Alright; I've had enough. It is time to sound off on the coddled children of the Communist party, those godless and amoral filthy dirtbags who are purposefully clogging up American cities with their whining and destructiveness - the so-called OCCUPY movement.
And there is much to say.
First of all, it is hardly a 'grass-roots' movement, but a leftist-Soros-socialist-organized intentional disruption of America patterned exactly to Karl Marx and Max Engall's The Communist Manifesto which instructs, 'agitate, agitate, agitate.'
Any American who can read can easily identify the strategies in either the same book or in another revealing publication, The Naked Communist. I read both books in 1985 and encourage every American to read them. Then what you see unfolding in American cities will make perfect sense, namely that these people have no solution, they simply want to destroy America.
Unlike the real grass-roots movement, the Tea Party gatherings which rose to support a limited federal government and true respect for the U.S. Constitution, the 'OCCUPiers do not even have a consensus agreement on what would replace the current American system. However, as seen in Russia in 1917, China in the late 1940's, Korea in the 1950's, Vietnam in the 60's and 70's, Cambodia in the 60's and 70's, and Eastern Europe after WWII, once there is adequate disruption, the Communists then turn to violent takeover of a society. And that is just the beginning...
For this action, of course, would then kill the very morons who are currently 'protesting' which correctly categorizes them as mere 'useful idiots' to the larger agenda. Yes, there are just pawns. (see Cambodia's Khmer Rouge's #2 on trial now here.)
But part of the overall effort of some is simply to create a state of anarchy. Which is the most hypocritical position of all. I mean, you approach the OCCUPier and ask him, so do you really believe in anarchy and lawlessness? Yes, the fleabagger responds. Well you would then support the rightness of getting rid of those who oppose you, correct? Absolutely, he says, the corporate ceo's ought to die. So he obviously, then, does not have a problem with someone pulling out a 2x4 and smacking him in the forehead with it, right? It is consistent with his reasoning and position.
No, he REALLY does not believe in anarchy and lawlessness, or he would be approving of his own beat-down. He just does not realize the foolish contradiction he has surrounded himself with.
Let's take this little cheeze whizzle for instance:
What is this youngster up to? Well, look at him, he is REAL brave. He went and got himself a little cut to prove it. And now he is looking back to make sure that all his fleabag peers are watching so that they will chalk him up as being a real man. Yes, he must be some kind of hero; a legend in his own mind.
Never mind that this big brave fella KNEW that the police would not really hurt him. A few bumps and bruises can be expected.
But being in an actual life-threatening position? Nope, that would take guys like this:
I wonder where all the OCCUPiers are in this photo from Iraq? Oh yeah, that might be because they are not fighting the ENEMY, but are fighting other Americans! (but doesn't that make them the enemy?)
More to come.