Raymond Ibrahim explained how the blasphemy law Islam is demanding would outlaw Islam. His logical and factual foundation is sound, but Islam is a one way street. Islam is in egregious and flagrant violation of existing human rights covenants and nobody is doing anything to enforce them. We must rise up as one demanding enforcement.
The original on Petition Site expired. The new version is at Petition2Congress which lets you email the petition to your Congressman, Senators and the President in one easy step. The petition calls for Islam to be stripped of its false mantle of religion, cast out of the umbra of the First Amendment's free exercise clause and proscribed by law. For the sake of brevity, this version is limited to a short declaration and a list of urls containing vital evidence cited in the declaration. A 30kb pdf file, embedded below through Scribid, contains the text of the original petition including quotes from and links to the Qur'an, hadith, Shari'ah and three international human rights covenants which provide ample evidence to support the demand for proscription of Islam. If you love life, liberty & prosperity and want to live in peace and security without the threat and reality of terrorism, sign, share, tweet, email and embed this petition and its supporting document. Make it go viral! Urge Congress to take action. If not us, who? If not now, when? If you do not have the good fortune to be an American, send the petition to your MP and MEP. International Qur'an Petition
Counter Jihad: Outlaw Islam and its Texts! Every time Muslims and their dhimmis bitterly bitch about exposing Allah as an impotent, demonic idol and Moe as a false prophet, barbarian, lecher, child molester and profiteer, we need to slap them down with the fatal facts of Islam from its own canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis, jurisprudence and biography. Muslims and their dhimis demand censorship because it is impossible to refute the fatal facts of Islam. That task is hopeless!
Demands for imposition of Islamic blasphemy laws must be met with contumacious contradiction: demands that Islam be stripped of its false mantle of religion and outlawed, its slaves emancipated and its institutions closed forever. The Qur'an and hadith are in flagrant violation of international human rights covenants which outlaw racist supremacism, incitement to hatred, violence & genocide.
If defamation of Allah and Moe is to be outlawed, then how about defamation of Jesus Christ? The G'd'd Qur'an denies Christ's patrimony, deity, crucifixion, death & resurrection and hadith depicts him as a genocidal warlord who will lead Muslims in the final genocide of the Jews. I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to: http://snooper.wordpress.com/2008/05/22/the-defamation-of-jesus-christ/ where they can obtain a clue.
If incitement to violence is to be outlawed, then consider Surahs Al-Anfal & At-Taubah of the G'd'd Qur'an and the books of Jihad & Expedition of the various collections of hadith. Consider also Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9. By your own standards, Islam must be outlawed! I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to : http://snooper.wordpress.com/whats-wrong-with-islam-muslims/ , where they can obtain a clue. The video: Innocence of Muslims and the Islamic and political reactions to it have spurred the creation of a series of blog posts which are cataloged below.
This post reproduces and dissects, concept by concept, the OIC's contumacious demand for international imposition of Islamic blasphemy law which I presume was delivered by Zamir Akram, Pakistan's U.N. Ambassador. A brief commentary and four critical questions proceed the embedded video Innocence of Muslims. which is followed by the text of the contumacious demand.
Crucial concepts in the screed are represented by H1 headers followed by flaming hot commentary laced with links to Islam's canon. Quotes include selections from the Qur'an & Sahih Bukhari, the First Amendment, Thomas Jefferson and George Washington. The sections dealing with respect & tolerance and peace & security in the final paragraphs push extra buttons.
This post provides a link to the statement of Egypt's President Morsi, presents some crucial quotes and tears them apart with H1 headers leading to the flames. Quotes include George Washington Reliance of the Traveller and Hedaya with several links to the Qur'an and ahadith documenting the nexus between Islam and terrorism. Last but not least is the embedded video.
This post provides a link to Indonesia's statement and quotes the most important paragraphs. Like the other posts in this Spew of Feces series, it uses H1 headers to contain crucial concepts and tears them apart with links to Islam's canon. One section features the embedded video.
Pakistan's statement is nine pages long. I extracted the important turds, represented them with H1 headers and tore them apart with links to the Islam's canon and The Qur'anic Concept of War. Innocence of Muslims is embedded twice due to a software glitch and careless editing. The first installment of another, more academic video using artwork and narrative from Sira is also embedded.
Unlike the other posts in this series, this one does not contain the video. Obamination's treachery & hypocrisy are documented with a full transcript of his spew of feces, with selected turds ensconced in H1 headers and refuted with reference to Islam's canon.
The statement is short, but tightly packed with turds, which are extracted to H1 headers and flushed with citations to Islam's canon. Video of the statement is included along with Innocence of Muslims and a new Pat Condell video which makes things explicitly clear. The post concludes with a George Washington quote.
Though he is out of office, the President of the 66th gets the same treatment as the other traitors to the human race. A link to the statement is followed by an outline of its salient points. The video is embedded, and quotes from Montesqieu, J.Q. Adams and Churchill are included. Islamic blasphemy laws would make those statements illegal. Links include the Qur'an & hadith.
The bitch makes my ears itch, so I did not watch the video, I read and reproduced the transcript. This post does not include the video but it has Qur'an and hadith quotes.
Readers asked, so I answered. The conceptual content of the video is essentially true. I back that conclusion up with copious quotes from Islam's canon including Ishaq, Tabari & Ibn Sa'd's sira. This post is long and detailed, with links to available source documents possible.
Innocence of Muslims Update: OIC Demands Blasphemy Law Pakistan addressed the General Assembly on behalf of the OIC. They demand international imposition of Islamic blasphemy law. It is necessary to highlight their AssWholliness & hypocrisy; that is the mission of this blog post. They are bitching about Innocence of Musalims, Charlie Hebdo's outrageous cartoons and Qur'an burning. Carefully examine the video and answer these questions:
What does the video say about Muhammad and the cult he founded?
STATEMENT BY PAKISTAN ON BEHALF OF THE OIC IN THE GENERAL DEBATE UNDER AGENDA ITEM 9 Madam President, I have the honour to make this statement on behalf of the OIC, The OIC Group unequivocally condemns the recent production of a film in the United States called "The Innocence of Muslims" which tries to defame Islam and the personality of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon Him). This film is a blatant attempt to provoke religious hatred, discrimination and intolerance that has led to unfortunate loss of life and damage to property. In this context, we also strongly condemn the violence that resulted in the deaths of a number of people including a US diplomat. We note that the Secretary General of the United Nations, The High Commissioner for Human Rights and the President of the United States have also expressed their opposition to the film. Incidents like this clearly demonstrate the urgent need on the part of States to introduce adequate protection against acts of hate crimes, hate speech, discrimination, intimidation and coercion resulting from defamation and negative stereotyping of religions, and incitement to religious hatred, as well denigration of venerated personalities. Over the past months, there have been a number of examples of acts of incitement to hatred. These include despicable incidents involving the burning of the Holy Quran, and the publication of defamatory cartoons. OIC countries have repeatedly called on the Governments concerned to take action to avert these offensive actions but nothing has been done on the excuse that such action would be a violation of the freedom of expression. The OIC underlines that the situation created by the malicious act affirms once more the urgency for all States to fully uphold their obligations under international law", in particular articles 19 and 20 olf ICCPR and article 4 of the International Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination We disagree. These are not exercises in freedom of expression but deliberate attempts to discriminate, defame, denigrate and vilify Muslims and their beliefs.Such acts constitute flagrant incitement to violence and are therefore in contravention of ICCPR Articles 19 and 20. It is therefore abundantly clear that there exists an urgent need to establish an internationally acceptable threshold between freedom of expression and incitement to violence and hatred.The OIC has never advocated any prohibitions on freedom of expression. Our emphasis has been on the need to examine the consequences of unchecked, unbridled and irresponsible statements and actions made by certain groups and individuals that deliberately instigate and incite violence on the basis of religion or belief. This can include situations involving religious minorities or situations in which minorities react violently either in their home societies or in societies where their co-religionists are in a majority. None of.this is completely uncharted territory. For instance, we are all aware of the fact that laws exist in Europe and other countries which impose curbs on anti-Semetic speech, holocaust denial or racial slurs. We need to acknowledge, once and for all, that Islamophobia in particular and discrimination on the basis of religion and belief are contemporary forms of racism and must be dealt with as such. Not to do so would be a clear example of double standards. Islamophobia has to be treated in law and practice equal to the treatment given to anti-Semitism, especially in the legislations. - We recall the general comment 11 of the Human Rights Committee and general comment of the Committee on Elimination of Racial Discrimination which confirm. that restricting the freedom of expression on issues relating to racial discrimination applies . also for incitement to religious hatred. The OIC's resolution on "Combating Intolerance, Negative Stereotyping And Stigmatization of; and Discrimination, Incitement to Violence, and Violence against Persons based on Religion or Belief" adopted by consensus at the 16th session of the Human Rights Council on 24 March 2011, was a concrete attempt: to address this very. concern by bringing all the key players on board. The consensus resolution was the -result of a long and often, difficult negotiation process. The OIC welcomes the joint statement by the OIC Secretary general, Arab League Secretary general, African Union Commissioner for Peace and Security and European Union High Representative for foreign and Security policy in which they shared the profound respect for all religion and refuse to, allow religion to be used to fuel provocation, confrontation and extremism. They reiterated their strong commitment to take further measures and to work for an international consensus on tolerance and full respect of religion, <<< including on the basis of UN Human rights Council resolution 16/18. At the heart of the resolution are a series of practical steps to be taken by states to combat the ever increasing instances of intolerance, negative stereo-typing, stigmatization and discrimination and violence all over the world. This core issue has been approached in a manner that is acceptable to all so that all stake-holders are bound by the commitments contained in the text. The OIC believes that there is an urgent need to take concrete steps towards the implementation of the plan action contained in the resolution to avoid the occurrence of such condemnable incidents in the future. If this is not done, there is a very real chance of a breakdown of the delicate consensus on this issue as reflected in the resolution which would be unfortunate for all of us. The OIC remains ready to work with its international partners at the Human Rights Council in Geneva, the UN General Assembly in New York to address and resolve these critical issues in order to better protect and promote human rights as well as peace and . security within our respective societies. We also call upon the High Commissioner and her Office to assist this . important effort. I thank you.
tries to defame
If you were trying to defame someone with a video, would you derive its dialogue from his original hagiographic biography and the most authentic oral traditions from his companions? In Western legal tradition, defamation involves malicious falsehood. Exactly what is false about the video's depiction of Moe?
deliberate provocation
What does the video have to do with religious hatred, discrimination and intolerance? It illustrated the hatred of Muslims who, when they can do it with impunity, murder Christians and destroy their property. What is provocative about that? Must the news media be prevented from reporting on religiously motivated violence in Africa. Arabia and Asia because it might be provocative? What was Moe's attitude toward infidels? Was it accurately depicted in the video? What is provocative about that?
unfortunate loss of life
How did the video lead to loss of life? How many of the rioters saw the video? The riots were deliberately stirred up by mass media and rabid rants in the mosques. Fortune had nothing to do with murder and destruction, they are intended effects of the damnable doctrines of Islam.
What did Christians destroy and whom did they kill over "Piss Christ" and "The Holy Virgin Mary"? What is the difference between Christians and Muslims or their respective doctrines that explains the widely divergent reactions to disturbing images? What did Jesus do? What did Moe do? Whom do Muslims emulate? Do the murders of Kab Ashraf, Asma Bint Marwan and Um Qirfa ring a bell?
appeal to authority
The listed authority figures are full of fecal matter so that it comes out their mouths, which I pointed out in several blog posts. It ain't who you know, it is what you know. I know that the conceptual content of the video is true according to Islam's canon. I know that there is no rational basis for condemning the video. I know that the listed authority figures are scared witless of Islam and seek to appease Muslims. I do not accept them as an argument for censorship.
hate crimes, hate speech...
Hate crimes and hate speech do not flow from defamation or negative stereotyping, they flow from hate. The riots in Egypt and murders in Bengazi are the fruit of wala wal bara: "love and hate for the sake of Allah". Those are hate crimes, for which the criminals constantly seek pretexts. That is low intensity warfare, a doctrine borrowed from the Soviets and their 'non aligned' clients.
Moe hated Jews and Christians because they perceived the fraudulent nature of the cult he contrived to ensnare them with perverted and distorted stories from their scriptures and apocryphal books. The first surah of the Qur'an reminds Allah why he should want to burn us. Muslims recite it 17 times each day. The second surah says that we are cursed by Allah, angels and men. The third tells Muslims that they are the best of peoples raised up for mankind as they drag us to Islam in chains. It also tells Muslims that if they attack us, we will do them no harm.
defamation
It ain't defamatory unless it is false and malicious. Did the video defame Moe when it reported that he thought he was demon possessed and tried to kill himself? Before answering, perhaps you should refer to the first book in Sahih Bukhari and Ibn Sa'd's hadith collection. Did the video defame Moe when it depicted him as a pedophile? Perhaps you should go to your favorite hadith search engine and look up "six years old" before answering that. Muttawir ahadith testify to Aisha's age at marriage and consummation, with one hadith giving her age as seven.
Did the video defame Moe when it depicted him as a lecher? Did he really divert Hafsa from the bedroom on her night in order to tryst with her slave girl? Dig into Volume 9 of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, page 88 if memory serves. And the murder of Kinana & rape of his widow, Safiya? True or false? Look it up in Guillaume's The Life of Muhammad and Tabari', if memory serves, its in Vol. 8. And the talking donkey? Ishaq reveals that it was paid in tribute by an Egyptian ruler, along with the slave girl and her sister. The part about the interview with the donkey is in the Encyclopedia of Canonical Hadith. And the command to wage war, killing the men and enslaving their widows and orphans, is that true? If you read the Qur'an, surahs 8, 9 & 33, you know the answer.
stereotyping
The video does not say anything about Muslims other than Moe and his companions who are long since dead. How does it stereotype Muslims? Moe defined and exemplified Islam. 33:21 tells Muslims if they want to meet Allah in a positive way, they had better emulate Moe. 3:32 tells them to Obey Allah & Moe. What Moe was, pious believers are to the extent that they know his sunnah and are able to emulate it.
If Moe channeled Satan instead of God, which he did, then in stead of worshiping God, Muslims worship his adversary. If Moe revealed situational scripture, which he did, then Muslims follow a fraud: a false prophet. When we expose the truth about Allah & Moe, we expose Muslims as demon's slaves and members of a crime syndicate.
incitement to religious hatred
How does the video incite religious hatred? And what is the foul if it did? Should not an impious fraud which has murdered millions and enslaves billions be hated? Exposing evil is not incitement. Doing evil is incitement. The terrorism, riots & murders,. not cartoons, books & videos cause us to hate Islam.
denigration
Moe was venal, not venerable, Guillaume's The Life of Muhammad and The Sealed Nectar display the true character and works of Moe; should they be banned for denigration of a venerable personality?
acts of incitement
Uttering & publishing Innocence of Muslims is not an act of incitement, it is an act of education:: showing viewers a fair sample what Moe was and what he did. The Qur'an is an insulting incitement; Allah told Moe to recite it in a low voice to avoid stirring up the pagans.
(And offer your Salah neither aloud nor in a low voice,) Ibn `Abbas said: "When he prayed with his Companions, he would recite Qur'an loudly, and when the idolators heard that, they insulted the Qur'an, and the One Who had revealed it and the one who had brought it. So Allah said to His Prophet
What was Moe doing when he recited these ayat? How does recitation of these verses and the rest of the 164 violent verses comport with ICCPR 19 & 20 CPPCG 3 and ICERD 4?
1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as the Christians).
3:85. And whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers. 3:110. You [true believers in Islâmic Monotheism, and real followers of Prophet Muhammad and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)] are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind; you enjoin Al-Ma'rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that Islâm has forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better for them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh - and rebellious against Allâh's Command). Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
The Verse:--"You (true Muslims) are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind." means, the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam.
3:111. They will do you no harm, barring a trifling annoyance; and if they fight against you, they will show you their backs, and they will not be helped. 3:112. Indignity is put over them wherever they may be, except when under a covenant (of protection) from Allâh, and from men; they have drawn on themselves the Wrath of Allâh, and destruction is put over them. This is because they disbelieved in the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allâh and killed the Prophets without right. This is because they disobeyed (Allâh) and used to transgress beyond bounds (in Allâh's disobedience, crimes and sins). 8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do. 8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise. 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. 9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter. 9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do all things. 9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâh's Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur'ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success . 9:120. It was not becoming of the people of Al-Madinah and the bedouins of the neighbourhood to remain behind Allâh's Messenger (Muhammad when fighting in Allâh's Cause) and (it was not becoming of them) to prefer their own lives to his life. That is because they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor hunger in the Cause of Allâh, nor they take any step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of righteousness. Surely, Allâh wastes not the reward of the Muhsinûn 9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious - see V.2:2). 61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment. 61:11. That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know! 61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of 'Adn Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.
offensive actions
Publishing videos, cartoons and books along with burning the Qur'an are symbolic actions which do no objective harm. Burning churches, murdering Christians, bombing mass transit and flying hijacked aircraft into office buildings are offensive actions which incite us to utter and publish the truth about Islam.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.
Since Islam declared and is prosecuting war upon us it is necessary that we be able to discuss it with honesty, accuracy and clarity. The War College and West Point need to be free to give full and honest instruction in the doctrines and laws of Islam in the training of our officer corps. Censorship and political correctness must be rolled back and stamped out!
Imposition of Islamic blasphemy law would make Thomas Jefferson a criminal for uttering & publishing his report to Congress.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven.
malicious act
Publishing Innocence of Muslims is not a malicious act, it simply makes available, for those who wish to view it, an accurate depiction of a segment of the Life of Moe. Rousing the rabble to attack our Embassy & Consulate and murder our Ambassador and staff were malicious acts.
Enforcement of human rights covenants
is indeed an urgent matter. The International Criminal Court must open a case condemning Islam for incitement to war, racial supremacism and incitement to genocide. Because Islam perpetrated the Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian genocides and seeks to commit genocide against Jews, it must be condemned and proscribed by law.
OIC never advocated
prohibition of free expression; never? You demanded that Holland block release of Fitna and Wilders' book. You demanded that Denmark prosecute the publisher of the Motoons. You promoted the passage of UN resolutions condemning and demanding the criminalization of criticism of Islam and you demand persecution of the creator of Innocence of Muslims. But you never advocated abridgment of the right of free speech: Camelshit!
consequences
Cartoons, videos, books and statements do not have consequences. The barbarian behavior of Muslim mobs is a consequence of the rabid ranting of Imams at Jumah Salat, not anything we do. Muslims exploit anything we say or do as a pretext for barbarism but pretext is not causation, it is rationalization. Ladies and gentlemen: Get a God blessed clue for Chrissake!!! I present for your edification a sentence of Shari'ah from Hedaya, the code of the Hanifi school of fiqh.
Did Copts burn mosques when Piss Christ and The Holy Virgin Mary were put on display as 'art'? When Muslims 'react violently', they exemplify the damnable doctrines of Islam and their own AssWholliness, which alone are the causes of their violence.
Curbs
on antisemitism & holocaust denial exemplify European stateism, the USA does not emulate them because of our First Amendment. We allow free and open debate, secure in the belief that truth will triumph in a level venue. Those restrictions on European free speech do not serve as a positive model for imposition of Islam's blaspemy law. Islam seeks to prohibit all criticism of Allah, Moe and their damned war cult because they are indefensible; our factual evidence and logic can not be refuted. Islam can not prevail in free debate, so it must silence all critics by force just as Moe commissioned the assassinations of his critics.
racism
What race is Islam? Its founder and first adherents were Arabs but it has conquered and forcibly converted Africans, Asians and Caucasians. The existence of both Black and White Muslims and the ability to become Muslim without changing one's skin pigment or physiognomy serve to devastate the accusation of racism in thinking minds. Hurling that epithet is the last refuge of scurrilous politicians and AssWholes.
Islamophobia
Phobia is an irrational fear. After the Accursed Abomination 11 years ago, we are fully aware of the fact that Islam is a worthy object of fear, loathing and execration, death & damnation be upon it! Islam inculcates hatred and incites genocidal violence. Hatred of Islam is well founded and rational, not irrational.
Tolerance is a two way street. Islam is intolerant. Go back and re-read 3:85 and the context of 3:110. That is intolerance, not tolerance. How in Hell can anyone who declares perpetual war against Jews & Christians lecture us about tolerance? Only by supreme AssWholliness!
Respect must be earned; Islam has not earned it and is no more respectable than it is tolerable. I can not tolerate propagation of the idea that my blood and property are not sacred; that I have no human rights and its open season. I can not tolerate that which declares and war against me. I can not respect a G'd'd demon who demands genocide as the price of admission to his Celestial Bordello. I can not respect a pederast who claimed divine sanction for his marriage to his best friend's six year old daughter. I can not respect a false prophet who attributed to his idol what his idol did not say, asserting divine sanction for his sexual proclivities.
promote peace and security
The highlighted clause in this sentence fragment is a thinly veiled threat: threatening violence if we do not submit to censorship. By God, I will never submit!!!
...to address and resolve these critical issues in order to better protect and promote human rights as well as peace and . security within our respective societies.
Peace and security can only be promoted by making Islam extinct.
We won’t solve our conflict with libelous speeches at the UN. That’s not the way to solve it. We won’t solve our conflict with unilateral declarations of statehood.
We have to sit together, negotiate together, and reach a mutual compromise, in which a demilitarized Palestinian state recognizes the one and only Jewish State.
Israel wants to see a Middle East of progress and peace. We want to see the three great religions that sprang forth from our region – Judaism, Christianity and Islam – coexist in peace and in mutual respect.
Yet the medieval forces of radical Islam, whom you just saw storming the American embassies throughout the Middle East, they oppose this.
They seek supremacy over all Muslims. They are bent on world conquest. They want to destroy Israel, Europe, America. They want to extinguish freedom. They want to end the modern world.
Militant Islam has many branches – from the rulers of Iran with their Revolutionary Guards to Al Qaeda terrorists to the radical cells lurking in every part of the globe.
But despite their differences, they are all rooted in the same bitter soil of intolerance. That intolerance is directed first at their fellow Muslims, and then to Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus, secular people, anyone who doesn’t submit to their unforgiving creed.
They want to drag humanity back to an age of unquestioning dogma and unrelenting conflict.
our conflict
It is not your conflict, it is Islam's. Moe hated Jews because, after he fabricated his new cult to appeal to them, they recognized his fraud and rejected it. Moe went to them and asserted ownership of the world and that he would expel them from the Hijaz if they did not convert to Islam. Moe expressed a preference for conquering the Levant before Yemen, saying that Allah had, on his account, taken special charge of the people of Syria. Umar's conquest of the Levant was completed in 638.
won't be solved
The conflict is existential: it can only be ended by extinction. Sahih Bukhari 4.52.177 & Sahih Muslim 41.6985 inform us that Islam intends to solve it by genocide. Ibn Kathir's exegesis of 7:167 informs us that Jesus Christ will lead the Muslims in the final genocide of Jews. Who might Allah send to continually humiliate and torment the Jews until the last day?
Muslims can never tolerate the existence of Israel because it is the ultimate blasphemy: it proves Allah to be an impotent idol whose promise is void. Allah promised Muslims, in 13:41, that Allah would irreversibly give the land to them; that none could recover it. Allah promised the Muslims first a ten to one, then a two to one kill ratio, yet they lost four wars in which they intended to exterminate you.
Peace
Peace is the absence of Muslims: cause them to cease believing in Allah, his imperative, threat & promise, or usher them into Hell. There are no other options.
Palestine
Israel is Palestine, Jews are Palestinians. Palestine is Israel, Palestinians are Jews. Gaza, Judea & Samaria are occupied by Muslim interlopers who must be expelled. Jerusalem has not been the capital of any nation other than the Jews. No nation of Palestine ever existed. There are enough Muslim nations, we don't need any more anywhere.
July 11, '02, Joseph Farah published in World Net Daily, a revelation of truth difficult for many to accept. He lifted the wool, exposing the fraud perpetrated by the propagandists. One quote in that article stands out above the rest for the clarity of its revelation.
The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct "Palestinian people" to oppose Zionism. ...[Zahir Muhsein, P.L.O. Executive Cmte.]
'Three great religions'
Two, AssWhole. No decent person calls Islam a religion, much less great! Such terms are the exclusive domain of damned fools and liars. What religion executes apostates? What religion ordainsoffensive conquest? If Islam were a religion, how would conquering half of the known world make confer greatness on a religion?
coexist
How in the G'd'd Hell does any fool hope to coexist with an ideology dedicated to his extermination?
Malignant malarkey!!!! "Its Islam, stupid!" Pull your head out of your anus long enough to read the Qur'an , Hadith: Sahih Bukhari: Jihad, Kumus & Expedition and Shari'ah: Reliance of the Traveller O9 & Hedaya Vol. II, Book IX, Chapter 1. Normative Islam is what Moe preached and practiced, nothing else. <META NAME="DESCRIPTION" CONTENT="Your keyword rich marketing sales-pitch meta description goes here"> <META NAME="KEYWORDS" CONTENT="your keywords,go here,separated by a comma,but not a space"> <META NAME="DESCRIPTION" CONTENT="Your keyword rich marketing sales-pitch meta description goes here"> <META NAME="KEYWORDS" CONTENT="your keywords,go here,separated by a comma,but not a space">
Ahmadinejad @ UN: Spew of Feces The screed is long, 11 pages and I am unable to maintain its format, so I will reproduce only the most important turds which I will attack with facts and logic. A link to the pdf file containing the spew of feces is immediately below. I expected that Ahmadinejad would spew some turd about Innocence of Muslims and demand imposition of blasphemy laws. If he did, I am blind to it. He did repeat the usual boiler plate about the evils of Capitalism and secular governments, selling Islam as the cure for the world's ills. He also repeated the boiler plate of mythical UN reform. If you want to waste your time reading that feces, follow the link. Address by H.E. Dr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad President of the Islamic Republic of Iran Before the 67th Session of the United Nations General Assembly New York 26 September 2012
In the Name of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful
In the name of Allah
The arrogant AssWhole thinks he is the caliph; Allah's spokesman. If he speaks for anyone, it is Satan.
Hasten the Emergence
Oh, God, Hasten the Emergence of Your Chosen Beloved, Grant Him Good Health and Victory, Make us His Best Companions, and all those who attest to His Rightfulness.
The arrogant AssWhole opened his spew of feces with a prayer to the chief demon, supplicating for the return of the Mahdi who fell down a well centuries ago and ain't coming back. Islamic eschatology depicts the Mahdi as returning just prior to the end of the world. He will perform the role of barbarian warlord in the final conquest of the world. I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to Sunan Abu Dawud 36.4266 & Sahih Muslim 41.6681 read each book to its end and obtain a clue.
Had extremism or terrorism not been used to secure political goals,
terrorism
Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam; used by Moe to gain victory. I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to Islam's canon to obtain a clue: 3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220. The Arrogant AssWhole is blaming Shrub for it, accusing him of political exploitation.
-I do not believe that Muslims, Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, and others have any problems, or are hostile against each other. They get along together comfortably and live together in an atmosphere of peace and amity. They are all devoted to the cause of justice, purity and love.
can't we all get along ?
The fact is that Islam is in a permanent state of war against the rest of the human race, wheresoever dispersed over the face of the earth. The war is waged on Islam's initiative, without provocation, as as a source of income and wealth. I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to Islam's canon to obtain a clue.
2:190 Extra-canonical definition of Jihad listing benefits and costs of abandonment; in translator's footnote at the bottom of the page.
Sunan Abu Dawud 23.3455Jihad is the original religion of Islam, an economic model preferable to agriculture & commerce; abandoning it brings a curse upon Muslims.
The order that is rooted in the anti-human thoughts of slavery and the old and new colonialism are responsible for poverty, corruption, ignorance, oppression and discrimination in every corner of the world.
Which order?
Reliance of the Traveller: O9.13 When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman's previous marriage is immediately annulled.
God Almighty has promised us a man of kindness, a man who loves people and loves absolute justice, a man who is a perfect human being and is named Imam A1-Mahdi, a man who will come in the company of Jesus Christ (PBUH) and the righteous. By using the inherent potential of all the worthy men and women of all nations and I repeat, the inherent potential of "all the worthy men and women of all nations" he will lead humanity into achieving its glorious and eternal ideals.
Ultimate Savior
Notice that the Mahdi is superior to Jesus. Notice the good works they are going to perform together.
What will Jesus do?
He will break the cross, kill the pigs, abolish Jizya because there will be nobody left to pay it and perish all other religions. Oh, he will lead the Muslims in the final genocide, too, fighting the people for Islam and killing the Jews. I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to Islam's canon to obtain a clue. Sunan Abu Dawud 37.4310 & Eternal Humiliation placed on the Jews
At the same time we can also evolve a universal culture of mutual tolerance and mutual appreciation of one another's religious convictions. In such a world, the voice of the moderates-the voice of reason and compassion-would be heard clearly over the din of prejudice and bigotry. In a global regime of compassion and tolerance, no war is possible. As a nation that celebrates its diversity of culture and religions, Indonesia calls for mutual respect and understanding among peoples of different faiths. Despite initiatives undertaken by states at the United Nations and other forums, the defamation of religions persists. We have seen yet another one of its ugly face in the film "Innocence of Muslims" that is now causing an international uproar. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights underlines that in exercising their freedom of expression, everyone must observe morality and public order. Freedom of expression is therefore not absolute. Hence, I call for an international instrument to effectively prevent incitement to hostility or violence based on religions or beliefs. This instrument, a product of international consensus, shall serve as a point of reference that the world community must comply with.
Respect is given where respect is due; we had to earn it, so must you. I can not respect a deity who demands genocide as the price of admission to Paradise. I can not respect a Profit whose prime motivating factor was loot. I can not respect a Profit who raided passive settlements, murdered the men and raped their widows. I can not respect a Profit who revealed situational scripture to give divine sanction to his sexual proclivities.
Moe married a six year old girl, consummating the marriage when she was nine years old. He arranged the marriage and divorce of his adopted son so that he could have his bride for his own harem. He commissioned the murder of his critics. There is no immorality depicted in the video that moe did not perform.
public order
The creator and publisher of the video did not breach public order: Muslim rabble, roused by rabid Imams, breached public order.
freedom of expression
Free speech being necessary to a citizens of a representative republic so that they can honestly discuss public policy issues with impunity, our courts proscribe only words deliberately designed to initiate panic or fighting. The video embedded above does not fall into either of those categories. This blog post must also be legal because it is necessary that we be able to identify, describe and warn against threats to our life and liberty, which Islam presents.
