Monday, September 17, 2012

Innocence of Muslims Update:Clinton's Crap

Innocence of Muslims Update:Clinton's Crap I do not suffer fools gladly and I hate liars.  I believe that when Muslims and their dhimmis bitch about our lifting the lid from the septic tank so that the world can see their doctrines for what they are, we need to redouble our efforts.  I therefore engage in deliaring the statements of fools and traitors.  The Secretary of State is no exception.  In this post you will find her statement, in video and text form, followed by my criticism. As always, bold, blue, underlined text is hyperlinked to external sources including Wikiislam, the Qur'an, hadith, tafsir and Shari'ah.

On Wordpress, viewers may need to click the link below to view the video.

I also want to take a moment to address the video circulating on the Internet that has led to these protests in a number of countries. Let me state very clearly – and I hope it is obvious – that the United States Government had absolutely nothing to do with this video. We absolutely reject its content and message. America’s commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. And as you know, we are home to people of all religions, many of whom came to this country seeking the right to exercise their own religion, including, of course, millions of Muslims. And we have the greatest respect for people of faith.

To us, to me personally, this video is disgusting and reprehensible. It appears to have a deeply cynical purpose: to denigrate a great religion and to provoke rage. But as I said yesterday, there is no justification, none at all, for responding to this video with violence. We condemn the violence that has resulted in the strongest terms, and we greatly appreciate that many Muslims in the United States and around the world have spoken out on this issue.

Violence, we believe, has no place in religion and is no way to honor religion. Islam, like other religions, respects the fundamental dignity of human beings, and it is a violation of that fundamental dignity to wage attacks on innocents. As long as there are those who are willing to shed blood and take innocent life in the name of religion, the name of God, the world will never know a true and lasting peace. It is especially wrong for violence to be directed against diplomatic missions. These are places whose very purpose is peaceful: to promote better understanding across countries and cultures. All governments have a responsibility to protect those spaces and people, because to attack an embassy is to attack the idea that we can work together to build understanding and a better future.

Now, I know it is hard for some people to understand why the United States cannot or does not just prevent these kinds of reprehensible videos from ever seeing the light of day. Now, I would note that in today’s world with today’s technologies, that is impossible. But even if it were possible, our country does have a long tradition of free expression which is enshrined in our Constitution and our law, and we do not stop individual citizens from expressing their views no matter how distasteful they may be.

There are, of course, different views around the world about the outer limits of free speech and free expression, but there should be no debate about the simple proposition that violence in response to speech is not acceptable. We all – whether we are leaders in government, leaders in civil society or religious leaders – must draw the line at violence. And any responsible leader should be standing up now and drawing that line.

nothing to do with

No gov't. involvement

    Even a lying politician tells the truth occasionally, this is one of those rare occasions, "The Innocence of Muslims" is not a government project, but it should be.  Islam's war on the human race has an ideological front parallel to the military, demographic and subversion  fronts. 

    Islam stands or falls on a bad foundation: Muhammad.  Discrediting Moe discredits Islam, subjecting it to the risk of mass apostasy.  The 13 minute 51 second video exposes the rotten core and foundation of Islam.  Several ayat & ahadith document Islam's mercenary mission and martial method. They should be dramatized in a documentary. 

    Other ayat and ahadith  document Moe's "revelation" of situational scripture designed to give an aura of divine sanction to his peccadilloes.  They should be dramatized in a documentary. 

    Other ayat document the offensively violent, genocidal and terrorist nature of Islam. They should be dramatized in a documentary.  Yet other ahadith document Moe's insanity and demonic influence.  They should be dramatized in a documentary. 

    A minority of the world's Muslims are literate.  Video is the best way to reach the ignorant, illiterate mass of the Ummah.  Brig. S.K. Malik, on page 60 of "The Qur'anic Concept of War, points out the fatal fact: destroying their faith is the key to defeating Islam.  We needed to get started long ago!  There are at least two good scripts available.  Choose one and start production immediately.  Then, as soon as possible, give it global distribution. 

reject its content & message

    Exactly what is the video's content & message: what is the Department of State rejecting in the name of the United States of America?  Aside from the casting, acting and production values, exactly what is wrong with the video? 

    The video portrays Moe as a narcissistic,  insane,  pedophile,  lecher, murderer and barbarian  warlord.  Each of those descriptions can be  substantiated from  Islam's canonical texts, and has been so substantiated for your reading displeasure

    The message of the video is that Islam is a false faith contrived by an impious wretch for his own emolument.  The message is true. Exactly what is wrong with that; why would any sentient and honest person reject it?

religious tolerance

    Religious tolerance is for legitimate religions, not war machines, and it must be reciprocal.  "Fight them untill...only Allah is worshiped..." & "Fight those who... until..." establish Islam's identity as a war machine, not a legitimate  religion.  Anything that wages war against us and curses us is not a legitimate religion.

    Islam only tolerates Islam: no other religion is acceptable.  Christians and Jews living under Islamic domination are subject to severe restrictions.  Why would we tolerate perpetual conquest? Why would we tolerate genocide? Why would we tolerate honoricide?  You only tolerate it because you are ignorant of it and you want to prohibit us from informing you about it. 

right to exercise their own religion

    Where in the Constitution is it written that there is a right to perpetual, genocidal conquest?  Islam is inseverable, selectivity is prohibited.  Whee in the Constitution are the rights to kill, rape {Bukhari 5.59.459}|, pillage and plunder recorded?  Those are all essential elements of the practice of Islam.  Muslims who do not join the Jihad are condemned to Hellfire.  Where in the Constitution is the right to engage in terrorism established? Allah rewards Muslims for any act of terrorism.  If there is a right to practice Islam in America, we have no rights, all of them are abrogated.

respect for people of faith

    You respect faith without respect to content: you are a damned fool; I am not.  I do not respect the belief that Muslims are superior  as they bring us to Islam with chains on our necks. I do not respect the belief that all non-Muslims must be converted, killed or subjugated.   

this video is disgusting and reprehensible

    Why? Are you disgusted by the poor casting, acting and production values or are you disgusted by the content? Exactly what is reprehensible about documenting the character and actions of Moe and his companions?  What is reprehensible about exposing the fact that Islam is demonic?   It is Islam, not the video that is disgusting and reprehensible!

deeply cynical purpose

to denigrate a great religion

    Exposure = denigration??  Would documenting  the  Holocaust denigrate Nazism?  Would  documenting the Rape of Nanking denigrate  Shinto?

     What is great about Islam?  It conquered vast areas of the globe, killing 270*106 innocent people in the process, including areas with large population bases and high birth rates. Does that confer greatness on a 'religion'?

    The root word of religion means "to bind". True, Islam binds, but does that really make it a religion equal to Christianity?  What 'great religion' imposes and executes a death sentence on apostates?

    Copts in egypt are assaulted and murdered with impunity. Their churches are bombed, shot up and burned down, all with impunity and state complicity.  What is cynical about exposing that reality?  1.3 billion Muslims are enslaved to Satan, believing that their relationship is with God.  What is cynical about showing them the documented truth about their Profit and the war cult he created?

provoke rage

    Provoking rage is a side effect, not the objective of the video.  The rioting is not provoked by the video, it is provoked by the rabid rants of Imams in the mosques and mass media. A heckler's veto is demanded: censorship of speech Muslims don't like.  Islam is perpetual war, genocide and terrorism, from 610 to the last day,  Our civilization faces an existential threat which is real, proximate and persistent. You would criminalize those who sound a warning about it and persecute them. 

Violence has no place in religion

    Jihad: war against non-Muslims, is "the peak" of Islam, its highest value.  You should face the fact that Islam is a predatory way of life, not a religion. 

no way to honor religion

    Moe had his critics murdered.  Islamic law demands the death of anyone who says anything negative about Moe, Allah or Islam.  I damn well direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to Reliance of the Traveller, the all purpose handbook of Shari'ah: O8.1, O8.7, O11.10 & O9.14.

Islam respects human dignity

    Camel Crap!!! Hillary purchased an extensive Islamic library while in the White House. Either she did not read it or she is deliberately dissembling.  Her statement is 180° out of phase with the truth.  [Emphasis added.]

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah." Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, "O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?" He replied, "Whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah', faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have."
  • then their blood and property will be sacred to us
  • then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims

Until we testify that only Allah has the right to be worshiped and follow Islamic rituals, our blood and property are not sacred. That means: "open season". When we do that we become Muslims and have the same rights other Muslims have.  Until we become Muslims, we have no human rights.

attacking innocents violates dignity 

Only Muslims are innocent!

    Obtain a clue from the Qur'an and Tafsir Ibn kathir. 

5:33. The recompense of those who wage war against Allâh and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter.

The Punishment of those Who Cause Mischief in the Land

`Wage war' mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways.

If you are not a Muslim, you are in rebellion against Allah and deserve to be killed; you are not innocent. 

will to kill for Islam precludes peace

    How can there be peace while Muslims are commanded to conquer the world, threatened with eternal damnation if they refuse and promised eternity in Allah's celestial bordello if they participate?  While men believe in Allah's imperatives, threat and promise, peace is impossible. 

can't prevent publication

    Our founders wisely gave us a representative republic; a limited government with indirect citizen control.  It is necessary that we be fully informed in order to vote wisely when selecting representatives and president.  A government with the power to squelch critical speech could cement itself in power and become a tyranny.  For that reason, free speech is essentially necessary and is enshrined in the first amendment of the Bill of Rights. 

    Our collective response to the threat posed by Islam is a political issue. It is therefore necessary that we be able to discuss Islam openly without fear of persecution.  For this reason, the publication of "Innocence of Muslims" and this blog post can not be proscribed by law. 

No comments: