09/21/'12 Due to poor auditory accuity and worse typing skills, this transcript is somewhat imperfect, but I managed to make out the important points in the screed.
I am not going to post the Charlie Hebdo cartoons, but I have posted a link to Bare Naked Islam, where you can see them in all their peurility. The sub sophomoric cartoons seem to be takeoffs on the video: "Innocence of Muslims"and Muslim reaction to it. Here is the video for those who have not yet viewed it or need a refresher.
malicious and provocative
Of course they are provocative, they are intended to provoke thought and inquiry. And people are inquiring about whether or not the video reflects reality or fiction. The lucky ones are viewing my blog post which documents the conceptual content of the video. Dr. Ali Sina has written that it is necessary to insult Muslims to get their attention. I agree with him. In my opinion, the video, while provocative, is not malicious. Hebdo seems to be pushing his pen over the line. I perceive that the French cartoonist shares the attitude of Pat Condell and raises it to a new order of magnitude.They wound up Pat real tight, didn't they! Of course he is factually and logically right.
The video does not portray Muslims in general, it portrays Moe and his companions. The portrayal of Moe is accurate: he was insane, suicidal, a lecherous pedophile, barbarian warlord and false prophet. Ample documentation of the fatal facts is provided here: http://dajjal.posterous.com/innocence-of-muslims-true-or-false-you-be-theBecause Islam is what Moe said and did, the video also portrays Islam accurately. It is pure, unmitigated evil: a continuing crime against humanity-- predation. When Moe declares that infidels are to be killed, their widows raped, orphans enslaved and property seized, he is describing the central mission of Islam.
What is the "original religion" of Islam? What is the economic system of Islam? I will let Moe answer those questions because he was the expert.
Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:
I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.
How did Moe get his income? The Qur'an & hadith have clues for you.
This is a blog post, not a college course. If you want more detail, read these related blog posts:
Muslims do not require provocation to attack infidels. Islam considers infidels to be rebels against Allah who deserve to be killed. Reliance of the Traveller, O9.1 describes the communal obligation to mount a minimum of one military expedition against innocent infidels in every year. Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX, page 141 is explicit.
Infidelity means not being Muslim; a status offense carying the death penalty. Infidels are to be destroyed as per the quote from Hedaya shown above. Moe's need for income caused him to compromise, substituting extortion or destruction in the case of Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians. For the disgusting details, begin reading at page 213.
The first amendment was created because, in a representative republic, freedom to criticize the government and it policies is necessary to maintenance of liberty. Likewise, we must be free to identify, accurately describe and warn against sources of impending danger. Thomas Jefferson bought a 'Qur'an to learn the doctrines of his enemy before fighting the Barbary Wars. Since the Accursed Abomination, we need to be able to accurately describe, criticize and raise the alarm against Islam, whose damnable doctrines motivated the murderers who perpetrated the attack.The Fort Hood Massacre happened precicely because the government turned an eye blinded by political correctness away from the curseworthy belief system of Maj. Nidal Malik Hassan. Now they are preventing our officer corps from receiving accurate training about enemy doctrine. George Washington said it best.