The article linked above caught my eye in my daily Google Alerts. I have excerpted some of the most egregious lies found in the article and exposed them with the help of Islam's canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence. The main concepts are expressed in H1 headers, underlined quotes are linked to source texts. Hover your mouse pointer over the link to view the url.
religious persecution and genocide
Hitler's National Socialist Party, at the urging of the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, exterminated six million Jews. Ambassador Gokcen, the OIC and Islam wield the Holocaust as a shield to deflect attention from Islam's own genocidal doctrines. Since the "international community" is committed to prevent religious persecution and genocide, and Islam is part of the "international community", we are to presume that Islam shares that commitment. In reality, Islam is part of the problem, not part of the solution; committed to shielding itself from all criticism & questioning wielding the Holocaust as a shield.
Allah ordered Moe to make a great slaughter before holding captives for ransom: "It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land.". That order is confirmed by another ayah, which commands killing and wounding "many of them": "So, when you meet (in fight Jihâd in Allâh's Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives). ".
Allah told Moe explicitly that he prefers genocide to profit while Moe preferred profit. When one local Jewish settlement surrendered after a long siege, Moe had all the adult and adolescent males slaughtered; the women and juveniles enslaved. Islamic law lists killing adult male captives as one option, and prescribes enslavement for women and children.Islamic eschatology informs us that Jesus will return to "fight the people for the cause of Islam", "break the cross" and "kill the pigs"; perishing all other religions so that none will be left to pay Jizya. In other words, all the Jews & Christians will be killed.
Is there any form of persecution worse than perpetual war? "Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."Islamic law states that "The caliph makes war upon Jews..." Allah promised that he would "certainly keep on sending against them (i.e. the Jews), till the Day of Resurrection, those who would afflict them with a humiliating torment. " Tafsir Ibn Kathir tells us more about this verse, confirming the obvious: "In the future, the Jews will support the Dajjal (False Messiah); and the Muslims, along with `Isa, son of Mary, will kill the Jews. The gates of Paradise will not swing open for Muslims until they hunt down and kill the last Jew. "
In the context of one hadith confirming Islamic Jihad imperatives, Moe informs us obliquely that Islam has no respect for the human dignity of anyone but Muslims. As kuffar, our lives and property are free for the taking and we have no human rights. He said that he was ordered to fight the people until they testify that only Allah has the right to be worshiped. He said that, when we so testify and practice, "then their blood and property will be sacred to us ".
This video is exemplary of how Muslims train their next generation. After viewing it, you should either curse Islam and demand its extinction or go out into the alley and hang yourself. Pay particular attention to the adult explanation which follows the boy's Salat.
I am not quoting the relevant paragraphs because of their length and the lack of good hooks. UNHRC Resolution 16/18 is cited as an example of consensus and understanding. The resolution demands that I be subjected to criminal and civil punishment for exposing the fatal facts of Islam to public view. There is no functional difference between the "defamation of religions" meme and the "negative stereotyping" meme substituted for it nor has the defamation meme been abandoned. I have detailed my objections to the resolution in previous posts.By association with the "international community", the Ambassador implies that Islam is tolerant. Nothing could be further from the truth. Perpetual war, extending to the Doomsday and displayed above through a Qur'an quote, two hadith quotes, Islamic Law and tafsir is the polar opposite of tolerance. But there ia more, and I will give you a sample. Only Islam will be accepted: " whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him". 'Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.'" The penalty for for apostasy is death: how tolerant is that? Allah tells Muslims that they are the best of peoples as they bring us to Islam with chains on our necks. No, I am not making this up. "You [true believers in Islâmic Monotheism, and real followers of Prophet Muhammad and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)] are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind; " Click the link, read the entire verse in context before reading the hadith which explains it. "the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam.".
freedom of religion
A "religion" whose scripture commands perpetual war until "only Allah is worshiped" and "they pay the Jizya with willing submission" , which command is confirmed by its tradition & jurisprudence, has no standing to invoke freedom of religion.
right to be respected
Respect must be reciprocal. Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387 clearly demonstrates Islam's lack of respect for us. Declaring perpetual war and open season: that our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims and we only obtain human rights by becoming Muslims puts the lie to the arrogant invocation of freedom of religion and the right to be respected.
- Defamation || Negative Stereotyping 11/05/09 What's the difference?!
- Defamation of Religions Draft 10-29-09 Link to and dissection of the new resolution plus extensive links to previous resolutions & related documents. This post sticks it right in the enemy's eye! 11/04/09
- OIC: United Stand Against Intolerance ? 08/18/11 Last March, the HRC passed a new resolution which was said to abandon
- Islam: No Right to Practice! 07/31/11 The concluding post of a five part series sums it all up.
For more than a decade, the OIC and their allies have been demanding national & international legislation to enforce Islam’s blasphemy laws on us; to squelch, silence, censor & censure their critics. In the face of a growing backlash, they changed their words this spring, but not their strategic objective.
The OIC, Ban Ki-Moon, the HRC, EU, Secretary of State & President demand that we “respect” that which is unworthy of respect, “tolerate” the intolerable and “dialog” with it instead of exposing absolute evil.
In the wake of the horrific & despicable bombing and shooting attack in Oslo, Islam’s exposers & critics are being unjustly accused of “hate speech”., “inciting violence” & “inspiring” the lunatic who perpetrated the massacre.
There is only one rational way to respond to the bitter bitching & caterwauling: by throwing it back in their face with redoubled efforts to expose the rotten core of Islam. That is the reason for the series of blog posts culminating in this post which flatly declares that there is and can be no right to practice or propagate Islam.
This series began with Right: Peaceful Practice of Islam, with more than three thousand words from and about Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition & jurisprudence, it established the fact that the practice of Islam is not and can never be peaceful. Islam is permanent war. That fact should be fatal to Islam, instead, Islam is fatal to those deluded fools who ignore it. Over the last 14 centuries, 270*106 people have lost their lives to Islam.
- Islam: the Right to Plunder 07/31/11 Promotion & perpetuation of plunder are the purposes of Islam. The mission is mercenary and the method is martial. It is difficult to comprehend this fact without sampling the Qur’an & hadith.
- Islam: the Right to Terrorize 07/31/11
Mohammad Atta, in his final message to the Magnificent 19, directed them to shout the Takbir while slaughtering because it terrifies disbelievers.
Psychological warfareWhen the confrontation begins, strike like champions who do not want to go back to this world. Shout, ‘Allahu Akbar,’ because this strikes fear in the hearts of the non-believers.
Moe used Takbir, Atta was emulating him.
- Islamic Right: to Rape 07/31/11 Is there a right to rape? Only if there is a right to practice Islam. In the first post in this series on the right to practice Islam, we established the fact that aggressively attacking disbelievers is a “religious obligation” binding on Muslims as fard al-kifaya, This post will establish the fact that taking, enslaving and raping captives is a permitted & approved practice of Islam.
- Right: Peaceful Practice of Islam 07/30/11 This is the initial post of a five post series. Herman Cain said something, previously mentioned by Rep. Allen West, which absolutely must be refuted and slapped down so hard that it will never again raise its head. This series of blog posts is my attempt to expose, refute and slap down the most malignant malicious malarkey: "right to practice Islam".