If you cannot see this, you are a pawn to be used by the devouring plague of Islam.

It's not about the terrorist; it's about the evil lies that motivates and inspires the terrorist, the Qu'ran. Until the Qu'ran goes away, Mohammedans (Muslims) will continue to kill innocent people as they have since 650 A.D.

And though our military should continue to hunt them down on a world-wide scale, and even should expand our offensive, we also need to kill the terrorist's inspiration. The Qu'ran needs to be outlawed, denied, opposed, confronted, banned and destroyed at every level in every society for anything to change, for it is the teachings in this that is the root of this world-wide problem.

T.K.O. (Technical Knock Out)

Church of England Surrenders to Islam

In one of the most stunning remarks in the Church of England's 1500 year history, current Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams ceded centuries of ideological ground to marauding Muslim demands without even a fight.

Rowan actually said that, "the introduction in Britain of some aspects of sharia law was unavoidable."

Britons are rightfully outraged. Based on the high volume of protest hurled at the Archbishop, many are not only convinced his statements are untrue, but are quite willing to take action to prevent such paganry to rule the people of England.

Williams later defended his statements by saying, he was "exploring ways in which reasonable accommodation might be made within existing arrangements for religious conscience" and his core aim was "to tease out some of the broader issues around the rights of religious groups within a secular state".

What the good, most and right reverend ought to do is check his history books a little and see that Islam does not have the heretofore: "conscience." Or perhaps he could simply turn on the news - any channel, any day.

As for the "rights of religious groups within a secular state, " what about a group that hates the state, that is diligently seeking to overthrow the state and would love to kill all its citizens; how many rights should such people have, according to the good bishop?

Though Mr. William's kindness is noble, it seems that he is blissfully unaware of the nature of the snake that has woven its way into many aspects of British society, and he is bending over backwards to try to make accommodations for it. "Sure, Mr. Snaik," says the archbishop, "Come in and lie down and make yourself comfortable. Why, you can sleep right here in this young child's crib."

Why should any society make accommodations for those who would seek to overthrow it? In fact are not those people who seek to overthrow England and other western countries actually, then, the enemies of the host country? And how should a state deal with its enemies, from those who seek to change its laws or kill its citizens? Should the state invite such enemies into the homes of her people?

A millennia ago, the Archbishop's forerunners also were confronted with the scourge of Islam, when it once before sought to conquer Europe. Fortunately previous generations of Brits were braver and more insightful than Mr. Williams as they aggressively went to the middle east and gave the muslims the kind of whatfor that they were asking for.

I doubt many of those who gave their lives on such battlefields would be too proud of the Archbishop's current attempts at secession or surrender.


(Cartoon from Red Planet Cartoons, http://www.redplanetcartoons.com/) :
T.K.O. (Technical Knock Out)

Ecumenica Blames Israel, Palestinians Skate Once Again

In another incredible example of the world's headlong swirl into the abyss, the World Council of Churches has denounced Israel for the plight of Gaza's incorrigible Palestinians. Of course, no mention was made by the liberal WCC of the rockets fired from inside Gaza by Palestinians that continue to rain into Israel.

No, it is the mantra of the times to allow any muslim, or muslim group, on the planet to do whatever they would like, and then blame everybody else; especially if one's name is Israel. There is no accountability to any recognizable standard of dignified humanity that these people are being held to. Rather than recognizing and announcing to all that Islamic cultures are ignorant, depraved, oppressive, dark, shallow and evil, the world has instead become Islamic enablers.

And we also conveniently forget things. Just a few years ago was Israel not pressured to give up the Gaza area entirely? Yes, we heard, 'Land for Peace'; the Palestinians will stop attacking Israel if Israel will just give them that land. So what happened to that? Where is the peace? There is no peace. Palestinians continue to attack Israel.

Have the Palestinians, then, lived up to their end of the agreement, or have they not? And if they have not, who is responsible and what are the consequences?

I know, Israel is responsible and Israel should suffer the consequences. Let's blame them!

Can you see this glaring hypocrisy? Can you see how Israel is being held to a completely different standard than are the muslim Palestinians, who are held to exactly none?

Israel is thus being dissuaded from its responsibility to its own citizens to protect them from attack. For some inexplicable reason, everybody wants to tie Israel's hands behind their backs and subject them to continual harassment and terror.

Sad to say, but not even George W. and Condi are on the right track on this one. They, too have fallen into the mire that concludes that the Palestinians can somehow be reasoned with. But how can you reason with someone who only wants your death and will stop at nothing? A child could answer that muse; a child could tell you that it cannot be done.

So why is everybody protecting the Palestinians from getting the lumps they have called down on their own heads by their own actions? And part of the world's requirement of this worldly, 'protective' stance is that Israel should take the lumps instead. How reasonable is this? How fair is this? How hypocritical is this!

The WCC is wrong to condemn Israel for actually taking steps to defend itself against ruthless murderers. And by its declaration it is in fact protecting evil. Compassion is one thing, but when such a stance ignores or denies evil, and does not insist on accountability, it simply works to perpetuate and exacerbate a cycle of drawn-out violence.

T.K.O. (Technical Knock Out)